Showing posts with label Australia-Japan relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia-Japan relations. Show all posts
Tuesday 25 June 2013
Watch International Court of Justice Australia v Japan in the matter of commercial whaling in the Southern Ocean - live June 26-July 16, 2013
The elusive white humpback whale known as Migaloo in 2012 off Green Island on the Great Barrier Reef in North Queensland. Picture: Marc McCormack
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF
JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.:
+31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Press Release Unofficial
No. 2013/14
12 June 2013
Public hearings in the
case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New
Zealand intervening) Public admission and media accreditation Live and
on-demand webcasts
THE HAGUE, 12 June 2013.
As announced in Press Release 2013/7 issued on 11 April 2013, the International
Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations,
will hold public hearings in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic
(Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) from Wednesday 26 June to Tuesday
16 July 2013, at the Peace Palace in The Hague, the seat of the Court.
1. Access for members of
the Diplomatic Corps
Owing to the limited
number of seats available in the Great Hall of Justice, members of the
Diplomatic Corps wishing to attend the hearings are kindly asked to inform the
Information Department before midnight on Sunday 23 June 2013, by e-mail
to confirmation@icj-cij.org.
Diplomatic missions are kindly requested to limit their delegations to two
persons.
Should members of the
Diplomatic Corps decide at any point not to attend a hearing for which they
have reserved a seat/s, they are kindly requested to inform the Information
Department so that their seat/s can be reallocated.
2. Access for media
representatives
Media representatives are
subject to an online accreditation procedure, details of which can be found in
the Media Advisory attached to this Press Release. The accreditation procedure
will close at midnight on Sunday 23 June 2013.
3. Access for members of
the public
Owing to the very limited
number of seats available in the Great Hall of Justice, priority access will be
given to members of the delegations of States that are parties to the case, and
members of the Diplomatic Corps.
A small number of seats
will be allocated daily to members of the public on a first come first served
basis. There will be no advance registration procedure, all previously
sent requests to attend these hearings will be ignored.
4. Live and on-demand webcasts
We strongly advise members
of the public to watch the hearings on the Court’s website, where they will be
broadcast live and in full (www.icj-cij.org,
under the heading “Multimedia”), or on the online television channel “UN Web TV
(http://webtv.un.org/)”.
The hearings will
subsequently also be available as a recorded webcast (VOD) on the United
Nations Web TV website (http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/).
5. Schedule for and
information on the hearings
The schedule for the
hearings is available on the Calendar on the Court’s website (www.icj-cij.org). Verbatim records of the hearings
will be published daily on the Court’s website (with translations to follow as
soon as practicable thereafter). On the final day of the hearings, a Press
Release will be issued presenting the submissions of the Parties (the Court’s
press releases do not constitute official documents).
6. History of the
proceedings
The history of the
proceedings can be found in Press Release No. 2013/7 of 11 April 2013, which is
available on the Court’s website.
_________
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
law,
whales
Monday 3 June 2013
Just when you think the Institute for Cetacean Research cannot sink any lower, the media reports this..................
ABC News 2 June 2013:
Japan's peak whaling body has launched a new campaign to promote whale meat as a nutritious food that enhances physical strength and reduces fatigue.
With about 5,000 tonnes of whale meat sitting unwanted in freezers around Japan, the country's Institute for Cetacean Research has decided to launch a new campaign to promote the by-product of its so-called scientific whaling program.
Once popular in school lunches, younger generations of Japanese rarely, if ever, eat whale.
But the institute hopes to revive flagging interest by advertising whale meat as a great source of balenine - a substance believed to enhance energy and physical health….
Sunday 14 April 2013
International Court of Justice to hear Australia's case against Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean on June 26, 2013
ATTORNEY-GENERAL TO REPRESENT
AUSTRALIA
IN INTERNATIONAL WHALING CASE AGAINST JAPAN
Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus QC will appear in Australia’s whaling case against Japan which has now been set down for a three week hearing in the International Court of Justice in the Hague from 26 June, 2013.
“I welcome the announcement of the ICJ hearing date. Australia wants this slaughter to end. We will now have our day in court to establish, once and for all, that Japan’s whaling hunt is not for scientific purposes and is against international law,” said Mr Dreyfus.
“The fixing of the date sets up the final stage in this case brought by the Australian Government. The oral hearings are the last phase of legal proceedings before the Court makes its decision.”
Australia commenced the proceedings against Japan on 31 May 2010. The International Court of Justice has received written submissions from both Parties.
Australia’s views on whaling are well known – we condemn all commercial whaling, including Japan’s so-called ‘scientific’ whaling,” said Minister for Environment Tony Burke.
“The Australian Government’s decision to bring this legal action demonstrates our determination to end commercial whaling.”
Minister for Foreign Affairs Bob Carr said Australia’s whaling case did not undermine the relationship between Australia and Japan.
“Australia and Japan have agreed that our differences over whaling will not affect the strong bilateral relationship we share,” said Mr Carr.
“The International Court of Justice is the appropriate forum to resolve these differences in a calm and measured way.”
Counsel appearing in the case with the Attorney-General will include Solicitor-General Justin Gleeson SC, Bill Campbell QC, Professor James Crawford SC, Professor Philippe Sands QC and Professor Laurence Boisson de Chazournes.
“We hope the Court will deliver its decision on the legality of Japan’s whaling before the start of the next whaling season,” Mr Dreyfus said.
April 12, 2013“I welcome the announcement of the ICJ hearing date. Australia wants this slaughter to end. We will now have our day in court to establish, once and for all, that Japan’s whaling hunt is not for scientific purposes and is against international law,” said Mr Dreyfus.
“The fixing of the date sets up the final stage in this case brought by the Australian Government. The oral hearings are the last phase of legal proceedings before the Court makes its decision.”
Australia commenced the proceedings against Japan on 31 May 2010. The International Court of Justice has received written submissions from both Parties.
Australia’s views on whaling are well known – we condemn all commercial whaling, including Japan’s so-called ‘scientific’ whaling,” said Minister for Environment Tony Burke.
“The Australian Government’s decision to bring this legal action demonstrates our determination to end commercial whaling.”
Minister for Foreign Affairs Bob Carr said Australia’s whaling case did not undermine the relationship between Australia and Japan.
“Australia and Japan have agreed that our differences over whaling will not affect the strong bilateral relationship we share,” said Mr Carr.
“The International Court of Justice is the appropriate forum to resolve these differences in a calm and measured way.”
Counsel appearing in the case with the Attorney-General will include Solicitor-General Justin Gleeson SC, Bill Campbell QC, Professor James Crawford SC, Professor Philippe Sands QC and Professor Laurence Boisson de Chazournes.
“We hope the Court will deliver its decision on the legality of Japan’s whaling before the start of the next whaling season,” Mr Dreyfus said.
ICJ hearing schedule
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
law,
whales
Sunday 3 March 2013
Spokesperson for Japan's Institute of Cetacean Research finally admits that its Antartic operation is about commercial whaling
The Japan Daily Press 27 February 2013:
Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke in The Age 28 February 2013:
How absurd has the argument become, if Japan is now arguing that it has a traditional cultural practice of travelling from one side of the planet to the other to kill whales in a whale sanctuary.
Glenn Inwood of Omeka Public Relations and SpinItWide, as a spokesperson for the Institute of Cetacean Research, makes an admission that commercial whaling is a stand alone reason for the Japanese Government sponsored annual whale kills in Antarctic waters.
Excerpt from ABC TV 7.30 program 27 February 2013:
LEIGH SALES: Say then I take you at your word. If this really was for just scientific research given the enormously bad PR that whaling delivers for Japan, why not just leave the scientific research to somebody else?
GLENN INWOOD: Yes, that's perfectly right but Japan wants to undertake more than just scientific research on abundant whale stocks in the Southern Ocean. It wants to undertake a limited, very limited commercial hunt on abundant whale species for food for Japanese people. There's lots of arguments going on and around this. At the end of the day this is Japan's right under the international law, under the international convention for the regulation of whaling. It is their right to do this and that's what they want.
LEIGH SALES: We will be interested to see what the ICJ says about that. Glenn Inwood thank you very much for joining us.
GLENN INWOOD: Yes, that's perfectly right but Japan wants to undertake more than just scientific research on abundant whale stocks in the Southern Ocean. It wants to undertake a limited, very limited commercial hunt on abundant whale species for food for Japanese people. There's lots of arguments going on and around this. At the end of the day this is Japan's right under the international law, under the international convention for the regulation of whaling. It is their right to do this and that's what they want.
LEIGH SALES: We will be interested to see what the ICJ says about that. Glenn Inwood thank you very much for joining us.
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
IWC,
whales
Thursday 28 February 2013
Did the Government of Japan condone what appears to be the deliberate ramming of Sea Shepherd ships?
Excerpt from an Institute of Cetacean Research media release dated 20 February 2013:
On February 20 around 1100JST until about 1200JST during refueling operations, the Antarctic whale research (JARPAII) mother ship Nisshin Maru (NM) and her supply tanker were subject to sabotage by the Sea Shepherd (SS) ships Steve Irwin (SI), Bob Barker (BB) and Sam Simon (SmS). The SI and BB are sailing under the flag of the Netherlands while the SmS has Australian registry.
1. As the NM was about to come alongside her supply tanker for refueling, SS vessels, SI, BB and SmS, in foolhardy obstruction attempts, repeatedly came at close-quarter distance with the NM and the supply tanker. During their obstruction to refueling operations the SS vessels provoked several collisions (at the least: SI once; BB twice, SmS once) with the NM. The BB collided with the supply tanker too.
2. There were no injuries to the crews of research vessels including NM and the supply tanker. However, the NM suffered denting damage and broken hand railing on her bow section while the supply tanker port side hull was dented and her hand railing was damaged. Both vessels’ ability for navigation was not affected by these damages.
3. During the attack, the NM used her water pump as a preventive measure to make SS vessels refrain from further approaching and repeatedly broadcasted a warning message to stop them. However, the NM decided to interrupt her refueling operations attempts judging from difficulty due to the extremely dangerous behavior of the SS vessels.....
1. As the NM was about to come alongside her supply tanker for refueling, SS vessels, SI, BB and SmS, in foolhardy obstruction attempts, repeatedly came at close-quarter distance with the NM and the supply tanker. During their obstruction to refueling operations the SS vessels provoked several collisions (at the least: SI once; BB twice, SmS once) with the NM. The BB collided with the supply tanker too.
2. There were no injuries to the crews of research vessels including NM and the supply tanker. However, the NM suffered denting damage and broken hand railing on her bow section while the supply tanker port side hull was dented and her hand railing was damaged. Both vessels’ ability for navigation was not affected by these damages.
3. During the attack, the NM used her water pump as a preventive measure to make SS vessels refrain from further approaching and repeatedly broadcasted a warning message to stop them. However, the NM decided to interrupt her refueling operations attempts judging from difficulty due to the extremely dangerous behavior of the SS vessels.....
The Institute offers no video evidence of these collisions as they were occurring but does have one short clip showing the Nissin Maru bearing down on the SS Bob Barker. It has published some selective photographs of the collisons.
However, the Sea Shepherd organisation does have film and its videos call into doubt the Japanese version of events.
It is hard not to conclude that the Nissan Maru did not collide with, but instead deliberately rammed, Sea Shepherd vessels.
A conclusion made all the more disturbing by the fact that this ramming appears to have been sanctioned by the Government of Japan, as there is no evidence that the Japanese Coast Guard officer/s on board the Nissan Maru attempted to intervene with that ship’s captain when he embarked on this reckless course of action.
Sea Shepherd Australia videos:
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
violence,
whales
Sunday 24 February 2013
Did the Japanese whaling fleet pollute Antarctic waters?
Sea Shepherd 17 February 2013:
In the early hours of the 17th of February, while the SSS Sam Simon was tailing the South Korean owned Sun Laurel, fuel bunker ship to the Japanese whaling fleet, the Sam Simon crew noticed the smell of diesel fumes coming from the wake of the Sun Laurel, over one mile ahead.
Captain Luis Pinho radioed the Sun Laurel at 3:00 am AEDT, approximately 15 minutes after the Sun Laurelentered Australian Antarctic Territory, informing them that they smelled diesel fumes, could see fuel slicks in the wake of the Sun Laurel, had collected water samples, and would be reporting the Sun Laurel to the authorities.
On the 17th of February at approximately 4:00 pm AEDT the Sam Simon recorded an audio transmission between the Captain and Bosun of the Sun Laurel - the Japanese whaling fleet's refuelling vessel. In this recording, the Captain of the Sun Laurel refers to the oil spill that the Sam Simon had documented and collected samples of hours earlier. The Sun Laurel Captain informed his Bosun to take care covering refuelling hoses, and that if oil dropped into the water there would be a “big problem”, as the Sam Simon had caught the Sun Laurel leaking fuel into the wake behind them earlier that morning.
Sea Shepherd Australia believes this transmission is further proof of an oil spill by the Sun Laurel in Antarctica's pristine waters, and has reported the incident to Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA).
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
pollution,
whales
Friday 22 February 2013
Japanese whaling fleet begins to withdraw from Antarctic waters
SBS World News 20 February 2012:
The latest spat between Japanese whalers and the Sea Shepherd group could become an international incident, amid reports Japan has temporarily suspended its whale hunt.
The ABC reports Japan has temporarily suspended its annual whale hunt in the Southern Ocean.
Yesterday, three Sea Shepherd ships were rammed by Japan's whaling fleet while it was attempting to refuel in Australian Antarctic Territory waters, the conservation group says.
Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson says the Nisshin Maru has hit the Steve Irwin, the Bob Barker and the Sam Simon, which were attempting to stop the Japanese fleet "illegally" refuelling.
Captain Watson said the Nisshin Maru also collided with the Korean-owned tanker Sun Laurel, which appeared to be leaving the area.
The Bob Barker was badly damaged, taking water in its engine room and losing power, but is under way again, he said.
There were no injuries among its 38 crew.
"It's extremely irresponsible and reckless for them to be taking these kind of manoeuvres around an oil tanker, especially in the Antarctic treaty zone," Captain Watson told AAP.
"The Nisshin Maru just came in, bullied their way through, and hit the Steve Irwin twice on the stern ... and hit the Bob Barker multiple times, pushing it into the side of the tanker.
"It then continued to hit it with stun guns and water cannons and did severe damage."
Captain Watson said the Japanese ship backed off when a mayday call was issued but the Sam Simon had then been hit.
"We actually had the situation of the Japanese ship on their loudspeakers telling the Sam Simon to leave the Australian Antarctic Territory, that's an Australian flagged ship, and they said so by order of the government of Japan," Captain Watson said.
Japan's Insitiute of Cetacean Research version of events here.
Sea Shepherd (Australia) version of events here.
Japan's Insitiute of Cetacean Research version of events here.
Sea Shepherd (Australia) version of events here.
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
whales
Wednesday 20 February 2013
Everytime you go to the supermarket or bottle shop you can make a stand against the annual Antarctic whale slaughter
As the Government of Japan and the Japanese people appear unwilling to listen to the Government of Australia when it asks that the Japanese whaling fleet cease its Antarctic commercial whaling (cynically conducted under the guise of lethal research), perhaps it will listen to its own overseas business interests when they complain that Australian consumers are beginning to pass over their products.
It is easy to spot products imported directly from Japan, however that is not the true extent of the Japanese presence on supermarket and liquor store shelves.
If you would like to protest the ongoing Southern Ocean whale slaughter you can easily make your mark - here is a list of some Japanese-owned brands currently available:
Lion Nathan National Foods a wholly owned subsidiary of Kirin Holdings Company Limited, a Japanese corporation specialising in beer, wine and dairy products. Brands are: XXXX GOLD, TOOHEYS NEW, JAMES BOAG’S PREMIUM, WITHER HILLS CHARDONNAY, ST HALLETT FAITH SHIRAZ, DAIRY FARMERS, YOPLAIT, COON, BERRI, DARE, FARMERS UNION, PURA, BIB M, MOOVE, TASMANIAN HERITAGE, and possibly KING ISLAND DAIRY.
Schweppes Australia a wholly owned subsidiary of Asahi Group Holdings Ltd of Japan. Brands: SCHWEPPES BRAND SOFT DRINKS & MIXERS, SOLO, SPRING VALLEY, COTTEE'S CORDIALS, COOL RIDGE SPRING WATER, EXTRA JUICY, POP TOPS, GLO, FRANTELLE, PEPSI, MOUNTAIN DEW (under licence), GATORADE (under licence).
Independent Distillers a subsidiary owned by Asahi Group Holdings of Japan. Brands: ASAHAI BEER, WOODSTOCK BOURBON, WOODSTOCK BOURBON & COLA, PULSE, HIGHLAND SCOTCH WHISKY, RED BEER, CS COWBOY, VODKA MUDSHAKE, VODKA CRUISER, CRUISER BLACK, CRUISER FREE, CRUISER APPARELLA, LADY LUCK, EVERGLADES, TWISTEE SHOTS, HUMMINGBIRD BLONDE LAGER,KINGKISHER BEER, BALTIKA BEER, HAAGEN PREMUIM MALT.
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
food,
people power,
whales
Friday 1 February 2013
An armed Japanese Government customs vessel entered Australia's exclusive economic zone without permission on 31 January 2013
ABC
News
February 1, 2013:
The
Federal Government has ordered a Japanese whaling vessel to get out of
Australia's exclusive economic zone.
The
Shonan Maru Number 2 - a Customs vessel which travels with the whaling fleet -
entered the zone off Macquarie Island in the Southern Ocean yesterday
afternoon.
Environment
Minister Tony Burke said he had made it clear to Japan that vessels associated
with the whaling program "are not welcome in in Australia's exclusive
economic zone or territorial sea".
"Our
embassy in Tokyo has conveyed these sentiments directly to the Japanese
government," Mr Burke said in a statement.
Former
Greens leader Bob Brown, now the mission leader of the Sea Shepherd
anti-whaling group, says he believes the vessel has armed Japanese personnel
aboard.
On
February 1 it was reported that the customs vessel was just outside of
Australian territorial waters, but remains in Australia’s economic exclusion
zone close to Macquarie Island, in direct defiance of the objections contained
in the Australian Government’s formal notification to the Japanese Government.
World
Heritage listed Macquarie Island forms part of the State of Tasmania.
The Hon Tony Burke MP
Minister for Sustainability,
Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Media release
31 January 2013
31 January 2013
The Australian Government has
received confirmation that a Japanese whaling support vessel, the Shonan Maru
No 2, has entered our exclusive economic zone near Macquarie Island in the
Southern Ocean.
The Government strongly
objects to whaling vessels passing through Australian territorial seas or our
exclusive economic zone.
Australia has made it clear to
Japan on a number of occasions that vessels associated with its whaling program
are not welcome in Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) or Territorial
Sea.
The vessel is a non-whaling
support ship which forms part of the fleet accompanying whaling vessels.
Our embassy in Tokyo has
conveyed these sentiments directly to the Japanese government.
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
whales
Thursday 3 January 2013
"Operation Zero Tolerance'' underway in the Southern Ocean
Website banner for 2013 in the Antarctic whale wars
With the Japanese Government sponsored whaling fleet reported to be heading towards its designated Antarctic killing zones (which includes the 50 million square kilometre Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary established by the International Whaling Commission), the 2013 battle in the whale wars is now underway.
Japan is said to have a kill target of 935 minke whales and up to 50 endangered fin whales this season under the guise of industrial scale lethal 'research'.
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
whales
Sunday 4 November 2012
Japan squander's 2.3bn yen from tsunami recontructions funds on Antarctic & Pacific whale hunts
The Times UK November 1, 2012:
BBC New
Asia October
31:
The
Australian November 2:
2.3bn yen or approximately AUD$2.7 million
went
to Japan's fisheries agencies to protect its whaling fleet from protests by
environmental activists.
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
protected species,
whales
Thursday 27 September 2012
Japanese Fisheries Agency denies November-March Antarctic whale hunt cancelled
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
whales
Tuesday 19 June 2012
Whale Meat FAIL
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
whales
Saturday 10 March 2012
Antarctic: When is the Government of Japan going to get its priorities straight?
Photograph from Hervey Bay Tourist Centre
When is the Government of Japan going to get its priorities straight? Hopefully before 2013. Its state-sponsored whale killers must be must be near a financial bottom of the ocean by now.
News.com.au March 9, 2012:
JAPAN has ended this season's whale hunt in the Antarctic Ocean having caught less than a third of its original target, the Fisheries Agency says.
Japanese whalers killed 266 minke whales and one fin whale, the agency said, well below the roughly 900 they had been aiming for when they left Japan in December.
The West Australian March 9, 2012:
The Japanese whaling fleet has pulled out of the Southern Ocean and is heading home three weeks before the whale hunt was scheduled to end.
The Japanese consul in Perth and the Institute of Cetacean Research have both confirmed the whalers are heading back to Japan.
Wednesday 22 February 2012
Japanese whalers receive setback in U.S. Court
The Institute of Cetacean Research / Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha
17 February 2012
Joint Statement on Court ruling by the U.S. District Court
The Institute of Cetacean Research and Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd. are disappointed that the Court did not award a Preliminary Injunction that would prevent Sea Shepherd from physically attacking their vessels during the current research season.
The Institute of Cetacean Research and Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd. will study the details of the ruling once it is issued. The court has not yet issued a ruling on Sea Shepherd’s motion to have the case dismissed.
The Institute of Cetacean Research and Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd. are now evaluating their options to ensure safety at sea in the future.
For more information contact: Gavin Carter, Washington, DC: +1-571-243-6030
Thursday 12 January 2012
Is the Japanese whaling fleet refusing to obey a lawful direction to leave Australian territorial waters?
Since at least 11 January 2012 the Government of Japan-sponsored whaling fleet operating in the Southern Ocean has failed to obey a lawful direction of the Federal Government to quit Australian territorial waters surrounding World Heritage listed Macquarie Island - which also form part of the Australian Whale Sanctuary and the wider International Whaling Commission-endorsed Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.
One has to wonder why the Japanese Government imagines it has a right to ignore Australia's sovereignty in this manner.
Should it continue this intransigence then the Federal Government would be well within its rights to withdraw the credentials of the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Japan, His Excellency Mr Shigekazu Sato.
The Sydney Morning Herald 12 January 2012:
A JAPANESE whaling ship has defied high-level Australian complaints to stay in the waters of World Heritage-listed Macquarie Island.
The harpoon-equipped whale hunter Yushin Maru No.3 was still there late yesterday, hours after the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, said the ship was leaving.
''I'm aware that there has been one vessel which I'm advised has been in Australian territorial waters and I'll advise that it will leave Australian territorial waters,'' Ms Gillard said.
The Australian embassy told the Japanese government on Tuesday that whaling vessels were not welcome in the country's waters, repeating earlier complaints.
But the Japanese ship was photographed yesterday within a few miles of the coast of Macquarie Island, which is part of the state of Tasmania……
ANU professor of international law Don Rothwell said if Yushin Maru No.3 was staying close to Macquarie Island it was violating the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea which would normally allow a ship to proceed though these waters.
''The actions of Yushin Maru No.3 are not consistent with the right of innocent passage,'' Professor Rothwell said.
The Greens leader, Bob Brown, said the ship's presence was illegal and called for a naval vessel to be sent there.
Yushin Maru No.3 stayed just off the coast of Macquarie Island yesterday.
Photo: Carolina A Castro/Sea Shepherd
A reminder of the 2008 Federal Court of Australia ruling against Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL INC
Applicant
AND: KYODO SENPAKU KAISHA LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 JANUARY 2008
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
1. THE COURT DECLARES that the respondent has killed, injured, taken and interfered with Antarctic minke whales (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) and injured, taken and interfered with humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Australian Whale Sanctuary in contravention of sections 229, 229A, 229B and 229C of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), (the “Act”), and has treated and possessed such whales killed or taken in the Australian Whale Sanctuary in contravention of sections 229D and 230 of the Act, without permission or authorisation under sections 231, 232 or 238 of the Act.
2. THE COURT ORDERS that the respondent be restrained from killing, injuring, taking or interfering with any Antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis), fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) or humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Australian Whale Sanctuary, or treating or possessing any such whale killed or taken in the Australian Whale Sanctuary, unless permitted or authorised under sections 231,n232 or 238 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth).
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Tuesday 10 January 2012
Whale Wars 2012: Sea Shepherd alleges Japanese whaler Yushin Maru 3 has entered Australian territorial waters
The Sydney Morning Herald
Whalers chase activist ship into Australian waters: Sea Shepherd
9 January 2012
Whalers chase activist ship into Australian waters: Sea Shepherd
9 January 2012
Sea Shepherd Organisation on 9 January 2012:
* Macquarie Island: a Tasmanian State Reserve managed by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service.
UPDATE
From The Age online 11 January 2012:
Labels:
Australia-Japan relations,
whales
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)