 |
| Freshwater section of the Clarence River Photo: The Daily Examiner, 31 August 2019 |
A proposal to dam the headwaters of the Clarence River would be a “bloody disaster”, says a grazier whose family has lived on the river since 1880. Trevor Wingfield said the flow in the river at his property at Fine Flower was the worst he had seen since the 1990-94 drought.
“I can drive across the river on my motorbike and the water doesn’t even cover the tyres on the bike,” he said.
“The ABC came out to shoot some footage to use on the Country Hour and I was able to ride my motorbike along the river and barely wet the wheels.
“Normally there would be three to four foot of water in the river at this time of the year.” Mr Wingfield rates the current water flows as worse than the 1990s drought.
“It took from 1990 to ’94 for the flows in the river to get so low. This time it’s only been about 14 months.”
He said taking any water out of the system during drought times would be disastrous and farmers along the Clarence would fight it.
“If they try anything, they’ve got a big fight on their hands,” he said. “I’ve got a heap of women from around here behind me and they’re not going to take a backward step.
“I call this my river. I was reared on it and my family has seen all that’s happened on it since the 1880s.
“The Aboriginals told my grandparents things about this river no-one knows now. There’s nothing anyone can tell me about the Clarence River.”
Clarence Valley Mayor Jim Simmons was also adamant no water would be leaving the Clarence for a long time.
Cr Simmons said not one of the Southern Downs, Toowoomba, Western Downs and Tenterfield Shire councils had contacted the Clarence Valley about a proposal to pipe water inland from the Clarence headwaters.
“It’s a little surprising they’ve gone so far down the track without involving us,” Cr Simmons said.
“Neither State Government has contacted us either.”
He said the council would defend the region against any attempts to take water out of the Clarence catchment.
“The attitude here is pretty strongly against it and if there was to be any change in policy we would have to thoroughly consult the community,” he said.
Cr Simmons said people who saw the tidal reaches of the Clarence River at Grafton or in the Lower Clarence would have a different view if they saw it north of Copmanhurst.
“They would see some pretty shallow flows in the river,” he said.
He said the Clarence Valley’s water supply came from the Nymboida River and the Shannon Creek Dam, which supplies water to the Clarence Valley and Coffs Harbour.
Cr Simmons said the Valley was now enjoying the benefits of planning for the future, which other areas perhaps needed to emulate.
“The problem for these councils is this plan won’t help them now,” Cr Simmons said.
“The lead time in consultation and planning, plus the construction of the infrastructure that would include water-conveying infrastructure as well as any dams will take a long time.”
Cr Simmons said the Clarence catchment would need all the water unless there was good rain soon.
“We were out opening a bridge on the Old Glen Innes Rd recently and I saw the creek bed was completely dry,” he said. “We might not be in a position to be giving up any of our water pretty soon.”
The man who kicked off the Not ADrop campaign to keep the Clarence River flowing, former Daily Examiner editor Peter Ellem, said his position has not changed since those days.
Mr Ellem, a Clarence Valley councillor, said he preferred to leave commentary on the latest developments to the Mayor, but was on record opposing any river diversion proposals.
The Clarence Valley’s drinking water supplies look good for now, with the Nymboida River flow of 236 ML/day feeding consumption of 18.17 ML/day.
The Shannon Creek Dam is at 97 per cent capacity.
The Daily Examiner, 31 August 2019, p.18:
FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK
BILL NORTH Editor
Take your gloves off and dig your heels into the muddy (edit: crystal-clear rocky) banks of the Clarence.
We’re going in for round two of the Not a Drop: Keep the Clarence Mighty campaign and this one could be an epic battle for the ages.
Views on how best to manage water vary greatly depending on whether you watch sunrises over sea or sunsets over dusty plains.
Those inland dwellers living in the rain shadow of the Great Dividing Range and sparse expanses beyond are in the grips of despair, pondering ways to manufacture reliable water supplies to ensure their longevity.
Southern Downs councillors voted in favour of submitting a project to divert water from the upper reaches of the Clarence River west as top priority in a list of significant projects to the Federal Government.
They see a seven per cent water allocation with large volumes flowing out to sea as a waste.
We know natural river flows are imperative to sustain fish stocks that drive our tourism industry in the upper and lower catchment, as well as commercial viability in the estuary.
They perceive that piping water inland will have little impact on coastal communities while rescuing the economic viability of Australia’s food basket.
We know a dam would have a disastrous impact on farmers living downstream in a Valley where primary production – which includes beef, sugar cane, aquaculture, prawn trawling, fishing, macadamias and blueberries – is worth almost $500 million to its annual economy.
The Southern Downs region incorporates councils from Toowoomba, Western Downs and Southern Downs in Queensland as well as Tenterfield Shire in NSW and has “a major deficit in access to secure water supplies for urban consumption and for agriculture”, according to Toowoomba Mayor Paul Antonio.
“New sources of water can include diversion from the headwaters of the Clarence River basin via the Maryland River,” Cr Antonio said.
“Nothing short of a visionary, nation-building initiative led by the Commonwealth will solve this problem.”
When the Darling Downs was last gripped in severe drought in 2006, then-editor of The Daily Examiner Peter Ellem deflected calls for water diversion in true Darryl Kerrigan fashion: “Tell ’em up there in Toowoomba they’re dreamin’,” he said at the time.
This publication launched the Not a Drop: Keep the Clarence Mighty campaign and successfully resisted the federal push to investigate options.
As droughts get harsher the waves of pressure inevitably become stronger and a government desperate to find solutions to combat the climate disaster may turn to drastic measures.
If we have to go to war with the Federal Government again, the Clarence River could become little more than a red trickle after that bloodbath.
As we’ve seen with Adani and other coal-mining projects in Queensland, not even the Great Barrier Reef – a World Heritage area with a tourism industry worth $6.4 billion a year – can stand in the way when this Government sets its mind to something.
At a meet-the-candidates forum for the state election earlier this year, all five Clarence candidates stood firm against the idea of sharing our water.
It’s that kind of solidarity that will be needed in the fight to keep our pristine waters unsullied. As the leading and most trusted local media source, we reach a greater audience in the Clarence Valley than anyone else and are your most effective mouthpiece.
What do you think about ideas to divert water west? Or proposals to build dams, mines and ports in our river system?
Join the debate, send an email to newsroom@dailyexaminer.com.au and have your say as we fight protect our most valuable asset: water.
