Tuesday, 14 October 2008
Remember when?
How many heeded that warning?
Monday, 13 October 2008
Barack delivers up a mess of misdirection
However this one sent after the Town Hall debate between Obama and McCain deserves a mention:
I thought the differences between John McCain and me were pretty clear tonight. I will fight for the middle class every day, and -- once again -- Senator McCain didn't mention the middle class a single time during the debate. [my emphasis]
If you agree that we need to cut taxes for 95% of working families, reduce health care costs, and end the war in Iraq responsibly, then I need your help right now.
And if you heard John McCain push more of the same discredited policies, including tax cuts for the wealthy and giant corporations, tax increases on health care, and continuing to spend $10 billion a month in Iraq, then now is the time to act.
Four weeks from tonight, we'll know which of us will be the next president.
The time to make a difference in this election is running out -- please make a donation of $5 or more right now.
https://donate.barackobama.com/townhall
Thank you,
Barack
Sounds good doesn't it? A heartless McCain ignoring the plight of the American middle class.
Problem is McCain did mention retirees, home owners, workers, small business, taxpayers - all components of the broadly inclusive American definition of middle class.
For heaven's sake Senator Obama, if you are going to attack (as is your right) at least make it believable and stop treating the voter like a prize idiot.
Didn't Harvard teach you anything?
Click to enlarge
The Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and carbon credits as property
Author: Nicola Durrant
Date: 01 October 2008
There appears to be a broad consensus that an emissions trading scheme is the best political response to climate change. But as Nicola Durrant points out, in this article, there is still much work to be done in establishing the legal foundations of such a scheme. Without such foundations, she argues, carbon trading will simply not work.
The innovative legal instrument of the tradeable emissions scheme, within a capped carbon trading system, promises to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and minimise the impacts of climate change in a swift and cost-effectively manner. The allure of this cost-effective approach to solving a global environmental problem led to the adoption of market mechanisms to assist in the reduction of global emissions under the Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and, subsequently, the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. This, in turn, acted as a catalyst for the Australian government's decision to rely almost entirely on the implementation of a carbon market to reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions through the proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (the CPR Scheme).
However, the effectiveness of the proposed Australian trading scheme could be seriously undermined by the absence of adequate legal reform to ensure the optimal operation of the future carbon market. In order for the carbon market to achieve its core objective, and facilitate cost-effective emissions reductions, it is critical that the trading scheme is supported by an appropriate legal framework.
Such a framework must be designed to enable the effective implementation, administration and enforcement of a legally enforceable regime to reduce emissions. That legal framework must include, first and foremost, the adoption of an appropriate emissions reduction trajectory and associated targets for Australia and the imposition of a regulatory restriction on the emission of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. The scheme must establish clear, transparent and consistent legal rules for participation in the carbon market, with minimal restrictions on trade, and an open flow of information to the market. There must also be rigorous monitoring and reporting procedures to enable instances of non-compliance to be identified and addressed through the imposition of both stringent penalties and provisions requiring liable entities to 'make good' on any shortfall in retired permits.
Full article at The Brisbane Line magazine.
Single, living alone, no assets, on a full pension and in community housing? Rudd and Rees want to starve you out
I've had a few phone calls in the last couple of days about this community housing.
With pensions and other income assistance not really keeping up with the cost of living and little hope that Kevin Rudd's increased pension 'promise' will come to fruition as anything more than a token, it was a shock for many Northern Rivers community housing tenants already living in straightened circumstances to recently receive a version of the item below.
Community housing rents changed
As far as I can tell, an average single pensioner living alone in community housing will be losing around $31 to $33 dollars minimum a fortnight due to this change in policy.
In practice this would mean at least an extra $23 to $25 dollars less on pension day as community housing already takes 25% of any Commonwealth rent assistance.
Even if the community housing company agrees to stagger this money grab to $20 per fortnight in the first year, this is twenty dollars more than most single pensioners (or for that matter the single unemployed without family) can afford.
NSW Premier Rees and Prime Minister Rudd should be ashamed of themselves - they have quite literally endorsed taking food out of the mouths of the elderly, widowed, disabled and carers.
Sunday, 12 October 2008
Best quotes found in the mad, mad week that was
Bartholomeusz quoted on the Business Spectator online banner 7 October 2008
William Hewlett in Quoteopia
Well, that’s not literally true about the Zaphod Beeblebrox of Australian politics, but it’s a good line.
So in effect, when Kevin Rudd quotes from the IMF, he is quoting himself; at the very least, he is quoting Wayne Swan.
NSW North Coast artist
One October far, far away................
WALL STREET COLLAPSE. FRENZIED TRADING. RECORD FALL IN VALUES. Banks Try to Check Decline. Heavy Loss on Leading Stock. NEW YORK. Oct. 28. The Argus Wednesday 30 October 1929, page 7. News 829 words... Loss on Leading Stock. NEW YORK. Oct. 28. The New York stock market crashed again on Monday under an ... overboard" as the stock market plunged downward, headed by- the earlier leading stock of the United States ... Surprises Officials. The stock market suffered a loss 1,000,000,000 dollars (£200,000,000), the sales... [full text not yet accessible]
Toll of Market Collapse
WASHINGTON, Sunday.
Despite the stock market, crash 581
persons in the United States had in-
comes of more than 1,000,000 dollars
in 1929, according to the Bureau of In-
ternational Revenue.
There was a diminution of seven
from 1928. No less than 38,1150 per-
sons had incomes exceeding 50,000 dol-
lars, aggregating 5,952,000,000 dollars.
The money lost on the stock market
totalled 661,000,000 dollars of which per-
sons with incomes of less than 5,000
dollars showed 43,000,000 dollar losses
in speculative activities, indicating the
intense nature of speculation of all at
the time of the crash.
The Canberra Times Tuesday 17 March 1931, page 1. News 106 words