Showing posts with label mining. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mining. Show all posts
Tuesday 29 January 2019
Wangan and Jagalingou people's fight against foreign mining giant Adani continues into 2019
ABC
News, 25
January 2019:
The United Nations has
asked the Australian Government to consider suspending the Adani project in
central Queensland until it gains the support of a group of traditional owners
who are fighting the miner in court.
A UN committee raised
concerns that the Queensland coal project may violate Indigenous rights under
an international convention against racial discrimination if it goes ahead,
giving Australia until April to formally respond.
Meanwhile, a public
interest legal fund backed by former corruption fighter Tony Fitzgerald has
stepped in with financial backing for a federal court challenge to Adani by its
opponents within the Wangan and Jagalingou (W&J) people.
The Grata Fund, which
boasts the former federal court judge as a patron, agreed to pay a
court-ordered $50,000 bond so W&J representatives can appeal a court ruling
upholding a contentious land access deal secured by the miner.
The UN Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination last month wrote to Australia's UN
ambassador to raise concerns that consultation on Adani's Indigenous Land Use
Agreement (ILUA) "might not have been conducted in good faith".
These allegations
"notably" included that members of the W&J native title claim
group were excluded, and the committee was concerned the project "does not
enjoy free, prior and informed consent of all (W&J) representatives"….
UN committee chair
Noureddine Amir in a letter told Australia's UN ambassador Sally Mansfield the
committee was concerned ILUAs could lead to the "extinction of Indigenous
peoples' land titles" in Australia.
Mr Amir said it was
"particularly concerned" by 2017 changes to native title laws to
recognise ILUAs not signed by all native title claimants, "which appears
to be in contradiction" with an earlier landmark Federal Court ruling.
"Accordingly, the
committee is concerned that, if the above allegations are corroborated, the
realisation of the Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project would infringe the
rights of the Wangan and Jagalingou people, rights that are protected under the
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination," Mr Amir said.
The committee gave
Australia until April 8 to outline steps taken to ensure proper consent
"in accordance with Indigenous peoples' own decision-making
mechanisms".
It asked Australia to
"consider suspending" the Adani project until consent was given by
"all Indigenous peoples, including the Wangan and Jagalingou family
council".
It invited Australia to
seek expert advice from the UN experts on Indigenous rights and to
"facilitate dialogue" between the W&J and Adani.
Labels:
Adani Group,
court,
human rights,
law,
mining,
Native Title,
United Nations
Thursday 24 January 2019
Hard right ideology has so blinded the Morrison & Berejiklian Coalition Governments that water sustainability is at risk in yet another part of New South Wales in 2019
This particular coal mining project below has a long history and each step of the way Liberal and National politicians at state and federal level have supported the interests of foreign-owned mining corporations over those of local communities and ignored the need for intergenerational equity.
The O'Farrell & Baird Coalition Governments went to bat for the coal mining industry in New South Wales in 2014 after Wyong Coal Pty Ltd neglected to gain consent from a landowner, the Darkinjung traditional owners:
Wyong Coal are
not, however, the owners of the land the subject of the DA. Rather, the DA
partially covers land owned by the applicant, the Darkinjung Local Aboriginal
Land Council ("Darkinjung"). Moreover, the DA partially covers land
over which a land rights claim has been made by Darkinjung under the Aboriginal
Land Rights Act 1983…..
The proposed development
is State Significant Development under Section 89C of the Environmental
Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) as it is 'development
for the purposes of coal mining', as specified in the State Environmental
Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011. The Minister for
Planning and Infrastructure is the consent authority for the project. However,
the Planning Assessment Commission (PAC) will determine the application under
delegation. In addition to approval under NSW legislation, the project is also
a controlled action requiring assessment and approval under the
Commonwealth's Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. The Commonwealth will
undertake a separate assessment and determination under its legislation.
The Berejilian Coalition Government in 2018 carried the flag for an amended Wyong Coal development application which bypassed the need for Darkinjung LALC consent:
Environmental Defender’s Office
NSW, November
2018:
Wyong Coal Pty Ltd,
which trades as Wyong Areas Joint Coal Venture, and Kores Australia Pty
Limited, are co respondents. KORES Australia Pty Ltd, a fully-owned
subsidiary of Korea Resource Corporation, is the majority shareholder of Wyong
Coal Pty Ltd.
The case is being fought
on four main grounds: climate change, flooding impacts, compensatory water and
risks to water supply for farmers in the region.
Wallarah 2 involves
construction and operation of an underground coal mine over the next 28 years,
until 2046. It would extract five million tonnes of thermal coal a year. The
total greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the mine will be 264+ million
tonnes of CO2.
In approving the
Project, the PAC chose not to take into account emissions which come from the
burning of coal mined at Wallarah 2. Our client argues that the law wasn’t
followed with respect to climate change impacts. The key ground with respect to
greenhouse gas emissions is that the PAC failed to consider an assessment of
downstream emissions from the project. Under the EP&A Act, the PAC was
required to consider the public interest. ACA argues that in 2018, considering
the public interest for projects such as coal mines mandates the consideration
of principles of ecologically sustainable development, particularly
intergenerational equity and the precautionary principle.
In addition, our client argues that the PAC unlawfully
failed to consider the risks of the flood impacts and the potential loss of
water occasioned by the mining project.
The Project, located within the Central Coast water
catchment, would have significant impacts on the Central Coast water supply and
residents in the surrounding areas.
It would permanently alter the landscape, causing
flooding events that will only increase over time as the impacts of climate
change are realised. The PAC approval proposes dealing with these devastating
flooding events by first requiring the mine to try mitigation measures like
putting people’s houses on stilts, relocating homes or building levees. If
those measures don’t work, then the mine would be required to pay the owners of
the properties for the harm. Our client says this simply is not a lawful way to
mitigate harm from flooding. There is no evidence that the mitigation measures
will work or that compensation is an effective way to remedy harm caused by
flooding.
The mine is also likely to impact upon the Central Coast
water supply and access to water for farmers in the surrounding region.
The mine proposes to construct a pipeline to deliver compensatory water to the
Central Coast Council and provide emergency and long-term compensatory water
supplies to farmers if they lose access to water on their properties. If
compensatory water cannot be provided, the mine can agree to buy those farmers
out. The approval does not cover how the pipeline and the compensatory water is
to be provided. ACA argues that the mitigation measures proposed by the PAC in
the conditions of approval are not lawful, primarily because they go beyond the
power of the PAC to deal with environmental impacts of the Project.
The Morrison Coalition Government by the hand of Minister for the Environment, Liberal MP for Durack and former mining industry lawyer Melissa Price, gave the stamp of approval on 18 January 2018:
This is the second time in the space of days NSW residents have learned that Liberal-Nationals politicians have allowed a new coal mine to progress towards operational capability in New South Wales.
Both of these new coal mines Shenhua Watermark and Wallarah 2 represent threats to regional water security.
Wednesday 16 January 2019
Another thing for NSW voters to remember as they cast their ballot in the 2019 state and federal elections
The Shenhua Group appear to have first approached the NSW O'Farrell Liberal-Nationals Coalition Government in 2011-2012 concerning its plans to mine for coal on the Liverpool Plains, a significant NSW foodbowl.
This particular state government was the subject of not one but two investigations by the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) - Operations Spicer (2014) and Credo (2014).
After he was found to have misled the independent commission Premier O'Farrell resigned as Premier in April 2014 and as Liberal MP for Ku-ring-gai in March 2015. Similarly the then NSW Minister for Resources and Energy, Minister for the Central Coast, Special Minister of State and Liberal MP for Terrigal Chris Hartcher resigned as government minister in December 2013 after he was named in ICAC hearings and left the parliament in March 2015.
On 28 January
2015 the NSW Minister for Planning and Liberal MP for Goulburn Pru Goward granted development consent
for a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned Shenhua Group, Shenhua Watermark Coal Pty Ltd, to create and operate an open cut mine on the Liverpool Plains.
On 4 July 2015 then Australian Minister for the Environment and
Liberal MP for Flinders Greg Hunt ticked off on the Abbott Government's environmental approval for Shenhua Watermark Coal to proceed with its mining operation.
Glaringly obvious environmental risks associated with large-scale mining in the region and vocal local community opposition had led to a downsizing of the potential mine site, for which the NSW Berejiklian Liberal-Nationals Coalition Government paid the Shenhua Group $262 million in compensation.
ABC News, 31 July 2015, projected new mine boundaries |
However, in July 2018 the Berejiklian Government renewed Shenhua’s mining exploration licence.
Given that on the successive watches of the O'Farrell, Baird and Berejiklian governments instances of mismanagement and/or corrupt conduct in relation to water sustainability, mining leases and the environment have been reported one would think that an abundance of caution would be exercised.
Instead we now learn
that that Shenhua Watermark Coal has been allowed to vary development consent
conditions for the open cut mine on the edge of the flood plain and, it is looking increasingly like pro coal, former mining industry lawyer, current Australian Minister for
the Environment and Liberal MP for Durack, Melissa
Price, will wave through these variations on behalf of the Morrison
Liberal-Nationals Coalition Government.
Thereby placing even more pressure on the already stressed
surface and underground water resources of the state.
The Liverpool Plains are said to be a significant groundwater source in the New South Wales section of the Murray-Darling Basin.
The Liverpool Plains are said to be a significant groundwater source in the New South Wales section of the Murray-Darling Basin.
Lock The Gate
Alliance, 8
January 2019:
The NSW Government has
allowed mining company Shenhua to alter its development approval for the
controversial Watermark open cut coal mine in the Liverpool Plains, near
Gunnedah, which will enable work on site to begin without key management plans
being approved.
Despite the NSW deal,
Shenhua is still not able to commence work under the Federal environmental
approval until two important management plans, including the crucial Water
Management Plan, have been approved by the Federal Government.
Now local farmers are afraid that the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, may be about to follow the NSW Government lead and vary the approval to allow Shenhua to start pre-construction for their mine without the management plans that were promised.
Liverpool Plains farmer John Hamparsum said, “We’re disgusted that the NSW Government has capitulated to Shenhua yet again, and amended the development consent to let them start pre-construction work without the crucial Water Management Plan in place.
"They have repeatedly stated that the best science would apply to this mine before any work was done, and now they’ve thrown that out the window.
"We’re calling on the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, and New England MP, Barnaby Joyce to now step up and promise that not a sod will be turned on this mine until the full Water Management Plan has been developed and reviewed by independent scientists.
"This mine represents a massive threat to our water resources and our capacity to feed Australia, and if the National Party has any respect for agriculture they need to act now and deliver on their promise that the best science will be applied.
"We won’t accept creeping development of this mine and weakening of the conditions that were put in place to protect our precious groundwater," he said.
Lock the Gate Alliance spokesperson Georgina Woods said, "It’s been four years since the NSW and Federal Governments approved Shenhua’s Watermark coal mine on the Liverpool Plains and there are still no management plans in place.
"Instead of upholding the conditions of Shenhua’s approval, the NSW Government has watered them down so that Shenhua can start work without these crucial plans in place.
"The community has a long memory and will not accept Governments changing the rules to the benefit of foreign-owned mining giants over local farmers," she said.
The former Federal Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, made a strong commitment that a Water Management Plan for the project would not be approved unless the Independent Expert Scientific Committee was satisfied with it.
The amended NSW approval can be accessed here.
Now local farmers are afraid that the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, may be about to follow the NSW Government lead and vary the approval to allow Shenhua to start pre-construction for their mine without the management plans that were promised.
Liverpool Plains farmer John Hamparsum said, “We’re disgusted that the NSW Government has capitulated to Shenhua yet again, and amended the development consent to let them start pre-construction work without the crucial Water Management Plan in place.
"They have repeatedly stated that the best science would apply to this mine before any work was done, and now they’ve thrown that out the window.
"We’re calling on the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, and New England MP, Barnaby Joyce to now step up and promise that not a sod will be turned on this mine until the full Water Management Plan has been developed and reviewed by independent scientists.
"This mine represents a massive threat to our water resources and our capacity to feed Australia, and if the National Party has any respect for agriculture they need to act now and deliver on their promise that the best science will be applied.
"We won’t accept creeping development of this mine and weakening of the conditions that were put in place to protect our precious groundwater," he said.
Lock the Gate Alliance spokesperson Georgina Woods said, "It’s been four years since the NSW and Federal Governments approved Shenhua’s Watermark coal mine on the Liverpool Plains and there are still no management plans in place.
"Instead of upholding the conditions of Shenhua’s approval, the NSW Government has watered them down so that Shenhua can start work without these crucial plans in place.
"The community has a long memory and will not accept Governments changing the rules to the benefit of foreign-owned mining giants over local farmers," she said.
The former Federal Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, made a strong commitment that a Water Management Plan for the project would not be approved unless the Independent Expert Scientific Committee was satisfied with it.
The amended NSW approval can be accessed here.
A legal perspective on the issues surrounding water management by Dr Emma Carmody, Senior Policy and Law Reform Solicitor, EDO NSW and Legal Advisor, Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, is included in the December 2018 issue of Law Society Journal, Managing our scarce water resources: recent developments in the Murray-Darling Basin.
Monday 14 January 2019
The Morrison Government has given permission for oil and gas exploration in NSW coastal waters by a company set up as a tax minimisation ploy
Those Liberal-Nationals MPs and senators preparing to return to Canberra late next month appear determined to annoy NSW voters - especially those who live in coastal communities.
Having wrecked the Murray-Darling freshwater river system that runs through four states, they have now turned their eyes towards the coastal commercial and recreational fishing grounds of New South Wales.
This is how it is playing out........
Asset Energy Pty Ltd holds an 85 per cent interest in Petroleum Exploration Permit PEP11, an offshore petroleum exploration lease covering 4,649 square kilometres in Commonwealth waters off the coast of New South Wales.
Having wrecked the Murray-Darling freshwater river system that runs through four states, they have now turned their eyes towards the coastal commercial and recreational fishing grounds of New South Wales.
This is how it is playing out........
Asset Energy Pty Ltd holds an 85 per cent interest in Petroleum Exploration Permit PEP11, an offshore petroleum exploration lease covering 4,649 square kilometres in Commonwealth waters off the coast of New South Wales.
Asset Energy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Melbourne-based (formerly Perth-based) mining company MEC Resources Ltd’s investee company Advent Energy Ltd.
Bounty Oil and Gas NL is the junior joint venture partner
in PEP11 holding a 15 per cent interest,
Newcastle Herald, 9 January 2019 |
In March 2018 the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and
Environment Management Authority (“NOPSEMA”) gave approval for a survey which
acquired high resolution 2D seismic data over the Baleen prospect,
approximately 30km southeast of Newcastle, which evaluated (amongst other things)
shallow geohazard indications including shallow gas accumulations that can
affect future potential gas drilling operations.
NOPSEMA falls within the portfolio of Australian Minister for Resources and Northern Australia & Nationals Senator for Queensland, Matt Canavan.
That particular survey
has been completed and on New Year's Eve 2018 MEC Resources informed the Australian Stock Exchange that it now intends
to do 3D seismic mapping in the vicinity of the potential test drill site at the
earliest opportunity.
Underwater seismic testing involves continuous seismic airgun blasts approximately every 2-3 seconds for 24 hours continuously, for days or weeks at a time. That is, such testing creates compressed air streams or focused sonic waves - in simple language, loud booms - towards the ocean floor in order to gauge the depth, location and structure of the oil or gas resources. The sounds of which can travel many thousands of square kilometres and which are known to have a negative effect on marine ecosystems.
Underwater seismic testing involves continuous seismic airgun blasts approximately every 2-3 seconds for 24 hours continuously, for days or weeks at a time. That is, such testing creates compressed air streams or focused sonic waves - in simple language, loud booms - towards the ocean floor in order to gauge the depth, location and structure of the oil or gas resources. The sounds of which can travel many thousands of square kilometres and which are known to have a negative effect on marine ecosystems.
Previous to this, on 15 May 2018 the NSW
Parliament had called on the federal government to suspend Asset Energy’s permit to
conduct seismic testing off the coast of Newcastle, with the NSW Minister for Resources
and Energy & Liberal Party Member of the Legislative Council Don Harwin expressing a lack of
confidence in Australia’s current offshore mining regulations.
The Morrison
Coalition Government in Canberra appears to be ignoring NSW Government and community concerns. Being more concerned itself with offering tax free investment opportunities to the market. 1
It is worth noting that any
significant Advent Energy/Asset Energy drilling rig (left) mishap has the potential for an uncontrolled release
of untreated oil into coastal waters.
It is reportedly intended that one or more exploration drilling rigs should be in place sometime in 2020.
MEC Resources (formerly MEC Strategic Ltd) is a registered corporation which only been in existence for the last thirteen years and for the last three years there has been a bitter rift between the board and certain shareholders involving repeated calls for removal of the entire board, with the last call for a spill occurring in November 2018. The company was also involved in a dispute with a former managing director, as well litigation involving a $295,000 loan.
One of the shareholder bones of contention appears to be the cost of exploration in PEP11. On 31 October 2018 MEC Resources informed the stock exchange that a cost reduction plan remains in place to ensure all costs are reduced wherever possible.
Questions raised about the rigour of offshore mining regulations covering PEP11 and an oil & gas exploration company determined to cut costs. What could possibly go wrong?
Concerned readers can sign Stop Seismic Testing Newcastle's change.org petition to Minister Canavan and NOPSEMA here.
Footnotes
1. www.mecresources.com.au, Tax Advanatges, retrieved
10 January 2018:
MEC is a registered
Pooled Development Fund (PDF). PDF shareholders pay no capital gains tax on the
sale of their PDF shares. Investors who receive dividends will also be exempt
from income tax on dividends.
This can be particularly
attractive to both traders and investors, since any profits derived from trades
or investments are tax-free or low tax. The Pooled Development Fund Programme
was established by the Federal Government to develop the market for patient
venture capital for growing small and medium enterprises and to provide a
concessional tax regime to encourage such investments. Any capital losses on
the sale of PDF’s are not deductable.
To encourage investors,
the government offers tax benefits to both the PDF and its shareholders as
follows:
capital
gains made by PDF shareholders are not taxable,
shareholders
can elect to treat dividends paid by a PDF as tax free,......
PDF’s tend to invest in
a portfolio of growing companies, thereby potentially reducing investors’ risk
through diversification. Investee companies have the potential to become listed
companies in their own right, which has the possibility of providing investors
with attractive returns.
This is not a complete
list of the taxation issues surrounding Pooled Development Funds. For further
information please contact AusIndustry.
See Pooled Development FundsAct 1992 as amended up to September 2018.
Wednesday 9 January 2019
Adani caught red handed breaking the rules - again
In 2017 the foreign multinational, the Adani Group, was found to have released heavily polluted water into coastal wetlands and the ocean around the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area - then lied about it.
Last Sunday it was reported to again be ignoring mining and environmental regulations and very predictably appears to be lying about its actions.
ABC
News, 30
December 2018:
Mining firm Adani has
unwittingly provided "persuasive" evidence for a Queensland
Government investigation into allegedly illegal works on its Carmichael mine
site, environmental lawyers say.
The evidence includes
specifications of groundwater bores registered by Adani on a government
website, which Queensland's Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) said could
only be used for prohibited dewatering operations, and not for monitoring as
Adani has claimed.
Adani has also confirmed
it cleared 5.8 hectares of land when correcting an "administrative
error" in its reporting to government, an action the EDO branded unlawful.
A spokeswoman for Adani
insisted the company had acted in accordance with its environmental approvals,
had not been dewatering for mining operations, and had "cooperated with
both relevant State and Commonwealth departments regarding these
allegations".
Satellite and drone
evidence of drilling was presented to DES by the EDO on behalf of its client,
environmental group Coast and Country.
Coast and Country
spokesman Derec Davies said the evidence had resulted in an official
investigation by the Queensland Government.
"Adani have been
caught red handed breaking the law, and then lying about it within official
documents," he said.
Dewatering bores are
used by miners to prepare for open cut and underground operations.
Conservationists have
repeatedly warned that Adani's dewatering plans could threaten the nationally
important Doongmabulla Springs.
An Adani spokeswoman
said the company had drilled the bores "to take geological samples and
monitor underground water levels", which she said was permitted as a stage
one activity under its licence.
However, an expert has
told the ABC the registrations for five of the bores that appear on a
Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy website bear the hallmarks of
dewatering bores, not monitoring bores.
They show the bores are
constructed with steel rather than plastic casing, were considerably thicker
than Adani's registered groundwater monitoring bores and ran deeper at 135 to
273 metres.
The bore reports did not
include the baseline underground water level or the elevation of each bore,
information considered critical for monitoring.
The five registered
bores are also ascribed the abbreviation "DWB", commonly used for
dewatering bores, instead of "GMB", commonly used for groundwater
monitoring bores.
Labels:
Adani Group,
coal,
environmental vandalism,
Great Barrier Reef,
mining
Tuesday 8 January 2019
Why proposed offshore mining in the Great Australian Bight matters to all of Australia
The Advertiser, 18 January 2015 |
BP p.l.c. is a British multinational oil and
gas company headquartered in London, UK.
It operates
in this country as BP Australia and Chevron.
On 11 October
2016 this multinational corporation announced it was not proceeding with its
exploration drilling programme in the Great
Australian Bight (GAB), offshore South Australia, in the foreseeable future.
It still owns
two oil/gas exploration leases in the GAB.
The Norwegian
multinational Equinor formerly Statoil Petroleum also holds two leases
in the same area and intends to drill an exploratory well in one of them by
October this year.
Last year in
October the Morrison Coalition Government
offered a new GAB acreage S18-1
for lease, with bids closing on 21 March 2019.
So it is well
to remember how Big Oil views Australia…….
Coastal towns would
benefit from an oil spill in the pristine Great Australian Bight because the
clean up would boost their economies, energy giant BP has claimed as part of
its controversial bid to drill in the sensitive marine zone.
BP, which has since withdrawn
the drilling plan, also told a federal government agency that a diesel spill
would be considered “socially acceptable”.
BP made the statements
in an environment plan submitted to the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and
Environmental Management Authority in March 2016.
The company had been
seeking to drill two wells off the South Australian coast, raising fears of an
environmental disaster akin to BP's 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in
the Gulf of Mexico.
Documents obtained under
Freedom of Information laws, first
published by London-based website Climate Home News, showed the
government authority had identified serious shortcomings with BPs environment
plan.
In a letter to BP, the
authority said a number of statements should be removed or supported by
analysis. They included BP's claim that “in most instances, the increased
activity associated with cleanup operations will be a welcome boost to local
economies”.
BP also claimed it had
not identified any social impacts arising from the event of a diesel spill and
“since there are no unresolved stakeholder concerns ... BP interprets this
event to be socially acceptable”.
In 2016, BP released
modelling showing a spill could hit land as far away as New South
Wales. The letters revealed that BP’s “worst case shoreline oiling scenario
predicts oiling of 650km coastline at 125 days after the spill, increasing to
750km after 300 days”. Nopsema had raised concerns over BP’s ability to
mobilise the people and equipment needed to clean up such a vast expanse of
coast.
BACKGROUND
Greenpeace, Crude Intentions: Exposing the risks of drilling and spilling in the Great Australian Bight [48 page PDF]
ABC
News, 14
November 2018:
If an oil spill happened
in the Great Australian Bight, it could reach as far east as Port Macquarie's
beaches, two thirds of the way up the New South Wales coast, according to a
leaked draft environment plan obtained by the ABC.
Under a "worst
credible case discharge" scenario, more than 10 grams of oil per square
metre could wash up on some of Australia's coasts, according to the document
authored by Norwegian oil company Equinor.
Maps show coastal areas
that could potentially be impacted, from above Sydney to Albany in Western
Australia.
Environmental group
Greenpeace, which obtained the leaked draft Oil Pollution Emergency Plan, said
it was the first time modelling had shown an oil spill could reach so far....
BACKGROUND
Greenpeace, Crude Intentions: Exposing the risks of drilling and spilling in the Great Australian Bight [48 page PDF]
Tuesday 1 January 2019
While North Coast Voices was on its annual break….
On Christmas
Eve the Morrison Government released the following:
By the time a
reader clicks on this link, http://epbcnotices.environment.gov.au/publicnoticesreferrals/,
there will
only be 8-9 days left to submit comments.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In what they
are now trying to pass off as an attempt at humour the Liberal National Party of Australia posted this petty, divisive Christmas
meme on their Facebook page.
LNP’s removal of this meme did little to stop the negative response on social media.
Tone deaf and abysmally stupid was the general consensus.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The
Guardian, 26
December 2018:
A man has been shot by
police in New South Wales after he allegedly lunged at officers with
a knife, and has been taken to hospital in a critical condition.
Police were called to a
home in Waterview Heights, west of Grafton, in the early hours of Wednesday
morning following concern for the 36-year-old’s welfare.
Police said he lunged at
officers with the knife upon their arrival.
The man was flown to
Gold Coast University hospital in a critical condition.
A critical incident team
will investigate the circumstances of the incident.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stock market volatility continued over
the Christmas break
as President Donald Trump tweets further personal attacks on the US Federal Reserve
and its personnel. Mr
Trump's latest attack heightened fears about the economy being destabilised by
a man who wants control over the Fed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another young child died whilst being
held in custody of US Customs and Border Protection. Eight year-old Felix Alonzo-Gomez died on December 25th after a medical diagnosis of
“common cold” proved inaccurate. The boy's death follows that of 7 year old Jakelin Caal Maquin, 7, also of Guatemala, who died in Border patrol custody earlier this month.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SBS News, 26 December 2018:
The Coalition could be
at risk of losing 24 seats at the next federal election, including those of six
frontbenchers, according to a Newspoll quarterly analysis. The analysis,
published in The Australian, reveals the government has failed to claw back
electoral ground from Labor in both regional and metropolitan seats. While
Prime Minister Scott Morrison remains ahead of Bill Shorten as preferred
leader, his satisfaction ratings have dropped into the negatives.
According to this
Newspoll survey analysis covering 25 October to 9 December 2018, 45% of voters over
50 years of age dissatisfied with Australian Prime Minster Scott Morrison’s
performance.
On a
two-party preferred basis, polling stands at Labor 53 and Lib-Nats Coalition
47.
Rumours of an
early March election, to be called just after Australia Day, persist according
to The
Guardian.
@nobby15 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@Quad_Finn, 27 December 2018:
Japan has announced its
first commercial whale hunt since leaving the IWC. The hunt will take place in
July 2019 and will target Endangered Sei whales along with Minke whales &
Bryde’s whales. It is not known how many whales of each species Japan intends
to kill each season.
On Thursday 27 December 2018 Marble Bar in the Pilbarra, Western Australia experienced it's hottest day on record reaching 49.3C at 3.40pm.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Thursday 27 December 2018 Marble Bar in the Pilbarra, Western Australia experienced it's hottest day on record reaching 49.3C at 3.40pm.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Daily Examiner, 28 December 2018, p.1:
The $300,000 fine issued
to Clarence Valley Council by the NSW Land and Environment Court last week for
the destruction of a rare Aboriginal object in Grafton will be reinvested into
the area, rather than go back into State Government revenue coffers.
The court’s ruling
handed down on December 21 included a series of detailed orders as part of the penalty
that includes several Clarence-based directives that were reached after
consultation with the Local Aboriginal Lands Councils and community members.
It is believed this case
is the first of its kind to be ordered with this directive.
The council was
prosecuted for the unlawful maiming and removal of a red/black bean scar tree
that occurred in 2013 and 2016. The tree, which stood on the corner of Breimba
and Dovedale streets in Grafton and was a surviving original specimen from the
flood plain before white settlement, was a registered culturally modified
object under the Aboriginal Site Register.
The council will pay the
fine amount of $300,000 to the Grafton Ngerrie Local Aboriginal Land Council
which will be applied to remediation actions.
These include a
feasibility study to establish a Keeping Place in the Grafton area for
Aboriginal cultural heritage items including long-term storage for the scar
tree remnants.
It will also provide
research funding into local Aboriginal cultural heritage for educational
purposes including training of council field staff and senior management.
The money will also be
used to establish a permanent exhibition and fund a series of one-day Clarence
Valley Healing Festivals to be held in various Clarence Valley Aboriginal
communities throughout 2019 and 2020.
The council was also
ordered to, at its own expense, publish a notice in several newspapers
including The Sydney Morning Herald, Koori Mail and The Daily
Examiner and on the council’s website and Facebook pages.
Additional costs include
a $48,000 legal bill which will bring the total costs to the council to more
than $350,000.
The council was
convicted of the offence against s 86(1) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act
1974 of harming an object that it knew was an Aboriginal object.
The original fine was
$400,000 but an early plea of guilty made council eligible for a 25 per cent
discount on the penalty. The council potentially faced a penalty of up to
$1.1million for its actions.
Council general manager
Ashley Lindsay said the council agreed it had done the wrong thing by removing
the scar tree and accepted the court’s decision.
“As the mayor and I have
said previously, we acknowledge the importance of the scar tree to our
Aboriginal community and are deeply sorry for the hurt and sense of loss the
removal of the tree has caused,” Mr Lindsay said.
“The tree’s destruction
does not represent who we are or who we strive to be as an organisation.
“This council values its
connections with the Aboriginal community and I genuinely believe we generally
work well together.
“But on this occasion we
did the wrong thing and for that we apologise.”
BACKGROUND
Chief
Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Clarence Valley
Council [2018] NSWLEC 205 (21 December 2018), excerpt:
A scar tree is harmed
1. Until May 2016, a
culturally modified tree stood in Grafton, on the corner of Breimba and
Dovedale Streets. The tree was either a Red Bean or Black Bean tree. It had a
bifurcated trunk with scarring on two parts of it. The larger scar faced a
south westerly direction and was approximately 1.4m tall and 40cm wide. The
smaller scar faced a westerly direction and was higher up the trunk.
2. Various reasons for
the scarring have been passed down by the knowledge holders to local Aboriginal
people. Aboriginal elders have said that the scar tree is culturally
significant to the local Gumbaynggirr people and that the scarring was made
using a stone axe either as a directional marker directing visitors to nearby
Fisher Park, or for ceremonial purposes in connection with other sites in the
area, or by someone wanting to make a shield.
3. In 1995, the scar
tree was registered as a culturally modified tree on the Aboriginal Site
Register. In 2005, the information about the scar tree was transferred from the
Aboriginal Site Register to the Aboriginal Heritage Information Management
System (“AHIMS”) maintained by the Office of Environment and Heritage (“OEH”).
The scar tree was thereby identified as an Aboriginal object for the purposes
of the National
Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (“NPW Act”). Under s 86(1) of the NPW Act,
it is an offence for a person to harm or desecrate an object that the person
knows is an Aboriginal object.
4. The local government
authority for Grafton and the Clarence Valley, Clarence Valley
Council (“the Council”), lopped the crown of the scar tree in July
2013. The Council was issued with and paid a penalty notice for harming an
Aboriginal object, in breach of s 86(2) of the NPW Act.
5. The lopping of the
scar tree exacerbated the decline in the health of the tree. In 2015, the
Council included the scar tree on the Council’s annual stump grinding list for
removal of the tree. On 19 May 2016, the Council completely removed the scar
tree. The scar tree was cut into four pieces, including a cut through the lower
scar. Remnants of the scar tree were taken to the Council’s nursery in Grafton.
On 20 May 2016, the Council realised what it had done and self-reported to the
OEH that, in completely removing the scar tree, it had harmed an Aboriginal
object in breach of s 86(1) of NPW Act.
6. On 27 May 2016, the
OEH after an investigation of the offence, seized the remnants of the scar tree
pursuant to s 156B(4) of the NPW Act. On 9 June 2016, the remnants of the scar
tree were relocated to the National Parks and Wildlife Service’s premises at
South Grafton, where they remain today.
Full judgment
is here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Perth
Now, 30
December 2018:
Four months after losing
the leadership spill he instigated, Peter Dutton has broken his silence in an
extraordinary spray at Malcolm Turnbull.
Calling the deposed
prime minister spiteful and indecisive, the Home Affairs Minister told
Brisbane's The Sunday Mail that Mr Turnbull had brought about his own downfall
through his lack of political nous.
"Malcolm had a plan
to become Prime Minister but no plan to be Prime Minister," was Mr
Dutton's damning evaluation.
He also criticised the
former leader for actions he saw as undermining the Morrison government.
"I am the first to
defend the legacy of the Turnbull government. Malcolm was strong on economic
management, borders and national security, but Malcolm will trash his own
legacy if he believes his position is strengthened by seeing us lose under
Scott (Morrison),'' Mr Dutton said.
He excoriated Mr
Turnbull for not supporting the Liberal Party's candidate in his old seat of
Wentworth.
"Walking away from
(his seat of) Wentworth and not working to have (Liberal Wentworth candidate)
Dave Sharma elected was worse than any behaviour we saw even under (former
Labor prime minister Kevin) Rudd."
Stating emphatically
that he wasn't a stalking horse for former leader Tony Abbott or a right wing
"Bible basher", Mr Dutton said Mr Turnbull's poor management had lost
the Libs 15 seats in the 2016 election, leaving the government "with a
one-seat majority which just made the parliament unmanageable. We were
paralysed.".....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unanswered
questions at the start of 2019.
The last federal general election was on 2 July
2016. A year later and the Federal Liberal Party
was still $3,711,956 in debt.
Has the party managed to pay down this debt and how
much money have they received as political donations since 1 July 2017?
One might
safely assume that sacked prime minister Malcolm Bligh Turnbull will not be personally
donating $1,750,000 to the Liberal Party this time around and one wonders if
the banks were as generous with their donations once the Royal Commission began
requesting their presence at public hearings.
This is the last available donor list. Will the corporations on this list still back the Liberal Party so strongly?
This is the last available donor list. Will the corporations on this list still back the Liberal Party so strongly?
List of donors to the Liber... by on Scribd
Labels:
coastal development,
mining,
news,
politics,
Social media
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)