Thursday 10 March 2011
Earth Hour, 8.30pm Saturday 26 March 2011 - will you be switched off?
From its debut in one city in one country in 2007 – Sydney, Australia – when 2.2 million individuals turned their lights off to take a stand against climate change, Earth Hour has become a truly global movement, embracing 128 countries and territories in 2010.
In four short years, Earth Hour has grown into the largest environmental campaign in history.
2011 marks a new phase for the initiative. The new campaign creative, 60+, will position Earth Hour 2011 as an hour of celebration where the community comes together and makes a pledge to do more to help the planet.
Sign up at earthhour.org.au
Wednesday 9 March 2011
What political hypocrites!
What a week I picked to return home.
Today Tony Windsor decides that the Gillard Government made a mistake in announcing its plan to introduce a carbon price. "In a blunt warning to the Government, Mr Windsor accuses it of making strategic mistakes in the timing of the tax announcement, "putting the cart before the horse" because of "pressure from the Greens", and says a key reason Australians appear to have baulked at the plan is because it is too vague." Hello? Isn’t Saint Tony on the multi-party committee which recommended a carbon price mechanism to the government, didn’t he agree to the announcement of same ("Mr Tony Windsor and Mr Robert Oakeshott, have agreed that the proposal should be released for community consultation"), attend the joint press conference and the next day release his own media blurb in support of this announcement? As today’s prime example of political hypocrisy this about face takes some beating.
Yesterday Pauline Hanson was sprung registering as an Upper House independent candidate on a group ticket in the March 2011 NSW state election. Aw, the luvvie of the far-right must be running out of pin money and needs to top up the bank account. After all this has worked for her in the past – 3 weeks minimum campaigning and maximum reimbursement as an unsuccessful candidate to the tune of $150,000. This latest tilt at campaigning (which sees Hanson change both her mind on “goodbye forever” and the state in which she lives) garners her the title of über political hypocrite also.
On the importance of opinion polls
Feeling unwell? Take two aspirin and stay away from NSW hospitals
While bureaucrats are happily busy preparing to collate personal health information (supplied to them by everyone from doctors through to chemists and optometrists) in order to satisfy Federal Health Minister Roxon’s unnatural desire for a great big database on Australian citizens, this is one of the computer systems from which this data will be drawn. It is said to be installed in 59 hospitals having an estimated 80 per cent of all NSW public hospital beds.
The Sydney Morning Herald 7 March 2011:
The system is so compromised it should be scrapped, a specialist doctors' group said yesterday.
Really inspires confidence doesn’t it?
These difficulties are not confined to large metropolitan areas as this 2010 quote from the North Coast Area Health Service indicates:
Little appears to have changed since the 2009 implementation of this e-health software on the NSW North Coast.
If the reader happens to live in communities covered by the Hunter Urban Division of General Practice this sick software system is probably informing e-discharge summaries etc. forming part of the data collection trial run currently underway in the Newcastle and Hunter Valley region.
Building on these shifting sands, on 1 March 2011 Roxon’s baby, the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), awarded IBM a $23.6M dollar contract to develop nation-wide authentication system for electronic health records.
Tuesday 8 March 2011
Facebook allows freedom of speech to degenerate into abuse
Once again Facebook is being used to support persons currently before the courts and, in this example the language used is beyond colourful.
Names have been redacted before the following comment is displayed here on North Coast Voices:
The more things change the more they stay the same when it comes to gender inequality
It would be comfortable to say “Could only happen in America” when reading this study, which indicates that it is not only developing countries which favour male children.
Do parents have preferences over the gender of their children, and if so, does this have negative consequences for daughters versus sons? In this paper, we show that child gender affects the maritalstatus, family structure, and fertility of a significant number of American families. Overall, a first-born daughter is significantly less likely to be living with her father compared to a first-born son. Three factors are important in explaining this gap. First, women with first-born daughters are less likely to marry. Strikingly, we also find evidence that the gender of a child in utero affects shotgun marriages. Among women who have taken an ultrasound test during pregnancy, mothers who have a girl are less likely to be married at delivery than those who have a boy. Second, parents who have first-born girls are significantly more likely to be divorced. Third, after a divorce, fathers are much more likely to obtain custody of sons compared to daughters. These three factors have serious negative income and educational consequencesfor affected children. What explains these findings? In the last part of the paper, we turn to the relationship between child gender and fertility to help sort out parental gender bias from competing explanations for our findings. We show that the number of children is significantly higher in families with a first-born girl. Our estimates indicate that first-born daughters caused approximately 5500 more births per year, for atotal of 220,000 more births over the past 40 years. Taken individually, each piece of empirical evidence is not sufficient to establish the existence of parental gender bias. But taken together, the weight of the evidence supports the notion that parents in the U .S. favour boys over girls…….Our findings are important for several reasons. First, regardless of how one interprets ourfindings on family structure and fertility, we show that child gender matters. The results on the educational and economic outcomes indicate that the negative effects on children living in families where the first-born child is a girl are substantial. While our findings indicate that some o fthe negative consequences of a first-born daughter affect younger siblings of both genders, girls are overall more likely to be exposed to these negative effects. Moreover, if there is evidence of parental sex bias in family living arrangements and fertility decisions, it may be indicative ofother ways in which parents treat boys and girls unequally. For example, even in families where the parents are married, parents who prefer boys may give less attention and nurturing to their daughters. They may also devote fewer financial resources to their education and health. In this sense, our results are related to the existing literature that documents an unequal intra-household allocation of resources. [The Demand for Sons, GORDON B. DAHL University of California, San Diego, and NBER and ENRICO MORETTI University of California, Berkeley, and NBER,2008]
WetlandCare Australia launches $2.5 million Coastal 20 project in Ballina today
WetlandCare Australia proudly announces the local launch of the $2.5 million Coastal 20 wetland restoration project
Come along and join us at Meldrum Park in Ballina. Janelle Saffin, Federal Member for Page will officially announce the launch of this exciting new project.
This project, funded under the Australian Government's Caring for Country program, will work in partnership with community, government and industry bodies to undertake the restoration of 20 important coastal wetlands from Kempsey to Gladstone. The wetlands located in the local area are: Cudgen Lake, Tyagarah Swamp, Belongil/Cumbebin, North Creek, Tuckean Swamp and the Clarence Broadwater.
When: Tuesday 8th March at 10.00am
Where: Meldrum Park (the northern end of Norton St) Ballina
Monday 7 March 2011
A little fur flies in Senate koala inquiry
On 17 November 2010 the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications was asked to conduct the Inquiry into the status, health and sustainability of Australia's koala population which is scheduled to report in June 2011.
Submissions have now closed with only 69 received and they hint at widely divergent positions bordering on the combative in some instances:
Koala Research Centre of Central Queensland
The status of the koala is uncertain, nationally. Local and regional populations are declining. There is not adequate data to address the IUCN criteria in any consideration of the formal status of the koala. Delaying any reclassification until data meets IUCN criteria produces a crisis driven response with limited capacity to recover the species. A proactive approach from the Commonwealth is recommended including: a move away from the IUCN criterion based assessment of the koala's status, proactive implementation of the actions of the national koala strategy within the Commonwealth's sphere of influence, Commonwealth resourcing of research and community organizations pursuing the objectives of the national koala strategy, support for the establishment of a network of koala sentinel sites monitoring trends in population and habitat status. A strategic review of the approach to managing the koala and its habitat is required taking account of the distinctly different needs in (a) the over abundant, genetically depauperate race of the koala in South Australia and Victoria, (b) the expanding urban and industrial footprint in predominantly coastal eastern Australia, and (c) the rural and regional western and northern habitats affected by climate extremes, fire and drought.
Board Member, NSW Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority
When questioned about this practice recently, DECCW’s Director of Landscapes and Ecosystem Management Tom Grosskopf commented in the local newspaper (Advocate 29 Dec. 2010) that “the Coffs Harbour (Koala) Plan of Management did not fall under the NSW environmental planning policy but rather the council had its own detailed plan and had written themselves out of the state plan.”
Far from writing itself out of the state plan, between 1996 and 2000, Coffs Harbour City Council(CHCC) undertook the preparation of a comprehensive Koala Plan of Management (KPoM)according to NSW State Government guidelines: “Procedures for Preparing Comprehensive Koala Plans of Management under State Environmental Planning Policy 1995 (SEPP) No.44-Koala Habitat Protection.
Ms Paulette Oldfield
A development was approved by my local council in Daisy Hill, Qld, 2007 which sat in the middle of prime habitat. http://thesanctuarydaisyhill.com/index.html (See attached articles) Over 5000 residents voiced their disapproval of this decision but the council ignored their constituents and forged ahead. Illegal clearing then occurred on this site with the developer NOT being held accountable or forced to pay any recompense (RIX Developments, Gold Coast). Rix Development also did not follow council orders with regards to spotter/catcher resources on site at the time of clearing. Again, nothing was done about this. A bulldozer waited until a Koala came out of the tree before the bulldozer knocked it down. This tree was over 80 years old. The Koala had nowhere to go.
Rix Developments
Firstly thank you for forwarding the comments in relation to our development at Daisy Hill, Queensland and the opportunity to reply. The information supplied by the submitter is grossly inaccurate and misleading.
Name Withheld
Lord Mayor and Councillors, my name is <?> and I am not a Greenie. I am also not an Activist. Up until now you could probably have described me as one of the masses. Up until now I would have been quite happy to mind my own business, raising my family in quiet peace in the suburbs of Brisbane.This all changed for me about six months ago when a newly created company gained approval from Brisbane City Council to develop the parcel of land on the up hill slopes adjacent to my home.
Property Council of Australia
The Property Council is strongly opposed to the continuation of the listing of endangered species on a jurisdictional basis. This is in part due to the fragmented review of endangered flora and fauna which fails to deliver a national snapshot of the sustainability and health of these species.
Urban Development Institute of Australia
UDIA (Qld) does not make claims as to present Koala population numbers or other scientific aspects. We do however seek that any decision is made on sound scientific information. It is clear to us, that at least in Queensland, issues around Koala population protection are very substantially affected by emotional or other views based on values which can lead to incorrect outcomes. It is critical that this hyperbole is stripped away and true scientific measures utilised.
National Association of Forest Industries
In addition, the relative scale of activity and landscape connectivity of ‘managed’ and formal conservation reserves (e.g. national parks) should be taken into account at a landscape level. The sustainable harvesting of forests represents less than one per cent annually of the forest estate potentially available for wood production in any one year (in all states and territories) and may enhance the habitat for a range of species through the provision of a diversity of mixed age classes, forest structure and food resources across the landscape.