In online debates concerning the NSW Government's proposal to make the Port of Yamba an official cruise ship destination and possibly build an international cruise ship terminal I have noticed a few misconceptions creeping in - so this post is a brief fact check.
The misconceptions are coloured red.
* The “MV Caledonian Sky” cruise ship is smaller than the “Island Trader” cargo ship and not much bigger than the Manly Ferry.
“Caledonian Sky” at 4,200 gross tonnage, dead weight of 645t, 90.6m length, 15.3m width, 4.25 maximum draft is over twice the size of the “Island Trader” which is 485 gross tonnage, dead weight of 242t, 38.8m long, 9m wide and maximum draft of 2.8m.
The four Manly ferries are 70 metres in length, 12.5 metres wide, with draughts of 3.3 metres and displace 1,140 tonnes and, only operate in a deep water harbour.
* Cruise ships already come into the Clarence River.
There hasn’t been an ocean-going cruise ship carrying passengers enter the Clarence River in a good many years. There is some anecdotal information that one small cruise ship of indeterminate size entered the Clarence River sometime in the 1990s, but that appears to have been both the first and the last time that a local resident can recall its passage which ended with this vessel scraping its bottom on "Dirrangun" reef as it left.
The last regular passenger service from Sydney to Port of Yamba ended in the mid to late 1950s when the small steamers operating on the NSW North Coast run were withdrawn.
The last regular passenger service from Sydney to Port of Yamba ended in the mid to late 1950s when the small steamers operating on the NSW North Coast run were withdrawn.
Despite local media reports to the contrary, the “Caledonian Sky” has not entered the Port of Yamba in the past – this cruise ship’s scheduled visit in October 2018 will be her maiden voyage into the Clarence.
* There is not going to be any dredging of the Clarence River entrance or estuary if Port of Yamba becomes a cruise ship destination and an international cruise ship terminal is built.
A representative of the NSW Dept. of Transport raised eyebrows in apparent astonishment when I mentioned that particular belief. Although diplomatically silent the implication was clear - dredging would have to occur.
* Medium to small cruise ships will not have a problem entering the Clarence River because they will have a pilot on board.
In 2015-16 there were 18 ship visits to Port of Yamba, none were cruise ships and the majority of vessels piloted into the Clarence River came in for ship repair at Harwood Island.
However, even with a pilot on board a cruise ship may ground in a relatively narrow navigation channel. The “Regal Princess” grounded in Cairns Harbour in March 2001 as it sailed a 90m wide & est. 8.3 m deep navigation channel with a pilot aboard. The subsequent official investigation found that the dimensions of the Cairns port channel were too restrictive for the 32.25 m wide “Regal Princess”.
Because the Clarence River estuary is strongly tidal the position and width of its main navigation channel can vary and the Yamba-Iluka bar at the river entrance is problematic.
The bar crossing appears to have been last dredged in 2004.
An Australian Navy tug 29m long, 8m wide with a draft of est. 3.4m grounded on the bar at the river mouth in October 1946 and from time to time cargo ships entering or leaving the Clarence have temporarily grounded when sand builds up outside the river entrance.
The bar crossing appears to have been last dredged in 2004.
An Australian Navy tug 29m long, 8m wide with a draft of est. 3.4m grounded on the bar at the river mouth in October 1946 and from time to time cargo ships entering or leaving the Clarence have temporarily grounded when sand builds up outside the river entrance.
* Having cruise ships and a cruise terminal will raise personal incomes in the Lower Clarence Valley.
This argument is often put forward by governments pushing coastal development proposals.
St. John's (population over 108,000) - a regional port in Canada popular with small cruise ships - is currently conducting its own investigation into economic returns from cruise ship visits, because it was told this year that the average amount of money spent onshore by a cruise passenger can be as low as $28.20 and for a crew member as low as $20.79. Note: The Canadian dollar is roughly on par with the Australian dollar.
St. John's (population over 108,000) - a regional port in Canada popular with small cruise ships - is currently conducting its own investigation into economic returns from cruise ship visits, because it was told this year that the average amount of money spent onshore by a cruise passenger can be as low as $28.20 and for a crew member as low as $20.79. Note: The Canadian dollar is roughly on par with the Australian dollar.
International cruise lines are usually the source of any financial information on passenger spending and industry observers tend to think that industry figures may be inflated. So it is not surprising to find one independent report published in 2015 states that passenger and crew spending in Cairns was 22 per cent lower than the figure supplied by Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) a group representing the interests of cruise lines.
By the industry's own optimistic calculations, if all “Caledonian Sky” passengers come ashore then they should at a minimum spend in total between $4,750 and $5,937 during the five or so hours the ship is moored on the river in October next year.
Except that the cruise ship’s itinerary shows these approximately 114 passengers will have both breakfast and lunch on board ship before sailing away and, in the approx. three hours in between meals, will take a walk up to the Yamba Lighthouse at no charge, visit the Yamba Museum which has a gold coin entrance fee or cross to Iluka to wander the Nature Reserve up to Woody Head and back which is fee free - although it may be possible that the ship rents a mini-bus to transport passengers to Iluka wharf for return to the ship.
However, even then this hardly lives up to the cruise ship industry’s boast that each passenger spends on average $200-$250 a day in Australian regional ports.
*
If ships the size of the "Rainbow
Warrior" can navigate to the Harwood slipway then quite a few of the
small similar size cruise vessels can safely do the same.
The second “Rainbow Warrior” was a yacht with 555 gross tonnage, 55m long,
9m wide with a draft of 3m. The third and current “Rainbow Warrior” has 855 gross tonnage, deadweight 180t, is 57.9m
long, 11.3m wide and has a maximum draft of 5m.
To date I cannot
find any cruise ships of similar size operating on the Australian east coast
ocean route.
All east
coast ships in P&O’s fleet
are large ships, as are Holland
America’s fleet. Princess
Cruises’ ships are all large and, the Royal
Caribbean’s fleet is also composed of large ships. Ditto Carnival’s fleet and Celebrity
Cruises’ ships. Norwegian
Cruise Line, MCS
Cruises and Cunard
Line fleets contain only large vessels. While Oceania Cruises’ fleet is composed of somewhat smaller ships, but with drafts nudging 6m to 7m it probably wouldn't consider entering the Clarence .
* Cruise lines are philanthropic - they will help people and the environment by giving money to a local cause.
Some but not all cruise lines do occasionally give money to institutions and causes within ports they regularly visit. It is often looked upon by port communities as 'guilty giving'.
For example, in 2014 one of Carnival Cruise Line's ships severely damaged a section of pristine reef in the Cayman Islands. The next year the Carnival Foundation announced it was giving a $75,000 donation to the Cayman Islands-based Central Caribbean Marine Institute toward restoration of an ecologically distinct and globally endangered coral species.
The Cayman Islands government had to step in before the cruise line would hand over $100,000 to the Cayman Islands National Trust towards the Magic Reef Restoration Project to cover the 11,000 sq feet of endangered coral that the "Carnival Magic" crushed.
If the international cruise ship industry genuinely had a social conscience then there wouldn't be reports like "Sweat Ships" (2002) which looks at the abuse of workers' rights aboard cruise ships.
* Modern cruising is really a form of eco-tourism
There is nothing inherently ecological about the design and functioning of a modern cruise ship.
Modern cruise ships:
* predominately still use bunker fuel when underway and diesel/gas power when berthed if there is no dedicated shore electricity supply available to them;
* give off emissions when these fossil fuels are burned and these emissions can and do sometimes exceed permissible levels of air pollution;
* emit underwater noise which disturbs whales and dolphins;
* are usually noisy when moored or berthed due to the need to generate power and/or provide entertainment for passengers;
* sewerage and waste water storage systems can sometimes malfunction or fail;
* have been known to illegally dump sewerage whilst in port;
* will sometimes dump chlorinated swimming pool water overboard;
* sometimes illegally discharge oily waste into the ocean;
* will sometimes have issues with unlawful garbage disposal on some voyages; and
* anti-fouling paint on their hulls leaches into the waters at wharfs and affects the surrounding marine ecosystem.
* The state government will never be able to dredge the bar or the river because of Native Title.
Yes, Native Title covers the Clarence River from just below Ulmarra to the river mouth and out past the two breakwaters where it creates a 350m buffer around "Dirrangan" reef, as well as a narrower ocean water boundary out from the shoreline starting at Woody Head and going on down past Wooli.
Any cruise ship approaching the entrance to the Clarence River would be sailing in waters covered by Native Title.
However, Native Title rights are non-exclusive and so contain a number of qualifications. Therefore people of goodwill across the Clarence Valley and the wider Northern Rivers region will need to speak up in support of the Yaegl People's stated position if the Berejiklian Government decides to proceed with its international cruise ship terminal proposal.
Any cruise ship approaching the entrance to the Clarence River would be sailing in waters covered by Native Title.
However, Native Title rights are non-exclusive and so contain a number of qualifications. Therefore people of goodwill across the Clarence Valley and the wider Northern Rivers region will need to speak up in support of the Yaegl People's stated position if the Berejiklian Government decides to proceed with its international cruise ship terminal proposal.
Excerpt from Native
Title Determination Yaegl People #2 Part B:
General qualifications
on native title rights and interests
8. Native title does not
exist in:
(a) Minerals as defined
in the Mining Act 1992 (NSW) and the Mining Regulation 2010 (NSW); and
(b) Petroleum as defined
in the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 (NSW) and the Petroleum (Submerged Lands)
Act 1982 (NSW).
9. The native title
rights and interests described in paragraphs 6 and 7 do not confer:
(a) possession,
occupation, use and enjoyment to the exclusion of all others;
(b) any right to control
access to, or use of, the Determination Area.
10. The native title
rights and interests in the Determination Area are subject to and exercisable
in accordance with:
(a) the laws of the
State of New South Wales and of the Commonwealth;
(b) the traditional laws
acknowledged and traditional customs observed by the Yaegl People; and
(c) the terms of any
Indigenous Land Use Agreement, which may be registered by the National Native
Title Tribunal in respect of any part of the Determination Area made after the
making of this Determination…….
Other
interest which existed at the time Native Title over “Dirrangun” was determined
are protected.
10. Other interests
generally
(a) Rights and
interests, including licences and permits, granted by the Crown in right of the
State of New South Wales, the Clarence Valley Council or of the Commonwealth
pursuant to statute or under regulations made pursuant to such legislation.
(b) Rights and interests
held by reason of the force and operation of the laws of the State of New South
Wales or of the Commonwealth.
(c) Rights and interests
of members of the public arising under common law or statute including, but not
limited to the following:
(i) any public right to
fish;
(ii) the public right to
navigate; and
(iii) the international
right of innocent passage through the territorial sea.
(d) So far as is
confirmed pursuant to section 18 of the Native Title (New South Wales) Act as
at the date of the Determination, any existing public access to and enjoyment
of:
(i) waterways;
(ii) the bed and banks
or foreshores of waterways;
(iii) coastal waters;
(iv) beaches;
(v) stock routes; and
(vi) areas that were
public places at the end of 31 December 1993.
(e) The rights of:
(i) an employee, agent
or instrumentality of the State of New South Wales;
(ii) an employee, agent
or instrumentality of the Commonwealth;
(iii) an employee, agent
or instrumentality of any Local Government Authority, to access the
Determination Area and carry out actions as required in the performance of his/
her or its statutory or common law duty.
Sea claim judgment: Yaegl People #2 v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 993 (31 August 2017)
