Proof that a business model of election campaigning has come off the pages of a Hollywood screenplay and out onto the streets of everyday Australia (video at 5:54).
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Wednesday 21 March 2018
The 'new' business model in politics
"It's
no good fighting
an election campaign on the
facts because actually it's all about
emotion."
Proof that a business model of election campaigning has come off the pages of a Hollywood screenplay and out onto the streets of everyday Australia (video at 5:54).
Labels:
data mining,
elections,
privacy,
safety,
transparency
Wednesday 7 March 2018
When it comes to human rights and civil liberties is it ever safe to trust the junkyard dog or its political masters?
On 18 July 2017, Prime
Minister Malcolm Bligh Turnbull announced the establishment of a Home Affairs
portfolio that would comprise immigration, border protection, domestic security
and law enforcement agencies, as well as reforms to the Attorney-General’s
oversight of Australia’s intelligence community and agencies in the Home
Affairs portfolio.
On 7 December 2017, the Prime Minister
introduced the Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation Amendment Bill2017 into the House of Representatives.
This bill amends the Anti-Money
Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, the Independent
National Security Legislation Monitor Act 2010, the Inspector-General
of Intelligence and Security Act 1986 and the Intelligence Services Act 2001.
The bill was referred to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security which tabled its report and recommendations on 26 February 2018.
This new government department on steroids will be headed by millionaire former Queensland Police detective and far-right Liberal MP for Dickson, Peter Craig Dutton.
His 'front man' selling this change is Abbott protégé, former Secretary
of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection and current Secretary of the new Department of Home Affairs, Michael Pezzullo.
The question every Australian needs to ask themselves is, can this current federal government, the ministers responsible for and department heads managing this extremely powerful department, be trusted not to dismantle a raft of human and civil rights during the full departmental implementation.
It looks suspiciously as though former Australian attorney-general George Brandis does not think so - he is said to fear political overreach.
The
Saturday Paper,
3-9 March 2018:
On
Friday last week, former attorney-general George Brandis went to see Michael
Pezzullo, the secretary of the new Department of Home Affairs.
The
meeting was a scheduled consultation ahead of Brandis’s departure for London to
take up his post as Australia’s new high commissioner. It was cordial, even
friendly. But what the soon-to-be diplomat Brandis did not tell Pezzullo during
the pre-posting briefing was that he had singled him out in a private farewell
speech he had given to the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation on the
eve of his retirement from parliament two weeks earlier.
As
revealed in The Saturday Paper last week, the then senator Brandis
used the ASIO speech to raise concerns about the power and scope of the new
department and the ambitions of its secretary. Brandis effectively endorsed the
private concerns of some within ASIO that the new security structure could
expose the domestic spy agency to ministerial or bureaucratic pressure.
In
a regular Senate estimates committee hearing this week, Pezzullo described his
meeting with Brandis – on the day before The Saturday Paper article
appeared – as Opposition senators asked him for assurances that ASIO would
retain its statutory independence once it moves from the attorney-general’s
portfolio to become part of Home Affairs.
“I
had a very good discussion on Friday,” Pezzullo told the committee, of his
meeting with Brandis.
“He’s
seeking instructions and guidance on performing the role of high commissioner.
None of those issues came up, so I find that of interest. If he has concerns,
I’m sure that he would himself raise those publicly.”
Labor
senator Murray Watt pressed: “So he raised them with ASIO but not with you?”
“I
don’t know what he raised with ASIO,” Pezzullo responded. “… You should ask the
former attorney-general if he’s willing to state any of those concerns … He’s a
high commissioner now, so he may not choose to edify your question with a
response, but that’s a matter for him. As I said, he didn’t raise any of those
concerns with me when we met on Friday.”
The
Saturday Paper contacted George Brandis but he had no comment.
“ANY
SUGGESTION THAT WE IN THE PORTFOLIO ARE SOMEHOW EMBARKED ON THE SECRET
DECONSTRUCTION OF THE SUPERVISORY CONTROLS WHICH ENVELOP AND CHECK EXECUTIVE
POWER ARE NOTHING MORE THAN FLIGHTS OF CONSPIRATORIAL FANCY…”
Watt
asked Pezzullo for assurance there would be no change to the longstanding
provisions in the ASIO Act that kept the agency under its director-general’s
control and not subject to instruction from the departmental secretary. The
minister representing Home Affairs in the Senate, Communications Minister Mitch
Fifield, said: “It is not proposed that there be a change to that effect.”
The
new Department of Home Affairs takes in Immigration and Border Protection, the
Australian Federal Police, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, the
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, known as AUSTRAC, and ASIO.
ASIO
does not move until legislation is passed to authorise the shift, and will
retain its status as a statutory agency.
Pezzullo
addressed the fears of those questioning his department’s reach. He said some
commentary mischaracterised the arrangements as “being either a layer of overly
bureaucratic oversight of otherwise well-functioning operational arrangements
or, worse, a sinister concentration of executive power that will not be able to
be supervised and checked”.
“Both
of these criticisms are completely wrong,” he said.
Pezzullo
had already described his plans, both to the committee and in a speech he made
in October last year, in which he spoke of exploiting the in-built capabilities
in digital technology to expand Australia’s capacity to detect criminal and
terrorist activity in daily life online and on the so-called “dark web”.
But
the language he used, referring to embedding “the state” invisibly in global
networks “increasingly at super scale and at very high volumes”, left his
audiences uncertain about exactly what he meant.
Watt
asked if there would be increased surveillance of the Australian people. “Any
surveillance of citizens is always strictly done in accordance with the laws
passed by this parliament,” Pezzullo replied.
In
his February 7 speech to ASIO, George Brandis described Pezzullo’s October
remarks as an “urtext”, or blueprint, for a manifesto that would rewrite how
Australia’s security apparatus operates.
Pezzullo
hit back on Monday. “Any suggestion that we in the portfolio are somehow
embarked on the secret deconstruction of the supervisory controls which envelop
and check executive power are nothing more than flights of conspiratorial fancy
that read into all relevant utterances the master blueprint of a new ideology
of undemocratic surveillance and social control,” Pezzullo said.
As for day to day human resources, financial management and transparent accountable governance, media reports are not inspiring confidence in Messrs. Turnbull, Dutton and Pezzullo.
The Canberra Times, 2 March 2018:
The Canberra Times, 2 March 2018:
Home Affairs head Mike
Pezzullo was one of the first to front Senate estimates on Monday.
It's been up and running
for only weeks, but his new department is part of one of the largest government
portfolios.
Having brought
several security agencies into its fold, and if legislation passes letting ASIO
join, the Home Affairs portfolio will be home to 23,000 public
servants.
Mr Pezzullo was also
quizzed on the investigation into Roman Quaedvlieg, the head of
the Australian Border Force who has been on leave since May last year,
following claims he helped his girlfriend - an ABF staff member - get a
job at Sydney Airport.
It was revealed the Prime Minister's department has had a corruption watchdog's
report into abuse of power allegations for at least five months
while Mr Quaedvlieg has been on full pay earning hundreds of thousands of
dollars.
Monday 12 February 2018
AUSTRALIA CARD MARK II: no national digital ID number will mean no access to any Australian federal government services
“When signing
up to the platform for the first time, users will be asked to provide their
name, email address, and phone number, and verify their details via email or
SMS. They will then be asked to provide information from three identity
documents, which goes through the exchange to the identity provider for verification.
The exchange receives encrypted details back which it passes on to the
government service the user wants to reach, which then grants the user access.” [IT News, 20 March 2015]
IT
News, 8
February 2018:
The Department of Human
Services looks set to become the federal government's exclusive manager of
digital identities after being selected to build the identity provider solution
that will be used for the Govpass platform.
The Govpass framework is
a decentralised identity model that allows individuals
to choose their identity provider - an organisation that issues identity
documents, like Australia Post or the ATO - and access a range of public and
private sector services through a single digital identity credential.
There is no limit on the
number of identity providers outside of the Commonwealth that can be accredited
for Govpass; Australia Post has already indicated it will seek to become
the first non-government identity provider, using its Digital iD platform.
Several state and
territory government agencies and private sector entities are also expected to
become identity providers over time.
However, the federal
government last year made the decision that only one
identity provider would operate for the entire Commonwealth.
The Digital
Transformation Agency revealed the decision following meetings with existing
Commonwealth identity service providers, DHS and the ATO. Its rationale for the
move was to focus security efforts in one place and avoid complex
administrative structures.
iTnews revealed in
October that the DTA was yet to make up its mind up on which of the two
agencies would serve as the federal government’s sole identity provider for
GovPass, even as testing
of the new platform was taking place with the ATO’s new online tax
file number application service.
Instead the DTA said it
was working closely with the ATO and DHS on the “next steps” for the platform.
But in response to
questions on notice from recent estimates hearings, DHS revealed it had been
instructed to develop the federal government’s single identity provider
platform, to be known as myGov IdP.
“The department was
commissioned by the DTA to build the identity provider (IdP) for the
whole-of-government,” it said.
“The myGov IdP will
enable citizens to verify their identity online and use it to apply for
government services.”
iTnews has made
several attempts to clarify the statements with the DTA and DHS, but
both refused to comment on the build and DHS’ apparent position as the
single government identity provider.
The ATO similarly
redirected questions about its involvement with Govpass, including whether it
had also been asked by the DTA to build an identity provider solution, to the
DTA.
Selecting DHS as the
sole government identity provider would be an obvious choice for the DTA -
the agency is the government’s current defacto whole-of-gov identity provider
through the myGov digital services platform.
A private beta release
of myGov IdP is currently planned for later this month.
Identity providers on
Govpass will use the DTA-built identity exchange – and in turn the document
verification service (DVS) and facial verification service (FVS) – to verify an
individual’s credentials without revealing their identity to service providers.
[my yellow bolding]Note: The Face Identification Service (FIS) is a one-to-many, image-based identification service that can match a photo of an unknown person against multiple government records to help establish their identity. FIS is also available to police, security services, Dept. of Immigration and Dept. of Foreign Affairs. [Australian Attorney-General's Department, October 2017]
Wednesday 17 January 2018
Things you should know if you are logging on to a website using your Facebook account
The Daily Telegraph, 5 January 2018:
Ian Cox of Supremo.tv said: “If you’ve ever pressed ‘Login with Facebook’ on a website, you’re giving Facebook permission to share sensitive data with the site you are visiting.
“This includes, for example, your personal email address, where you live, where you work, details about your relationship, places you have recently been and who you’re friends with.
“In today’s digital age, people are sharing just about everything on social media sites like Facebook. But most are unaware of just how much can be seen by brands, businesses and, in some cases, criminals.
“The best way to stay protected online is to only share what you would be happy with the whole world seeing.
“As tempting as it may be to rejoice about the fact that the whole family is going on a weekend away, keep in mind that you may be inadvertently letting criminals know that your house is empty during this time.”
WHAT INFORMATION CAN FACEBOOK SHARE ABOUT YOU?
* Your public profile (name, age, gender, location, profile picture, timezone)
* All your likes
* Your friends
* Where you are now
* Your email address
* Your photos
* Your “about me” section
* All your posts
* Your birthday
* Your relationship details
* Your education history
* Your religion/politics
* Events you’ve been to
* Your work history
* Where you are from
* Your phone number
Thursday 11 January 2018
NSW Auditor-General not impressed by government agencies cyber security risk management
“Specific financial reporting, controls and service delivery comments are included in the individual 2017 cluster financial audit reports tabled in Parliament from October to December 2017.” [NSW Auditor-General, Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2017, December 2017]
On 20 December 2017 the NSW Auditor-General released the Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2017.
Two-thirds of NSW government agencies are failing to properly safeguard their data, increasing the risk of improper access to confidential information about members of the public and identity fraud by cyber criminals.
The finding has emerged from an audit of dozens of government agencies, including those holding highly sensitive personal information collected from millions of citizens, such as NSW Health, the department of education, NSW Police Force, Roads and Maritime Services and the justice department.
While the report by auditor-general Margaret Crawford does not name the agencies failing to properly manage privileged access to their systems, it highlights the potential consequences.
"Personal information collected by public sector agencies about members of the public is of high value to cyber criminals, as it can be used to create false identities to commit other crimes," she says in the report.
"Despite these risks, we found that one agency had 37 privileged user accounts, including 33 that were dormant. The agency had no formal process to create, modify or deactivate privileged users."
Overall, Ms Crawford's report found 68 per cent of NSW government agencies "do not adequately manage privileged access to their systems".
In addition, she said, the audit determined that 61 per cent of agencies "do not regularly monitor the account activity of privileged users".
"This places those agencies at greater risk of not detecting compromised systems, data breaches and misuse," the report said.
The audit found 31 per cent of agencies "do not limit or restrict privileged access to appropriate personnel". Of those, just one-third monitor the account activity of privileged users.
It found that almost one-third of agencies breach their own security policies on user access.
The report warns that if agencies fail to implement proper controls "they may also breach NSW laws and policies and the international standards that they reference".
Read the full article here.
List of NSW Government Agencies Examined by NSW Auditor-General
Education
|
Department of Education
|
Family and Community Services
|
Department of Family and Community Services
|
New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation
|
Finance, Services and Innovation
|
Department of Finance, Services and Innovation * Specifically identified in report
|
Place Management NSW
|
Property NSW
|
Service NSW
|
Health
|
NSW Health
|
Industry
|
Department of Industry
|
Destination NSW
|
Forestry Corporation of New South Wales
|
Office of Sport
|
TAFE Commission
|
Water NSW
|
Justice
|
Department of Justice
|
Fire and Rescue NSW
|
Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales
|
NSW Police Force
|
Office of the NSW Rural Fire Service
|
Planning and Environment
|
Department of Planning and Environment
|
Essential Energy
|
Hunter Water Corporation
|
Landcom
|
Office of Environment and Heritage
|
Office of Local Government
|
Sydney Water Corporation
|
Premier and Cabinet
|
Department of Premier and Cabinet
|
Transport
|
NSW Trains
|
Rail Corporation New South Wales
|
Roads and Maritime Services
|
Sydney Trains
|
Transport for NSW
|
WCX M4 PTY Limited
|
WCX M5 PTY Limited
|
Treasury
|
Crown Finance Entity
|
Insurance and Care NSW
|
Lifetime Care and Support Authority
|
NSW Treasury Corporation
|
NSW Self Insurance Corporation
|
Excerpt from Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2017:
Some deficiencies were common across agencies
The most common internal control deficiencies were poor or absent IT controls related to:
user access management
password management
privileged access management
user acceptance testing.
The most common governance deficiencies related to:
management of cyber security risks
capital project governance
management of shared service arrangements
conflicts-of-interest management
gifts-and-benefits management
risk management maturity
ethical behaviour policies and statements.
Labels:
big data,
data retention,
information technology,
Internet,
NSW government,
privacy,
risk,
safety
Tuesday 19 December 2017
Turnbull Government's data retention privacy blunder just rolls on and on...
“If data can be re-identified with no more than SQL, there's no
"if" about a leak, and the "when" is history.” [Journalist Richard Chirgwin, Twitter
18 December 2017]
“But why are
medical records so attractive? Well, it turns out that there’s a metaphorical
holiday feast of enticing data served up in your average health record. Family
history, demographic data, insurance information, medications, etc. means
there’s enough information to completely steal an individual’s identity and
commit medication fraud, financial fraud, insurance fraud and a wide array of
other crimes. When this very private, unchangeable information gets into the
wrong hands, devastation can ensue.” [Robert
Lord writing in Forbes,
15 December 2017]
First the Australian general public were told that patient data was well protected and data breaches wouldn't happen as a result of government's drive to collect, cross-match and retain as much information about each and every Australian citizen/permanent resident as possible.
Then when the inevitable day came where poor data security was laid bare - as the personal histories of 550,000 blood donors were placed on an insecure computer and accessed, as Medicare details began to be offered for sale on the Internet's dark web and Medicare itself became careless with its encryption - the public was told in the first instance that misuse was unlikely, in the second instance that personal medical information couldn't be accessed and that patients couldn't really be individually identified in the third instance where a billion line encrypted data set was publicly released.
After that the Turnbull Government assured the population that it would create legislation which would make it illegal for anyone to de-encrypt anonymised data and create a Notifiable Data Breaches scheme.
We were all going to be safe once more in the arms of the Turnbull Government.
Now the cat is out of the bag, because that billion-line 30 year's worth of personal health information about est. 3 million people just won't stay in the back of the ministerial cupboard where Greg Hunt shoved it.
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
18 December 2017:
One in ten Australians'
private health records have been unwittingly exposed by the Department of
Health in an embarrassing blunder that includes potentially exposing if someone
is on HIV medication, whether mothers have had terminations, or if mentally unwell
people are seeing psychologists.
A report, published on
Monday by Dr Chris Culnane, Dr Benjamin Rubinstein and Dr Vanessa Teague from
the University of Melbourne's School of Computing and Information Systems,
outlines how de-identified historical health data from the Australian Medicare
Benefits Scheme (MBS) and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) released to
the public in August 2016 can be re-identified using known information about
the person to find their record.
The study reveals unique
patient records matching the online public information of seven prominent
Australians, including three (former or current) MPs and an AFL footballer.
While a unique match may not always be accurate, Dr Rubinstein said there was
the possibility to improve confidence by cross-referencing other data.
"Because only 10
per cent of Australians are included in the sample data, there can be a
coincidental resemblance to someone who isn't included," he said.
"We can improve
confidence by cross-referencing with a second dataset of population-wide
billing frequencies. We can also examine uniqueness according to the
characteristics of commercial datasets we know of, such as bank billing
data."…….
Privacy analyst and
Lockstep consultant Stephen Wilson said the breach damaged public confidence in
health policy makers and data custodians.
"It's a huge breach
of trust," he said.
"Promises of
'de-identification' and 'anonymisation' made by health officials, and ABS too
in connection with census data releases, have been shown to be erroneous.
"The ability to
re-identify patients from this sort of public release is frankly, in my view,
catastrophic. Real dangers are posed to patients with socially difficult
conditions.
"It beggars belief
that any official would promise 'anonymity' any more. These promises cannot be
kept."
Computer security
researcher Troy Hunt said re-identification of anonymised records was
attractive to researchers and nefarious parties alike.
"In this case,
clearly more work needs to be done to protect individuals' identities,' he
said. "My hope is that the government embraces responsible research like
this and strives to improve confidentiality rather than penalise those seeking
to report deficiencies such as this."
The federal Department
of Health was notified about the issue December last year.
"The Department of
Health takes this matter very seriously and had already referred this to the
Privacy Commissioner," a Department of Health spokesperson told Fairfax
Media......
Meanwhile, the Office of
the Australian Information Commissioner, which houses Australia's privacy
commissioner, said it was investigating the publication of the datasets.
"The investigation
was opened under section 40(2) of the Australian Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act)
in late September 2016 when the Department of Health notified the OAIC that the
datasets were potentially vulnerable to re-identification," a spokesperson
said.
"Given the
investigation into the Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS) and Pharmaceutical
Benefits Scheme (PBS) datasets is ongoing, we are unable to comment on it
further at this time.
However, the
commissioner will make a public statement at the conclusion of the
investigation."
The OAIC said it
continued to work with Australian government agencies to enhance privacy
protection in published datasets.....
Labels:
#TurnbullGovernmentFAIL,
big data,
data retention,
health,
Medicare,
privacy,
safety
Friday 17 November 2017
Oh dear, is the Turnbull Government asking chickens to visit the digital fox's den?
“The Turnbull Government has welcomed the eSafety Commissioner’s announcement today about the delivery of the pilot for a new national portal for reporting instances of non-consensual sharing of intimate images (colloquially known as image-based abuse or revenge pornography).” [Senator Mitch Fifield, media release,15 October 2017]
Given the dubious reputation Facebook Inc has managed to garner in relation to business ethics, transparency, consumer privacy, e-safety, data mining and data breach history, one wonders what the Minister for Communications and Liberal Senator for Victoria Mitch Fifield was thinking.
Facebook Newsroom, 9 November 2017:
Image Pilot
By Antigone Davis, Global Head of Safety
We don’t want Facebook to be a place where people fear their intimate images will be shared without their consent. We’re constantly working to prevent this kind of abuse and keep this content out of our community. We recently announced a test that’s a little different from things we’ve tried in the past. Even though this is a small pilot, we want to be clear about how it works.
This past week, in partnership with the Australian eSafety Commissioner’s Office and an international working group of survivors, victim advocates and other experts, Facebook launched a limited pilot in Australia that will help prevent non-consensual intimate images from being posted and shared anywhere on Facebook, Messenger and Instagram. Specifically, Australians who fear their intimate image may be shared without their consent can work with the eSafety Commissioner to provide that image in a safe and secure way to Facebook so that we can help prevent it from being shared on our platforms.
To be clear, people can already report if their intimate images have been shared on our platform without their consent, and we will remove and hash them to help prevent further sharing on our platform. With this new small pilot, we want to test an emergency option for people to provide a photo proactively to Facebook, so it never gets shared in the first place. This program is completely voluntary. It’s a protective measure that can help prevent a much worse scenario where an image is shared more widely. We look forward to getting feedback and learning.
Here’s how it works:
* Australians can complete an online form on the eSafety Commissioner’s official website.
* To establish which image is of concern, people will be asked to send the image to themselves on Messenger.
* The eSafety Commissioner’s office notifies us of the submission (via their form). However, they do not have access to the actual image.
* Once we receive this notification, a specially trained representative from our Community Operations team reviews and hashes the image, which creates a human-unreadable, numerical fingerprint of it.
* We store the photo hash—not the photo—to prevent someone from uploading the photo in the future. If someone tries to upload the image to our platform, like all photos on Facebook, it is run through a database of these hashes and if it matches we do not allow it to be posted or shared.
* Once we hash the photo, we notify the person who submitted the report via the secure email they provided to the eSafety Commissioner’s office and ask them to delete the photo from the Messenger thread on their device. Once they delete the image from the thread, we will delete the image from our servers……..
Thursday 19 October 2017
So troubled multinational Serco's staff are going to answer phone calls made to Centrelink in a Turnbull Government pilot program?
Multinational Serco Group plc registered in England and Wales, with revenue in 2016 of an est. $5 billion and an underlying trading profit of est. $139 million, has made the news again.
One of its subsidiaries, SERCO CITIZEN SERVICES PTY LTD1 ABN:89 062 943 640, won this $53.75 million federal government contract commencing 7 September 2017:
CN ID: CN3460117
Agency: Department of Human Services
Publish Date: 11-Oct-2017
Category: Temporary personnel services
Contract Period:
7-Sep-2017 to 29-Oct-2019
Contract Value (AUD): $53,752,454.80
Description: Centrelink Call Centre Enhancements Initiative
On 11 October 2017 it was reported that the Minister for Human Services Alan Tudge stated this contract was for a pilot commencing in late October 2017 would help reduce Centrelink call wait times.
An est. 250 Melbourne-based Serco staff will take calls about welfare payments in the three-year pilot program.
The minister’s office stated: "Under the partnership arrangement, Serco's staff will be fully trained and will comply with all Commonwealth government privacy and security requirements".
Of course Serco will comply, Minister.
Just as it has on every single contract in the past......
Stolen Laptop Exposes Personal Data on 207,000 Army Reservists. Serco held the data on reservists as part of its contract with the U.S. Army’s Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation division. As a result, Dahms said, some of the data on the missing laptop may belong to dependents and spouses of U.S. Army reservists, 13 May 2010
Serco's paper trailer raises accountability questions. Crikey has taken a closer look at the extent that Serco contracts outsources to other companies and can reveal that millions of dollars from the detention contract has ended up in some startling places, 1 November 2010
Serco employee suspected of Victoria Police breach. Man accused of adjusting 67,541 traffic infringement records, 15 April 2011
Contract breaches by the operator of Australia's detention centres are incurring 'unsustainable' fines, 13 July May 2011
Serco operates and maintains a surprisingly large and diverse range of services in both the UK and Australia, as well as in several other countries. Its website lists some examples of the scale of its operations including: traffic management systems covering more than 17,500kms of roads worldwide, managing 192,000 square miles of airspace in five countries, managing education authorities on behalf of local governments, and providing defence support services worldwide.[2] Serco also manages a number of hospitals, prisons and detention centres, and is involved in a host of other services.[3]…..Focussing on the company Serco, there have been numerous reports of instances where its service provision has been sub-standard, high-cost, has eliminated diversity, or has lacked accountability. Putting this focus on Serco’s faults is not to say that it is any more prone to failures than other corporations in this area, or that it is always unsuccessful in its service provision. Rather, the point is to show clearly the dangers of privatisation, and why it must not be accepted as a universal good, 7 March 2012
Gaol escapes blamed on Serco Pacific cost cutting on $1.8 billion Australian government contract, 29 May 2013
Sexual abuse allegations corroborated at Yarl's Wood immigration centre run by Serco, 22 September 2013
Sexual abuse allegations corroborated at Yarl's Wood immigration centre run by Serco, 22 September 2013
Sources in the justice system blamed the foul-up on staffing issues at Serco. One said: "This sort of thing happens every week." The seven-year PECS deal has turned into a horror show for Serco. It faces allegations that it doctored transfer records to flatter its performance, with five Serco staff under investigation by the City of London police. That is not its only problem contract. There are separate claims that, along with rival outsourcer G4S, it overcharged taxpayers on a deal to put electronic tags on criminals, 17 October 2013
Private contractors Serco has agreed to repay £68.5million to the taxpayer after over-charging for tagging criminals. The firm was investigated by the Ministry of Justice over claims that together with rival company G4S it over-charged for tens of thousands of criminals, including those who had left the country, been returned to prison or even died, 19 December 2013
Outsourcing giant Serco is embroiled in a fresh misuse of public funds scandal after a company it set up overcharged NHS hospitals millions of pounds, 27 August 2014
Private contractors Serco has agreed to repay £68.5million to the taxpayer after over-charging for tagging criminals. The firm was investigated by the Ministry of Justice over claims that together with rival company G4S it over-charged for tens of thousands of criminals, including those who had left the country, been returned to prison or even died, 19 December 2013
Outsourcing giant Serco is embroiled in a fresh misuse of public funds scandal after a company it set up overcharged NHS hospitals millions of pounds, 27 August 2014
Serco is failing, but is kept afloat thanks to Australia's refugee policy. It’s a sign of the times that a company like Serco, with murky financial statements masking its true economic shape, is continually rewarded for failure by new and larger contracts, 11 November 2014
Serco has brought a culture of profiteering, bullying, intimidation and corruption to Mt Eden prison, a Whangarei barrister says.The comments come as controversy surrounds the private company that operates the prison, and with Corrections boss Ray Smith revealing a third incident at the facility has left him no choice but to seek legal advice in regards to the contract, 24 July 2015
On Monday, Serco was fined $NZ500,000 ($A328,750) and was prohibited from overseeing operations at the correctional facility while an internal investigation took place. The fine came after six disturbing videos — shot on a smartphone and smuggled inside the prison — surfaced on YouTube earlier this month. The videos showed prisoners participating in organised ‘fight clubs’ as large groups of fellow inmates watch on. Inmates were also seen blatantly smoking and drinking alcohol in the videos, which were captured without the knowledge of staff. However, the NZ prison officers union said bosses knew about the fight club for up to 18 months, but did nothing about it, 29 July 2015
A GUARD at the Wickham Point Detention Centre in Darwin has been fired after it was found he was trying to coerce female detainees into having sex with him. Serco, the company contracted to run Australia’s immigration facilities, said in a statement to the NT News that a detainee services officer from Wickham Point was dismissed in late May following two separate complaints from female detainees, 6 August 2015
On Monday, Serco was fined $NZ500,000 ($A328,750) and was prohibited from overseeing operations at the correctional facility while an internal investigation took place. The fine came after six disturbing videos — shot on a smartphone and smuggled inside the prison — surfaced on YouTube earlier this month. The videos showed prisoners participating in organised ‘fight clubs’ as large groups of fellow inmates watch on. Inmates were also seen blatantly smoking and drinking alcohol in the videos, which were captured without the knowledge of staff. However, the NZ prison officers union said bosses knew about the fight club for up to 18 months, but did nothing about it, 29 July 2015
A GUARD at the Wickham Point Detention Centre in Darwin has been fired after it was found he was trying to coerce female detainees into having sex with him. Serco, the company contracted to run Australia’s immigration facilities, said in a statement to the NT News that a detainee services officer from Wickham Point was dismissed in late May following two separate complaints from female detainees, 6 August 2015
Fiona Stanley Hospital: dirty theatres, IT woes blamed on Serco, 23 September 2015
Corruption allegations at a Secro managed prison, 2 June 2016
The scandal of refugees housed in 'slum conditions' in Scotland by Serco sub-contractor, 12 June 2016
Serco shares slide as investor concerns mount over turnround. Revenues and profits fall after hit from lossmaking and terminated contracts, 23 February 2017
The scandal of refugees housed in 'slum conditions' in Scotland by Serco sub-contractor, 12 June 2016
Serco shares slide as investor concerns mount over turnround. Revenues and profits fall after hit from lossmaking and terminated contracts, 23 February 2017
Serco targets further cost cutting as it seeks to keep its profits on track. Serco boss Rupert Soames has said the company still has costs to cut before it is trading at full strength, as the firm enters the middle stage of its five-year turnaround plan. He said that there were plans to further reduce overheads and make Serco’s processes more efficient, as well as bringing down some of its IT costs. “We’ve still got a lot of costs that we have to get out of the business,” he said, 3 August 2017.
Serco lost the Prisoner Transport contract, its contract to run Wandoo Prison won't be renewed in 2018 and prison will return to public hands, 27 August 2017
Clarence Valley residents may recall that Serco is part of a three-corporation consortium building the new $1.5 billion Grafton gaol.
Footnotes
1. Serco provides care and welfare services, on behalf of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection, to people living in Australian onshore immigration centres whilst their visa status is resolved. Since 2009, more than 61,000 individuals have been in our care, representing more than 20 different cultural and linguistically diverse communities. Within the Australian justice system, Serco operates three prisons: the Southern Queensland Correctional Centre (Queensland) with 400 beds, Acacia Prison (Western Australia) with 1400 beds and the Wandoo Reintegration Facility (Western Australia) with 80 beds.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)