Age has not dimmed Fred 'The Red Herring' Perring......
Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts
Thursday 18 July 2019
Local conspiracy theorist is at it again
Age has not dimmed Fred 'The Red Herring' Perring......
The
Daily Examiner, Letter to the Editor, 16 July 2019, p.15:
Plotters
signed Australia up to new world order
EX-PM
Turnbull and his acolyte Julie Bishop were in cahoots with many
others to bring down Tony Abbott long before Turnbull finally wielded
the knife.
Both
Turnbull and Bishop were part of the far left of the Liberal party.
Both were disciples of the principles of the United Nations, which
encompassed a Sustainable Development Agenda 2030.
During
a speech Bishop made at the United Nations she actually signed
Australia on to become part of the new world order global government.
The
Australian people were never consulted.
The
Paris Agreement is a case in point – a United Nations piggy bank
into which subservient, signed-up countries must tip a billion or so
each and every year, ostensibly to help poorer countries.
It
is the UN that is getting fatter, although for how long is the
question – more and more European countries are wanting out.
In
relation to the UN and its hold over various bodies controlling areas
of the environment under heritage orders, the NSW Government proposes
to raise the wall on Warragamba Dam to increase water storage and to
alleviate flooding on the lower reaches.
This
vital work cannot go ahead without the authority of the United
Nations puppet on World Heritage, which recently held a meeting in
Azerbaijan to discuss the proposal.
A
report is out soon with UN members to come to Australia to view the
effects on the Blue Mountains heritage area.
No
thanks to Bishop and Turnbull.
Bob
“World Government” Brown would be oh so pleased.
Fred
Perring,
Halfway
Creek
Labels:
environment,
United Nations,
water
Thursday 30 May 2019
United Nations asked to pass judgement on the impact of Australian Morrison Government's climate change 'denialism'
The Conversation, May 2019:
Climate change threatens
Australia in many different ways, and can devastate rural and urban communities
alike. For Torres Strait Islanders, it’s a crisis that’s washing away their
homes, infrastructure and even
cemeteries.
The failure to take
action on this crisis has
led a group of Torres Strait Islanders to
lodge a climate change case with the United Nations Human Rights
Committee against the Australian federal government.
It’s the
first time the Australian government has been taken to the UN for
their failure to take action on climate change. And its the first time people
living on a low lying island have taken action against any government.
This case – and other
parallel cases – demonstrate that climate change is “fundamentally a human rights issue”,
with First Nations most vulnerable to the brunt of a changing climate.
The group of Torres
Strait Islanders lodging this appeal argue that the Australian government has
failed to take adequate action on climate change. They allege that the re-elected
Coalition government has not only steered Australia off track in meeting globally
agreed emissionsreductions, but has set us on course for climate
catastrophe.
In doing so, Torres
Strait Islanders argue that the government has failed to uphold human
rights obligations and violated their rights to culture, family and
life.
This case is a show of
defiance in the face of Australia’s years of political inertia and turmoil over
climate change.
It is the first time
people living on a low-lying island – acutely vulnerable in the face of rising
sea levels – have brought action against a government. But it may also be a
sign of things to come, as more small island nations face impending climate
change threats…..
The
Guardian, 13 May 2019:
The complaint will
assert that the Morrison government has failed to take adequate action to
reduce emissions or pursue proper adaptation measures on the islands and, as a
consequence, has failed fundamental human rights obligations to Torres Strait
Islander people.
One of the complainants,
sixth-generation Warraber man, Kabay Tamu, said in a statement: “When erosion
happens, and the lands get taken away by the seas, it’s like a piece of us that
gets taken with it – a piece of our heart, a piece of our body. That’s why it
has an effect on us. Not only the islands but us, as people.
“We have a sacred site
here, which we are connected to spiritually. And disconnecting people from the
land, and from the spirits of the land, is devastating.
“It’s devastating to even imagine that my
grandchildren or my great-grandchildren being forced to leave because of the
effects that are out of our hands.
“We’re currently seeing
the effects of climate change on our islands daily, with rising seas, tidal
surges, coastal erosion and inundation of our communities.”
The non-profit
coordinating the complaint by the Torres Strait Islanders says this will be the
first climate change litigation brought against the Australian government based
on a human rights complaint, and also the first legal action worldwide brought
by inhabitants of low-lying islands against a nation state.
Lawyers with environmental law
non-profit ClientEarth, are representing the islanders, with support from
British-based barristers.
The UN Human Rights
Committee is a body of 18 legal experts that sits in Geneva. The committee
monitors compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights.
The complainants are
alleging that Australia has violated article 27, the right to culture; article
17, the right to be free from arbitrary interference with privacy, family and
home; and article 6, the right to life.
According to briefing
material supplied by ClientEarth, the complaint alleges these rights have been
violated both by Australia’s insufficient
greenhouse gas mitigation targets and plans, and by its failure to
fund adequate
coastal defence and resilience measures on the islands, such as
seawalls.
Lawyers for the
islanders allege that the catastrophic nature of the predicted future impacts
of climate change on the Torres Strait
Islands, including the total submergence of ancestral homelands, is a
sufficiently severe impact as to constitute a violation of the rights to
culture, family and life.
The islanders want the
government to commit at least $20m for emergency measures such as seawalls, as
requested by local authorities, and sustained investment in long-term adaptation
measures to ensure the islands can continue to be inhabited.
They want a commitment
to reduce emissions by at least 65% below 2005 levels by 2030 and going net
zero before 2050 and a phase out of thermal coal, both for domestic electricity
generation and export markets....
Tuesday 5 March 2019
The graphs that expose Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison's climate change policy propaganda
Australia has a monumental problem.
Since September 2013 the Australian Government, first under Liberal prime ministers Abbott and Turnbull and then under current Australian Prime Minster and Liberal MP for Cook Scott Morrison, has failed to implement effective national climate change mitigation measures.
This has left the nation with an est. 695 million tonnes (or 2.9 billion tonnes) of greenhouse gas emissions it has to reduce/abate by 2021-2030 in order to meet its international obligations.
Ever since he successfully ousted the last Liberal prime minister in a 'palace coup' Morrison has been telling the world that this country will meet its Paris Agreement targets "at a canter" and that national greenhouse gas annual emissions are falling.
Both he and his ministers talk of greenhouse gas emission levels falling per capita or per head of population. All that means is that the Australian population is growing at a slightly faster rate than national emission levels are rising. It doesn't mean greenhouse gas emissions are falling.
On 25 February 2019 Morrison announced his Climate Solutions Package - mostly a rehash of old Liberal-Nationals climate policies and as yet unrealised infrastructure projects - which he rather misleadingly states will "reduce greenhouse gases across the economy".
After this 'solutions' initiatives announcement the Minister for Energy and Liberal MP for Hume Angus Taylor went on national television claiming Australia's national greenhouse gas emissions had fallen by "over 1 per cent" - omitting to point out that this quarter to quarter seasonally adjusted weather normalised change did not result in an overall decrease in total greenhouse gas emissions for the year to September 2018.
In August 2015 the then Abbott Government, in which Scott Morrison was a cabinet minister, also misspoke when it told the United Nations that its "direct action" plan was successful and that:
The target is a significant progression beyond Australia’s 2020 commitment to cut emissions by five per cent below 2000 levels (equivalent to 13 per cent below 2005 levels). The target approximately doubles Australia’s rate of emissions reductions, and significantly reduces emissions per capita and per unit of GDP, when compared to the 2020 target. Across a range of metrics, Australia’s target is comparable to the targets of other advanced economies. Against 2005 levels, Australia’s target represents projected cuts of 50 to 52 per cent in emissions per capita by 2030 and 64 to 65 per cent per unit of GDP by 2030. [my yellow highlighting]
For this to be a genuine reduction which will help alleviate the effects of climate change it means this 695 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions that are in the earth's atmosphere right now have to be removed by abatement action on Australia's part between 2019 and 2030.
At the United Nations 2018 Climate Action Summit (COP24) it was pointed out to all member countries that attempting to use old credits from the Kyoto Protocol as carryovers when accounting for ongoing emission rates will not actually bring down current global emissions levels.
However, the Morrison Government is using old carryover credits from the Labor Government years 2008-2012 to reduce Australia's own abatement commitment by est. 368 million tonnes - bringing it down to only a 328 million tonnes reduction in greenhouse gases by 2030. Less than half of what the Australian Government actually committed to under the Paris Agreement.
The federal Dept of Environment and Energy's own data gives a more honest picture of where Australia stands on bringing down greenhouse gas emissions since 2013 than does Morrison's dodgy accounting tricks.
4. Trend
emissions levels are inclusive of all sectors of the economy, including Land
Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF). Removing LULUCF from caluclations will result in higher trend levels.
|
Only three of the eight sectors in this graph show any real improvement since 1990 and even these become somewhat static after 2013.
|
When it comes to the year 2018 from 1 January to 30 September, the Financial
Review reported on 28 February 2019 that:
Increases in greenhouse
gas emissions from growing liquefied natural gas exports, although offset by
lower emissions from electricity, pushed Australia's overall carbon pollution
up by nearly 1 per cent in the year to September….
Greenhouse gas emissions
were up by 4.6 millon tonnes, or 0.9 per cent, in the year to September last
year to 536 million tonnes, according to the quarterly update of Australia's
National Greenhouse Gas Inventory.
The gains from big
declines in emissions from the electricity sector (3.2 per cent) and
agriculture (3 per cent) were negated by the 5.8 per cent increase in mining
and manufacturing, especially LNG exports (up 19.7 per cent), steel production
(up 10 per cent) and aluminium production (up 5.5 per cent).
"Growth in LNG also
strongly impacted fugitive emissions due to the flaring and venting of methane
and carbon dioxide. An increase in 10 per cent in steel production in
particular affected industrial process emissions," the report said…..
The bottom line is that in September 2013 Australia's greenhouse gas emissions stood at 515.1 Mt of CO2-e, having fallen from a high of 617.5 Mt of CO2-e in March 2007.
However, emissions have steadily risen in the years following 2013 until in September 2016 they had reached 527.2 Mt of CO2-e, by September 2017 533.3 Mt of CO2-e, by March 2018 535.8 Mt of CO2-e and by September 2018 our national emissions were 536 Mt CO2-e.
No matter how many ways Morrison Government spokespersons attempt to present the figures, the fact remains that Australia's national greenhouse gas emissions began to fall steadily between 2007 and 2013 but once the Abbott Government removed the price on carbon and altered other Labor climate change policies they began to rise again and they are still rising.
To date the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison Government has marched this country backwards towards national greenhouse gas emission levels not found since the end of 2012.
How much further will they send us back in time if they govern for another three years? Will the national emissions total in 2022 be in excess of 545 million tonnes? A higher national total than that of the year the Abbott Government promised the United Nations it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
The Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: September 2018 Incorporating emissions from the NEM up to December 2018 can be found here.
However, emissions have steadily risen in the years following 2013 until in September 2016 they had reached 527.2 Mt of CO2-e, by September 2017 533.3 Mt of CO2-e, by March 2018 535.8 Mt of CO2-e and by September 2018 our national emissions were 536 Mt CO2-e.
No matter how many ways Morrison Government spokespersons attempt to present the figures, the fact remains that Australia's national greenhouse gas emissions began to fall steadily between 2007 and 2013 but once the Abbott Government removed the price on carbon and altered other Labor climate change policies they began to rise again and they are still rising.
To date the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison Government has marched this country backwards towards national greenhouse gas emission levels not found since the end of 2012.
How much further will they send us back in time if they govern for another three years? Will the national emissions total in 2022 be in excess of 545 million tonnes? A higher national total than that of the year the Abbott Government promised the United Nations it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
The Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: September 2018 Incorporating emissions from the NEM up to December 2018 can be found here.
Tuesday 29 January 2019
Wangan and Jagalingou people's fight against foreign mining giant Adani continues into 2019
ABC
News, 25
January 2019:
The United Nations has
asked the Australian Government to consider suspending the Adani project in
central Queensland until it gains the support of a group of traditional owners
who are fighting the miner in court.
A UN committee raised
concerns that the Queensland coal project may violate Indigenous rights under
an international convention against racial discrimination if it goes ahead,
giving Australia until April to formally respond.
Meanwhile, a public
interest legal fund backed by former corruption fighter Tony Fitzgerald has
stepped in with financial backing for a federal court challenge to Adani by its
opponents within the Wangan and Jagalingou (W&J) people.
The Grata Fund, which
boasts the former federal court judge as a patron, agreed to pay a
court-ordered $50,000 bond so W&J representatives can appeal a court ruling
upholding a contentious land access deal secured by the miner.
The UN Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination last month wrote to Australia's UN
ambassador to raise concerns that consultation on Adani's Indigenous Land Use
Agreement (ILUA) "might not have been conducted in good faith".
These allegations
"notably" included that members of the W&J native title claim
group were excluded, and the committee was concerned the project "does not
enjoy free, prior and informed consent of all (W&J) representatives"….
UN committee chair
Noureddine Amir in a letter told Australia's UN ambassador Sally Mansfield the
committee was concerned ILUAs could lead to the "extinction of Indigenous
peoples' land titles" in Australia.
Mr Amir said it was
"particularly concerned" by 2017 changes to native title laws to
recognise ILUAs not signed by all native title claimants, "which appears
to be in contradiction" with an earlier landmark Federal Court ruling.
"Accordingly, the
committee is concerned that, if the above allegations are corroborated, the
realisation of the Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project would infringe the
rights of the Wangan and Jagalingou people, rights that are protected under the
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination," Mr Amir said.
The committee gave
Australia until April 8 to outline steps taken to ensure proper consent
"in accordance with Indigenous peoples' own decision-making
mechanisms".
It asked Australia to
"consider suspending" the Adani project until consent was given by
"all Indigenous peoples, including the Wangan and Jagalingou family
council".
It invited Australia to
seek expert advice from the UN experts on Indigenous rights and to
"facilitate dialogue" between the W&J and Adani.
Labels:
Adani Group,
court,
human rights,
law,
mining,
Native Title,
United Nations
Sunday 27 May 2018
Another asylum seeker death on Manus Island
There have been three deaths of asylum seekers held in Australian off shore detention in the last nine months - one on Nauru and two on Manus Island - according to Border Crossing Observatory.
This recent death brings the count to four.
UNHCR: The United
Nations Refugee Agency, media
release, 22 May 2018:
UNHCR Statement
By UNHCR Regional
Representation in Canberra 22 May 2018
UNHCR, the UN Refugee
Agency, is profoundly saddened by the death of a Rohingya refugee on Manus
Island, Papua New Guinea, today. The tragic loss of yet another vulnerable
person under Australian ‘offshore processing’ again underscores the need for
proper care and immediate solutions.
“With the passage of too many years and the withdrawal or reduction of essential services, the already critical situation for refugees most in need continues to deteriorate,” said Nai Jit Lam, UNHCR’s Deputy Regional Representative in Canberra. “Australia’s responsibility for those who have sought its protection remains unchanged. Our thoughts and condolences are with the man’s family today.”
UNHCR renews its call for the Government of Australia to take immediate action to provide assistance and solutions, and to avert further harm and tragedy. Comprehensive, intensive support for refugees and asylum-seekers remains desperately needed in both Papua New Guinea and Nauru. The national authorities of both countries lack the means and infrastructure to address growing needs.
UNHCR is continuing to seek further information from the Governments of Australia and Papua New Guinea respectively.
“With the passage of too many years and the withdrawal or reduction of essential services, the already critical situation for refugees most in need continues to deteriorate,” said Nai Jit Lam, UNHCR’s Deputy Regional Representative in Canberra. “Australia’s responsibility for those who have sought its protection remains unchanged. Our thoughts and condolences are with the man’s family today.”
UNHCR renews its call for the Government of Australia to take immediate action to provide assistance and solutions, and to avert further harm and tragedy. Comprehensive, intensive support for refugees and asylum-seekers remains desperately needed in both Papua New Guinea and Nauru. The national authorities of both countries lack the means and infrastructure to address growing needs.
UNHCR is continuing to seek further information from the Governments of Australia and Papua New Guinea respectively.
UNHCR Regional
Representation in Canberra
UNHCR’s Regional Representation is based in Canberra, and is responsible for the promotion and protection of refugee rights in Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.
The Guardian, 22 May 2018:
UNHCR’s Regional Representation is based in Canberra, and is responsible for the promotion and protection of refugee rights in Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.
The Guardian, 22 May 2018:
A Rohingya refugee has
died in a violent motor vehicle incident on Manus Island.
The man was witnessed
“coming out of a moving vehicle”, according to the Asylum Seeker Resource
Centre, and suffered “very serious head injuries”.
He died at the scene,
the organisation said. “It is not know who else was in the vehicle.”
The man, whose identity
is not being released until his family is notified, had a long history of
physical and mental illness and had been on Manus for more than five years.
A few years ago he was
sent to Australia for medical treatment but was returned, according to the
journalist and refugee Behrouz Boochani.
Boochani said the other
refugees had been aware of his illness. They were “deeply saddened and
horrified at the news of another friend’s death”.
Wednesday 7 February 2018
As a new member of the UN Human Rights Council is Australia continuing to act the hypocrite?
For the
second time in three months the UN Special
Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights has written to the Turnbull Coalition Government
concerning its welfare policies.
Australian-born Professor
Alston has been Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights since
June 2014.
The Commonwealth of Australia was elected on
16 October 2017 as a member of the UN Human Rights Council 2018-2020.
So the
following news item is more than a little embarrassing with what it reveals about government policies.
ABC Radio RN
Breakfast, 1
February 2018:
A top UN official has
delivered a scathing assessment of Australia's welfare policies describing them
as 'punitive' and harmful to women.
Australian Philip Alston
is the UN's Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty. He accuses the government of
pursuing policies that 'stigmatise' and 'marginalise' poorer sections of
society.
In a letter sent to the
government this week, Philip raised concerns about the planned expansion of
cashless welfare cards, and their impact on indigenous communities.
The
first letter
dated 17 October 2017 addressed the Social Services Legislation Amendment
Act 2017 (Cth) (No. 33 of 2017) and concerns that it may have a negative impact
on the human rights of persons living in poverty, particularly single parents
and their children, as well as expressing concerns about proposed
drug testing of young people on unemployment benefits.
It would appear
that the Turnbull Government’s welfare reforms make nonsense of Australia’s
voluntary undertakings lodged with the United Nations on 14 July 2014
as part of its candidature for a vacancy on the UN Human Rights
Council.
Sunday 7 January 2018
Trump starts the New Year with the United Nation's thumbing its nose at his threats
Despite US President Donald Trump’s threats to pull foreign aid from countries which didn’t vote as he directed, seventy-four per cent of national representatives participating in the UN General Assembly Emergency Session ‘Status of Jerusalem’ vote cast their ballots against the Trump Regime’s declaration of Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel.
United Nations News Centre, 21 December 2017:
General Assembly demands all States comply with UN resolutions regarding status of Jerusalem
21 December 2017 – By an overwhelming majority, Member States in the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday “demanded” that all countries comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the status of Jerusalem, following an earlier decision by the United States to recognize the Holy City as the capital of Israel.
Through a resolution adopted by a recorded vote of 128 in favour to nine against (Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Togo, United States), with 35 abstentions, the 193-member Assembly expressed “deep regret” over recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem and stressed that the Holy City “is a final status issue to be resolved through negotiations in line with relevant UN resolutions.”
Action in the Assembly today follows a failed attempt by the Security Council on Monday adopt a similar text reflecting regret among the body’s members about “recent decisions regarding the status of Jerusalem,” with a veto from the United States, a permanent member of the Council.
Ahead of that failed resolution, Nickolay Mladenov, Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, told the Security Council that the security situation in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory had become more tense in the wake of US President Donald Trump's decision on 6 December to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Subsequently, Yemen and Turkey, in their respective capacities as Chair of the Arab Group and the Chair of the Summit of the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation, requested the President of the General Assembly to “urgently resume’ the tenth emergency special session of the General Assembly in accordance with the so-named ‘Uniting for peace’ procedure.
This procedure, under Assembly resolution 377 (1950), is a pathway around a Security Council veto. By it, the Assembly can call an emergency special session to consider a matter “with a view to making appropriate recommendations to members for collective measures,” if the Security Council fails to act or if there is lack of unanimity among the Council’s permanent members, China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and the United States.
Since the tenth such meeting, the Assembly has temporarily adjourned the emergency special session and authorized “the President of the General Assembly […] to resume its meeting upon request from Member States,” allowing for speedy consideration by the body of urgent issues.
The most recent resumed emergency session was in 2009 when the Assembly called a meeting on East Jerusalem and the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Resolutions in the Assembly are non-binding and do not carry the force of international law as do measures agreed in the Security Council.
Find out more about the Assembly’s emergency special sessions and resolution 377 (1950) here
Today’s resolution demanded that “all States comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the Holy City of Jerusalem, and not recognize any actions or measures contrary to those resolutions.”
The General Assembly further affirmed that “any decisions and actions which purport to have altered the character, status or demographic composition of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal effect, are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with relevant resolutions of the Security Council.”
In that regard the Assembly also called upon all States to refrain from the establishment of diplomatic missions in the Holy City of Jerusalem, pursuant to Security Council resolution 478 adopted in 1980.
Reiterating its call for the reversal of the negative trends that endanger the two-State solution, the Assembly urged greater international and regional efforts and support aimed at achieving, without delay, a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East.
The text of the ‘Status of Jerusalem’ resolution include the undertaking; to ask nations not to establish diplomatic missions in the historic city of Jerusalem, as delegates warned that the recent decision by the United States to do so risked igniting a religious war across the already turbulent Middle East and even beyond.
Labels:
Donald Trump,
international affairs,
United Nations,
USA
Monday 20 November 2017
The depths to which xenophobia and bigotry has reduced Australia
Australia began to ignore its obligations under international law in 1992 and its determination to turn back asylum seeker boats and reduce the number of refugees accepted into this country grew apace until this is the situation in November 2017.
The New York Times, 18 November 2017:
Veteran United Nations officials said this month they had never seen a wealthy democracy go to such extremes to punish asylum seekers and push them away.
Papua New Guinea officials and local leaders, enraged at how the camp’s closure was handled, have demanded to know why Australia is not doing more to help the men.
HuffPost, 18 November 2017:
MELBOURNE (Reuters) - Australia's main medical association called on Saturday for the government to allow independent doctors and other health experts to help more than 400 asylum seekers languishing inside a recently closed detention center in Papua New Guinea.
The asylum seekers have shut themselves inside the Australian-run Manus Island Centre for the past 18 days, defying attempts by Australia and Papua New Guinea (PNG) to close it in a standoff the United Nations describes as a "looming humanitarian crisis".
Australia has shut access to the center, and staff, including doctors, have left, leaving the men without sufficient food, clean water, power or medical care.
Members of the Australian Medical Association (AMA) voted unanimously on Saturday to call on the government to grant access to the center so doctors could assess the men's health, wellbeing and living conditions.
"The AMA has made many representations on this matter, both publicly and in private but, with a worsening and more dangerous situation emerging on Manus, the federal council strongly believes that urgent action and answers are needed," AMA President Michael Gannon said.
The Australian, 17 November 2017:
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton has warned New Zealand it may damage its relationship with the government if it chooses to take Manus Island refugees without the approval of Australia.
Mr Dutton said New Zealand and Papua New Guinea “would have to think through” the impact it would have on their relationship with Australia if they made a unilateral agreement to resettle refugees from the offshore detention centre.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has put pressure on the Turnbull government to accept its offer to resettle 150 refugees from Manus Island. The PNG Supreme Court ruled last week the asylum-seekers and refugees were probably the responsibility of PNG, opening the door for an agreement to resettle refugees without permission from Australia.
The Sydney Morning Herald, 5 November 2017:
As the Manus Island detention centre stand-off entered its fifth day, Mr Turnbull held talks with New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in Sydney, where she formally extended to Mr Turnbull the offer to take in 150 people. "The offer is very genuine and remains on the table," she said.
But Mr Turnbull said Australia remained focused on the US refugee resettlement deal, which has so far resulted in 54 people being resettled. The US deal covers up to 1250 people but US President Donald Trump dislikes it and vetting is taking a long time.
"In the wake of that deal obviously we can consider other ones," Mr Turnbull said. "We thank New Zealand for making an offer – we are not taking it up at this time."
New Zealand first made its offer to Julia Gillard's government in 2013 but it has been rejected by both Labor and the Coalition. Opposition Leader Bill Shorten has now called on Mr Turnbull to accept it, saying it is similar to the US deal.
Sky News, 4 November 2017:
The United Nations human rights office has called on Australia to restore food, water and health services to about 600 interned refugees and asylum seekers in Papua New Guinea, which Canberra cut off three days ago.
The detainees in the Manus Island Centre have defied attempts by the governments of Australia and PNG to close the camp, saying they fear violent reprisals from the local community if they are moved to other 'transit centres'.
'We call on the Australian government ... who interned the men in the first place to immediately provide protection, food, water and other basic services,' UN rights spokesman Rupert Colville told a news briefing on Friday.
Australia has an obligation to do so under international human rights law and the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, he said.
There was no immediate comment from Australia or its representatives in Geneva. Its government has said the camp had been ruled illegal by PNG authorities and it had committed to supply other sites for 12 months.
Colville joined the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in warning of an 'unfolding humanitarian emergency' in the centre where asylum seekers began digging wells on Thursday to try to find water as their food supplies dwindled.
The remote Manus Island centre has been a key part of Australia's disputed immigration policy under which it refuses to allow asylum seekers arriving by boat to reach its shores, detaining them instead in PNG and Nauru in the South Pacific.
'We repeat our overall concerns about Australian offshore processing centres which are unsustainable, inhumane and contradictory to its human rights obligations,' Colville said.
Around 500 of the men have still not had their asylum claims processed, he said.
Thursday 27 July 2017
Shorter UN Position: Australia's policy of offshore processing has caused extensive, avoidable suffering for far too long
To add insult to injury our very own J. Edgar Tuber, Peter Craig Dutton, Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & just about everything that isn't nailed down, has apparently been lying to the United Nations.
United Nations Refugee Agency, UNHCR chief Filippo Grandi calls on Australia to end harmful practice of offshore processing, 24 July 2017:
Australia’s policy of offshore processing in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, which denies access to asylum in Australia for refugees arriving by sea without a valid visa, has caused extensive, avoidable suffering for far too long.
Four years on, more than 2,000 people are still languishing in unacceptable circumstances. Families have been separated and many have suffered physical and psychological harm.
In light of this dire humanitarian situation, last November UNHCR exceptionally agreed to help with the relocation of refugees to the United States following a bilateral agreement between Australia and the US. We agreed to do so on the clear understanding that vulnerable refugees with close family ties in Australia would ultimately be allowed to settle there.
UNHCR has recently been informed by Australia that it refuses to accept even these refugees, and that they, along with the others on Nauru and Papua New Guinea, have been informed that their only option is to remain where they are or to be transferred to Cambodia or to the United States.
This means, for example, that some with serious medical conditions, or who have undergone traumatic experiences, including sexual violence, cannot receive the support of their close family members residing in Australia.
To avoid prolonging their ordeal, UNHCR has no other choice but to endorse the relocation of all refugees on Papua New Guinea and Nauru to the United States, even those with close family members in Australia.
There is no doubt these vulnerable people, already subject to four years of punishing conditions, should be reunited with their families in Australia. This is the humane and reasonable thing to do.
The Australian government’s decision to deny them this possibility is contrary to the fundamental principles of family unity and refugee protection, and to common decency.
UNHCR fully endorses the need to save lives at sea and to provide alternatives to dangerous journeys and exploitation by smugglers. But the practice of offshore processing has had a hugely detrimental impact. There is a fundamental contradiction in saving people at sea, only to mistreat and neglect them on land.
Australia has a proud humanitarian tradition, manifested in its support for overseas aid and its longstanding refugee resettlement programme. I urge Australia to bring an immediate end to the harmful practice of offshore processing, offer solutions to its victims, for whom it retains full responsibility, and work with us on future alternatives that save lives at sea and provide protection to people in need.
At a time of record levels of displacement globally, it is crucial that all States offer protection to survivors of war and persecution, and not outsource their responsibilities to others. Refugees, our fellow human beings, deserve as much.
Background
Approximately 2,500 refugees and asylum-seekers have been forcibly transferred by Australia to ‘offshore processing’ facilities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru since the introduction of the current policy in 2013. Of these, some 1,100 remain in Nauru and 900 in Papua New Guinea.
Following the Australia-US bilateral agreement on relocation, UNHCR has referred more than 1,100 refugees to the US over the past eight months. Another 500 people are still waiting for the outcome of the refugee status determination processing being carried out by authorities in PNG and Nauru, under the Australian arrangement.
Monday 5 June 2017
World Environment Day, 5 June 2017
Connecting people to nature
From your backyard to your favourite national park,
nature is closer than you think.
It’s time to get out and enjoy it.
A species growing in the Barmah region in the Murray-Darling Basin, NSW
For at least the last 6,000 years
Photograph: The Australian
Labels:
environment,
United Nations
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)