Tuesday, 18 May 2010
"Play It Again Sam" Maclean 28th & 29th May, 4th & 5th June -Yamba 6th June 2010
New political parties seeking registration this month and how you can object
The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has advertised the following applications for registration as a non-parliamentary party under the provisions of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act).
Knock yourself out objecting to any or all of them. Starting with the T(I)CS!
___________________________
Name of Party: Secular Party of Australia
Abbreviation of party name: No abbreviation requested
Proposed registered officer: John August
Address: 12/225 Darlinghurst Road
DARLINGURST NSW 2010
___________________________
Name of Party: Australia First Party (NSW) IncorporatedAbbreviation of party name: Australia First Party
Proposed registered officer: Anthony Pettitt
Address: 165 Garfield Road
RIVERSTONE NSW 2765
___________________________
Name of Party: Building Australia PartyAbbreviation of party name: Building Australia
Proposed registered officer: Raymond Robert Stanton Brown
Address: 5 Windarra Place
CASTLE HILL NSW 2154
___________________________
Name of Party: The Climate ScepticsAbbreviation of party name: T.C.S
Proposed registered officer: Anthony Kenneth Cox
Address: 51 Lawson Street
HAMILTON NSW 2303
___________________________
"The above applications have been made by the secretary and another 9 members of each party and states that the parties wish to receive election funding."
If you believe that any of these parties should not be registered because, under the Electoral Act:
• the party does not meet the eligibility criteria for registration; or
• the party's application has not been correctly made; or
• the party's name and/or abbreviation are prohibited,
you may lodge an objection. Objections must be received by the Funding and Disclosure Section of the Australian Electoral Commission by 15 June 2010, must be in writing and include your name, street address, signature and the grounds for your objection.
Objections can be sent to the:
Funding and Disclosure SectionAustralian Electoral Commission
PO Box 6172
Kingston ACT 2604 or
faxed to (02) 6271 4555 or
scanned and emailed to fad@aec.gov.au
For more detailed information on objecting to an application for the registration of a political party, please consult the AEC website at the following link, or contact the AEC by fax or email as above, or by phone on (02) 6271 4667.
Be afraid.......
"The die is cast."
Monday, 17 May 2010
So who works for McDonald's in Australia?
Fair Work Australia in its 23 April 2010 decision stated in part that:
The Agreement not only fails to satisfy the no disadvantage test, on various levels it significantly compromises industrial standards that would be expected for agreement-reliant employees.....
I do not believe the employees could be considered to have genuinely agreed to the Agreement. I would dismiss the application for that reason alone....
I propose also to direct that a copy of this decision be forwarded to the Fair Work Ombudsman, given the evidence suggesting the applicant or its licensees, or both, may have been underpaying some employees.
So who exactly are McDonald's 80,000 employees Australia-wide?
They are predominately under 21 years of age, female with an English speaking background, work as casuals in the multinational's 780 fast food stores and most are paid the percentage rates for juniors.
McDonald's opened its first Australian store in 1971.
McDonald's workforce taken from the Fair Work Australia decision:
Male employees: 37,200 (46.5%)
Female employees: 42,800 (53.5%)
Employees from non-English speaking backgrounds: 28,800 (36%)
Employees who are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: 2,400 (3%)
Employees with disabilities: 2,400 (3%)
Employees who are not otherwise categorised: 46,400 (58%)
Full-time employees: 7,888 (9.86%)
Part-time employees: 7,656 (9.57%)
Casual employees: 64,456 (80.57%)
Employees under 21 years of age: 65,600 (82%)
Employees aged 21-45 years: 11,200 (14%)
Employees over 45 years of age: 3,200 (4%)
Slug Boy disappears leaving no trail, but a few red faces in his wake?
Those old enough to remember when evening newspapers were still part of the social fabric will fondly recall those rather improbable fillers in the righthand column of the page.
These snippets often recycled urban myths as news for Australian readers, who were still many decades away from the 24 hour news cycle and Internet access which hopefully has led to an increasing sophistication when assessing what the mainstream media has on offer.
However, it seems that urban myths and hoaxes continue to find their way into print.
The latest media report to exhibit signs that journalists have been the victims of a classic Australian leg pull was a report which ran last Wednesday that; The ABC has been told that a 21-year-old caught rat lungworm disease after he ate a slug as a dare some time ago.
On the basis of the original media reports the NSW Health media unit issued this media release on Thursday:
NSW Health is warning people of the dangers of eating raw slugs, which although extremely rare, can cause meningitis.
Animals, including slugs and snails, can carry a range of infections, including bacteria, virus and parasites that may infect people. One parasite (or worm) carried by slugs and snails is Angiostrongylus (also called rat lung worm). The adult form of the worm is found only in rodents, and infected rodents pass larvae in their faeces which snails and slugs can eat, getting infected.
NSW Health understands that there may be a suspected case in NSW of rat lung worm, however as this is not a notifiable disease and for privacy reasons is unable to provide further details.
A spokesperson was also on radio talking about this rare condition which had allegedly seen the young man hospitalised for a month.
By then media was also online asking for more details from the general public; Do you know more? Text 0424 SMS SMH (+61 424 767 764), email us at scoop@smh.com.au or direct message on Twitter @smh_news.
The story was posted on Digg and by Friday was up on Twitter with b3ta_links repeating that: Some Australians Aren't Terribly Bright: Man eats slug for a dare. Now critically ill in hospital.
On Saturday morning it was starting to unravel, as Caroline Overington writing in The Australian suggested that all may not be as it seems because no-one could find the man who was the subject of the original story and NSW Health apparently admitted that it knew nothing more than what journalists had told it; We got calls about it from the media and we responded to that," a spokeswoman said.
If this story is a hoax, I wonder if the mischief maker got his or her inspiration from the ABC's News In Science webpage on 20 October 2003 which also reported a man eating two slugs for a dare and developing the very same medical condition in Man's brain infected by eating slugs:
Whatever the case this story is off and running - Google's search engine had man eats slug indexed over 2,000 times and by Saturday morning most of these references were to the Australian story.
Image from TNT Magazine
Demanding, arrogant, out of touch, superficial, narrow-minded. How many Australians see federal political leaders
Image from ABC's The Drum
According to the Essential Research weekly report on 10 May 2010:
There was majority approval of all recent changes to Australia’s taxation.
The most popular proposal was to increase superannuation contributions from 9% to 12% ‐ 74% approved and 17% disapproved.
63% approved increasing taxes on cigarettes and alcohol.
More than half approved cutting company tax rates (54%) and higher taxes on the profits of large mining companies (52%).
78% of Labor voters approved higher taxes on mining company profits (11% disapprove) and 56% of Liberal/National voters disapproved (35% approve).
Increasing superannuation contributions received high support from both Labor (85%) and Liberal/National voters (72%).
61% of both Labor and Liberal/National voters supported cutting company tax rates.
63% of Labor voters and 69% of Liberal/National voters approved increasing taxes on cigarettes and alcohol.
However Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott are not so clearly differentiated on personal attributes in the table below:
Kevin Rudd has only slightly better ratings than Tony Abbott across key positive attributes such as hard‐working (+5%), a capable leader (+5%) and trustworthy (+2%).
The main differences were that Kevin Rudd is perceived as more demanding (69%/52%), less narrow‐minded (43%/53%), more superficial (52%/44%)and more complacent (38%/30%).
Comparison of Leader Attributes
Click on image to enlarge
Sunday, 16 May 2010
Next question: Where's Harold Holt?
In fact, "Captain Dragan", also known as Daniel Snedden, was wiling away his time at down-town Harwood Island, a satellite suburb of Yamba, "the best town in Australia", in Big River Country (aka Clarence River territory).
Dutch courage
A suspected Serbian war criminal goes AWOL under the very noses of the Australian Federal Police ('' 'Captain Dragan' tried to make a deal'', May 14). What does it do? It asks the Dutch authorities to check its end. Lo and behold they were able to tell our people not only that he was not holed up somewhere in Holland but supplied the address where he was hiding here. Good to know the AFP is on the ball.
Eddie Raggett Mosman
Is it too late for the Australian Federal Police to ask the Dutch police to find Harold Holt?
Glen op den Brouw Liverpool
Source: SMH letters