Ken Nicholl from Iluka Landcare transferred this little koala to a koala food tree next door.
Showing posts with label protected species. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protected species. Show all posts
Saturday 25 February 2017
"Blinky Bill" visits a couple of Iluka residents in February 2017
Delightful video and photograph of a koala in Spenser Street, Iluka NSW, by Lisa Shaw from the Green Room café at Iluka.
Ken Nicholl from Iluka Landcare transferred this little koala to a koala food tree next door.
An Iluka resident tells me that this koala was approximately 1km from the proposed subdivision of Lot 99 Hickey Street, Iluka, a parcel of land which also reportedly contains koala food trees.
Tuesday 21 February 2017
Of the 2,145 species studied forty-seven per cent of land-based animals and over twenty-three per cent of threatened birds may have already been negatively impacted by climate change
NATURE.COM, Nature Climate Change, Letter, abstract, 13 February 2017:
Species’ traits influenced their response to recent climate change
Michela Pacifici, Piero Visconti, Stuart H. M. Butchart, James E. M. Watson, Francesca M. Cassola & Carlo Rondinini
Although it is widely accepted that future climatic change—if unabated—is likely to have major impacts on biodiversity1, 2, few studies have attempted to quantify the number of species whose populations have already been impacted by climate change3, 4. Using a systematic review of published literature, we identified mammals and birds for which there is evidence that they have already been impacted by climate change. We modelled the relationships between observed responses and intrinsic (for example, body mass) and spatial traits (for example, temperature seasonality within the geographic range). Using this model, we estimated that 47% of terrestrial non-volant threatened mammals (out of 873 species) and 23.4% of threatened birds (out of 1,272 species) may have already been negatively impacted by climate change in at least part of their distribution. Our results suggest that populations of large numbers of threatened species are likely to be already affected by climate change, and that conservation managers, planners and policy makers must take this into account in efforts to safeguard the future of biodiversity.
UPDATE
Climate Home, 21 February 2017:
Seaweeds, invertebrates, fish and giant, ethereal kelp jungles are among a group of more than one hundred species that are being driven towards extinction by warming waters around Tasmania, an Australian senate inquiry has heard.
Neville Barrett, a research fellow at the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies in Hobart, where the hearing was held, told the Environment and Communications References Committee that the waters around Tasmania were a global hotspot for warming.
“I mentioned that there were 100 or more species in general of kelps and endemic fishes and things that will probably disappear over the coming century, certainly by the turn of the next century under the current bottom end of predictions of climate change,” he told Climate Home after his appearance.
“There’s a whole lot of species on the southern end of Australia that are as far south as they can currently go and some of them are already pushed to their upper thermal limit, as far as summer temperatures will go.”
Beyond Tasmania, there is no major landmass until Antarctica, meaning many species have “nowhere else to go”, said Barrett.
One such species is the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, the last stands of which Climate Home reported had been lost from Tasmania’s east coast in 2016.
Friday 17 February 2017
North Coast marine species protection record of NSW Coalition Government a very sad affair in 2017
One dead Great White Shark and 30 dead in non-target/ innocuous marine species. The NSW Coalition Government has a worse by-catch kill rate than many super trawlers.
Report period: 8 Jan 2017 – 7 Feb 2017
Over 8 Jan – 7 Feb 2017 nets were deployed on 27–31 days at five beaches and each checked 28-39 times (Table 1). The contractors are required to check the mesh nets twice a day, but if the weather or bar conditions prevent safe access, then fewer checks are made.
Table 1: The number of days that mesh nets were deployed at each beach, and the number of times each mesh net was checked over 8 Jan - 7 Feb 2017.
Beach
|
Number of days net deployed
|
Number of time net checked
|
Seven Mile, Lennox Head
|
27
|
28
|
Sharpes, Ballina
|
27
|
28
|
Shelly, Ballina
|
27
|
29
|
Lighthouse, Ballina
|
27
|
29
|
Main, Evans Head
|
31
|
39
|
During the second month, 72 individuals across 11 species were caught in the mesh nets
56% were released
44% were deceased and had tissue samples retained for analyses (Table 2).
of the three target shark species (White, Tiger and Bull Sharks), one White Shark was caught in the mesh nets at Sharpes Beach; the animal was deceased and retained for analysis.
Table 2: The numbers of each species caught in the mesh nets that were alive and released, or dead at each beach.
Beach
|
Species
|
Number alive
|
Number dead
|
Seven Mile, Lennox Head
|
Cownose ray
|
1
|
0
|
Loggerhead turtle
|
1
|
0
| |
Manta ray
|
0
|
1
| |
Whitespotted guitar fish
|
1
|
0
| |
Sharpes, Ballina
|
Cownose ray
|
1
|
0
|
Great hammerhead shark
|
0
|
2
| |
White shark
|
0
|
1
| |
Green turtle
|
0
|
1
| |
Manta ray
|
2
|
3
| |
Shelly, Ballina
|
Bottlenose dolphin
|
0
|
1
|
Cownose ray
|
3
|
2
| |
Great hammerhead shark
|
0
|
1
| |
Manta ray
|
0
|
1
| |
Spotted eagle ray
|
3
|
0
| |
Lighthouse, Ballina
|
Cownose ray
|
3
|
2
|
Great hammerhead shark
|
0
|
4
| |
Ocellated eagle ray
|
1
|
0
| |
Spotted eagle ray
|
1
|
0
| |
Main, Evans Head
|
Cownose ray
|
17
|
7
|
Great hammerhead shark
|
0
|
3
| |
Loggerhead turtle
|
0
|
1
| |
Manta ray
|
0
|
1
| |
Ocellated eagle ray
|
1
|
1
| |
Spinner shark
|
1
|
0
| |
Spotted eagle ray
|
4
|
0
| |
Total
|
40
|
32
|
Sunday 22 January 2017
And property developers try to say that Iluka in the Clarence Valley NSW has no koala population
Clarence Valley Council, media release, 18 January 2017:
Koala avoids nasty shock
On the way to work one morning in early January, Iluka resident Mark Starkey was shocked to see a koala high up an electricity pole. Koalas usually prefer good quality habitat with plenty of their favourite food trees.
Thanks to Mark, the koala avoided serious injury. ‘I rang the energy company who temporarily disconnected the power and relocated the animal to nearby bushland’, he said.
Mark was just one of the residents in the areas of Iluka, Woombah and Ashby to receive a brochure from Council detailing ways to help koalas by protecting native bushland, containing dogs, and ways to recognise koala food trees. The brochure also asked residents to ring and report koala sightings. Mark then contacted Council with the details of the koala.
The biggest threats to koalas in our area are loss of food and shelter trees, vehicle strike and dog attacks. Even though there are 100’s of different types of Eucalypts, koalas tend to only eat one or a few species. So even a single tree in your backyard can be important to koalas and other wildlife.
There’s more information about koalas in the Clarence on our website www.clarence.nsw.gov.au (search ‘koala’).
If you’d like a copy of the brochure or if you’ve seen koalas in your area, please ring Council on 66430200.
Release ends.
Koala in bushland at Frazer's Reef, Iluka, in May 2016 at
Wednesday 7 December 2016
Dutch-owned 'super' trawler "Geelong Star" has left Australian waters and will not be returning
Save Our Marine Life is celebrating the fact that the Dutch-owned factory trawler Geelong Star has left Australian waters and will not be returning.
The trawler has removed its Australian flag of convenience and been reflagged as Dutch – in the process its old name KW 172 Dirk Dirk has been re-instated.
ABC News reported on 24 November 2016 that:
The ship's departure came just before Labor and Greens members on a Senate committee recommended all mid-water trawlers be banned from fishing in Australian waters.
The committee had been investigating the environmental, social and economic impacts of super trawlers.
In 2012, ships known as super trawlers were prohibited from fishing in Australian waters, but the ban only applied to vessels over 130 metres, and not the Geelong Star, which is 95 metres.
Labor and Greens committee members also urged the Federal Government to appoint a National Recreational Fishing Council.
The report said public confidence in the management of Australia's fisheries needed to be enhanced, and it suggested the Australian Fisheries Management Authority publish information about fishing activity in the Small Pelagic Fishery regularly, such as bycatch quantities.
Liberal Senators Jonathon Duniam and David Bushby dissented from the recommendations, and said the Government was "committed to maintaining a balanced and science-based approach to all decisions regarding access to Commonwealth fisheries".
The Senate Standing Committees on Environment
and Communications report into the Environmental, social and economic
impacts of large-capacity fishing vessels commonly known as 'Supertrawlers'
operating in Australia's marine jurisdiction was published in November 2016.
The Committee
report stated:
1.46 The FV Geelong Star commenced
fishing in the SPF on 2 April 2015.40 The Geelong Star is
a 3181 tonne factory freezer vessel with a hold capacity of 1061 tonnes. At
95.18 metres, the Geelong Star is the longest fishing vessel
in the AFZ.41
1.47 The operation of the Geelong
Star in the SPF is a joint enterprise between Seafish Tasmania and
Dutch company Parlevliet & Van der Plas BV and its Australian subsidiary,
Seafish Tasmania Pelagic Pty Ltd.42 The fish caught by the Geelong
Star is shipped to export markets, usually in West Africa.43
1.48 AFMA was notified that Seafish
Tasmania had nominated the Geelong Star to fish its
concessions in the SPF on 12 February 2015. Following registration of the Geelong
Star as an Australian-flagged boat by the Australian Maritime Safety
Authority,44 AFMA confirmed that the vessel met its
requirements. The Geelong Star commenced fishing in the SPF on
2 April 2015. As the Geelong Star is less than 130 metres in
length, it is not affected by the ban introduced by the government in April
2015….
1.50 Since it commenced operating, AFMA
has initiated various regulatory measures in response to mortalities of
protected species caused by the operations of the Geelong Star.
Various stakeholders are also concerned about the effect of the trawler's
operations on other commercial fishing operations and recreational fishing
activities. Both the fishing activities of the Geelong Star and
the regulatory approach taken by AFMA have attracted controversy.
1.51 Environmental non-government
organisations expressed opposition to the activities of the Geelong
Star and the approach taken to managing the SPF. Environment Tasmania
and the Australian Marine Conservation Society both called on the government to
'enact a permanent ban on the operation of factory freezer trawlers in the
Small Pelagic Fishery'.45 The Conservation Council SA provided
a list of recommendations regarding potential localised depletion, adverse
environmental effects, how to minimise impacts on protected species and the
presence of AFMA observers on the vessel. The Conservation Council SA called
for vessels such as the Geelong Star to be banned from the
fishery 'until management strategies', including the recommendations outlined
in its submission, 'are in place to effectively minimise impacts on protected
species'.46
1.52 Recreational fishing interests are
another key stakeholder group. Submitters in this group expressed concern about
potential repercussions for the Australian recreational fishing sector from the
operations of the Geelong Star. The Australian Recreational Fishing
Foundation (ARFF) called for a moratorium on 'industry scale' fishing in areas
of the SPF that are of concern to the recreational fishing sector. The ARFF
argued that this moratorium should remain in place 'until a comprehensive
assessment has been conducted to determine whether industrial scale fishing of
the SPF is the highest and best use of the SPF, in our nation's interest and
whether the small pelagic fishery should be commercially fished at all'.47
1.53 Seafish Tasmania, the operator of
the Geelong Star, argued that the use of a factory freezer trawler
such as the Geelong Star is the only way that operations in
the SPF can be commercially viable. Seafish Tasmania also advised that, over 11
years, it has worked within the regulatory arrangements to assist in developing
management plans and strategies 'that support the sustainable management of the
SPF'.48 Seafish Tasmania added:
The current management regime in the
SPF, and in particular the conditions applied to the Geelong Star,
are extremely strict. Clearly, they are designed
to provide a high degree of public
confidence that the operations of the vessel are being closely monitored and
managed.49
1.54 Seafish Tasmania concluded:
The company has made substantial
investments in supporting scientific surveys and more recently in bringing
freezer trawlers from Europe to catch our quota and to produce high quality
fish for human consumption. It is time to let us get on with the job of
catching our quota.50
1.55 Seafish Tasmania and the Small
Pelagic Fishery Industry Association (SPFIA) also argued that the science-based
management of the fishery and the statutory fishing rights associated with the
vessel should be respected. For example, the SPFIA submitted:
The impact of the continued political
interventions in the management of the Small Pelagic Fishery is being felt well
beyond the confines of this Association. Although SPF quota holders are
effectively the primary target of the political attacks, there is widespread
erosion of industry confidence in the ability of AFMA to manage fisheries in an
independent, non-political and science based manner. Consequently, industry
confidence in the quality and security of their Statutory Fishing Rights is
being steadily undermined.
In these destabilising circumstances,
it should not be surprising if industry were to take a shorter term view of
their investments reflecting the increased political risk being faced. This is
exactly the situation that Government sought to avoid by providing the fishing
industry with well defined, long term secure fishing rights to inspire
operators to take economically responsible decisions and to look after the
marine resources on which their businesses depend.51
1.56 Other commercial fishing interests
urged the committee and other interested stakeholders to separate concerns
about factory freezer vessels operating in the SPF, where resource sharing
issues involving recreational fishers are important, and the operation of
factory freezer trawlers in other fisheries. Petuna Sealord Deepwater Fishing,
which has operated a factory freezer vessel in the blue grenadier fishery since
1988, urged the committee to separate 'what we see are two dissimilar issues',
namely concerns about 'super trawlers' in the SPF and the operation of factory
freezer trawlers elsewhere. It explained:
The current community concern which has
led to this inquiry is not necessary driven by the size or freezing capacity of
the vessel or the science of the fishery, as evidenced in the blue grenadier
fishery, but centres around resource sharing and access to a fish species that
recreational fishers consider is a significant driver in maintaining
healthy populations of key recreational species.52……..
1.62 The Geelong Star is
95 metres long and, therefore, is not covered by the 130-metre definition of
super trawler used for the ban. Nevertheless, the Geelong Star has
commonly been referred to as a super trawler, including by the media and state
governments.58 In addition, some of the concerns expressed by
groups that opposed the Margiris have similarly been applied
to the Geelong Star. Some submitters also argued that there is only
a marginal difference in the quota allocated to the Abel Tasman,
which was banned, and vessels such as the Geelong Star that
are not.59 Other submitters, however, maintain that 'there is
no correlation between vessel size and fishing power'.60
1.63 On this issue, Mr Allan Hansard,
Managing Director, Australian Recreational Fishing Foundation, commented: 'It
is not necessarily the size of the boat; it is that intensity that we need to
really focus on in this case'.61
1.64 From the perspective of the Stop
the Trawler Alliance, which is an alliance of environment, fishing and tourism
organisations established in 2012 in response to the Margiris, the
principal issue is that a factory freezer vessel is operating in the SPF, not
that a vessel of a certain size is operating.62......
The end result was this:
Recommendation 1
6.22 The committee recommends that the
Australian government ban all factory freezer mid-water trawlers from operating
in the Commonwealth Small Pelagic Fishery.
The full
report can be read here.
Because the recommendation is not yet reflected in legislation and because there is some uncertainty about the reasons the trawler vacated Australian waters as well as a fear it may eventually return, concerned people should write to Deputy Prime
Minister, Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources, Barnaby Joyce MP and Assistant
Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources, Senator Anne Ruston who have portfolio responsibility for fisheries management and to their federal MP calling on government to permanently ban all freezer mid-water trawlers from operating in Australian Small Pelagic Fisheries.
Tuesday 29 November 2016
Iluka Development Application No. SUB2015/0034: "The Bob Jelly Gazette" decides it always knew it would happen
In March 2016 the Ratepayers Association of Iluka Inc. published its regular newsletter in which its president, real estate agent Graeme Lynn, stated the following:
Eight months later and the story has changed – now we’re told there was always going to be a major revision of the development application:
As for those ordinary people who “suddenly became town planners and without any knowledge were telling everyone the design was poor and needed redoing”.
Well it appears that the “experts” are not as disdainful as Bob Jelly & Co, because this turned up in one of the documents being submitted to the Northern Joint Regional Planning Panel on behalf of the developer:
So congratulations to all those locals at Iluka who took the photographs, did the geo-plotting and otherwise supplied information for the Thursday, 16 June 2016 blog post
Sunday 20 November 2016
This is just not good enough, Premier Baird!
This lack of prior consultation with indigenous Native Title holders or registered claimants happens too often at state and local government level in NSW to be considered instances of accidental oversight.
It certainly does not show the NSW Government in a good light when it ignores both federal and state legislation and/or regulations requiring such consultation.
Click on image to enlarge
Tuesday 15 November 2016
Clarence Valley Council announces Section 55 amendment to application for SUB2015/0034 a 162 lot subdivision at Lot 99 Hickey Street, Iluka
On 10 November 2016 Clarence Valley Council sent out by email a letter dated 7 November 2016 concerning a development application being determined by the Northern Joint Regional Planning Panel:
Redesigned subdivision plan for 157 lot development:
Note: Streetscape plantings are indicative only and were not part of the development application.
Amended DA documents can be viewed and download here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fo7a1wml2tak7xf/SUB2015-0034%20Amended%20Application%20Documents.pdf?dl=0
A brief history of the development application here.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fo7a1wml2tak7xf/SUB2015-0034%20Amended%20Application%20Documents.pdf?dl=0
A brief history of the development application here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)