Showing posts with label elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elections. Show all posts
Sunday 1 July 2018
Oi! Malcolm Bligh Turnbull and every dumb-witted member of his federal government as well as every premier and member of a state or territory government – when are you all going to wake up to the fact that digital is bloody dangerous?
For literally hundreds of years now, first in colonial, then in dominion and later in federation periods, Australia has relied on a 'paper and ink' processes to decide major political votes by its eligible citizens.
By and large this system has produced reliable results with regards to the people's will.
This is evidence of just the
latest red flag that Australian governments have ignored ……
The Mercury online, 30 June 2018:
The personal information
of about 4000 Tasmanian voters has been leaked after a data breach on a
third-party website linked to express votes, the state’s Electoral Commission
has revealed.
Tasmanian Electoral
Commissioner Andrew Hawkey said hackers had access to the names, dates of
birth, emails and postal addresses of those who applied for an express vote at
the recent state and Legislative Council elections.
“Early today, the
Tasmanian Electoral Commission was informed by the Barcelona-based company
Typeform, that an unknown third party had gained access to one of their servers
and downloaded certain information,” he said.
“Typeform online forms
have been used on the TEC website since 2015 for some of its election services.
The breach involved an unknown attacker downloading a backup file.
“Typeform’s full
investigation of the breach identified that data collected through five forms
on the TEC website had been stolen.”
The breach was
identified by Typeform on June 27 and shut down within half an hour of
detection, Mr Hawkey said.
“The Electoral
Commission will be contacting electors that used these services in the coming
days to inform them of the breach,” Mr Hawkey said.
“The Electoral
Commission apologises for the breach and will re-evaluate its collection
procedures and internal security elements around its storage of electoral
information for future events. The breach has no connection to the national or
state electoral roll.”
Mr Hawkey said some of
the stolen information had previously been made public, such as candidate
statements for local government by-elections.
Typeform said it had
responded immediately and had fixed the source of the breach to prevent further
hacks.
“We have since been
performing a full forensic investigation of the incident to be certain that
this cannot happen again,” a statement on the Typeform website read.
“The results that were
accessed are from a partial backup dated May 3, 2018. Results collected since
May 3 are therefore safe and not compromised.’
Typeform reportedly
provides services for some pretty big names, including Apple, Uber, Airbnb and
Forbes.
The hack comes after up
to 120,000 Tasmanian job seekers may have had their personal information
compromised following a data breach reported by human resources company PageUp
in early June.
That site was linked to
the Tasmanian Government and the University of Tasmania.
The State Government is
still waiting for a further response from PageUp but it is believed the breach
was limited to names, addresses, emails and phone numbers.
Thursday 21 June 2018
At last! A way to gaol the entire Turnbull Government
Excerpts from
the Explanatory Memorandum for CRIMINAL
CODE AMENDMENT (IMPERSONATING A COMMONWEALTH BODY) BILL 2017
The
Criminal Code Amendment (Impersonating a Commonwealth Body) Bill 2017 (the
Bill) will introduce new offences and a new injunction power to prohibit and
prevent conduct amounting to false representation of a Commonwealth body….
It
is essential that the public can trust in the legitimacy and accuracy of
statements made by Commonwealth bodies. The amendments are critical to ensure
the public has confidence in the legitimacy of communications emanating from
Commonwealth bodies, thereby safeguarding the proper functioning of
Government…..
The
Bill introduces a primary offence where the person is reckless as to whether
their conduct will result in, or is reasonably capable of resulting in, a false
representation. These amendments also create a new aggravated offence where a
person engages in such conduct with the intent to obtain a gain, cause a loss,
or influence the exercise of a public duty.
This bill
finally passed both house of the Australian Parliament on 18 June 2018.
Of course the
bill doesn’t actually allow the gaoling of every member of the Turnbull
Coalition Government for two to five years.
A government
whose members have turned the uttering of outright lies and the continual
misrepresentation of fact into art forms. Who only pretend to be governing in
the interests of the people.
But a voter
can dream, can't she?
This bill was
created with the
sole purpose of providing the Turnbull Government with a weapon to use
during the forthcoming election campaign.
Labels:
elections,
government policy,
legislation,
Turnbull Government
Tuesday 15 May 2018
The reason Peter Dutton is looking so smug lately
Peter Dutton, 4 May 2016
Photo: Stephanie Peatling
Already a sitting member in a predominately 'white bread', somewhat politically disengaged Queensland electorate with a relativley large workforce and a stable employment rate, Liberal MP for Dickson, Minister for Home Affairs & Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Peter Dutton is exuding confidence bordering on arrogance.
Well he might - the Liberal Party having strongly lobbied the Australian Electoral Commission in last year's redistribution thereby slightly increasing the slim margin by which he holds the seat of Dickson,
with $650,000
pledged to his 2018-19 election campaign chest, legislation transferring ASIO into the Home Affairs portfolio having received royal assent on 10 May 2018, on track to gain unprecedented control over the
criteriagoverning citizenship acquisition, the time it takes for a person to
gaincitizenship after their application has been approved, and even
the circumstances in which citizenship can be revoked and, exercising his political muscle within his own party, he looks to be firmly in the driver's seat.
The people of Kurwongbah, Petrie, Strathpine, Albany Creek, Ferny Hills, Everton Hills, Murrumba Downs, parts of Kallangur, Lake Samsonvale, Lake Kurwongbah and the rest of Dickson need to take a good hard look at their sitting member and ask themselves; do they really want to be responsible for re-electing Peter Dutton who is on his way to be the next far-right, authoritarian 'Trump' to head a federal government?
Tuesday 10 April 2018
So many Newspoll losses mean democratic processes at risk as Turnbull Government strives to claw back political ground
“The Coalition now trails Labor by 47.5 per cent to
52.5 per cent in two-party terms across the four polls. This reflects a 48:52
result from Fairfax/Ipsos, the same from Newspoll, the same from Essential and
a 46:54 result from ReachTel on March 29.” [The
Sydney Morning Herald, 9 April 2016]
From
May 2014 to September 2015 the Abbott
Coalition Government experienced 30 consecutive negative Newspoll federal voting intentions
opinion polls*.
After
the sacking of Tony Abbott by his party and the installation of Malcolm
Turnbull as prime minister the Turnbull Coalition
Government saw 12 positive Newspolls before this second rendition
of a Coalition federal government itself experienced 30 consecutive negative
Newspolls from 12 September 2016 to 9 April 2018.
This
polling history indicates that the Liberal-National federal government is
likely to have only had the national electorate’s approval for around ten of
the last thirty-seven calendar months.
According
to the Australian Electoral Commission;
As
House of Representatives and half-Senate elections are usually held
simultaneously, the earliest date for such an election would be Saturday 4
August 2018. As the latest possible date for a half-Senate election is Saturday
18 May 2019, the latest possible date for a simultaneous (half-Senate and House
of Representatives) election is also Saturday 18 May 2019.
Given
that (i) between them the Abbott and
Turnbull governments have
experienced experienced only 12 positive
polls in the last 68 Newspolls; and (ii)
the Liberal Party has already admitted that during its successful March 2018 South Australian
election it had utilised
the services of one of the known “bad actors” on the international election campaign
consultancy scene, the US-based data miner i360;
it is highly likely that “bad actors” will be employed once more and over the
next four to thirteen months voters will be subjected to a barrage of
misinformation, bald lies, vicious rumour and false promises from both
Coalition politicians and their supporters in mainstream and social media.
Voters will have to fact check what they hear and read as never before.
Voters will have to fact check what they hear and read as never before.
* A
federal voting intentions Newspoll is
considered negative for one or other of the two main political parties based on two party preferred percentage results.
Newspolls surveys normally occur every two to three weeks outside of election campaign periods when they are likely to occur more often.
Newspoll results can be found at https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/newspoll.
Newspolls surveys normally occur every two to three weeks outside of election campaign periods when they are likely to occur more often.
Newspoll results can be found at https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/newspoll.
Wednesday 4 April 2018
Are those nasty digital chickens coming home to roost for Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook?
In 2014 rumours began to spread about the about Strategic Communication Laboratries (SLC) Cambridge Analytica.
By 12 December 2015, after contacting Facebook's public relations representatives in London, The Guardian (UK) was reporting that:
"A little-known
data company, now embedded within Cruz’s campaign and indirectly financed by
his primary billionaire benefactor, paid researchers at Cambridge University to
gather detailed psychological profiles about the US electorate using a massive
pool of mainly unwitting US Facebook users built with an online survey.
As part of an aggressive
new voter-targeting operation, Cambridge Analytica – financially supported by
reclusive hedge fund magnate and leading Republican donor Robert Mercer – is
now using so-called “psychographic profiles” of US citizens in order to help
win Cruz votes, despite earlier concerns and red flags from potential
survey-takers.
Documents seen by the
Guardian have uncovered longstanding ethical and privacy issues about the way
academics hoovered up personal data by accessing a vast set of US Facebook
profiles, in order to build sophisticated models of users’ personalities.
By 6 January 2016 The Guardian was reporting on what was likely to turn up in Facebook feeds by way of political advertising:
If you lived in
north-east Iowa, the evangelical stronghold where the battle for the soul of
conservative American politics will play out in person on Monday, and happened
to have given Senator Ted Cruz’s campaign your email address sometime in the
last few months, you might find something especially appealing this weekend in
your Facebook feed.
Even the most obtuse member of Facebook Inc.'s board or senior management would have been aware that the company was fast becoming an active participant in the US presidential primaries campaign.
The Guardian, 26 March 2018:
In rejecting the media’s
characterisation of this large-scale privacy violation as a “data breach”,
Facebook claims “everyone involved” in the 2014 data-siphoning exercise had
given their consent. “People knowingly provided their information,” the company
claimed. As with its interpretation of the word “clear”, Facebook seems to have
a skewed understanding of what “knowingly” really means.
Facebook’s senior
executives may now be feeling apologetic, “outraged” even. But in January 2016,
as Trump surged in the polls, Facebook’s COO, Sheryl Sandberg, told investors the 2016 election was “a big
deal in terms of ad spend”. In other words, a major commercial opportunity. The
ability to target voters, she said, was key: “Using Facebook and Instagram
ads you can target by congressional district, you can target by interest,
you can target by demographics or any combination of those,” she boasted. “And
we’re seeing politicians at all levels really take advantage of that
targeting.”
It’s perhaps worth
remembering, then, that until recently Facebook was encouraging political
operatives to take full advantage of its garden of surveillance. And while
aspects of the Cambridge
Analytica affair may be surprising, and offer a disturbing glimpse
into the shadows, the routine exploitation of information about our lives –
about who we are – is what’s powering Facebook. It’s the behemoth’s lifeblood.
This was a statement from the U.K. Parliament House
of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee on 28 March
2018:
Christopher Wylie gave
evidence to the Committee on Tuesday 27th March 2018 during which he
referred to the evidence the Committee is publishing today. This session is
available to watch.
Please note the transcript will be published online shortly.
On
Tuesday 20th March, the Committee Chair Damian Collins MP wrote to Mark
Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, requesting oral evidence. Facebook have responded
offering two senior executives. The Committee has accepted evidence from Chris
Cox, Chief Product Officer, but has written today to Facebook to clarify
whether Mr. Zuckerberg will also appear himself, as requested. This
matter was also raised with The UK Prime Minister Theresa May, in her evidence
before the Liaison Committee on the evening of the 27th March. She said that
Facebook should be taking the matter seriously.
On
Thursday 22nd, the Committee wrote to Alexander Nix, the suspended CEO of
Cambridge Analytica, recalling him to Parliament to give further evidence. Mr.
Nix has agreed to come before the Committee again. You can watch the evidence
session that took place on 27th February 2018 where Mr. Nix gave evidence
on Parliamentlive.tv and
read the transcript.
Chris Wylie Background Papers - referring to the work of SCL elections, Cambridge Analytica, Global Science... by clarencegirl on Scribd
Labels:
data mining,
data retention,
elections,
Facebook,
information technology,
Internet,
privacy,
safety
Monday 26 March 2018
A brief scrutiny of the byzantium maze that is Cambridge Analytica
Attempting to make sense of a group of corporate actors who obviously delighted in establishing a veritable labyrinth of companies and to create a reference to follow any future revelations.........
So what does the British-US company Cambridge Analytica which;
(i) has been accused of rat f**king the 2015 Nigerian presidential election and the 2013 & 2017 Kenyan elections,
(ii) allegedly influenced the 2016 UK Brexit referendum vote by assisting the Leave.EU campaign,
(iii) was known to have purchased data from Global Science Research Ltd who harvested personal details from an est. 50 million Facebook user accounts and,
(iv) later sold a breakdown of user data first to a number of GOP candidates during 2014 midterms, as well as to Ted Cruz during the US primaries and then to Donald Trump during the 2016 US presidential campaign,
actually look like on paper?
This appears to be the company whose business name is included in so many media reports at the moment:
Cambridge Analytica LLC incorporated in Delaware USA on 31 December 2013 offering data mining, analysis, and behavioral communication solutions according to Bloomberg.com and, now considered a subsidiary of SCL Group Limited.
“The genesis of Cambridge Analytica was to address the vacuum in the US Republican political market that became evident after [Mitt] Romney’s defeat in 2012” [Alexander Nix, CEO Cambridge Analytics].
Executives
Alexander James Ashburner Nix Chief Executive Officer
Julian David Wheatland Chief Financial Officer
Mark Turnbull Managing Director of CA Political Global
Thomas Finkle Global Head of Client ServicesIt shares its name with a UK Company CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA (UK) LIMITED - formerly SCL USA Limited incorporated 6 January 2015.
Directors
NIX,
Alexander James Ashburner Appointed founding sole director 6 January 2015. Only shareholder - in his own name and through
another company solely owned by him, SCL Elections
Limited (incorporated
17 October 2012).
SCL Elections Limited is described by Cambridge Analylitica as "an affiliate of Cambridge Analytica" and also the "genisis" of Cambridge Analytica. It is now being blamed for receiving harvested Facebook data and Cambridge Analytica is hypocritically trying to distance itself in a company media release on 23 March 2018.
The Cambridge Analytica website states it has offices in London, New York, Washington DC, Brazil and Malaysia. Until 20 March 2018 Alexander Nix was listed as its CEO. Acting CEO is now Chief Data Scientist at SCL Group Limited Dr. Alexander Tayler.
How do two firms on opposite sides of the world - one of which has only one director/owner and no indentifiable board members - suddenly become this company with reputed influence and tentacles everywhere?
Perhaps the answer lies in the est. US$15 million in indirect funding Cambridge Analytica has allegedly received from right-wing American billionaire Robert Mercer & his daughter Rebekah through one or all five affiliated US 'front' companies including Cambridge Analytica LLC and in its relationship with another UK corporation with which it shares information/data/personnel.
The remaining US 'front' companies are:
SCL Elections Limited is described by Cambridge Analylitica as "an affiliate of Cambridge Analytica" and also the "genisis" of Cambridge Analytica. It is now being blamed for receiving harvested Facebook data and Cambridge Analytica is hypocritically trying to distance itself in a company media release on 23 March 2018.
The Cambridge Analytica website states it has offices in London, New York, Washington DC, Brazil and Malaysia. Until 20 March 2018 Alexander Nix was listed as its CEO. Acting CEO is now Chief Data Scientist at SCL Group Limited Dr. Alexander Tayler.
How do two firms on opposite sides of the world - one of which has only one director/owner and no indentifiable board members - suddenly become this company with reputed influence and tentacles everywhere?
Perhaps the answer lies in the est. US$15 million in indirect funding Cambridge Analytica has allegedly received from right-wing American billionaire Robert Mercer & his daughter Rebekah through one or all five affiliated US 'front' companies including Cambridge Analytica LLC and in its relationship with another UK corporation with which it shares information/data/personnel.
The remaining US 'front' companies are:
Cambridge Analytica Holdings LLC (Delaware (US), 9 May 2014- )
Cambridge Analytica Commercial LLC (Delaware (US), 21 Jan 2015- )
Cambridge Analytica Political LLC (Delaware (US), 21 Jan 2015- )
That other UK company is SCL Group
Limited – formerly Strategic Communication Laboratories Limited incorporated on 20 July
2005 by STG Secretaries Limited on behalf of an unidentified person/s, with an opening share capital of £100,000.
Directors
NIX,
Alexander James Ashburner
Appointed co-founding director along with Alexander Waddinton Oakes on 20 July 2005, resigned on 7 December 2012 and reappointed on 28
January 2016. Shareholder. Owner of Cambridge
Analytica (UK) Limited.
OAKES,
Nigel John Appointed
on 3 October 2005. Shareholder.
GABB,
Roger Michael Appointed
on 10 November 2005. Shareholder. Ownership of shares – more than 25% but not
more than 50%. Ownership of voting rights - more than 25% but not more than 50%
Barclays
Bank PLC – current lender to the company It seems this bank assisted in restructuring SCL Group Limited's finances.
Company Positions
Identified by LinkedIn
United
Kingdom
Web / Software Developer
at Cambridge Analytica / SCL Group
Twickenham, United Kingdom
Current: Web
Developer at SCL Group
Data
Engineer presso Cambridge Analytica
London, United
Kingdom
Current: Data Engineer at Cambridge Analytica &
SCL Group
Account Director at
Cambridge Analytica
London, United Kingdom
Current: Senior
Project Manager at SCL Group
Chairman at SCL Group
Chief Executive at Hatton International
London, United Kingdom
Current: Chairman
at SCL Group
CEO, SCL Group -
Behavioural Influence
London, United Kingdom
Current: CEO
at SCL Group - Strategic Communication Laboratories
Financial Crime
Investigations & Security Intelligence
London, United Kingdom
Current: Head
- Fraud Surveillance, Corruption, Investigations at SCL Group
Head of Elections
London, United Kingdom
Current: Head
of Elections at SCL Group
Lead Data Scientist at
SCL Group
London, United Kingdom
Director of Operations
(SCL) / Consultant (BDI)
London, United Kingdom
Current: Director
of Operations (from 2011), Head of Infrastructures (2009-2011) at The SCL Group
DevOps Engineer at SCL
Group
London, United Kingdom
Current: Development
Operations Engineer at SCL Group
Senior Planning Engineer
at SCL Group
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Community manager chez
SCL Group
London, United Kingdom
Current: Community
manager at SCL Group
Financial Controller at
SCL Group
London, United Kingdom
Management Accountant at
SCL Group
London, United Kingdom
Account Coordinator at
SCL Group
United Kingdom
Paralegal
London, United Kingdom
Current: Paralegal
at SCL Group
IT Support Analyst at
SCL Group
Slough, United Kingdom
United
States
Director, Business
Development at SCL Group
Washington D.C. Metro Area
Senior Data Scientist at
SCL Group
Washington D.C. Metro Area
Canada
Technical Manager at SCL
Group
Alberta, Canada
Russia
Менеджер
по закупкам - SCL Group [purchasing manager]
Russian
Federation
Current: Менеджер
по закупкам at SCL Group
Macedonia
Head of
SCL Balkans at SCL Group
Macedonia
Germany
Project
Manager bei SCL Group
Hannover Area, Germany
Current: Project
Manager at SCL Group
Netherlands
Behavioural
& Legal Research Scientist // BDI Consultant
Breda Area, Netherlands
Australia
Project
Portfolio Manager at SCL Group Australia
Sydney, Australia
Current: Project
Portfolio Manager at SCL Group
New
Zealand
SCL
Products Manager at SCL Group
Auckland, New Zealand
Malaysia
Head, CA
Political/Commercial Southeast Asia
Putra Jaya, Malaysia
Current: Director
of SCL Southeast Asia at SCL Group
India
Research Analyst at SCL
Group
New Delhi Area, India
Director Business
Development at SCL Group
New Delhi Area, India
China
CUSTOMER SERVICE at SCL
Group
China
Open Corporates' Company Grouping for Cambridge Analytica
SCL
GROUP LIMITED (United Kingdom, 20 Jul 2005- ) directors
SCL
INSIGHT LIMITED (United Kingdom, 13 Sep 2016- ) directors
SCL
ELECTIONS LIMITED (United Kingdom, 17 Oct 2012- ) director
SCL
ANALYTICS LIMITED (United Kingdom, 23 Oct 2015- ) directors
CAMBRIDGE
ANALYTICA(UK) LIMITED (United Kingdom, 6 Jan 2015- ) director
STRATEGIC
COMMUNICATION LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED (India, 16 Nov
2011- )
SCL
COMMERCIAL LIMITED (United Kingdom, 10 Jan 2014- ) director
inactive SCL
SOVEREIGN LIMITED (United Kingdom, 6 Jan 2015-28 Jun 2016) director Voluntarily dissolved June 2016
inactive BOLDNOTE
LIMITED (United Kingdom, 27 Oct 2004- 8 Jan 2013) directors Voluntarily dissolved January 2013
inactive SCL DIGITAL LIMITED (United Kingdom, 6 Jan 2015-28 Jun 2016) director Voluntarily dissolved January 2015
CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA LLC (Delaware (US), 31 Dec 2013- )
inactive branch SCL USA INC. (Virginia (US), 25 May 2016-31 Jul 2017)
SCL USA INC. (Delaware (US), 22 Apr 2014- ) details
branch SCL USA INC. (New York (US), 10 May 2016- )
branch SCL USA Inc. (District of Columbia (US), 22 Apr 2014- )
inactive Strategic
Communication Laboratories LLC (Virginia (US), 7 Mar 2011-30
Jun 2013)
STRATEGIC
COMMUNICATION LABORATORIES, INC. (Delaware (US), 23 Aug 2006-
)
CAMBRIDGE
ANALYTICA COMMERCIAL LLC (Delaware (US), 21 Jan 2015- )
CAMBRIDGE
ANALYTICA POLITICAL LLC (Delaware (US), 21 Jan 2015- )
BACKGROUND
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
23 March 2018:
Wylie, a Canadian
citizen, moved to London in 2010 and started to work in 2013 for SCL Group,
which he said conducted "information operations" around the world and
also worked in campaigns, especially in African nations.
As research director,
Wylie helped that company give birth to Cambridge Analytica as "an
American brand" that would focus on US politics with at least $US10
million from billionaire hedge fund manager Robert Mercer. The Cambridge
Analytica office was in the posh Mayfair neighbourhood of London, and the
dozens of young workers - many of them contractors, a number of whom were from
Eastern Europe - buzzed about with Apple laptops.
At the helm, said Wylie,
was Mercer's daughter Rebekah, who was president, and conservative strategist
Steve Bannon, who was vice president. Running day-to-day operations was a
smooth-talking upper-crust Briton, Alexander Nix……
Wylie said that it was
under Nix's direction - but with the knowledge of Bannon and Rebekah Mercer -
that Cambridge Analytica began an ambitious data-gathering program that included
tapping into the Facebook profiles of 50 million users through the use of a
personality-testing app. The company did that with the help of a Russian
American psychologist at Cambridge University, Aleksandr Kogan, who also made
regular visits back to Russia, according to Wylie.
Wylie said he and others
at Cambridge Analytica were initially skeptical of the power of this tactic for
gathering data. But when the company approved $US1000 for Kogan to experiment
with his app, he produced data on 1000 people who downloaded it and roughly
160,000 of their friends - all in a matter of hours.
Cambridge Analytica next
approved $US10,000 for a second round of testing and was rewarded with nearly a
million records, including names, home towns, dates of birth, religious
affiliations, work and educational histories, and preferences, as expressed
using the popular Facebook "like" button on many social media
updates, news stories and other online posts.
They soon married that
data with voter lists and commercial data broker information and discovered
they had a remarkably precise portrait of a large swath of the American
electorate.
Kogan's app, called
"thisisyourdigitallife" and portrayed as being for research purposes,
gathered data on the 270,000 people who downloaded it and tens of millions of
their Facebook friends. It was this data and others that Wylie later worried
might have ended up in Russian hands.
"I'm not saying
that we put it on a drive and posted it to Vladimir Putin on Number 1 Red
Square," Wylie said, referring to the Russian president's official
residence. But he said that he and others affiliated with Cambridge Analytica
briefed Lukoil, a Russian oil company, on its research into American
voters.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The
Guardian, 14
May 2017:
What was not known,
until February, was the relationship between all these figures and the Leave
campaign. That was when Andy
Wigmore, Leave.EU’s communications director, revealed to this paper that
Farage was a close friend of both Bannon and Mercer. He said that the Leave
campaign was a “petri dish” for the Trump campaign. “We shared a lot of
information because what they were trying to do and what we were trying to do
had massive parallels.”
Wigmore also said that Mercer had been “happy to help” and Cambridge Analytica had given its services
to the campaign for free. It was the general secretary of Ukip, a British lawyer called Matthew Richardson, who effected Leave.eu’s introduction to Cambridge
Analytica, Wigmore said. “We had a guy called Matthew Richardson who’d known Nigel for a long time and he’s always looked after the Mercers. The Mercers hadsaid that here’s this company that we think might be useful.”
He said that Mercer,
Farage and co had all met at a conference in Washington. “The best dinner we
ever went to. Around that table were all the rejects of the political world.
And the rejects of the political world are now effectively in the White House.
It’s extraordinary. Jeff Sessions. [Former national security adviser Michael]
Flynn, the whole lot of them. They were all there.”
When the Observer revealed
Mercer’s “help” in February, a “gift” of services, it triggered two
investigations. One by the Information
Commissioner’s Office about possible illegal use of data. And another
by the Electoral Commission. Cambridge Analytica is a US company and Mercer
is a US citizen and British law, designed to protect its electoral system from
outside influence, expressly forbids donations from foreign – or impermissible
– donors. The commission is also looking into the “help” that Gunster gave the
campaign. It was not declared in Leave.EU’s spending returns and if donated, it
would also be impermissible. Gavin Millar QC, an expert in electoral law, says
it raises questions of the utmost importance about the influence of an American
citizen in a UK election.
But the contents of this
document raise even more significant and urgent questions. Coordination between
campaigns destroys the “level playing field” on which UK electoral law is
based. It creates an unfair advantage.
Millar said that one of
the significant and revealing aspects of the arrangement was that it was
hidden. “It’s the covert nature of the relationship between these two companies
and campaigns that I find particularly revealing and alarming. If there is covert
cooperation via offshore entities, [it] is about as serious a breach of the
funding rules as one can imagine in the 21st century.”
Millar said that this
case was without precedent. “To have a billionaire so directly buying influence
in a British election is absolutely unheard of. This is completely out of the
ordinary. And what’s clear is that our electoral laws are hopelessly
inadequate. The only way we would be able to find the truth of what happened is
through a public inquiry.”
The link between Cambridge
Analytica and AggregateIQ was never supposed to come to light. And it is still
uncertain how Vote Leave came to work with AggregateIQ.
There are several major
Tory donors and pro-Brexit figures associated with Cambridge Analytica and SCL
Elections, including Lord Marland, former treasurer of the Conservative party
and head of the Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council. The pro-Brexit
Tory donor Roger Gabb, the owner of South African wine company Kumala, is also
a shareholder and was involved in one of the Leave campaigns. In
a separate incident he was fined £1,000 by the Electoral Commission
for failing to include “imprints” – or campaign branding – on newspaper ads.
The Observer revealed
last week that two core members of the Vote Leave team used to work with both
Cambridge Analytica and AggregateIQ. Cummings said that he found the company –
on which he spent by far the biggest chunk of his campaign budget – “on the
internet”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Committee, Oral
evidence: Fake News, HC 363, Tuesday 27 February 2018, Ordered
by the House of Commons to be published on 27 February 2018.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cambridge Analytica is currently under investigation in the UK with the Information Commissioner's Office entering the company's London office under search warrant on 23 March 2018.
Labels:
big data,
data mining,
data retention,
elections,
ethics,
Facebook,
politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)