The handling of the Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program during the 2019 federal election campaign - otherwise know as SportsRorts scandal - has already taken the scalp of former Agriculture Minister & Nationals Senator for Victoria, Bridget McKenzie, after poor personal polling on 12 January and growing public anger on the release of the Auditor General's adverse report of 15 January 2020 caused Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison to order an internal investigation into this $100 million dollar scheme.
Ms. McKenzie has been made Leader of the Nationals in the Senate as compensation for the fact that she was forced to resign in an effort to put a lid on the whole affair.
Nevertheless disquiet remains after Morrison refused to release the written finding of the Gaetjens investigation.......
Former
head of the Departments of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Finance, and
Employment and Industrial Relations and currently Visiting Fellow at
the Australian National University, Michael
Keating,
writing in Crikey.com.au
on
11 February 2020:
In
my view the Gaetjens’ report reflects poorly on its author.
It
would seem on the evidence that Gaetjens has produced a report whose
only purpose was to get the government off a political hook.
One
suspects that finding McKenzie guilty on the grounds of political
bias in her administration of these grants would have implicated
other ministers and/or their offices, and therefore she was
exonerated on this charge.
However,
as head of the public service, Gaetjen’s first duty is to uphold
its values and integrity. And as set out in its enabling legislation,
the Australian Public Service is meant to be apolitical, serving not
only the government but also parliament and the Australian public.
Gaetjens
should be setting an example for the rest of the APS — indeed the
head of any organisation has their greatest impact on its culture.
My
other concern about this sports rorts saga is what it tells us about
the prime minister’s attitude to the public service.
As
the High Court has found: “the maintenance and protection of an
apolitical and professional public service is a significant purpose
consistent with the system of representative and responsible
government mandated by the constitution”.
But
the Gaetjens’ report reinforces doubts about whether Morrison
accepts the independence and impartiality of the APS.
Furthermore,
this report comes on the back of the Morrison government’s
rejection of all the recommendations from the independent ThodeyReview of the APS which would have strengthened that independence,
and therefore reinforces that concern.
On 5 February 2020 the Senate resolved to establish a Select Committee on Administration of Sports Grants to inquire into and report on the administration and award of funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program.
The first and, perhaps the only, hearing day is today Thursday 13 February 2020 - beginning at 4.30pm when the Auditor General Grant Hehir will be giving evidence.
On 5 February 2020 the Senate resolved to establish a Select Committee on Administration of Sports Grants to inquire into and report on the administration and award of funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program.
The first and, perhaps the only, hearing day is today Thursday 13 February 2020 - beginning at 4.30pm when the Auditor General Grant Hehir will be giving evidence.
The closing date for submissions is 21 February 2020 and the committee is to present its final report on or before 24 March 2020.
BACKGROUND
Terms of Reference
1. That a select committee, to be known as the Select Committee on Administration of Sports Grants, be established to inquire into and report on the administration and award of funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program, with particular reference to:
a) program design and guidelines;
b) requirements placed on applicants for funding;
c) management and assessment processes;
d) adherence to published assessment processes and program criteria;
e) the role of the offices of the Minister, the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, and any external parties, in determining which grants would be awarded and who would announce the successful grants; and
f) any related programs or matters.
2. That the committee present its final report on or before Tuesday 24 March 2020.
3. That the committee consist of 5 senators, as follows:
a) 2 nominated by the Leader of the Government in the Senate;
b) 2 nominated by the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate; and
c)1 nominated by the Leader of the Australian Greens.
4. That:
a) participating members may be appointed to the committee on the nomination of the Leader of the Government in the Senate, the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate or any minority party or independent senator; and b) participating members may participate in hearings of evidence and deliberations of the committee, and have all the rights of members of the committee, but may not vote on any questions before the committee.
c) a participating member shall be taken to be a member of a committee for the purpose of forming a quorum of the committee if a majority of members of the committee is not present.
5. That the committee may proceed to the dispatch of business notwithstanding that not all members have been duly nominated and appointed and notwithstanding any vacancy.
6. That the committee elect as chair one of the members nominated by the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate and as deputy chair the member nominated by the Leader of the Australian Greens.
7. That the deputy chair shall act as chair when the chair is absent from a meeting of the committee or the position of chair is temporarily vacant.
8. That, in the event of an equality of voting, the chair, or the deputy chair when acting as chair, have a casting vote.
9. That the committee have power to appoint subcommittees consisting of 3 or more of its members, and to refer to any such subcommittee any of the matters which the committee is empowered to consider.
10. That the committee and any subcommittee have power to send for and examine persons and documents, to move from place to place, to sit in public or in private, notwithstanding any prorogation of the Parliament or dissolution of the House of Representatives, and have leave to report from time to time its proceedings and the evidence taken and such interim recommendations as it may deem fit.
11. That the committee be provided with all necessary staff, facilities and resources and be empowered to appoint persons with specialist knowledge for the purposes of the committee with the approval of the President.
12. That the committee be empowered to print from day to day such papers and evidence as may be ordered by it, and a daily Hansard be published of such proceedings as take place in public.
The resolution establishing the committee is available in the Journals of the Senate No. 37 - Wednesday, 5 February 2020
1. That a select committee, to be known as the Select Committee on Administration of Sports Grants, be established to inquire into and report on the administration and award of funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program, with particular reference to:
a) program design and guidelines;
b) requirements placed on applicants for funding;
c) management and assessment processes;
d) adherence to published assessment processes and program criteria;
e) the role of the offices of the Minister, the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, and any external parties, in determining which grants would be awarded and who would announce the successful grants; and
f) any related programs or matters.
2. That the committee present its final report on or before Tuesday 24 March 2020.
3. That the committee consist of 5 senators, as follows:
a) 2 nominated by the Leader of the Government in the Senate;
b) 2 nominated by the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate; and
c)1 nominated by the Leader of the Australian Greens.
4. That:
a) participating members may be appointed to the committee on the nomination of the Leader of the Government in the Senate, the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate or any minority party or independent senator; and b) participating members may participate in hearings of evidence and deliberations of the committee, and have all the rights of members of the committee, but may not vote on any questions before the committee.
c) a participating member shall be taken to be a member of a committee for the purpose of forming a quorum of the committee if a majority of members of the committee is not present.
5. That the committee may proceed to the dispatch of business notwithstanding that not all members have been duly nominated and appointed and notwithstanding any vacancy.
6. That the committee elect as chair one of the members nominated by the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate and as deputy chair the member nominated by the Leader of the Australian Greens.
7. That the deputy chair shall act as chair when the chair is absent from a meeting of the committee or the position of chair is temporarily vacant.
8. That, in the event of an equality of voting, the chair, or the deputy chair when acting as chair, have a casting vote.
9. That the committee have power to appoint subcommittees consisting of 3 or more of its members, and to refer to any such subcommittee any of the matters which the committee is empowered to consider.
10. That the committee and any subcommittee have power to send for and examine persons and documents, to move from place to place, to sit in public or in private, notwithstanding any prorogation of the Parliament or dissolution of the House of Representatives, and have leave to report from time to time its proceedings and the evidence taken and such interim recommendations as it may deem fit.
11. That the committee be provided with all necessary staff, facilities and resources and be empowered to appoint persons with specialist knowledge for the purposes of the committee with the approval of the President.
12. That the committee be empowered to print from day to day such papers and evidence as may be ordered by it, and a daily Hansard be published of such proceedings as take place in public.
The resolution establishing the committee is available in the Journals of the Senate No. 37 - Wednesday, 5 February 2020
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), Award of Funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure Program, Report NO. 23 OF 2019–20, which found:
- The award of grant funding was not informed by an appropriate assessment process and sound advice.
- The successful applications were not those that had been assessed as the most meritorious in terms of the published program guidelines.....
- There was evidence of distribution bias in the award of grant funding. Overall statistics indicate that the award of funding was consistent with the population of eligible applications received by state/territory, but was not consistent with the assessed merit of applications. The award of funding reflected the approach documented by the Minister’s Office of focusing on ‘marginal’ electorates held by the Coalition as well as those electorates held by other parties or independent members that were to be ‘targeted’ by the Coalition at the 2019 Election. Applications from projects located in those electorates were more successful in being awarded funding than if funding was allocated on the basis of merit assessed against the published program guidelines.
