Tuesday 18 September 2018
When a prime minster fails to grasp the basics of climate change policy.....
The
Australian Prime Minister for Fossil Fuels and Liberal MP for Cook, Scott Morrison, has been repeatedly insisting
since he came to office on 24 August 2018 that Australia is on target to meet
its Paris Agreement greenhouse gas emissions targets.
Apparently he
is telling journalists that “the
business-as-usual model gets us there in a canter”.
Business-as-usual of course includes those cuts to climate change mitigation programs Morrison made as federal treasurer - including no further funding for the Abbott Government's Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) which has so far failed to purchase enough abatement to outpace Australia's emissions growth.
Those agencies outside of Morrison's ‘magic circle’ are quite frankly contradicting his prediction of success.......
The COAG
Energy Security Council’s Energy Security
Board expects that Morrison’s refusal to revive National Energy Guarantee
legislation will see the electricity sector “fall short of the emissions
reduction target of 26% below 2005 levels”.
According to
Dept. of Environment and Energy total
annual emissions for the year to December 2013 fell by 0.8%.
No report was issued for the year ending December 2014, however annual
emissions rose by 0.4% for the year ending December 2015 and annual
emissions for the year to December 2016 rose by 1.4%.
While the Dept.
of Environment and Energy's, Quarterly
Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: December 2017 stated:
Annual emissions for the
year to December 2017 are estimated to be 533.7 Mt CO2 -e. This represents a 1.5% increase
in emissions when compared with the previous year. Over the year to
December 2017, there were increases in emissions from the stationary energy
(excluding electricity), transport, fugitive emissions, industrial processes
and product use, waste and agriculture sectors. These increases were partially
offset by a decline in emissions from the electricity sector. The annual
increases in stationary energy (excluding electricity) and fugitive emissions
were largely driven by an increase in LNG exports. [my
yellow highlighting]
The
independent Climate
Works Australia reported on 6 September 2018:
Australia is not yet on
track to meet its emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement but
there are many opportunities to still get there, according to new research
released today.
The ClimateWorks
Australia report, Tracking Progress to net zero emissions, found Australia
needed to double its emissions reduction progress to achieve the federal
government’s target of 26-28 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, and triple
progress to reach net zero emissions by 2050.
The report found
Australia’s emissions were 11 per cent below 2005 levels in 2017 but have been
steadily increasing since 2013. If Australia sustained the rate of improvement
in emissions intensity it had achieved between 2005 and 2013, it could meet the
government's 2030 target. But progress has stalled in most sectors and reversed
overall. [my yellow highlighting]
Climate Works’
latest report, Tracking
progress to net zero emissions: National progress on reducing emissions across
the Australian economy and outlook to 2030, was released in September
2018 and although cautiously optimistic it doesn’t suggest that a Morrison
Government would be able to just canter towards the commitments given in Paris:
This report uses
findings from the Deep Decarbonisation Pathways Project (DDPP) and compares
these with the Australian Government's emissions data and projections to
examine whether Australia is on track for a net zero pathway and for its first
commitments under the Paris Agreement on climate change to reduce emissions by
26 to 28 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. It assesses recent progress since
2005 and the outlook to 2030.
In common with 179 other
countries who ratified the Paris Agreement, Australia has committed to keeping
global warming well below 2 degrees, aiming to limit warming to 1.5 degrees and
to reach net zero emissions. For developed countries like Australia, a 2 degree
limit is generally accepted to mean reaching net zero emissions by 2050 – the
majority of states and territories have agreed to this goal. Limiting global
warming to well below 2 degrees or 1.5 degrees would require an earlier date.
Australia’s current
emissions reduction target is 26 to 28 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. This
is less ambitious than the Climate Change Authority’s recommended target range
of 45 to 65 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030 for Australia’s contribution to
a 2 degree goal (CCA 2015). To make sure the world is on track, all countries
in the Paris Agreement have been asked to consider whether their current target
is ambitious enough.
We already know
Australia can reach net zero emissions by 2050. The Pathways to Deep
Decarbonisation in 2050 (DDPP) report (ClimateWorks et al 2014) identified the
emissions reductions potential to put Australia on a pathway to net zero in 2050
while the economy continues to grow…
In 2017 Australia’s
emissions were around 11 per cent below 2005 levels. This is an increase from
their lowest point in 2013. Overall progress was due to strong reductions in
the land sector, while emissions rose in most other sectors. Although there
were improvements at the whole of economy level and in some sectors,
improvements on average were not equivalent to the pathway to net zero
emissions by 2050.
Emissions are higher in
buildings, industry and transport than they were in 2005. Emissions are lower
in the land sector, with the reduction being larger than increases in other
sectors. Electricity emissions fell slightly…
There were times of
reasonable emissions intensity improvements in industry and buildings but, as
with the electricity sector, these improvements then slowed or reversed. This
occurred alongside the repeal of the carbon price and related policies. Energy
intensity improved in these sectors, suggesting better energy efficiency, but
not at the rate needed for net zero. And in industry, some of this improvement
was driven by declines in energy-intensive manufacturing….
Without further policies, Australia will not be on track
for the net zero pathway or the Government's 2030 target. ClimateWorks’ research previously
identified potential emissions reductions on the net zero pathway and this
report shows where this potential is not yet being unlocked. The national
process of developing Australia’s long term emissions reduction strategy
provides an opportunity to unlock this remaining potential and get on track to
achieving net zero emissions by 2050, as do similar processes in many state and
territory governments. [my yellow highlighting]
Monday 17 September 2018
Castillo Copper Limited's Jackadgery Project: has spinning the truth already begun?
On 15 September 2018 The Daily Examiner reported that:
Concerns about the health of the Mann and Clarence
rivers have been raised by community members following explorations by Castillo Copper at
Cangai, near the historic copper mine….
It’s the high grade of
the finding that has some community members concerned, with the prospect of a
mine opening in the area becoming more likely.
At a meeting attended by
about 20 people, NSW Parliament Greens candidate for the Clarence Greg Clancy
and John Edwards from the Clarence Valley Environment Centre explained their
concerns with mining so close to the river.
After having trouble
getting in contact with Castillo through its website, Mr Edwards took
his inquiries about the exploration to the mining regulator.
“I got an email from
their managing director … and he said they were just out there doing some
investigation and it wasn’t very much to worry about,” he said.
But this has not eased
his concerns about the future of the Clarence Valley’s rivers.
“It would be good to get
out there and see what they are actually doing,” he said.
“They’ve been talking up
their exploration finds to date … maybe that is to just get investors’ money,
but it’s certainly in a bad position where the river is and where all this
siltation and run-off and toxic crap that runs off when they mine copper,
silver...
“It’s not going to be
easy for them when they are at the top of a hill overlooking a river.”
Mr Clancy said the group
would need to get more information so they could understand exactly how the ore
would be mined.
“There is loss of
vegetation and threatened species on the hill. This is going to be an open cut
mine … and the water table may not be up there, but once they’ve got an open
cut mine it will gather water and they have to use water in the process to get
the minerals out.
“They will be creating
their own artificial ponds and we would have to explore this further, but I
know with (extracting) gold they use arsenic.
“There are a whole range
of chemicals they could be using. Whatever projections they are supposed to
use, they often don’t work.”
The group is planning to
do more research and attempt to make contact with the company before they hold
another meeting in one month’s time at the Grafton library.
[my yellow bolding]
Castillo Copper Limited (ASX:CCZ) is a West Australian base metal explorer listed on the stock exchange which has four subsidiaries:
Castillo Copper Chile Spa, Total Minerals Pty Ltd, Queensland Commodities Pty Ltd and Total Iron Pty Ltd.
Castillo Copper Limited holds three mining exploration leases as part of its Jackadgery Project:
Castillo Copper Chile Spa, Total Minerals Pty Ltd, Queensland Commodities Pty Ltd and Total Iron Pty Ltd.
Castillo Copper Limited holds three mining exploration leases as part of its Jackadgery Project:
EL 8625 (1992) 17-Jul-2017 17-Jul-2020 35
UNITS About 43 km WNW of GRAFTON TOTAL
MINERALS PTY LTD est. at 155 km2
EL 8635 (1992) 21-Aug-2017 21-Aug-2020 52
UNITS About 41 km WNW of GRAFTON TOTAL
IRON PTY LTD
EL 8601 (1992) 21-Jun-2017 21-Jun 2020 51
UNITS About 38 km SE of DRAKE QUEENSLAND COMMODITIES PTY LTD.
Castillo Copper is not characterising its activities on these leases as "just doing some investigation".
In fact it is indicating to its shareholders and the stock exchange that the company has clear intentions to mine at the old Cangai Mine site before the end of the exploration on these leases:
* “Road to fast-track
production taking shape”
* “Preliminary
metallurgical test-work on samples from the two McDonough’s stockpiles, along
the line of lode, has demonstrated the ore can be beneficiated materially….. Discussions
continue with prospective off-take partners interested in processing ore as
relevant information comes to hand …. Meanwhile, the geology team have
approached the regulator for guidance on the optimal way forward to remove the
stockpiles from site and capture the economic benefits”
* “…they are an asset and
could potentially generate early cashflow”
* “The clear options are
third party processing locally or a direct shipping ore product once regulatory
clearance is secured”.
Castillo Copper Limited images
Well, the board is composed of:
Peter Francis Meagher, company director since 2 February 2018, from East Freemantle, West Australia - position Chairman;
Peter Smith, on the board as but not officially listed as a director of Castillo Copper Limited - position Non-Executive Director; and
Alan David Stephen Armstrong, company director since 1 August 2017, from Canning Vale West Australia - position Executive Director.
Listed company director who is not included at https://www.castillocopper.com/board/ is:
Neil Armstrong Hutchinson. company director since 1 August 2017, from Double View, Western Australia - position previously reported to be Technical Executive Director at Castillo Copper Limited since August 1, 2017. by Bloomberg.
NOTE; All three listed company directors appear to be shareholders in this miming company.
Castillo Copper Limited's Top 20 shareholders as of 20 September 2017 were:
Castillo Copper Limited Annual Report 2016-17 |
Labels:
Clarence River,
Clarence Valley,
environmental vandalism,
mining,
water
Will Dutton face the High Court?
On 23 August 2018 sixty-nine members of the Turnbull Coalition Government voted down a Labor motion to refer the Minister for Home Affairs and MP for Dickson, Peter Dutton, to the Court of Disputed Returns.
Included in this sixty-nine was Peter Dutton himself and most of the forty-five MPs who a day later refused to support Dutton's second leadership bid, as well as some reported to now be keeping their options open concerning referral to the Court.
It seems that another motion is being prepared and there is no guarantee that the vote would go Dutton's way in a Morrison Coalition Government.
News.com.au, 15 September 2018:
Included in this sixty-nine was Peter Dutton himself and most of the forty-five MPs who a day later refused to support Dutton's second leadership bid, as well as some reported to now be keeping their options open concerning referral to the Court.
It seems that another motion is being prepared and there is no guarantee that the vote would go Dutton's way in a Morrison Coalition Government.
News.com.au, 15 September 2018:
Home Affairs Minister
Peter Dutton has been dealt another legal blow as constitutional law expert
Anne Twomey says her advice for his referral to the High Court is
"stronger" than ever.
Professor Twomey told
The Australian the Solicitor-General's opinion brings up information about
funding for the child care centres owned by Mr Dutton's family trust which
"raised considerably the risk of disqualification" under section 44
of the constitution.
This new assessment
comes after Julie Bishop called for "clarity" over Mr Dutton's
eligibility and backed former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull's calls for his
referral.
Shadow Treasurer Chris
Bowen told reporters in Sydney on Saturday that it was "very
important" that Mr Dutton be referred.
"I see one of
Australia's most eminent constitutional lawyers, Anne Twomey, suggesting today
that the case for the reference to the High Court has been increased, is now
stronger," he said.
Mr Bowen wouldn't say if
and when Labor would make a second attempt to move a motion to refer Mr Dutton
to the High Court, only that "we'll keep our options open."
A Labor motion for a
referral was defeated by just one vote on August 23.
Ms Bishop hasn't ruled
out crossing the floor to support the motion, saying if a vote was called:
"I will make up my mind at that time".
Crossbenchers Cathy
McGowan and Rebekha Sharkie told The Conversation on Wednesday that they would
vote for a referral.
Ms McGowan said,
"it should be done quickly and efficiently and effectively and sorted
out."
"I think it's
taking up a huge amount of space in parliament at the moment," she
said."
According to The
Saturday Paper, Mr Dutton only absented from one cabinet discussion on child
care, despite having regularly declared his family investments.
A spokesperson for Mr
Dutton said: "The minister has complied with the Statement of Ministerial
Standards and the Cabinet Handbook. Suggestions to the contrary are
false".
News.com.au, 15 September 2018:
The Greens are preparing
a vote in parliament to check Home Affairs minister's eligibility over
questions about his family financial interest in two childcare centres.
A similar motion failed
by just one vote on Malcolm Turnbull's second last day as prime minister.
"I have taken
advice in relation to my position, which put the question beyond doubt,"
Mr Dutton told parliament on Thursday.
Section 44 of the
constitution disqualifies anyone who has a "direct or indirect pecuniary
interest" in any agreement with the Commonwealth.
Childcare centres now
get direct funding from the Commonwealth, which is then passed through to
parents.
"Every day he
continues on in this place there's going to be a huge cloud over him and over
the government," Greens leader Richard Di Natale told reporters on Friday.
Greens MP Adam Bandt has
been speaking to Liberal MPs about voting to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court,
and the Greens believe support is rising.....
At the height of the
Liberal leadership crisis, Solicitor General Stephen Donaghue advised he could
not categorically determine Mr Dutton's status and only the High Court could.
However Mr Donaghue
found on balance Mr Dutton was "not incapable" of sitting as an
MP.....
A News Corp report on
Friday claimed two government MPs are considering voting with Labor in forcing
Mr Dutton to the High Court.
The report understands
the rogue MPs are planning to use the threat of crossing the floor to force Mr
Morrison to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court.
Prime Minister Scott
Morrison says he won't act on Mr Turnbull's advice.
He's also checking
whether Mr Dutton stepped out of cabinet when the childcare funding changes
were discussed.
Sunday 16 September 2018
The Scott Morrison Social Media Experience in 2018: expletives deleted
"QT was on fire today 🔥 Good work, team. https://t.co/M6UWcQO0HU"
Three hours after he posted this tweet on 13 September 2018, Australian Prime Minister and Liberal MP for Cook Scott Morrison deleted it;
Some hours later he apologised for the profanity included in the Fat Man Scoop "Be Faithful" hip hop song, part of which he had embedded in video of that afternoon's HoR Question Time - pleading ignorance.
Remove that dodgy tweet from his Twitter account he may have, but the twitterverse being faster than Morrison's digits meant there was still an echo left on that social media platform:
The reason why the government benches were conspicuous for so many arms upstretched in unison in the video is because, in true tent revival-style, Morrison was asking his colleagues to raise their hands:Good morning!— BuzzFeedOz Politics (@BuzzFeedOzPol) September 13, 2018
The prime minister deleted a tweet while you were asleep because it contained a song about fucking tonight. pic.twitter.com/oRxrIJi8aP
I'll ask those on this side of the House: who's ever run a small business here? Here we go! Who's ever worked in the private sector here? Here we go! Who's been a police officer here? Here we go! We've got a police officer up the back. Who is a farmer on this side of the House? We've got some farmers over here. We've got medical practitioners. Who has ever served in the Australian defence forces on this side of the House? The Liberal-National Party is the party of ordinary, everyday Australians going out there every day, having a go and getting a go.
"Who F#ckin Tonight? Who F#ckin tonight?
Who F#ckin Tonight? Oh!Oh! Who F#ckin tonight?
Who f#ckin Tonight? Who F#ckin Tonight? Oh!Oh!
Stop Playin, Keep It Movin! Stop playin, keep it movin!
Stop playin, keep it movin! Keep movin movin movin movin!
Hey sing along!" [Fat Man Scoop's "Be Faithfull"]
I'm still wondering which age demographic he was trying to impress. Particularly as these lyrics appear to have originally been penned in 1999.
I am also curious as to why the Prime Minister of Australia chose to ignore the conditions imposed on use of footage of parliamentary proceedings.
In particular 15.12(c) broadcast material may not be digitally manipulated.
As for why the reason Morrison gave for deleting his tweet changed in the following days from inappropriate lyrics to being in breach of parliament's rules on use of video footage, well that is anyone's guess.
Labels:
music,
right wing rat bags,
Scott Morrison,
Twitter
A sign of increasing desperation on Australian Minister for Home Affairs Peter Dutton's part?
After threatening to bring into the House of Representatives files he kept on members of parliament when he Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, Minister for Home Affairs and Liberal MP for Dickson Peter Dutton made sure two particular files were very visible on 11 September 2018.
Images found on Twitter
After he quoted from these files the Opposition requested that they be tabled. A request Dutton refused.
Watching these files deployed prior to and during Question Time, in what looked suspiciously like a form of visual intimidation, did little to enhance Dutton's defence of his own actions as immigration minister in 2015.
Saturday 15 September 2018
Quote of the Week
“Real power is – I don’t even want
to use the word – fear” [Then presidential candidate
Donald J. Trump in a 31 March 2016
interview with Bob Woodward and Robert Costa at the Trump International Hotel,
Washington DC]
Labels:
Donald Trump
Tweets of the Week
Supreme Court of QLD found that Wagner brothers have succeeded in their defamation claim against Alan Jones, 2GB, and 4BC . Awarded a total of $3.754m. Read summary and judgment here, https://t.co/zze75fWRnn— Supreme Court of QLD (@SupremeCourtQLD) September 11, 2018
* Between 28 October 2014 and 20 August 2015, 2GB Radio and
Alan Jones published 30 broadcasts. Twenty-seven of these broadcasts conveyed
76 defamatory imputations of and concerning the Wagner brothers according to
the Court*
Labels:
defamation,
law,
libspill,
Malcolm Bligh Turnbull,
radio,
Supreme Court
Friday 14 September 2018
NSW Far North Coast keeping an eye out for Yellow Crazy Ants
The yellow crazy ant is
listed as one of the top 100 worst invasive species by the IUCN and the Global
Invasive Species Database. They are a category three restricted pest under
the Biosecurity Act 2014. As such, all citizens have a general biosecurity
obligation to minimise the risk of further infestation.....
Lismore local
government area residents are reminded that the Crazy Yellow Ant infestation has not yet been completely eradicated
and are asked to report any sightings to the Biosecurity hotline 1800 680 244.
Labels:
biosecurity,
noxious pests
Dutton doubles down in a very public fight
“Grooming is when someone builds an emotional connection
with a child to gain their trust for the purposes of sexual abuse, sexual
exploitation or trafficking. Children and young people can be groomed online or
face-to-face, by a stranger or by someone they know - for example a
family member, friend or professional.” [National
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, 2018]
The
Canberra Times,
11 September 2018:
Home Affairs Minister
Peter Dutton has dramatically escalated his attack on Roman Quaedvlieg,
claiming the former Border Force commissioner "groomed" a woman 30
years his junior.
Mr Dutton also said Mr
Quaedvlieg – who has emerged as a key figure in the high-profile saga
surrounding the Minister's interventions in visa matters – was Labor's
Godwin Grech, a reference to the former Treasury official whose misleading
evidence in the "Utegate" scandal helped destroy Malcolm Turnbull's
first stint as Liberal leader.
On Tuesday, amid ongoing
scrutiny of Mr Dutton's conduct, Fairfax Media reported he pressed Mr
Quaedvlieg in 2014 to help
two Queensland policemen get jobs in the newly formed Border Force.
In response to questions
from Labor in question time, the Home Affairs Minister said Mr Quaedvlieg was
spreading lies.
"This smear is
coming from the former Australian Border Force commissioner, a man who was, as
commissioner, sacked from his position. He was a man who had groomed a girl 30
years younger than himself. He is discredited and disgraced," Mr Dutton
said.
Mr Quaedvlieg,
53, was sacked from Border Force earlier this year after he was found to
have helped his younger girlfriend, Sarah Rogers, reportedly 22 years old, get
a job within the agency.
"He is somebody
that the Labor Party should not rely on. A lot has been promised to the Labor
Party but it's clear to me that Roman Quaedvlieg is your Godwin
Grech."
Mr Quaedvlieg
immediately responded to the attack, saying they were "curious,
stuttering, rambling comments". He noted Mr Dutton was making the comments
under parliamentary privilege, protecting him from legal action.
"Grooming? Are you
serious? That has a legislative meaning. Is that what he meant?" he said
on Twitter.
Quaedvlieg has since written to the Speaker of the House of Representatives complaining that Dutton has abused parliamentary privilege.
The Dutton allegations......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhPorZ3tWoo
Quaedvlieg has since written to the Speaker of the House of Representatives complaining that Dutton has abused parliamentary privilege.
The Dutton allegations......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhPorZ3tWoo
Thursday 13 September 2018
Australia has a prime minister who rejects realitiy and embraces idiocy
Scott Morrison with a coal specimen supplied by the Minerals Council of Australia ABC News, 9 February 2018 |
During an interview
with the ABC 7.30 program on 11
September 2018 Prime Minister & Liberal MP for Cook Scott Morrison declared he is “troubled” by the politics of envy in
Australia and has “a very strong view” on what fairness means.
His version
of “fairness” is a redefinition far removed from the contents of any dictionary
wherein it is usually taken to mean impartial and just treatment or behaviour
without favouritism or discrimination.
His expresses
his version of fairness as “those that have a go get a go” or “a fair go for
those that have a go”– phrases that are inherently judgemental.
It seems that in Morrison's world only individuals who are already capable of helping themselves in some fashion will deserve
assistance from others.
Morrison
again refused to say why the parliamentary Liberal Party changed leaders and in the interview sought to divorce himself from both the spill process and outcome, as though he
wasn’t a participant in those rolling leadership ballots.
But what
caught the attention of a numbers of viewers was his response to two questions.
The first response contained Morrison's assertion that he had separated climate/ environment and energy policies and admissions that he was removing climate change targets from future energy policy and was giving no guarantee of future funding for greenhouse gas emissions reduction.
The first response contained Morrison's assertion that he had separated climate/ environment and energy policies and admissions that he was removing climate change targets from future energy policy and was giving no guarantee of future funding for greenhouse gas emissions reduction.
The second involved his belief that there was a need for additional legal protections of religious freedoms when none were being threatened.......The moment @ScottMorrisonMP condemned my great grandchildren to death. @abc730 #auspoll #climatechange pic.twitter.com/eKlhfEY7jc— Fr Rod Bower (@FrBower) September 11, 2018
For Scott Morrison the primary fear of a majority of the Australian population is less important that demonstrating his missionary zeal to institutional Christianity and his unwavering support to the fossil fuel industry.Sales: "Can you give me an example at the moment where people's religious freedoms are being impinged?"— Greg Jericho (@GrogsGamut) September 11, 2018
Morrison: "That's not the point. Australians want to be sure that in the future those things won't be"
oh dear #abc730
Blatant water theft by miners being allowed under Berejiklian Government rules?
IMAGE:
Ros Druce. Maules Creek Mine, January 2016 in New Matilda
ABC
News, 10
September 2018:
A New South Wales coal
mine is being accused of inappropriately taking more surface water than it is
entitled to.
A review of Whitehaven
Coal's Maules Creek Mine near Narrabri by the campaign group Lock the Gate
showed it captured 1,800 million litres (ML) of surface water in 2016, despite
being licenced to take 30 million litres.
Surface water is water
that is collected from rainfall and run off.
An examination of
surface water licences in New South Wales has been unable to find any other
surface water licences held by the mine to justify the additional water.
"It does appear
that the take is much higher than the licence they have explained to the
community," Maules Creek farmer Lochie Leitch said.
Whitehaven Coal declined
to be interviewed.
The company issued a
statement saying it was in compliance with its water licences, and the use of
rainfall and runoff is permissible under legislation.
Farmers whose properties
neighbour the mine have joined forces with the campaign group, Lock the Gate
Alliance, to lodge a complaint with the state's new water watchdog, the Natural
Resources Access Regulator.
The NRAR was set up in
April 2018 following a review of water management and compliance which was
prompted by a story
by the ABC's Four Corners.
The farmers are worried
that the alleged collection of this extra surface water is affecting the
environment.
"[It's] simply
capturing too much water that would otherwise be recharging groundwater and
flowing into surface water systems," Maules Creek farmer Sally Hunter
said.
Labels:
mining,
sustainability,
water wars,
water policy politics
Wednesday 12 September 2018
Yet another opportunistic mining exploration company has the Clarence Valley in its sights: Public Meeting 2.30pm on 13 September 2018 at Grafton Regional Library
Having received approval from the NSW mining regulator in June 2018 Castillo Copper Limited (CCZ) has
proceeded with its exploratory drilling program with a view to establishing an
open cut mine at Cangai in the Clarence Valley.
Castillo Copper Limited image |
This small West
Australian base metal exploration company may be operating on a shoestring
budget and currently trade at only $0.039 per ordinary share, however an open
cut mine so close to the Mann River means that the greed of Messrs. Peter Meagher, Peter Smith And Alan
Armstrong has the potential to severely damage the Clarence River system.
2 hrs ·
Goodbye Mann and Clarence Rivers if this gets approval. The plan is to
open cut mine and that involves removing a large hill and metal extraction
usually involves highly polluting chemicals. This is no win for the Valley. It
is a disaster. A meeting is being held at the Clarence Regional Library in
Grafton at 2.30 PM on Thursday September 13 to discuss this threat to the
Rivers. All welcome.
Labels:
Clarence Valley,
environmental vandalism,
mining,
pollution
Assistant Minister for Regional Development and Territories & Liberal MP for Farrer Sussan Ley shows her true colours
"This is an industry with an operating model built on animal suffering" [Sussan Ley, 21 May 2018]
Recently
welcomed back into the Coalition ministerial fold after being forced to resign
as health minister due to her expense scandal, Assistant Minister for
Regional Development and Territories & Liberal MP for Farrer
Susan Ley, placed her lack of moral
compass on full display this week when she abandoned her commitment to limit the
cruel trade in live sheep.
Compare her present actions with her description three months earlier of the live sheep trade which she then condemned in no uncertain terms.
Compare her present actions with her description three months earlier of the live sheep trade which she then condemned in no uncertain terms.
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
10 September 2018:
They threatened to cross
the floor to stop the trade they felt was so heinous. But when it came to a
vote on Monday, Liberal MPs Sussan Ley and Sarah Henderson staged a change of
heart and used their deciding votes to prevent a debate on a ban on the live
animal export trade.
As backbenchers the pair
led a government backlash against the live export trade after horrific footage
showing the deaths of thousands of sheep en route to the Middle East last year
emerged. They even proposed their own bill to stop the trade.
That was within grasp on
Monday, when a private member's bill sponsored by the Greens and crossbenchers
to stop the trade passed the Senate 31 votes to 28.
Just two votes were
required to approve it in the House of Representatives but Ms Ley and Ms
Henderson, who were recently elevated to the outer ministry in Scott Morrison's
reshuffle, voted against moves to bring it on for debate.
To cross the floor, they
would have needed to quit their ministerial positions.
The pair then also
rejected Labor attempts to bring on a debate in the House on their own bill.
Their two votes made the difference with the bill going down 70-72.
Labor's agriculture
spokesman Joel Fitzgibbon said the pair had put their political interests ahead
of animal welfare.
“Sussan Ley and Sarah
Henderson sponsored a bill to phase-out the live sheep export trade and made
passionate speeches in support of their proposal," Mr Fitzgibbon said.
"But today they put
their own political careers ahead of their policy convictions.
"Given the 72-70
result, their votes were the difference."
Both bills now disappear into history and the issue of cruelty to exported livestock remains unresolved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)