“Throughout the 1980s, '90s, and most of the 2000s, electricity prices tracked fairly closely to general consumer price trends. In the past decade, however, electricity has shot off the charts. Since 2008 power prices have risen 117 per cent, more than four times the average price increase across sectors.” [ABC News, 18 July 2018]
Sunday 19 August 2018
Once more a Coalition federal government is promising savings on household electricity bills
“Throughout the 1980s, '90s, and most of the 2000s, electricity prices tracked fairly closely to general consumer price trends. In the past decade, however, electricity has shot off the charts. Since 2008 power prices have risen 117 per cent, more than four times the average price increase across sectors.” [ABC News, 18 July 2018]
All three major NSW political parties - Liberal, Nationals and Labor - along with their federal counterparts drank the Kool-Aid when it came to the alleged desirability of privatising state assets in the electricity and gas sectors of energy supply.
Here is a brief outline of the how and why......
DECEMBER 2010
"The completion of this first tranche
of the energy reform process meets the government's objectives – we have exited
electricity retailing, we have created a competitive market structure approved
by the ACCC and we have received a strong financial return for the taxpayers of
NSW,” he [NSW
Treasurer] said…..
Earlier, the shadow
treasurer, Mike Baird, said: "Whatever they finally announce, it is clear
from the ongoing speculation that the receipts will be at the lower end of the
$5 billion to $7 billion range, which is about half what these assets are worth
– and that is before you take off the $2.3 billion in inducements for the new
coalmine needed to get the deal away.
'The end result is
billions of dollars lost forever."
A UBS analyst, David
Leitch, said: "NSW households are in for higher electricity tariffs and
more people at their front door, trying to get them to change electricity
supplier."
NOVEMBER 2013
"When this bill is
passed, this Government estimates that power prices will go down by 9 per cent,
gas prices will go down by 7 per cent, and that means that the average power
bill will be $200 a year lower and the average gas bill will be $70 a year
lower," Mr Abbott said on October 15.
JUNE 2014
As of 12 May 2017, two
government assets have been privatised in 2017. The most recent privatisation
is the 99-year lease of a 50.4% share of Endeavour Energy. On 11 May 2017, the
NSW [Berejiklian
Coalition] Government announced that a consortium led by Macquarie Group's
infrastructure arm had been successful in securing the tender for a price of
$7.6 billion. Along with Ausgrid and Transgrid, the lease of Endeavour Energy
represents the final of the three “poles and wires” sales – a key policy of the
Liberal/National government in the 2015 State election. Announcing the sale,
NSW Treasury stated:
The
NSW Government will retain a 49.6 per cent interest in Endeavour Energy and
will have ongoing influence over operations as lessor, licensor and as safety
and reliability regulator.
June 2017
Electricity is now
management heavy with a blow out in the number of managers relative to other
workers. In addition electricity now employs an army of sales and marketing and
other workers who do not actually make electricity. In addition the reforms
seemed to encourage profit gauging on the part of companies in the industry who
are able to inflate the asset base used in calculating the permitted return on
assets. More than half the asset base appears to be ‘goodwill’ and retained
earnings. There is a weird circular process in which high rates of return are
capitalised in ‘goodwill’ and other fictitious or notional items while high
profits guarantee high retained earnings which also feed into the asset base.
In that way the unproductive capital base is allowed to increase and we are
charged for capital that has no real function in producing electricity….
A host of factors have
been blamed for the increase in electricity prices relative to other prices but
we would point out that the main departure from the rest of the price index
happened post privatisation and corporatisation.
JULY 2017
Origin, EnergyAustralia
and AGL have all announced price increases for electricity and gas starting
from July 1….
In NSW, residential
EnergyAustralia customers will see electricity prices increase by up to 19.6
per cent. Origin Energy customers will get a 16.1 per cent rise.
DECEMBER 2017
The key supply chain
cost components examined in the report include wholesale electricity purchase
costs, regulated network costs and environmental policy costs.
Annual electricity
prices for the representative consumer on a market offer in New South Wales:
*
increased by 10.2 per cent from 2016-17 to 2017-18 due to higher wholesale
electricity costs, driven by the retirement of Northern and Hazelwood
generators and increasing gas prices
*
are expected to decrease by an annual average of 6.6 per cent in 2018-19 and
2019-20. The expected decreases are largely attributable to decreases in
wholesale electricity costs driven by expected new generation (approximately
4,100 MW across the NEM) and the return to service of the Swanbank E generator
(385 MW in Queensland). In addition, in NSW, regulated network costs are
uncertain in the two years to June 2020 due to the AER being required to remake
revenue determinations for the NSW distribution network providers for the
2014-19 regulatory control period.
JANUARY 2018
The most significant
price rises were electricity, up 12.4 per cent, fuel up 10.4 per cent, domestic
holiday travel up 6.3 per cent and fruit up 9.3 per cent.
Across New South Wales, we found theaverage annual electricity bill to be just over $1,667. However, we found that
bill-payers aged in their 40s reported the highest average bills in NSW at
$1,911.76. Those aged 70 or over reported the lowest average bills at
$1,466.40.
JULY 2018
This was comprised of
$120 due to the [national
energy] guarantee and $280 due to new investment in renewable energy that was
already planned, mainly because of the Renewable Energy Target, which will run
to 2030….
The ESB [Energy Security Board**]
proposal increases the annual average saving to $550 on 2018 prices, of which
$150 is due to the guarantee and $400 due to renewable energy.
AUGUST 2018
After reading the National Energy Guarantee Consultation Paper as well as the 1 August 2018 Final Detailed Design and listening to statements made by the Turnbull Government, I personally find it hard to believe this change in federal government policy will significantly limit the rate of increases to household energy costs over time when this is based on an assumption that the market will respond by lowering prices across the Australian wholesale and retail sectors of energy supply.
Talk of money 'saved' by households is illusory as It will certainly see no reduction in the actual amounts listed on 2019-20 household electricity and gas bills once this guarantee comes into effect.
Network
charges represent on average about half of the electricity supply chain costs,
with generation and retail costs (combined into the ‘competitive market’
category) accounting for 42%, and environment policies adding the remaining 8%,
based on the latest AEMC Electricity Price Trend report.
The
make up of the total average retail cost is shown in Chart 6 which reveals the
single largest component of the price of electricity is distribution costs,
which represented about 40% of the average cost of electricity. Over the AEMC
forecast period to 2018/19, these costs are still expected to represent by far
the largest component of the electricity cost stack, albeit fractionally lower
in a couple of years’ time.
The
next largest component is the wholesale price of electricity, which in 2015/16
represented about 28%. Under the AEMC Base Case scenario – which includes the
retirement of the brown coal fired Hazelwood Power station in Victoria – this
cost component had been anticipated to rise steadily over the forecast period
to represent about 30% of the cost of electricity by 2018/19.
As
shown in Chart 7 below, these three jurisdictions experienced higher than
anticipated wholesale electricity costs in the order of between 30% and 80%
when compared to original forecasts for FY2016/17. When considered on a
weighted average basis, using the same methodology applied by the AEMC to estimate
the values for the National Summary, wholesale electricity costs have therefore
been about 17% to 20% higher than anticipated.
This
increase in wholesale electricity costs pushed the bundled cost of electricity
to rise by about 5% higher than anticipated by the AEMC, and shifted the
relative importance of wholesale prices in the cost stack from about 28% to
31%.
**
Energy.gov.au, A
Better Energy Future for Australia
Formed
out of the Independent Review into the Future Security of the National
Electricity Market (the Finkel Review), the Energy Security Board comprises an
independent chair and deputy chair along with the expert heads of the Australian
Energy Market Commission (AEMC), the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) and the
Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).
The current Board membership is Chair Dr Kerry Schott AO,
Deputy Chair Clare Savage, Australian
Energy Market Commission Chair John Pierce, Australian Energy Market Operator
Chief Executive Audrey Zibelman, and the Chair of the Australian Energy
Regulator Paula Conboy.
Monday 13 August 2018
North Coast Voices will resume posting after Sunday 19 August 2018
North Coast Voices apologises to its readers.
Due to ill health there will be no daily postings on this blog
until after Sunday 19 August 2018.
Labels:
NCV admin
Sunday 12 August 2018
Anthropomorphic Global Warming in Australia 2018
Australians have been told repeatedly that global warming leading to climate change is real.
The continent is becomng dryer, record air and ground temperatures are no longer novel, heavy rain events are predicted to become more destructive, mass flora and fauna extinctions are expected and the coastline is beginning to erode faster than at the historical rate.
It's not just happenng in Australia, other continents are also experience climate change and, the one factor most have in common is generations of ever increasing greenhouse gas emissions produced by both households and industries in metropolitan, regional and rural areas.
Everyone bears some responsibility for where the world finds itself......
In the first
quarter of 2018 Australia’s total greenhouse gas emissions will be over MT 7.3 CO2-e higher than the national Paris ERT commitment made on our behalf by the Australian Government.
Over one
quarter of Australia’s CO2-e budget for 2013 to 2050 has already been
spent in the last 4.75 years.
AUSTRALIA’S ANNUAL
EMISSIONS, CALENDAR YEAR TO SEPTEMBER 2017*
* This graph includes both published Government NGGI data and Ndevr Environmental projections for Q4/FY2017 and Q1/FY2018
BY SECTOR 2005-2017
~~~~~~~~~~~
World-wide, land
used for non-animal and animal-based agriculture in 2017 was estimated to
produce 24% of all global greenhouse gas emissions.
In Australia agriculture
was responsible for est. 85.03 CO2-eMt or about 16% of Australia’s total greenhouse gas emissions in 2013:
66.3%
from enteric fermentation in ruminant livestock (eructation and flatulence)
15.5%
from agricultural soils
10.8%
from prescribed burning of savannas
3.9%
from manure management
2.4%
from liming and urea application
and
the remainder from rice cultivation and field burning of agricultural residues.
Total
greenhouse gas emissions from world-wide food systems in 2012 contributed between
19% to 29% of all global greenhouse gas emissions. By
2030 the combined greenhouse gas emissions from global food production is
expected to double.
~~~~~~~~~~~
National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting, Australia’s highest 10 greenhouse gas emitters 2016–17
Labels:
business,
climate change,
energy,
environment,
extinction,
farming,
industry,
mining
Saturday 11 August 2018
Quotes of the Week
“You can’t tell me
what to do, you’re not my dog!” [Anon]
“Take your hundred
dollar hat on your 1 dollar head and get back to rorting the system for you own
greed you lying, dribbling fraction of a man.” [Self-confessed reformed journalist Ronnie
Salt tweeting about the Nationals MP for New England NSW, 6 August
2018]
Labels:
Barnaby Joyce,
companion animals
Tweet of the Week
we interrupt our slide towards a racist surveillance dystopia to bring you this surprisingly honest government ad: https://t.co/TKG1mYyFzn— Scott Ludlam (@Scottludlam) August 2, 2018
Labels:
racism
Friday 10 August 2018
The fight against Japanese whaling in the Antarctic continues....
Minke Whale Breaching at http://wildwhales.org/speciesid/whales/minke-whale/ |
Australia states its position……
Joint media release
Minister for Foreign
Affairs, The Hon Julie Bishop MP
Minister for the
Environment and Energy, The Hon Josh Frydenberg MP
2 August 2018
Australia is very
concerned by Japan’s latest proposal to lift the global moratorium on
commercial whaling at the next International Whaling Commission meeting in
September 2018.
Australia remains
steadfastly opposed to all forms of commercial and so-called ‘scientific’
whaling and continues to be a leader in seeking to strengthen the International
Whaling Commission to protect whales.
We strongly support the
30-year global moratorium on commercial whaling and will vehemently oppose any
attempts to undermine the processes that support it, including through changed
voting regimes or the establishment of catch-limits for commercial whaling.
Australia and Japan
enjoy a deep and strong bilateral relationship, but we disagree on the issue of
whales. At the Commission meeting in September, Australia will be calling on
like-minded nations to reject Japan’s proposal.
Australia has worked
tirelessly to see an end to commercial whaling. We have co-sponsored
resolutions to improve the operation and scrutiny of the Commission and its
scientific committee; we have supported the establishment of new sanctuaries
where whales can thrive in their own environment; we initiated the Commission’s
twelve-nation Southern Ocean Research Partnership supporting non-lethal whale
research; and we successfully took Japan to the International Court of Justice.
The Australian
Government will continue to advocate strongly and consistently for the
cessation of commercial whaling and so-called ‘scientific’ whaling. The science
is clear, you do not need to kill whales in order to study them.
How one Japanese
newspaper reported the issues……
The
Japan Times,
4 August 2018:
SINGAPORE – Japan
and Australia agreed Friday to make efforts to prevent their whaling dispute
from hurting bilateral relations, a government official said.
During talks in
Singapore, Foreign Minister Taro Kono briefed his Australian counterpart Julie
Bishop about Japan’s proposal to restructure the International Whaling
Commission to make it easier to resume commercial whaling.
But Australia is
strongly opposed to all forms of whaling, raising concern that ties between
Tokyo and Canberra could be strained by a practice that Japan says is a
cultural tradition.
Last month, Japan
proposed resuming whaling of some species of relatively abundant whales. The
government halted commercial whaling in 1982, in line with the global
moratorium adopted by the IWC, but has hunted the mammals since 1987 for what
it calls “scientific research purposes.”
In September 2014, the IWC
adopted a resolution saying Japan should abide by the International Court of
Justice’s ruling earlier this year that its “scientific whaling” program was
illegal and should be halted.
Bishop and environment
minister Josh Frydenberg released a joint statement on Thursday condemning the
proposal to lift the global moratorium on commercial whaling.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
News.com.au, 30 May 2018, Japan
whaling kills 122 pregnant whales for ‘research’
Thursday 9 August 2018
YouTube begins to face the Internet's darker realities in 2018
The
Hill, 6
August 2018:
YouTube on Monday said
it had banned Alex Jones’s Infowars channel, following similar
actions taken against the controversial right-wing conspiracy theorist by other
major U.S. technology companies.
After the channel
violated YouTube's policies against child endangerment and hate speech,
Jones was banned for trying to circumvent the site's enforcement measures,
according to a source familiar with the company’s decision. The source
said Jones received a 90-day moratorium on livestreaming for violating its policies and that
he then tried to promote his flagship radio show on other YouTube pages,
prompting a permanent ban.
Is Minister for Home Affairs Peter Dutton value for money?
Australia's millionaire Minister for Home Affairs and Liberal MP for Dickson Peter Dutton has gathered to himself a lucrative salary worth in the vicinity of $478,068 per annum, before any parliamentary entitlements are realised.
The Prime Minister's annual salary is only a little under $50,000 more than this, while the U.S, President's annual salary is apparently around AU$70,000 less than Dutton's annual payment for services rendered.
So is Peter Dutton giving taxpayers value for the revenue dollars they supply.
It honestly doesn't appear to be the case if this audit is any indication.
Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), Report
No.45 2017–18 The
Integration of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection and the
Australian Customs and Border Protection Service, excerpts:
On
18 July 2017, the Prime Minister announced that the government had
decided to establish a Home Affairs portfolio which would have responsibility
for:
federal
law enforcement;
national
security;
transport
security;
criminal
justice;
emergency
management;
immigration
and multicultural affairs; and
border-related
functions.
The Department of Home
Affairs has assumed all of the department’s functions (including the ABF) in
addition to functions from each of the Departments of Prime Minister and
Cabinet; Social Services; Infrastructure and Regional Development and the
Attorney-General’s department.
In addition to the ABF,
the Home Affairs portfolio also includes the following entities:
the
Australian Federal Police;
the
Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission;
the
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre; and
the
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation. …..
Conclusion
10. The Department of
Immigration and Border Protection achieved the integration of DIBP and ACBPS
and the creation of the Australian Border Force in a structural sense and is
also progressing with the implementation of a suite of reform projects.
However, it is not
achieving commitments made to government in relation to additional revenue, and
is not in a position to provide the government with assurance that the claimed
benefits of integration have been achieved.
11. The department
established largely effective governance arrangements which were revised over
time in response to emerging issues.
12. The department’s record keeping
continues to be poor.
13. The department is
effectively managing a suite of 38 capability reform projects and has developed
sound monitoring arrangements, although the Executive Committee does not have
visibility of the overall status of individual projects.
14. The efficiency
savings committed to by the department were removed from its forward estimates
and have thus been incorporated in the budget. However, the department has not verified whether
efficiencies have been delivered in the specific areas which were nominated in
the Integration Business Case.
15. Based on progress to
the end of December 2017, if
collections continue at the current rate the department will only collect 31.6
per cent of the additional customs duty revenue to which it committed in the
Integration Business Case.
16. In the Integration
Business Case, the department committed to a detailed Benefits Realisation
Plan. The plan was not implemented despite several reviews identifying this
omission. As a result, the
department cannot demonstrate to the government that the claimed benefits of
integration have been achieved….
18. Reporting to the
Executive focused primarily on integration and organisational reform, with
minimal coverage of progress in delivery of the suite of 38 capability reform
projects. Following the identification of this as a gap in the 2017 Gateway
Review, an Enterprise Transformation Blueprint was established to provide the
Executive Committee with greater visibility over the progress of activity
across the department.
19. There was no evidence
identified to indicate that written briefings were provided to the Minister on
progress throughout the implementation process.
20. Detailed
communication plans were established and implemented to support the integration
process. ‘Pulse Check’ surveys were regularly taken to evaluate staff
satisfaction and engagement with the process.
21. The audit found that the
department did not maintain adequate records of the integration process. This
finding repeats the outcomes of a substantial number of audits and reviews
going back to 2005. The department’s own assessment is that its records and
information management is in a critically poor state. The problems and
their solutions are known to the department, and it has an action plan to
address them, although numerous previous attempts to do so have not been
successful.
22. The department also
experienced a loss of corporate memory due to the level of turn-over of SES
staff, with almost half of SES officers present in July 2015 no longer in the
department at July 2017.
23. The department
initially identified possible risks to effective integration. However, regular
reporting against those risks ceased when the Reform and Integration Task Force
was disbanded.
24. The department made
extensive use of consultants to assist it with the integration process. Despite a requirement to
evaluate contracts upon completion, this did not occur in 31 out of 33 (94 per
cent) of contracts with a value of more than $1 million examined by the ANAO,
and therefore it is unclear whether these services represented value for money…..
The Assurance Partner [Third Horizon] was engaged by DIBP as a
consultant for the period 19 June 2014 to 18 June 2016 with a contract value of $2 million
The total paid to the consultant was $1.6 million. Due to the department’s
concerns with the Assurance Partner’s performance, the engagement ended early
in August 2015……
The initial allocation
of funds for the Portfolio Reform Program in the 2014–15 budget was $710.4
million.5 Additional funds were approved in successive budgets which brought
the total funding for the Program to $977.8 million. [my yellow highlighting]
BRIEF BACKGROUND
Wednesday 8 August 2018
Great Barrier Reef Foundation: waiting for the inevitable crash
Mainstream
media reports that Australian Prime Minister & Liberal MP for Wentworth Malcolm Turnbull (former director Goldman
Sachs), Minister for Environment and Energy & Liberal MP for Kooyong Josh Frydenberg (former director Deutsche
Bank Australia) and Chair of the Great Barrier Reef Foundation & Member of
the Business Council of Australia John
Schubert (former chair Commonwealth Bank) met on 9 April 2018 to discuss the
allocation of a grant valued at in excess of AU$487.6 million to the
foundation.
It was also
reported that no
officials from the Department of the Environment and Energy were present at
that meeting when the grant offer was made and apparently accepted.
Less than ten weeks later the grant was formally approved
without meeting all relevant provisions in the Commonwealth
Grants Rules and Guidelines 2017.
The Great Barrier Reef
Foundation with a staff of only six full-time employees now has no more
than 6 financial years to spend this large sum, which represents est. 69.66 per cent of funds held in the federal government operated Reef Trust since 2014 and 97.52 per cent of additional funds received by the trust on 29 April 2018.
Leaving the Reef Trust with an unspecified amount to fulfil other commitments over the next six years.
Due to obvious time constraints, the Great Barrier Reef Foundation’s board and corporate 'advisers' need to have
a detailed financial and project action plan for 2018-19 immediately - if not
sooner.
I suspect that I am not alone in waiting for waste of resources, duplication of effort, poorly targeted projects, lack of verifiable outcomes and other instances of mismanagement to emerge over time, given the
slapdash way this grant was put together.
Australian Government, GrantConnect:
GA ID: GA9190
Agency: Department of the Environment and Energy
Approval Date: 20-Jun-2018
Publish Date: 12-Jul-2018
Category: Natural Resources - Conservation and Protection
Grant Term: 27-Jun-2018 to 30-Jun-2024
Value (AUD): $487,633,300.00 (GST inclusive where applicable)
Ad hoc/One-off: Yes
Aggregate Grant Award: No
PBS Program Name: DoTE 17/18 Program 1.1: Sustainable Management of
Natural Resources and the Environment
Grant Program: Reef Trust
Grant Activity: Reef Trust grant to the Great Barrier Reef
Foundation
Purpose: The project will deliver activities which are consistent
with the purposes of the Reef Trust Special Account Determination to achieve
the Reef Trust Objectives and assist to protect the Great Barrier Reef World
Heritage Area.
Internal Reference ID: 100000001841
Confidentiality - Contract: Yes
Confidentiality Reason(s) -
Contract: Other: Aspects of the
Co-Financing Plan and the Communication and Stakeholder Engagement Plan
Confidentiality - Outputs: No
Grant Recipient Details
Recipient Name: Great Barrier Reef Foundation
Recipient ABN: 82 090 616 443
Grant Recipient Location
Suburb: Brisbane
Town/City: Brisbane
Postcode: 4000
State/Territory: QLD
Country: AUSTRALIA
Grant Delivery Location
State/Territory: QLD
Country: AUSTRALIA
Australian Government, Department of the Environment
and Energy - Marine:
Third
Sector, 7
June 2018:
The Great Barrier Reef
Foundation (GBRF) has confirmed one of its board directors will step down as he
faces criminal charges for cartel conduct.
Stephen Roberts, an
investment banker and GBRF board director, has been charged by the Australian
Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) for allegedly playing a part of a
criminal cartel during a $2.5 billion deal.
ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims,
said: “These serious charges are the result of an ACCC investigation that has
been running for more than two years.”
The charges, which
included other banking chief executives and senior staff, were laid by the
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions and will be determined in court.
Criminal
charges relating to an alleged cartel by Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and the ANZ
have been formally laid in relation to alleged cartel arrangements relating to
trading in ANZ shares following a $2.5 billion institutional share placement in
August 2015.
Stopping coal expansions in NSW that are bigger than Adani's proposed Carmichael Mine complex
If you’re concerned about extreme weather & drought, get involved in stopping coal expansions in NSW that are bigger than Adani.— Annie Kia (@AnnieKia) August 2, 2018
Cast your ballot here:https://t.co/qEbG1rXZDU#nswpolpic.twitter.com/YVBapNOlfK
Tuesday 7 August 2018
Australian Digital Health Agency is considering adding DNA data to My Health Record
Crikey.com.au, 6 April 2018:
DNA DEBATE
The federal government’s
controversial My Health Record program is capable of storing genomic data, such
as cancer risks, using technology that both has huge research applications and
highlights privacy and security concerns.
The Sydney Morning Herald reports that
genome-sequencing company Genome.One, which can track genetic variations and
therefore disease risks, has built “necessary infrastructure” for uploading
sensitive genomic data into the opt-out system.
University of Canberra privacy expert Bruce
Arnold has criticised the inherent risks of DNA-tracking technology and,
just a week after the government backdown on police access to My Health Records, today’s news as
again demonstrating a lack public consultation.
The Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) which is responsibe for My Health Record gave Genome.One, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Garvan Institute, $40,000 in September 2017 to support the development of this software.
Its GoExplore™ software provides sequencing and analyses of patients’ DNA samples to assesses their risk of developing 52 hereditary conditions, including 31 cancers, 13 heart conditions, as well several other conditions where monitoring or intervention can be of benefit.
In a change of focus, Genome.One and The Garvan Institute are reportedly no longer offering clinical reporting for genetic disease diagnosis or personal health genomics in Australia. This service was priced at $6,400 plus GST, with no Medicare rebate.
Staffing numbers in Genome.One have been severely cut, new capital is being sought and, Gavan has
stated that it intends to spin off Genome.One
software into a new company in which it will be a minority shareholder.
However, Genome.One still intends to pilot its genomics technology integrated into GP practice software and on !8 April 2018 its CEO stated; “We're working with some electronic medical record providers and we're hoping that we can get a trial underway at some point this year”.
Labels:
Big Brother,
big data,
data retention,
genetics,
health,
information technology,
privacy,
safety
Is Sky News Autralia fast becoming national propaganda central for extreme world views?
This is an excerpt from the book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (1988) by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky.
That these observations have a basis in fact can sadly be borne out by mainstream and social media in 2018.
Take this most recent example....
The United Patriots Front (UPF) is a
far-right Australian white supremacists group.
In September
2017 admirer
of Adolf Hitler, UPF founder & sometime leader Blair Cottrell and two supporters were each convicted under
Victoria’s Racial and Religious
Tolerance Act 2001
and fined $2,000 plus $79.50 in statutory costs for religious
vilification/inciting serious contempt.
This is not
the first time Cottrell has been before the courts. In 2013 he was gaoled for a
string of offences including stalking, arson, burglary and damaging property.
Despite this dubious history Sky
News decided to invite him on as
a guest of former Northern Territory Chief Minister & former Country Liberal Party Leader Adam Giles for a one-on-one
studio interview on The Adam Giles Show on 5 August 2017.
To describe Cottrell as "an activist" is deliberately misleading as his history is well-known, as are some of his more extreme pronouncements such as this:
The reaction to Sky News was swift and this is just four examples:
What a sad moment for Sky in a year full of them. I’m officially giving @foxtel & @SkyNewsAust the boot for good for supporting & platforming neo-Nazism and hope many Australians do so as well. Hope you honestly reflect on your participation in a propaganda network for extremism.— пятьдесят две победы 76ers (@scouse_roar)August 5, 2018
Sky News knows exactly who Blair Cottrell is and what he stands for. They don’t give a shit. That’s why they’re hosting him. Platforming a guy who believes Mein Kampf should be compulsory reading in schools doesn’t even come close to being beyond the pale for them.— ya fave μαλάκας (@mathaiaus) August 5, 2018
"WE DIDN'T KNOW WHO BLAIR COTTRELL WAS WHEN WE BOOKED HIM TO COME ON OUR CHANNEL. GOOGLE WAS BROKEN THAT DAY" pic.twitter.com/sTkEE5b7rF— Kenny Devine (@TheKennyDevine) August 5, 2018
Sky News issued an apology:I have advised @SkyNewsAust that I have quit as a Sky commentator. My father fought Nazis in WWII and was interred in a German POW camp. The decision to allow Neo-Nazi Blair Cotterell onto the channel was another step in a journey to normalising racism & bigotry in our country.— Craig Emerson (@DrCraigEmerson) August 6, 2018
Then announced a ban on Blair Cottrell and a suspension of the Adam Giles Show, along with an internal management shakeup, as the general public pushed to the limits continued to fight back against the 'normalising' of violence and racism.
However, as Sky News often employs markedly right-wing personalities and regularly hosts guests with extreme, intolerant and sometimes racist world views, it is not always easy to accept assertions that extremist views are not the news channel's own views. Or at the very least, that these divisive opinions are seen by Sky News management as driving an agenda desired by News Corp and powerful right-wing groups.
In fact Sky News appears to be fast developing into a version of that US right-wing propaganda vehicle, Fox News, in that it seeks to legitimise and monetise for its own corporate profit the most dangerous elements on the far-right political and social spectrum.1
Notes
1. Sky News' liking for yellow press journalism hasn't past unnoticed.
Junkee, 6 August 2018: Sky News…. was deeply
sorry for slut-shaming a (female) federal senator a few weeks
ago. In the past, Sky News has been deeply sorry for linking a (female) former state
Premier to corruption, deeply sorry for poking fun at a (female) journalist’s
disability, and deeply sorry for suggesting a school boy was gay because he’d
appeared in a video about feminism.
Monday 6 August 2018
'Too Dumb To Know That They Are Dumb': an unexpected explanation of why political extremism in Western democracies is as it is.....
A possible explanation for the continuing presence on the Australian political stage of Pauline Hanson, David Leyonhjelm, Tim Wilson, Darren Hinch, Ian Macdonald, Barnaby Joyce, Michaelia Cash, Tony Abbott, Scott Morrison, Peter Dutton, Christian Porter, Julie Bishop, Josh Frydenberg, Greg Hunt, Alan Tudge and Malcolm Turnbull - Rupert Murdoch suffers from the Dunning‐Kruger effect and has infected much of the mainstream media.
A
widely cited finding in social psychology holds that individuals with low
levels of competence will judge themselves to be higher achieving than they
really are. In the present study, I examine how the so‐called “Dunning‐Kruger effect” conditions citizens'
perceptions of political knowledgeability. While low performers on a political
knowledge task are expected to engage in overconfident self‐placement and self‐assessment when reflecting on their
performance, I also expect the increased salience of partisan identities to
exacerbate this phenomenon due to the effects of directional motivated
reasoning. Survey experimental results confirm the Dunning‐Kruger effect in the realm of
political knowledge. They also show that individuals with moderately low political
expertise rate themselves as increasingly politically knowledgeable when
partisan identities are made salient. This below‐average group is also likely to rely
on partisan source cues to evaluate the political knowledge of peers. In a
concluding section, I comment on the meaning of these findings for contemporary
debates about rational ignorance, motivated reasoning, and political
polarization.
PsyPost, 16 April 2018:
For his study, Anson
examined 2,606 American adults using two online surveys.
He evaluated the
knowledge of the participants by quizzing them regarding the number of years
served by a senator, the name of the current Secretary of Energy, the party
with more conservative positions regarding health care, the political party
currently in control of the House of Representatives, and which of four programs
the U.S. federal government spends the least on.
Most of the participants
performed poorly on the political quiz — and those who performed worse were
more likely to overestimate their performance.
“Many Americans appear
to be extremely overconfident in their political knowledgeability, because they
have no way of knowing how little they actually know about the world of
politics (this is the so-called ‘double bind of incompetence’). But there’s a
catch: when Republicans and Democrats engage in partisan thought processes,
this effect becomes even stronger than before,” Anson explained.
“Partisans with modest
factual knowledge about politics become even more convinced that they are
savvier than average when they reflect on a world full of members of the opposite
party. In fact, when I asked partisans to ‘grade’ political knowledge quizzes
filled out by fictional members of the other party, low-skilled respondents
gave out scores that reflected party biases much more than actual knowledge.”
“The results seem to
indicate the existence of a widespread failure of political discourse in the
United States: when a partisan talks to someone of the out-party, they are
pretty likely to misjudge the political knowledgeability of themselves and
their conversation partner. More often than not, this means that partisans will
think of themselves as far more politically knowledgeable than an out-partisan,
even when that person is extremely politically knowledgeable,” Anson told
PsyPost.
“I think this has major
implications for the breakdowns in political discourse we often observe in
contemporary American democracy.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)