http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrument1.nsf/0/BCB69D7BEB03CD8ECA2573CC00036065/$file/ExplanatoryStatement.pdf
Sunday 13 January 2008
Rudd Government clears up Social Security anomalies for non-parent principal carers of children
http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrument1.nsf/0/BCB69D7BEB03CD8ECA2573CC00036065/$file/ExplanatoryStatement.pdf
But where are all the Christmas Beetles?
Saturday 12 January 2008
The Humpback Whale - Australia's line in the sand with Japan's whaling fleet
National Geographic:
http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/humpback-whale.html
Some idle thoughts on why the Australian Federal Police Association supported a Labor win?
There are two immediate issues that impact all Australian Federal Police employees; that being Mr Rudd's commitment to merge the AFP into a larger Government agency called the Office of Homeland Security, and the AFPA's strong opposition to AWA's or any other form of secret remuneration contract in the policing environment. The AFPA has already made it clear to Mr Rudd that the independent office of constable and independent office of Commissioner is paramount within any future Homeland Security model. At a more general level Mr Rudd has formally announced that he will increase Federal Policing resources and abolish WorkChoices in its current form."
Last Modified: Tuesday, 11 December 2007
Authorised By: Assistant Director, APEC 2007 Security Branch
Maintainer: APEC 2007 Security Branch"
Attorney General's Department:
It's just not cricket
Friday 11 January 2008
'Up yours!': Japan's whalers reply to Australia
7 January 2008
President of the Japan Whaling Association responds to Australia
On December 19, 2007 Australia's Minister for Foreign Affairs the Honourable Stephen Smith issued a joint media release with the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, Mr. Peter Garrett. The release states that "Australia strongly believes that there is no credible scientific justification for the hunting of whales and is opposed to all commercial and 'scientific' whaling" and notes that "the Australian Government will step up efforts to end this senseless and brutal practice, using a range of diplomatic, legal and monitoring and surveillance initiatives" that "the Government is giving serious consideration to a range of options for international legal action against Japan" and that "the Government will develop its own proposal for improving and modernising the IWC which will include closing the loophole that allows for scientific whaling. "
In the proper context of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) and the International Whaling Commmission (IWC) these comments of the Government of Australia are provocative and absurd. The fact is that the ICRW is about properly managing the whaling industry by regulating catch quotas at levels so that whale stocks will not be diminished. The Convention is not about protecting all whales irrespective of their abundance.
Further, the fact that Australia was a whaling country when it agreed to and signed the ICRW and subsequently changed its postion to anti-whaling following the closure of its industry in the 1970s does not change the Convention. If Australia can no longer agree to the Convention it should withdraw rather than subvert its purpose. Smith and Garrett can ignore these facts but they cannot change them.
Australia together with other anti-whaling members of the IWC have sacrificed the principles of science-based management and sustainable use that are the world standard (and supported by Australia in other international fora and for the management of their own resources) as a political expediency to satisfy the interests of non-government organizations. This has made the IWC dysfunctional and threatens much-needed international cooperation required to properly manage and conserve all marine resources. It is of considerable concern therefore that Australia's stepped up efforts to end commercial and scientific whaling will undermine the work of the current Chairman (William Hogarth of the US) of the IWC to resolve the dysfunctional nature of the organization and return it to its proper functioning as a resource management organization.
Japan's whaling is not "senseless and brutal". Neither is it illegal in any way. The most recent review of Japan's research whaling program in the Antarctic by the IWC's Scientific Committee in December 2006 concluded that "the dataset provides a valuable resource to allow investigation of some aspects of the role of whales within the marine ecosystem and that this has the potential to make an important contribution to the Scientific Committee's work in this regard as well as the work of other relevant bodies such as the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources". The Scientific Committee also agreed to its earlier (1997) conclusion that the results from the research program "have the potential to improve management of minke whales in the Southern Hemisphere".
The suggestion of Smith and Garrett that somehow Japan's whale research program is a violation of international law and that Japan is not acting in accordance with its international treaty obligations is totally without foundation. Article VIII of the ICRW unequivocally provides the right of members of the IWC to kill whales for research purposes and further states that "the killing, taking, and treating of whales in accordance with the provisions of this Article shall be exempt from the operation of this Convention." Conversely, the fact that the Government of Australia has publicly stated that it no longer accepts the terms of the ICRW and yet continues to participate in the IWC is a self indictment that it has failed to meet its legal obligation to interpret and implement its treaty obligations in good faith.
Finally, Smith and Garrett note that "Australia values its extensive and mutually beneficial relationship with Japan" and that "as in any close relationship there are some issues on which we cannot agree". In the face of this disagreement on whaling, Australia's determination "to play a leading role in international efforts to stop Japan's whaling practices" is arrogant and an insult to Japanese people and their culture. A more constructive approach with less media hype is needed.
Keiichi NAKAJIMA
President
Japan Whaling Association
Japan Whaling Association:
http://www.whaling.jp/english/release/080107.html
"Australia's health system third best" - did the study really say that?
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23026791-23109,00.html
Help Wanted: no bleedin' hearts, trade unionists or furriners need apply
Thursday 10 January 2008
John Howard's death by a thousand cuts in 2008
Three political halleluiahs and a vote for me
Vale George Moore, Australian jockey
Wednesday 9 January 2008
Rudd Government looking to thwart Howard's attempt to empty kitty ahead of 2007 federal election
However, when John Howard began to promise money like a drunken sailor ahead of the 24 November 2007 federal election, I suspected that he might also be attempting to reduce government coffers just in case the Coalition was voted out of office. So I was rather glad to see the following.
Mr Tanner has told Sky News he would prefer not to disrupt contracts that are already under way.
"In many cases, decisions that were made just prior to the election campaign have not been implemented," he said.
"They have not actually been actioned. Contracts haven't been signed, money hasn't gone out the door.
"That does mean that it's in some respects less difficult to focus on those kind of commitments than those things that are already the subject of existing contracts."
Mr Tanner says spending cuts are needed to put downward pressure on interest rates.
"We are in a tough environment. Inflation is getting beyond the 3 per cent level, that is the outer limit of the Reserve Bank zone," he said."
ABC News report:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/01/07/2133067.htm?section=australia
Good move, Minister Tanner. Time to cull the former Howard Government's attempt at pork barrelling and rein in an unwieldy and fiscally inefficient bureaucracy.
Your own party's election promises are going to be hard enough to fund as it is, in light of sustained inflationary pressures .
The Australian article today:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23015322-5013871,00.html
It's still a case of "Brendan who?"
Winners and grinners on the NSW North Coast
North Coast artist Patricia Piccinini's work "Thicker than water". Photograph at http://www.artsnorthernrivers.com.au/
"Mapping Ulgundahi" by Frances Belle Parker, winner of the ABC North Coast ArtsNest 2007 Award.
Photograph at http://www.abc.net.au/
Debrah Novak's "Cygnets during a performance of Swan Lake". Debrah has won numerous photography awards.
Photograph at http://www.arthouseaustralia.com.au/
Aunty Jack to host ripper Australia Day in Clarence Valley
Tuesday 8 January 2008
The folly of allowing developments in flood-prone land
In an article headed Court agrees climate-change risk rules out housing plan
The Sydney Morning Herald (January 8, 2008) reports:
"Many may be pleased to know the Land and Environment Court can overturn not just a council decision but a ministerial one.
The court recently ruled invalid a concept plan approved by the Minister for Planning, Frank Sartor, for a controversial residential subdivision and retirement complex at Sandon Point, on the coast near Wollongong. The action was brought by a resident, Jill Walker.
The court agreed the department should have considered the flooding risk from climate change as it was an aspect of the public interest that potentially had a bearing on the justice of the decision.
The decision is a win for residents who have been protesting for years against the development of the flood-prone 25-hectare site by Stockland Development and Anglican Retirement Villages.
Deacons Lawyers said councils would have to ensure risks from climate change in flood-constrained coastal areas had been addressed by developers and that they considered such risks in their decisions."
Comment:The land at West Yamba is flood-prone. Allowing further development in the area will require fill being obtained from elsewhere in order to raise the area above designated ASL requirements. That may solve current problem associated with the West Yamba site but one doesn't have to be Einstein to understand that water which would normally find its way to this naturally occurring flood storage area in times of heavy rainfall will be diverted elsewhere. And just where is elsewhere? Think about it. Land that is currently occupied and considered flood free will not necessarily carry such a tag in the future.
Yes, further development at West Yamba will create a new set of winners (just think 'developers and their associates'), but there'll also be a crew of losers who'll be up the creek without paddles in times of high local rainfall and/or flooding that results from waters flowing downstream from the catchment area.
Clarence Valley Council should have this matter uppermost in its collective mind. So too, should Minister Frank Sartor and all others who will be called upon to give consideration to any hair-brained proposals to develop West Yamba.
Remember, the law attaches great significance to the concept of precedence. Hence, this decision of the Land and Environment Court has implications for West Yamba.
Leopards cannot change their spots
Roebuck wrote:
"If Cricket Australia cares a fig for the tattered reputation of our national team in our national sport, it will not for a moment longer tolerate the sort of arrogant and abrasive conduct seen from the captain and his senior players over the past few days. Beyond comparison it was the ugliest performance put up by an Australian side for 20 years. The only surprising part of it is that the Indians have not packed their bags and gone home. There is no justice for them in this country, nor any manners.
That the senior players in the Australian team are oblivious to the fury they raised among many followers of the game in this country and beyond merely confirms their own narrow and self-obsessed viewpoint. Doubtless they were not exposed to the messages that poured in from distressed enthusiasts aghast to see the scenes of bad sportsmanship and triumphalism presented at the SCG during and after the Test. Pained past players rang to express their disgust (my emphasis). It was a wretched and ill-mannered display and not to be endured from any side, let alone an international outfit representing a proud sporting nation."
Comment:
Events as the SCG during the second test went from the sublime to the ridiculous. Ponting set the ball rolling with his petulant behaviour when dismissed in Australia's first innings. Previously given a "life" by an umpire's mistake, Ponting returned to the sheds after his dismissal (which, admittedly was not a clear-cut decision) and carried on like a spoilt three-year old brat.
Ponting later attempted to claim the high moral ground when he recalled Rahul Dravid because he was not sure if he had held a chance from Dravid at second slip.
However, Ponting's halo slipped again in India's second innings when he claimed a catch in the final session on day 5. Ponting also had the temerity to wave his upright index finger at the umpire on another occasion when the umpire was considering whether a ball had carried to an Australian fielder. The umpire subsequently gave the Indian batsman out - did the umpire jump, or was he pushed?
Ponting's captaincy must be terminated. No ifs. No buts. Leopards don't change their spots - Ponting's behaviour and attitude isn't something that appeared out-of-the-blue overnight.
On a final note, hands up anyone who would like to become a full time cricket umpire. Just as I thought. Although I've been critical of umpires Bucknor and Benson for their performances in the second test in an earlier post, most first-class cricket umpires do an A-1 job. Much of the decision-making by umpires must remain in their hands and on the field. Technology is not, although Channel 9's team thinks otherwise, the only solution. It is helpful in a number of aspects, but it must never replace the immediate and spontaneous actions and decisions that make the game worth going to see live at the ground.
Read Peter Roebuck's "Arrogant Ponting must be fired" at
http://www.smh.com.au/news/cricket/arrogant-ponting-must-be-fired-roebuck/2008/01/07/1199554571883.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
Million dollar Yamba
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23015416-5010800,00.html
Not racism - just a genuine concern for whales which inhabit Australian waters
Australia coming of age
However briefly, this makes the deputy leader the first indigenous person to head an Australian government. You little bewdy, Marion!
Photo from abc.net.au
Monday 7 January 2008
More NSW North Coast flood pictures
Rudd meets with US Congressional Leaders delegation
There was expected to be a host of issues on the agenda during their meeting, including the US-Australian alliance and security issues such as Iraq and Afghanistan."
Hey Hughie, tone it down a little!
Ballina Shire Council has a great arts idea
Sunday 6 January 2008
Cricket: Questionable umpiring decisions spoil the Second Australia v. India Test Match
A number of very dubious (no, make that downright wrong) umpiring decisions favoured the home team. Ironically, Australia's Andrew Symonds who was a prominent member of the cast in the umpiring controversies was named Man of the Match. Many experienced cricket-goers are convinced Steve Bucknor was easily THE man of the Match. Well, he did make a very big impression on it!
Bucknor's time in the centre must now be drawn to a sad and sorry close. Honestly, he should have stepped aside at a time when he was on top of his game and been remembered for the fantastic contribution he made to the game.
A full report of the game and its score card is at:
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/baggygreen/engine/match/291352.html
Are we turning into a nation of rude bores?
Get out those knitting needles ladies. You'll go back to the role of housewife very soon the way Bogpond is sacking their engineering teams."
http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/insults-deter-quality-debate/2008/01/04/1198950070621.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
Footpath and road etiquette on NSW North Coast
Where is Australia's commitment to stop whaling in Antarctic waters?
Well it's off taking a Christmas holiday, along with Kevin Rudd.
The annual Japanese whale hunt is now halfway over and not one league of ocean has been covered by the promised monitoring ship.
Well done, Kev and Pete. Such determination and action - you're really doing us proud.
The whaling nations must be laughing fit to burst.
Saturday 5 January 2008
Hey baby, it's wet out there! NSW North Coast flood pictures
Where's the blanket opt-out clause, Senator Conroy?
First unofficial water report card of 2008
NSW farmers welcome Rudd Government drought plan and climate change focus
George Bush uses backdoor to reward Friend John
Friday 4 January 2008
NSW North Coast homeless struggling in soggy conditions
Hotting up across Australia - one for those climate change sceptics out there
2007 a record warm year in southern Australia
For many Australians, 2007 was the warmest year on record, although when averaged across the whole of the continent, it was only the sixth warmest year.
Other features of the Bureau of Meteorology's 2007 Climate Statement, issued by its National Climate Centre, include near average rainfall but with a dry winter and spring following rain in southern Australia earlier in the year.
Statistically, the mean temperature for Australia was 0.67°C above average in 2007, making it the sixth warmest year since high quality Australia-wide records commenced in 1910.
But in the southern half of the continent temperatures were well above normal, with the Murray Darling Basin, South Australia, New South Wales and Victoria all recording their warmest years on record.
A grim feature of the year has been extremely low water availability across parts of Australia. Despite promising rains during the first half of the year, July to October was particularly dry. It was not until November that rain returned to much of the continent with the emergence of a La Niña event.
Overall, annual rainfall was average to above average across northern and central Australia, and average to below average in the southwest, with mixed results in the southeast. Patchy rainfall across southern Australia means that long-term droughts persist in the far southwest and in the southeast, including the Murray Darling Basin, all of Victoria and northern Tasmania. South-eastern Australia has now missed out on the equivalent of an average year's rainfall over the duration of this continuing 11 year drought.
Since 1 January 1908, the Bureau of Meteorology has been responsible for collecting, managing and safeguarding Australia's climate record. It is this national climate archive that allows data recorded today to be placed in historical context.
The Annual Australian Climate Statement 2007 can be viewed at:
http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/climate/change/
State climate summaries can be viewed at:
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/index.shtml
Petroleum merry-go-round
Life wasn't meant to be queasy
Thursday 3 January 2008
We intend to honour all our election promises - just don't ask us how or when
Ministerial ethics
http://www.pmc.gov.au/guidelines/docs/ministerial_ethics.rtf
Good times in the Clarence Valley?
Memo to Tim Gartrell
Wednesday 2 January 2008
Australian national archives just a tad out of date
- Minister for Business and Consumer Affairs (1975–77)
- Minister for Special Trade Negotiations (July–December 1977)
- Treasurer (1977–83)
- Minister Assisting the Prime Minister (May–December 1977)
Gone but not forgiven
Bless Julie Bishop's little cotton socks
Ah Brendan, Brendan....
Tuesday 1 January 2008
Time to cut that credit card in half as banks raise rates
Most at risk are credit card holders, who owe the banks a record $31 billion and face interest rates of up to 19.9 per cent as the Christmas bills fall due in coming months.-----------------------------------
Amateur pyrotechnicians = dangerous nuisances
Responsible individuals and organisations respect lawful directions associated with fireworks displays. In NSW this involves making application to WorkCover to conduct public displays of fireworks.
WorkCover's website provides a search facility that shows listings of notified displays. The listings enable authorities and members of the public to take appropriate action in preparation for the displays. The website is http//www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/fireworks_search.htm
In addition to the nuisance factor associated with illegal fireworks, the far more important factor of PUBLIC SAFETY need addressing.
Unauthorised and illegal fireworks should not be tolerated. Contact POLICE, LOCAL COUNCIL and WORKCOVER to report incidents of such activities.
Authorised fireworks displays between 01-Nov-2007 and 31-Jan-2008 were registered with WorkCover. The list isn't very long, so obviously most fireworks are unauthorised and illegal.
Heavy seas, wind and rain bring in New Year on the NSW North Coast
Wild weather in south-east Queensland flowed somewhat weakly through to northern New South Wales, resulting in heavy seas, strong winds and sporadic rain as we saw the New Year in.
Although the rain was welcome on the coastal strip it was not excessive and has not resulted in any significant run-off into local rivers so far.
Climate change predicted to dominate Australian economic outlook in 2008
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Economic-outlook-2008--climate-change-will-dominat-A9VFT?OpenDocument
It's the year 2008: one European city-state and one Antipodean nation are regressing
And I thought all those devil vibes were coming out of the Bush Administration and the Pentagon!
It seems that Cardinal Ratzinger now Pope Benedict XVl cannot decide which century he is actually residing in.
Perhaps it's time for a few good, level-headed Aussie members of his flock to remind His Holiness that it is now 2008.
Meanwhile, according to ABC News on the same day, the new Federal Telecommunications Minister Stephen Conroy told Australia that all internet connections will soon be subject to mandatory ISP filtering in order to shield the young from violence and pornography.
Leaving us all to wonder exactly how much online news and current affairs will make it past this enthusiastic censor, if such 'filtering' causes regional download speed to decrease even more than the current snailpace or if the mooted opt-out function does not reliably work.
Has Senator Conroy been speaking with his Pope?