Image: C-Span US television network |
Sunday 26 August 2018
The American Resistance has many faces and this is just one of them……(23)
Text
of open letter to US President Donald J.
Trump by William H. McRaven, a
retired Navy admiral, who was commander of the U.S. Joint Special Operations
Command from 2011 to 2014. He oversaw the 2011 Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan that
killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. Published in The Washington Post on 16 August
2018:
Dear
Mr. President:
Former CIA Director John
Brennan, whose security clearance you revoked Wednesday, is one of the finest
public servants I have ever known. Few Americans have done more to protect this
country than John. He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and
character have never been in question, except by those who don’t know him.
Therefore, I would
consider it an honor if you would revoke my security clearance as well, so I
can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your
presidency.
Like most Americans, I
had hoped that when you became president, you would rise to the occasion and
become the leader this great nation needs.
A good leader tries to
embody the best qualities of his or her organization. A good leader sets the
example for others to follow. A good leader always puts the welfare of others
before himself or herself.
Your leadership,
however, has shown little of these qualities. Through your actions, you have
embarrassed us in the eyes of our children, humiliated us on the world stage
and, worst of all, divided us as a nation.
If you think for a
moment that your McCarthy-era tactics will suppress the voices of criticism,
you are sadly mistaken. The criticism will continue until you become the leader
we prayed you would be.
Labels:
Donald Trump,
US politics
Saturday 25 August 2018
Who do we blame as matters go from bad to worse over the next eight months in Australia?
The country is being crippled by the effects of drought and basic food prices will soon begin to rise, while at the same time wages growth remains stagnant. Cost cutting by successive Coalition federal governments is impacting service delivery on everything from health and welfare through to national broadband connectivity.
The federal government is still a policy-free zone with regard to energy and climate change due to toxic infighting between members of the Liberal Party of Australia which, along with its coalition partner the National Party, has an ideological inability to drag itself into the 21st century to face the consequences of ongoing land degradation and water insecurity.
Australia now has a new prime minister, but this situation is unlikely to change as the hard right remains holding the reins of government.
The next federal election is still over eight months away.
So who do we blame for the situation the country finds itself in between now and the election?
Take your pick.......
According to News.com.au this is the list of federal parliamentary members of the Liberal Party of Australia who voted to bring on the leadership
spill of 24 August 2018:
1.
Andrew Hastie
2. Tony
Pasin
3.
Craig Kelly
4.
Michael Sukkar
5.
Kevin Andrews
6. Tony
Abbott
7. Ian
Goodenough
8.
Nicolle Flint
9.
Peter Dutton
10.
Jason Wood
11.
Ross Vasta
12.
Luke Howarth
13.
Rick Wilson
14. Ted
O’Brien
15. Zed
Seselja
16 Greg
Hunt
17
Steven Ciobo
18
Angus Taylor
19 Alan
Tudge
20.
Michael Keenan
21
Andrew Wallace
22
Scott Buchholz
23 Jim
Molan
24
Slade Brockman
25 Dean
Smith
26 Jane
Hume
27
Mitch Fifield
28.
John McVeigh
29.
David Fawcett
30.
Amanda Stoker
31.
Jonathon Duniam
32.
David Bushby
33.
James Paterson
34 Eric
Abetz
35.
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells
36.
James McGrath
37.
Mathias Cormann
38.
Michaelia Cash
39.
Karen Andrews
40. Andrew Laming
41 Ben Morton
42. Sussan Ley
43. Warren Entsch
Sadly the Joke of the Decade was on the Australian people
"I will not
lead a party that is not as committed to effective action on climate change as
I am." [Liberal
Party leader Malcolm Bligh Turnbull,
October 2009]
Labels:
#TurnbullFAIL,
climate change
Tweet of the Week
So far what grade do you give Donald Trump as president. retweet everyone.......— Trump Administration Supporter (@Robfortrump2020) August 15, 2018
Labels:
Donald Trump
Friday 24 August 2018
Nationals MP for Page Kevin Hogan tries to straddle the Coalition fence by becoming a Faux Independent after the new Morrison Government is sworn-in
The political situation in Australia thus far this week..............
Thinking to hedge his bets in a toxic political environment and remain in the federal parliament beyond the forthcoming federal election, Kevin Hogan sent out this media release on 23 August 2018:You can't get any more blunt than @murpharoo's assessment of #libspill -— News Breakfast (@BreakfastNews) August 22, 2018
"The Government is killing itself in plain view ... It doesn't matter who wins because they're stuffed" pic.twitter.com/1HazIUyd06
STATEMENT FROM KEVIN
HOGAN
This constant rotation
of Prime Ministers by both the Labor Party and the Liberal party, I cannot
condone.
I am announcing
today, that if there is another leadership spill for the position of Prime
Minister prior to the next federal election, I will remove myself from the
government benches and sit on the cross benches.
I have made this
decision because my community is fed up. What we have been seeing in
Canberra with leadership changes over the last 10 years, is letting our
great country down.
This is not about Peter
Dutton, Malcolm Turnbull or Kevin Hogan, it is about the Office of Prime
Minister.
I remain 100 per cent
committed to delivering for my community. I remain committed to the National
Party.
If this occurs, I will
still attend National Party meetings if invited. I will not attend Coalition
Party Room meetings.
I will support the
Government in No Confidence Motions and Supply. Any other legislation I
will take on a case by case basis.
The model I intend
to follow is similar to what the Western Australian National, Tony Crook did.
Hogan has been in the federal parliament and a member of the Abbott & Turnbull Coalition governments for almost five years and in that time has never voted against Liberal-Nationals party policy.
What Hogan is doing with this media release is taking a hollow stance.
He fully intends to support the new Liberal Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Nationals Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack.
An arrogant new prime minister with a history since 2013 of human rights abuses as Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, of welfare recipient bashing as Minister for Social Services, of relentless cost cutting as Treasurer and as a strong supporter of propping up the rich at the expense of low income families.
Federal Labor promises to pursue return of dodgy grant to Great Barrier Reef Foundation
Excerpt from email sent out over Labor Senator Kristine Keneally's signature on 17 August 2017:
On April 29 Mr Turnbull announced the largest donation of taxpayers money to a private foundation in Australian history.
That's why we're calling on Mr Turnbull to return the reef money. Here's what we know so far:
- There was no tender process for the donation and the foundation never applied for the money.
- The Prime Minister was present at the meeting with the foundation and he personally told the chair, Dr John Schubert about the donation. It appears no public servants were present.
- Before receiving the donation the budget for the foundation was only $9 million and it only employed six full time staff.
- The negotiations for the contract that governs the half a billion dollars of taxpayers' money only began after the money had been announced and committed by the government.
- The foundation has acknowledged the biggest threats to the reef include climate change and land clearing, yet the foundation has made clear none of its work goes to act against climate change or land clearing.
- All the probity checks and balances which ordinarily apply to expenditure by government agencies will not apply to spending decisions made by the foundation.
Effectively, half a billion dollars of taxpayers’ money has been given away without process, probity or policy justification.
The future of the reef should not be determined behind closed doors by Mr Turnbull’s mates......
The future of the reef should not be determined behind closed doors by Mr Turnbull’s mates......
Labor will continue to pursue this through the Senate Inquiry process and all other avenues available to the opposition.
Australian Attorney-General releases a draft bill which will allow the gaoling of Australian citizens for 10 years if they refuse to reveal passwords or encryption codes
According to Crikey.com.au on 15 August 2018:
In addition to its
village idiot approach to undermining end-to-end encryption in new surveillance
laws, the government is also seeking a blunt-force trauma approach: it wants to
jail people for a decade if they refuse to give up the password to their
devices.
Under the draft Assistance
and Access Bill 2018 unveiled yesterday, the government is giving
police, spy agencies and regulators like the ATO the power to demand that tech
companies help them plant malware on computers and phones to help it defeat
end-to-end encryption.
Thursday 23 August 2018
“Sneaky laws which declare you as guilty in the eyes of the law the minute the police say you are guilty” - Turnbull Government legislative overreach continues in 2018?
Sydney
Criminal Lawyers,
16 August 2018:
A Senate committee has
just given the Turnbull government the green light to nationalise a scheme that
allows government to seize citizens’ assets unless their legitimate origins can
be explained, even if the owner of the wealth hasn’t been charged with let
alone convicted of an offence.
On 6 August, the Senate
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee recommended that the federal government pass the Unexplained Wealth Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 without
any changes.
Unexplained wealth laws
currently exist in every Australian jurisdiction, but the new scheme provides a
broader model allowing for federal and state authorities to work in
collaboration across jurisdictional borders to target serious and organised
crime.
“The scale and
complexity of this criminal threat has necessitated an enhanced focus on
cooperative, cross-jurisdictional responses by Australian governments,” home
affairs minister Peter Dutton said in the second reading speech of the bill.
However, critics of the
scheme warn that existing unexplained wealth laws undermine the rule of law and
broadening their scope will lead to a further erosion of civil liberties. And
while these laws are meant to target untouchable crime bosses, they’re actually
being used against petty criminals.
Presumption of guilt
“These beefed-up laws
bring down all the secret surveillance and the swapping of scuttlebutt
masquerading as intelligence on everyone in Australia,” Civil Liberties Australia CEO
Bill Rowlings told Sydney Criminal Lawyers.
“The unexplained wealth
laws completely overturn the presumption of innocence, which is part of our
rule of law in Australia,” he continued. “They are sneaky laws which declare
you as guilty in the eyes of the law the minute the police say you are guilty.”
Unexplained wealth laws
are a recent development in Australia. But, unlike other
proceeds of crime laws that allow for the confiscation of assets derived from
prosecuted criminal acts, unexplained wealth places the onus upon the
individual to prove their wealth was legally acquired.
“People don’t
understand, under these laws the government can confiscate your assets even if
you haven’t been found guilty of anything,” Mr Rowlings stressed.
Broadening the reach
The current Commonwealth
unexplained wealth laws were introduced in 2010 via amendments made to
the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (the Act).
These laws apply where
there are “reasonable grounds to suspect” an individual’s assets have been
derived from a committed federal
offence, “a foreign indictable offence or a state offence that has a
federal aspect.”
There are three sorts of
orders that can be sought in relation to unexplained wealth. Section 20A of the Act provides that a court can issue
an unexplained wealth restraining order, which is an interim order that
restricts an individual’s ability to dispose of property.
Section 179B of the Act allows for the issuance of a
preliminary order, which requires a person to appear in court to prove their
wealth is legitimate. And under section 179E, an order can be issued requiring that the
payment of an amount of wealth deemed unlawful be made to the government.
The new legislation
amends sections 20A and 179E, so that these orders can be issued in respect to
relevant offences of participating states, as well as in relation to territory
offences. Relevant state offences will be outlined in state legislation that
enables participation in the national scheme.
Sharing it around
The legislation broadens
the access authorities have to an individual’s banking information in relation
to an unexplained wealth investigation.
Section 213 of the Act allows certain authorised
Commonwealth officers to issue access notices to financial institutions. This
provision will now be extended to states and territory law enforcement
agencies.
Proposed section 297C of
the Act outlines how federal, state and territory governments will divvy up the
seized wealth. A subcommittee will be established to distribute the money. And
while any state that opts out of the scheme will be eligible for a share, it
will be a less favourable amount.
The legislation also
makes amendments to the sharing of information provisions contained in
the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.…..
Backdoor revenue raising
The NSW government has
already introduced legislation into parliament, which enables that state
to participate in the national scheme. The legislation sets out that the
relevant offences the laws apply to are set out in section 6(2) of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990.
NSW police minister Troy
Grant told parliament that the legislation allows the state to refer matters to
the Commonwealth, which then authorises the Australian federal police to use
certain NSW offences as a basis for the confiscation of unexplained wealth.
But, Mr Rowlings states
that the nationalising of the scheme will actually streamline a process that
sees the unwarranted confiscation of wealth to prop up government coffers.
“The cash seized is
paying for extra government lawyers to help seize more cash,” Mr Rowlings made
clear, “so it’s a devious upward spiral where more and more unconvicted people
will have their assets taken, and then have to prove their innocence or the
government gets their assets.”
Read the full
article here.
Corruption in the Australian public sector
All three
tiers of government in Australia have recorded instances where public service employees allegedly participate in potentially criminal activity.
Here is the
most recent……
WA Crime and Corruption Commission, 16 August 2018:
The Corruption and Crime
Commission (CCC) has today tabled in State Parliament a comprehensive report
into corrupt activity at the North Metropolitan Health Service (NMHS) that went
undetected for up to a decade.
The Report into bribery
and corruption in maintenance and service contracts within North Metropolitan
Health Service highlights serious misconduct at its most shocking – corrupt
relationships between the private and public sectors resulting in the gross
misuse and fraudulent misappropriation of hundreds of thousands of dollars of
public funds.
The Commission heard
evidence of corruption and serious misconduct involving public officers who:
• accepted
tens of thousands of dollars in gifts of interstate and overseas travel and
accommodation from contractors in return for awarding them work;
• accepted
tens of thousands of dollars in gifts of expensive restaurant meals,
entertainment, alcohol and other gratuities in return for awarding work;
• received
thousands of dollars in cash payments from contractors in return for awarding
them continued work;
• facilitated
contractors to fraudulently invoice NMHS to cover the costs of the corrupt
benefits of travel, accommodation, meals, entertainment and cash they received;
• colluded
with particular contractors in 'bid rigging' activities for the purpose of subverting
the WA Health and NMHS procurement processes; and
• a
senior public officer used contractors to renovate his private residence at a
discount and then facilitated the building contractors to fraudulently invoice
NMHS approximately $170,000 for works carried out on his private residence.
The Report recommends
that prosecuting authorities consider preferring criminal charges against three
former public servants (including a former Executive Director of Facilities
Management at NMHS and a former Executive Director of Perth Children’s Hospital
Service Integration) and no fewer than 10 private sector contractors.
Read the full media
release
Download the Report
ABC
News, 16 August
2018:
Senior WA Health
bureaucrats corruptly reaped hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts and
travel paid for by contractors in exchange for winning work on Government
projects, an explosive new report has found.
One senior bureaucrat
allowed contractors to fraudulently bill the North Metropolitan Health
Service (NMHS) for $170,000 in renovations carried out on his private home,
while he and another accepted benefits that included overseas travel,
restaurant meals, entertainment, cash bribes and alcohol in exchange for the
awarding of government contracts.
The Corruption and Crime
Commission began investigating after a tip-off from a junior whistleblower
within the department in 2014.
Its report recommends
charges be considered against three former senior health bureaucrats and nearly
a dozen contractors, for what was described as sustained efforts to engage in
and cover up bribery.
The report named former
NMHS executive directors John Fullerton and David Mulligan, as well as former
facilities development manager Shaun Ensor, as the bureaucrats involved in the
corrupt conduct.
"This report
details more than a decade of corrupt conduct reaching into senior levels
within WA Health," the CCC report stated.
"It exposes a culture
of contractors freely giving gifts and benefits to public officers, with the
expectation of thereby winning work and recovering the costs of the gifts
through fraud.
The report uncovered
extensive efforts by contractors to shower Mr Fullerton with gifts and other
benefits in exchange for government work.
Examples of corruption
found by the CCC:
Lavish
lunches at restaurants including Nobu, Rockpool and Coco's totalling more than
$50,000
A
three-week business-class trip to the UK for Mr Fullerton and his wife, Jacqui
A
business-class trip for the Fullertons to Canada to attend their son's wedding
A
three-week US holiday for Mr and Mrs Fullerton
Annual
trips to Melbourne for Mr and Mrs Fullerton
Trips
to Canada, Bali, Hong Kong, China and Dubai for Mr Fullerton and his wife
An
all-expenses paid trip to the UK for Mr Mulligan
A
night at the Galaxy nightclub including paid hostesses
Melbourne
Cup lunches and AFL grand final tickets
Gifts
of cologne, shoes, business suits and shirts worth thousands of dollars
Cash
payments of more than $25,000
Over about a decade, Mr
Fullerton received thousands of dollars in cash and $150,000 in gifts including
flights, meals, perfume and clothes paid for by contractors, according to the
report.
"In return, those
contractors obtained regular work at NMHS," the report stated.
"For the majority
of contractors, this was the price of doing business with Mr Fullerton."……
The CCC said prosecution
should be considered for 10 contractors involved in the corruption, as well as
the three senior bureaucrats.
"On occasion, money added to NMHS invoices [was]
purely for greed rather than to recoup money spent on 'gifts'," the report
stated.
CCC commissioner John
McKechnie said covert surveillance discovered some of those involved discussing
plans to destroy evidence and create falsified records to cover up their
wrongdoing.
"It's staggering,
the extent of this in North Metro Health and the fact it has continued for so
long," Mr McKechnie said.
"We think serious
consideration should be given to prosecuting not only the public officers but
some of the contractors.”
BACKGROUND
Australian
Criminal Intelligence Commission, 17 July 2018:
Public sector corruption
refers to the misuse of public power or position with an expectation of undue
private gain or advantage (for self or others). It may include:
bribery
embezzlement
fraud
extortion
trading
in influence
perverting
the course of justice
exchanging
goods for money or information.
Corrupt conduct can
occur directly through the improper or unlawful actions of public sector
officials, or through the actions of individuals operating in the private
sector who attempt to inappropriately influence the functions of
government.
Organised crime groups
try to corrupt public officials to gain access to public funds, information,
protection and other services to facilitate criminal activities. These
officials are likely to be from law enforcement agencies, border agencies, and
agencies that issue identification documents.
Corruption has a serious
impact on government, industry and national security. It prejudices the rule of
law and distorts markets. It can inhibit foreign investment and international
credit ratings and damages Australia’s reputation as a safe reliable economy in
which to invest and trade. It can also harm cooperation and relations with
foreign governments and law enforcement agencies.
Corruption of public
sector officials has substantial multiplier effects and benefits for organised
crime. There may be significant links between corruption in the public sector
and organised crime groups that, by their very nature, remain hidden. The key
challenge in identifying and investigating corruption is that corrupt conduct
occurs in secret, between consenting parties who are frequently skilled at
deception.
Labels:
Australian society,
corruption,
public sector
Wednesday 22 August 2018
A definitive list of the far right nutters within the current federal Liberal Party?
Sky News stated this as a list of those in the Liberal party room who backed, then Minister for Home Affairs and now backbencher, Peter Dutton's attempt to overthrow Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull:
A Who’s Who of those voting against Malcolm Bligh Turnbull in the Liberal party room leadership ballot on 21 August 2018:
Peter Dutton himself,
Michael Sukkar, MP for Deakin (Vic) & Assistant Minister to the Treasurer,
Greg Hunt, MP for Flinders (Vic) & Minister for Health,
Tony Abbott, MP for Warringah (NSW) & former sacked prime minister,
Zed Seselja, Senator for ACT & Assistant Minister for Science, Jobs and Innovation,
Steven Ciobo, MP for Moncrieff (Qld) & Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment,
Michael Keenan, MP for Stirling (WA) & Minister for Human Services,
Alan Tudge, MP for Aston (Vic) & Minister for Human Services,
Angus Taylor, MP for Hume (NSW) & Minister for Law Enforcement and Cyber Security,
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, Senator for NSW & Minister for International Development and the Pacific,
Tony Pasin, MP for Barker (SA),
Jason Wood, MP for La Trobe (Vic),
Andrew Hastie, MP for Canning (WA),
Kevin Andrews, MP for Menzies (Vic),
Eric Abetz, Senator for Tasmania,
Ted O'Brien, MP for Fairfax (Qld),
Amanda Stoker, Senator for Queensland,
Andrew Wallace, MP for Fisher (Qld),
Karen Andrews, MP for McPherson(Qld),
Jim Molan, Senator for NSW,
Luke Howarth, MP for Petrie (Qld),
Nicole Flint, MP for Boothby (SA),
James Paterson, Senator for Victoria,
David Bushby, Senator for Tasmania,
Ross Vasta, MP for Bonner (Qld),
Ben Morton, MP for Tangney (WA),
James McGrath, Senator for Queensland,
Rick Wilson, MP for O'Connor (WA),
Scott Buchholz, MP for Wright (Qld),
David Fawcett, Senator for SA,
Dean Smith, Senator for WA,
Ian Goodenough, MP for Moore (WA),
Andrew Laming, MP for Bowman (Qld),
Jonathan Duniam, Senator for Tasmania,
Bert Van Manen, MP for Forde (Qld).
What a gathering of 'entitled' climate change denialists, followers of King Coal, members of the IPA, homophobes and hardened welfare recipient bashers.
All in all, a handy list of who not to vote for at the forthcoming federal election if one prefers a world where Peter Dutton never becomes Prime Minister of Australia.
And the warnings continue about My Health Record.....
Financial
Review, 13 August 2018:
One of the world's
leading experts in cyber security policy has warned the manipulation of health
data is one of his biggest concerns facing society, as debate continues to
rage about the long-term viability of the government's controversial opt-out My
Health Record.
Former Pentagon chief
strategy officer for cyber policy and newly appointed head of cyber security
strategy for data centre security company Illumio, Jonathan Reiber,
told The Australian Financial Review the health data of MPs and
business leaders would be of particular interest to cyber criminals.
"If I'm a malicious
actor wanting to cause discontent, I would be interested in that," he
said.
"If you get access
to the health information of key leaders, you can understand what they like,
who they are and what their problems are. [Cyber criminals] would want to look
at a segment of 50 to 100 key leaders in the country, figure out data for
intelligence purposes and then manipulate the data for the negative."
Earlier this month
Health Minister Greg Hunt announced that the government would redraft the
legislation surrounding My Health Record to restrict police access and allow
records to be deleted permanently.
He had previously
copped criticism for saying the digital health database had "military-grade security",
despite not having two-factor authentication protocols.
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
14 August 2018:
Labor's health
spokeswoman Catherine King said the government's decision to switch to an
opt-out model, which Labor originally supported, gave rise to "a whole
range of significant privacy and security issues that we don't think were
thought of in the original enabling legislation".
"Are they then able
to opt-out when they become adults? What's happening in terms of survivors of
domestic violence and the capacity through the creation of a record by an
abusing partner, of a record for their children or agreement to a record for
their children, what security is in place to ensure that they are not
traced?"
Legal experts have
warned that the system provides a loophole for a violent person to create
a record for their child without their ex-partner's consent, potentially
allowing them to track down their estranged family's location, as revealed by
Fairfax Media last month.
Ms King also highlighted
concerns raised about access to medical records by health insurers, including
in relation to worker’s compensation claims, which the government has said will
not occur.
"We want to make
sure that's not the case and we want to make sure that's not the case under the
law," she said.
Some people may find
their My Health Record places them at risk of stigma and discrimination or may
cause safety issues.
You may wish to
carefully consider whether you want your health records held or shared if you:
*
have a criminal record or are affected by the criminal justice system
*
use or have used drugs
*
live with a lifelong transmissible condition such as HIV or hepatitis B
*
have or had hepatitis C
*
are not on treatment after it was recommended
*
are sexually active and test regularly for STIs
*
are or have been a sex worker
*
are transgender or intersex
*
are bisexual, lesbian or gay
*
have lived with mental health issues
*
have been pregnant or terminated a pregnancy
*
are a health care worker.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)