This
is a Twitter thread created by Janette Francis,
a
Walkley-award
winning journalist, TV Presenter and
podcaster.
Jan’s
Twitter account was created in 2009.
The debate on the best responses to the COVID-19 pandemic is global and one cold-blooded aspect of this debate is currently found in British, American and Australian mainstream media articles and on social media - save the investments and assests of the well-off because old people and the chronically ill are going to die anyway.
This is Jan's contribution to this debate.
Jan
Fran @Jan__Fran, 21
April 2020:
I
keep hearing folks describe this pandemic as a kind of trade-off
between public health and the economy. This trade-off is often framed
around loss of life. 1
It
usually goes something like this: if we ease the lockdown we’ll see
people die from the virus. If we prolong the lockdown we’ll see
people die from the consequences of possible economic collapse (i.e
suicide, depression, poverty, ill health, violence). 2
We
are led to believe that attempts to limit one set of deaths, will
increase the other, that one group of people will have to sacrifice
for the other. But whose lives are more important? 3
Do
we sacrifice the sick now to save the healthy later; the old to save
the young; the poor to save everyone else? We are led to believe that
this is our dilemma and it is an impossible one. 4
Hey,
here’s a fun thing to think about: guess how much money Jeff Bezos
made today? 5
Jeff
Bezos made 17,000 dollars. But he didn’t make it in one day. He
made it in ONE SECOND. Every single second Amazon is reaping 17
thousand dollars worth of sales (this is AUD BTW) & this is
happening SPECIFICALLY during this pandemic as more people seek
deliverable supplies. 6
Jeff
Bezos is now worth 216 BILLION dollars and good on Jeff Bezos, I say!
I mean, the man is clearly providing a service that people need and
reaping the rewards. That is #inspo, amirite?! Please speak at my
conference, Jeff. 7
Thing
is, there's a wee bit more to the world we live in. 8
We
live in a world where, in the middle of a pandemic, one man makes 17
thousand dollars A SECOND and another is buried in a mass grave
because his family can’t afford a funeral. 9
It’s
a world where the homeless sleep in socially-distant quadrants in a
hotel car park, while above them thousand-dollar-a-night rooms sit
empty. It’s a world where folks are protesting their right to get
sick in a country they can not afford to seek treatment in. 10
One
thing this pandemic has done is exacerbated the gross inequalities we
always knew existed. It has exposed them, brought them to the surface
as the bodies of the poor and the desolate continue to be stacked
beneath the ground. 11
The
framing of this pandemic as ‘lives lost now V lives lost later’
is really just us tryna work out which sections of our society are
more productive, more useful. Which sections are going to best
replicate the system that was in place before all this Covid/lockdown
malarky. 12
I
mean, we all wanna get back to how it was ASAP, right? Now that we
think about it we were having a great time. The system was working.
But for who? 13
Not
for the man whose body now sits in a mass grave on Hart Island NY, it
wasn’t. Not for the homeless sleeping in their car park quadrants,
it wasn’t. Not for the nearly 40 million Americans living below the
poverty line, it wasn’t. This is the system we will replicate. 14
It
is right to talk about sacrifice in this dark and uncertain time. I
guess we all have to make sacrifices at some point so if not now,
when? If not me, who? Before you answer that, know this … 15
Twenty-six
individuals own as much wealth as HALF the world’s population -
Lemme say that again: TWENTY SIX people (two. six) own the same
amount of wealth as 3.8 BILLION PEOPLE. 16
That’s
worth remembering the next time some legend waxes lyrical about why
you might need to sacrifice yer nan for the sake of the economy.
Maybe those 26 people should sacrifice the spoils they’ve reaped
from a system that now needs saving from itself. 17
We
do indeed have a dilemma but it might not be an impossible one. Maybe
we actually don’t need to ask those who have the least to sacrifice
the most, maybe it’s the other way around. Maybe that’s the
trade-off? 18
Anyway,
thanks for letting me share my thoughts on this website twitter dot
com. 19/19
