Teh Parrot in breach of Australian broadcasting rules

Well who woulda thunk it – Alan Jones found to be spouting inaccurate nonsense over the airwaves.

ACMA Media Release 123/2011 issued on 23rd November 2011:  

Radio 2GB breaches rules on factual accuracy and presentation of significant viewpoints

Sydney radio station 2GB has breached the commercial radio codes of practice by failing to present factual material accurately and by not making reasonable efforts to present significant viewpoints.
The breaches relate to certain segments of The Alan Jones Breakfast Show broadcast in February 2010. During the segments, Mr Jones was highly critical of the operation of native vegetation laws and their administration by the (then) New South Wales Department of Environment and Climate Change.
The ACMA found that 2GB did not present nor take steps to present more than one significant viewpoint about the operation and administration of native vegetation laws in NSW.
‘The codes require licensees to make reasonable efforts or give reasonable opportunities to present significant viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance,’ said the ACMA Chairman, Mr Chris Chapman. ‘Licensees can do this either within the same program or across similar programs but merely presenting substantially identical viewpoints is not sufficient to satisfy the code.’
The ACMA also found that one of the segments contained a factual error.
The complainant also alleged 2GB breached the code rule against broadcasting material likely to encourage violence for its own sake but the ACMA did not uphold this complaint.
The ACMA is in discussion with 2GB about its response to the breaches.
Investigation Report 2540 can be found on the ACMA website.

Most amusing tweet of the week puts things into perspective

GOOGLE: "I know everything!"

FACEBOOK: "I know everyone!"

INTERNET: "Without me you're all nothing!"

ELECTRICITY: "Keep talking, bitches."

SocialMedia411

Tweed News going to Saturday only, Coffs Advocate being stripped down to giveaway - which APN masthead is next?

About the only advantage coming out of APN’s surgical strike on its NSW North Coast newspapers is that the online presence still remains for those pale print ghosts, the Tweed Daily News and Coffs Coast Advocate.

mUmBRELLA 21^st November 2011:

“Tweed’s 123-year-old Daily News and the 104-year-old Coffs Coast Advocate will both move to reduced frequency, while free titles the Gold Coast Mail and Robina Mail will be closed in a move that will lead to 35 redundancies.

In the latest set of Audit Bureau of Circulations figures, the Daily News was selling just 3,689 copies. The paper started life in 1888 as the Tweed and Brunswick Advocate. It became The Tweed Daily in 1914. At one point it was one of only two daily newspapers in Australia to have an offset printing press.

Instead the Daily News will sell a print edition only at the weekends with a cover price of 50 cents instead of the current $1.30. It will go on offering readers online updates via the mydailynews across the week….

the free weekly Tweed Border Mail will continue to be distributed during the week to 30,000 households in the Tweed/ Coolangatta/ Murwillumbah region.

APN has also swung the axe in the Coffs Coast market with the 104-year-old daily Coffs Coast Advocate, which covers the NSW mid north coast, becoming a twice weekly freesheet, circulating on Wednesdays and Saturdays. On its paid for days it had been averaging 2,959 sales.

In a statement, Warren Bright, CEO of APN Australian Regional Media said: “In each of these markets, although the audience for paid daily newspapers has been declining there remains very strong demand from both advertisers and the community for the twice weekly newspapers that we are retaining.

“We also have strong digital audiences in each market so it makes sense to combine a constantly updated digital news service with this modified print offering.”

APN said there were no further plans to make closures in its other markets.”

Granny Herald on 22^nd November 2011:

“APN recorded a $98 million loss in September.

The Coffs Harbour mayor, Keith Rhoades, said the job losses would be felt in communities already reeling from hundreds of job losses in Grafton.

''The disappointing part would be for … particularly the elderly community who may not be fully conversant with online.''

Well, what did you expect?

Nothing surprising in this move by NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell – he’s a Liberal Party MP and leads a Coalition government after all. L'état, c'est moi is their motto and their business model.

“A BAN imposed by the O'Farrell government on the release of all public service briefs prepared for the incoming administration was unjustified, the Office of the Information Commissioner has said.

The office has recommended that government departments reconsider decisions to refuse access to briefing folders, often referred to as ''blue books''.

The availability of the documents is seen as a test of the new government's accountability. The Premier, Barry O'Farrell, declared in May that all the briefs are cabinet documents and exempt from release under the state's freedom-of-information laws

The decision put Mr O'Farrell at odds with the Federal Labor government and was disparaged by freedom-of-information experts.

The books contain departmental information prepared in the months before the election on election promises, the costs and difficulties in implementing them, along with advice on any pending urgent decisions….”

Calls for Metgasco's Stuart George to stand down from local government roles fall on deaf ears

Metgasco land administration officer Stuart George, son of Lismore MP Thomas George and failed Nationals' preselection candidate in Clarence, has ignored calls for him to stand down from Richmond Valley Council and Rous Water.

Today's Northern Star reports:

Stuart George will not be standing down from his roles on the Richmond Valley Council (RVC) or Rous Water, despite calls for him to do so.

Mr George, son of Lismore MP Thomas George, commenced work at Metgasco this month as a land administration officer, a role which sees him liaise with landowners for the purpose of gaining access to their land for CSG mining.

Groups opposed to CSG mining have called for Cr George to stand down from his civic responsibilities because of a perceived conflict of interest.

Founder of the Casino Group Against Gas, Dean Draper said Cr George should go because his role at Metgasco put him in conflict with his constituents who were increasingly concerned about the industry.

Other Northern Rivers groups against CSG mining have backed Mr Draper's call.

However, in a statement released to The Northern Star yesterday Cr George said he would not be standing down.

"I will not be resigning from my positions as Richmond Valley councillor as I was elected by the Richmond Valley Council community and I will be carrying out my duties for the full term," the statement read.

Mr George said if there was a matter which came before the council in relation to Metgasco he would declare a conflict of interest and deal with the matter as he was required to do so.

He said he would respond in the same way on Rous Water.

Rous Water is the regional water supply authority. Its chairman Phillip Silver said just because Mr George worked for an organisation some people were opposed to it did not disqualify him from holding a position on the council.

Mr Silver said there were processes in place to deal with situations where councillors held a conflict of interest.

The current Model Code of Conduct for NSW Local Councils prescribes standards of conduct in relation to conflicts of interest.

Under the Local Government Act there are two types of private interests: pecuniary and non-pecuniary.

The Act defines a pecuniary interest as one in which there is a reasonable likelihood or expectation of appreciable financial gain or loss to the person.

Non-pecuniary interests are personal interests where there is no financial gain.

RVC mayor Col Sullivan backed Cr George's stand saying there would be no problem with his new role providing he declared an interest when required to do so.

Cr Sullivan also said issues relating to Metgasco rarely came before the council as they operated under the State's jurisdiction.

Councillors themselves are responsible for identifying a conflict of interest.

If members of the public are concerned a councillor may have breached the code of conduct they can write to the general manager requesting the matter be investigated.

Source: The Northern Star, 22/11/11

Commonwealth moves to ensure coal seam gas projects are subject to scientific evidence - but will the states comply?

The Australian Government has moved on the issue of coal seam gas mining by creating an independent panel to provide Commonwealth and state approval agencies with scientific advice on mining licence applications for large-scale coal seam gas mining projects.

Because this federal government does not have the outright constitutional power to ban coal seam gas mining or significantly limit its expansion and its current plan is dependent on state co-operation, now is the time to pressure National Party MPs on the NSW North Coast to support this panel.

Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities:

Federal environment minister, the Hon Tony Burke MP, has approved the appointment of an expert panel to advise him on coal seam gas water management, for Queensland coal seam gas projects approved and conditioned under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.Those projects include the Queensland Curtis LNG project, the Santos Gladstone LNG project, and the Australia Pacific LNG project. The expert panel will provide advice on the adequacy of water management plans which the companies must submit under the conditions of approval.
The members of the expert panel are:

• Professor Paul Greenfield AO, Vice Chancellor, University of Queensland
• Professor Chris Moran, Director, Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland
• Dr Richard Cresswell, Sinclair Knight Merz
• Ms Jane Coram, Geoscience Australia
• Associate Professor Heather Chapman, Griffith University.

Several major gas/petroleum companies are pursuing projects to extract CSG from the Bowen and Surat Basins in Queensland, and other CSG producing areas in NSW. The Queensland projects would feed export-oriented LNG plants in the Gladstone area, the majority on Curtis Island off the coast opposite Gladstone. The projects involve significant capital expenditure and would operate over a long period……There are uncertainties of groundwater and surface water impacts from the extraction of significant amounts of CSG water including the risk of impacts to aquifers and groundwater quality which may lead to impacts on matters of national environmental significance protected under the EPBC Act.

Terms of Reference for the Expert Panel (PDF - 79 KB)

Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Treasurer Wayne Swan on November 21, 2011:

The Government has listened to community concerns, and will:

·   *    Provide $150 million to establish a new Independent Expert Scientific Committee that will provide scientific advice to governments about relevant coal seam gas and large coal mining approvals where they have significant impacts on water; oversee research on impacts on water resources from coal seam gas and large coal mining projects; and commission and fund water resource assessments for priority regions.

·    *   Establish a new National Partnership Agreement with the states through COAG, agreeing that the Commonwealth and states have to take into account the advice of the Committee in their assessment and approval decisions.

·    *    Provide $50 million in incentive payments to the states to deliver this outcome.

·    *   Mandate that the Independent Expert Scientific Committee publicly disclose its advice to ensure local communities have all the best information available to them.

NSW North Coast MP Janelle Saffin in a media release on the same day: 

Page MP Janelle Saffin today welcomed the Federal Government’s move to ensure that all future decisions about coal seam gas projects are based on the most rigorous scientific evidence available.

“I’ve made many representations to Federal ministers and the Prime Minister on CSG, about what can be done at the Federal level to address community concerns.  It is not an easy area, as so much is under the power of the states. 

“I had asked the Minister for the Environment, Tony Burke, to explore the nature and extent of his power vis-à-vis the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC) and the Federal Water Act.

“I’m pleased that the Government has listened to the representations and the concerns of the community, particularly in regard to the impact of CSG on our water. 

‘The Government recognises that the community can only have confidence if all environmental approvals and licensing decisions are made on the basis of transparent, objective scientific evidence.

Did Steve Cansdell really resign or did he just decide to operate though a glove puppet?

If the fact that disgraced former Nats MP for Clarence Steve Cansdell was such a big part of the Chris Gulaptis campaign in the Clarence by-election gave more than a few people on the NSW North Coast pause for thought, then some statements and media reports since could be viewed as alarming.

This is Gulaptis after claiming victory:

“Mr Gulaptis said he will follow in the footsteps of his hard-working predecessor…. Mr Gulaptis said he would be talking to Mr Cansdell about these and other issues, as he had a lot of respect for what he achieved and knowledge he gained after more than eight years as member for Clarence.”

Gulaptis’ elevation to Clarence MP is so ambiguous that on the 18th November this year the Murdoch media itself was confused enough to think that the new member of the O’Farrell Government is none other than that right-wing chimera “Steve Gulaptis”:

Snapshot taken 10.30am 21^st November 2011

Tragedy at Sandon

Sandon.

A majestic coastline

With a sandy beach

Gently caressed

By waves of white and blue.

Sandon.

A precious home

For shorebirds.

A coastal feeding,

Nestling, roosting treasure.

Sandon.

A lifeline,

A chance to avoid extinction

For an endangered fellow creature,

The pied oyster catcher.

But,

Sandon, October 7.

Its sandy beach

Becomes a "highway"

An intruding 4WD.

Its driver

Indifferent and cruel

Sees an oyster catcher

And deliberately swerves

To hit it.

The 4WD continues on,

No thought of stopping

While the oyster catcher

Lies injued, in agony,

A wing badly broken.

To the stricken bird

NPWS carers come.

They strive to save it,

They do their utmost

But all in vain - the oyster catcher dies.

Our Earth community,

Its future is in the balance.

All life is important -

A supreme message - 

But, for some people ignored.

Stan Mussared

Clarence Valley Conservation Coalition

Sourced from CVCC's Voices from the Earth,
published in The Daily Examiner, 21/11/11

Spot the errors in Teh Daily Terror

One has to wonder why The Daily Telegraph journalist, Barclay Crawford, didn’t bother to check a couple of basic facts on Saturday night – Peter Ellem has not worked as an editor/journalist since 2008, Colin Clague stood as the endorsed Labor candidate in March 2011 and at the time these newspaper articles were being composed the swing to Labor on a two candidate preferred basis was +16.3 (+17.9 on first preference votes) by Antony Green’s final calculations on election night.
Perhaps Mr. Crawford was foolishly relying on the veracity of information supplied by the NSW North Coast Nationals? Never a good idea not to double check those media releases or helpful emails from vested interests.
Here in the regions we prefer our news to be accurate.

Nationals set to retain Clarence

Chris Gulaptis, a former mayor and federal candidate for the Nationals, was expected to enter state parliament with a convincing win in the Clarence by-election yesterday.

But the Labor Party was buoyed by a big swing in votes for its candidate, local newspaper editor Peter Ellem.

Mr Ellem campaigned hard on claims the O'Farrell government wanted to privatise electricity and the Grafton jail, and attacked the government over its decision to cut the death and disability scheme for police.

The Nationals, who retained the seat easily, said the swing to Labor was expected because the party did not contest the last state election, instead backing an independent candidate.

Nationals' leader and deputy premier Andrew Stoner was campaigning in Clarence yesterday, as was Opposition leader John Robertson.

The by-election was prompted by the resignation from parliament of Steve Cansdell, after he admitted he lied to avoid a speeding fine…….

Nationals win despite swing to Labor

CHRIS Gulaptis, a former mayor and federal candidate for the Nationals, will enter state parliament with a convincing win in the Clarence by-election yesterday, despite a solid swing of about 15 per cent for the Labor Party.

Paradise lost in Maclean

A letter to the editor in The Daily Examiner November 19, 2011:

Paradise lost
I'M visiting the Clarence area, having been away for some time.
I'm appalled at the lack of re-vegetation of the Maclean Rainforest Reserve, the amount of trimmings and vegetation removal in the high school area and the resulting movement of the flying fox camp to the gully/sub station area.
I was a member of the Maclean Rainforest Reserve Trust before the 1999 dispersals and I remember having a conversation with one of the residents of Harwood St, who stated from experience, that flying foxes had used the gully area in the past at times of dispersal/disturbance.
At the time, no one planning the dispersal would take any notice of this statement.
The "belief de jour" was that the disturbed flying foxes would move to Yaegl Nature Reserve - known then as Farlow's Swamp - despite the fact that there was no evidence that this was so.
The residents of the gully are certainly currently living daily with the results of this decision.
All evidence at the time stated that flying foxes are best managed in their original camp site.
I don't know what it takes to make those in authority take notice of evidence and consequences before they make decisions that others are going to have to live with.
They obviously use other criteria to make their decisions.
I wish I knew what they were.
It's interesting to note that Chris Gulaptis, who led the Maclean flying fox disturbance regime, is once again standing in the position of decision-maker for the people of this area.
I wonder if he ever reflects on the consequences of that earlier decision.
It certainly worked well for him, jump-starting his political career.
But the residents of the gully and a threatened species have not been so fortunate.

Carole West

Port Macquarie

Photograph from Google Images

NSW Police fight to keep mug shots of persons found not guilty by courts and succeed

NSW Police has given us more reason not to fall foul of the law – it intends to keep all those physical and digital copies of mug shots even after people are found not guilty by the courts.

The reason why police get to keep these records forever? Well the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal tells us it's because those lawmakers in Macquarie Street forgot to consider mug shots and surveillance photos when framing LEPRA.

The Tribunal also says; “NSW Police Force is not required to comply with the information protection principles when taking photographs of a person in lawful custody under s 133 of the LEPRA”

LEPRA allows for the destruction of finger and palm prints, but this legislative oversight leaves the way wide open for police to indulge in some petty revenge by keeping people in the database who have no criminal record.

Now I had a wee hunt back in time and discovered that LEPRA was enthusiastically embraced in 2006 by none other than the present NSW Police Minister who said in Parliament that “We want to re-empower police in relation to arrest and research with what is known as LEPRA—the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act.”

So the O’Farrell Government can’t just blame NSW Labor for the current stupidity.

Here’s one recent example of a person having prints destroyed but photos retained by police.

APN proofreaders asleep at the wheel

As if the matter covered by the item wasn't bad enough, APN's online report about the fire in a Sydney nursing home carried more pain for victims, their families and friends when APN stuffed up big time with the name of the alleged killer.

Catvertising - the new reality?

World's first catvertising agency

http://youtu.be/IkOQw96cfyE

Northern Rivers businesses on notice regarding future carbon tax claims made to consumers

The ACCC has published online a guide for business when making any claim that the carbon tax to be introduced in mid-2012 will increase costs to consumers.

Hopefully the Northern Rivers business community will read this document as there will be local people watching out for any false or misleading claims.

Carbon price claims - Guide for business.pdf (1.6 MB)

Gulaptis becomes new Clarence MP

The National Party’s Chris Gulaptis is the new Member of Parliament for the Clarence Electorate until 2015 and, on his past history this tenure is likely to be one marked by discord between himself and local communities in the Clarence Valley - with the possibility of dissatisfaction also emerging on the Dorrigo Plateau and in the Casino district.

Overall at this election there appears to have been a -16.3% two candidate preferred swing against the Nationals and, according to Antony Green on paper Clarence is the 5th biggest by-election swing since the war. However, the outcome was never in doubt.

At close of counting tonight primary votes and 2CP votes for all 45 booths have been reported with the following results.

National Party result and swings by polling booths overleaf.

Image of lightning strikes over South Grafton on 12 November 2011 found at NBN News

Clarence By-election - links to live cover 19 November 2011

ABC’s Antony Green with live updates at http://www.abc.net.au/elections/nsw/2011/clarence/ from 6pm

NSW Electoral Commission at
http://www.elections.nsw.gov.au/results/by-elections/state/2011_clarence_by-election_results/.
Clarence by-election results will be uploaded as soon as available after 6pm, and will be updated progressively on Election Night and until ballot count ends.

Northern Rivers Greens will be tweeting at https://twitter.com/#!/nrgreens

ABC Local Radio (Grafton/Kempsey/Richmond) news updates at 738 AM and 92.3 FM or 94.5 FM

Starry, starry night

The Giant Nebula, NGC 3603

Thousands of sparkling young stars nestled within the giant nebula NGC 3603. This stellar "jewel box" is one of the most massive young star clusters in the Milky Way Galaxy. NGC 3603 is a prominent star-forming region in the Carina spiral arm of the Milky Way, about 20,000 light-years away. This image shows a young star cluster surrounded by a vast region of dust and gas. The image reveals stages in the life cycle of stars. The nebula was first discovered by Sir John Herschel in 1834. The image spans roughly 17 light-years. Text and Image Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage

After weeks of campaigning Gulaptis has few friends

Nats Candidate Chris Gulaptis has been on the Clarence campaign trail from the getgo and on Facebook since about the 28^th of October – yet he had less than 125 friends on this social networking site by election eve. And quite a few of these seem to be the party’s political operators.

Not a good look for a man who unswervingly believes in his own popularity.

No fraccing, no dredging, no floating coal seam gas hub

Country Labor candidate, Peter Ellem has demanded the O’Farrell-Stoner Government rule out allowing the Clarence or Evans Rivers to be dredged to support offshore Coal Seam Gas processing facilities on the North Coast.

“I’m calling on the O’Farrell-Stoner Government to rule out any dredging of the Clarence or Evans Rivers to support Coal Seam Gas operations in northern NSW,” Mr Ellem said.

“Metgasco has already flagged a proposal to build a floating Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facility off the North Coast to process Coal Seam Gas from Casino and export overseas.

“If Metgasco is allowed to proceed with these plans, we could see the Clarence or Evans Rivers being dredged so a pipeline could be built from Casino out to sea.

“Dredging the Clarence or Evans Rivers would see us facing a pulp mill style scenario like the region faced in the 1980’s, which would have a disastrous impact on the fishing, tourism and farming industries.

“We have already faced the complete destruction of our river with the pulp mill proposal back in the 1980’s - we cannot risk the health and future of our river again by allowing it to be dredged, especially for the Coal Seam Gas industry.“We have already seen dredging in Gladstone Harbour to support offshore Coal Seam Gas operations and places like Yamba and Evans Head must not be forced to face the same fate.

“Metgasco’s proposal is extremely concerning for local residents, farmers, fishers and the businesses that rely on tourists coming to the Clarence for our stunning rivers and beaches.

“Country Labor believes that until the science is in, we should suspend all current Coal Seam Gas exploration licenses, cease issuing extraction licenses and refuse any applications to expand existing operations.

“Moratoriums are simply not good enough because they suggest that whatever science is available from a certain date will judge the future of the industry.

[Excerpt from statement by Peter Ellem]

Clarence By-election: survey respondent left in the dark

The phone rang last night during dinner so Clarrie Junior kindly offered to answer it.

"Hey Dad, there's a bloke here wanting to ask questions about the election on Saturday. Do you want to speak with him?"

"Yep, sure do," I responded.

Although I missed the caller's preamble I had a fair idea what to expect, given it was about the fifth survey that had come my way since the former, and disgraced, local MP Steve Cansdell sh*t in the proverbial nest and then jumped ship after serving just 6 months of the four-year parliamentary term. Please, remind me again how much this by-election is costing you and me and how much the former local MP is contributing to it from his handsome parliamentary pension. Hey, he caused it so he should be forking out for it.

Question 1: "Which party will you give your first preference to on Saturday?" 

I thought, "That's an easy one to answer but I wished they asked me why would I not vote for candidate so-and-so".

Question 2 went a bit like this: "We want to know what you think about some identities who are  associated with politics in your area. Press 1 for favourable, 2 for neutral, 3 for unfavourable or 4 for if you don't know them."

First name, Steve Cansdell. There's no prize for guessing how this voter, along with most of the electorate, feel about being p*ssed on from a great height by someone who told big fibs in a sworn statement and then tried to downplay the seriousness of his actions.

Second name, Chris Gulaptis. Again, there's no prize for readers on this one.

But then, the real shocker! The phone went dead! No more names! No more questions! I was left standing there with the phone like a shag on a rock. What an anti-climax! Not a thank-you, kiss my b*m or anything else. C'mon, that's not fair and square. Imagine the uproar if the final siren was sounded ten minutes early in the AFL grand final or the winner of the Melbourne Cup was the nag that was in front at the furlong pole.

Boy oh boy, that was such a disappointment. I had been looking forward to giving Fred Nile's disciple a very special rating. After all, she went out on a limb to reveal how out of touch with reality she is when she made a cameo appearance in the scandalous Stuart Ramsey - Grafton abattoir affair.

Admittedly, I would have had to give most of the other candidates, with the exception of The Greens and Country Labor candidates, ratings of "4". Well, they are apart from Wade Walker pretty much blow-ins and/or serial election offenders (one in particular has almost had as many starts as Phar Lap). 

As for Wade Walker, one of my mates at our local watering hole pretty much summed him up when he said, "Walker had a bit of a go and kept the goat track (aka Pacific Highway) up there as an issue but other than that his effort was rather pedestrian." (That mate's a punny fella.)

2011 Clarence By-election Scorecard. Part Five - the wrap up

NSW Nationals candidate Chris Gulaptis ended his personal election campaign in much the same manner as he started it – showing up for photo opportunities with recognisable faces from the Liberal or Nationals camp, doing the minimum number of interviews and sometimes spectacularly going off piste with wild claims. I expect this candidate to lose more votes than he would have if he had not decided to keep the electorate guessing on so many local concerns and broader state issues. While his cynical attempt to ride on the coat tails of an admitted law breaker displayed personal characteristics which may make some voters nervous.

NSW Country Labor candidate Peter Ellem remained consistent in his campaigning – bringing local issues and targeted policy to the fore. Staying on message from the time writs were issued. In fact he was one of only two candidates who seriously attempted to communicate with the electorate.  His ability to talk well in print was probably one of the reasons that the O’Farrell Government delivered a small amount of genuinely new funding for the Clarence electorate in the dying day of the by-election campaign.

NSW Greens candidate Janet Cavanaugh displayed a passion and commitment throughout her campaign and an engagement with community which should gain some additional traction with voters. I suspect that The Greens decision to place mining on the agenda from Day One will strike a chord within many local communities. Janet was the only candidate besides Ellem who seriously attempted to communicate with the electorate and not just throw slogans and sound bites around. Like Ellem she identified important issues and stayed on message - though she was possibly slightly more responsive to community feedback.

As for Independents Wade Walker and Stewart Scott-Irving, along with Christian Democratic Party candidate Bethany Camac, Outdoor Recreation Party candidate Clinton Mead and Australian Democrat candidate David Robinson – they ignored almost every opportunity to fully explain themselves to the electorate. Somewhat mistakenly they all appeared to rely too heavily on Meet the Candidates nights in an electorate where travel distances are an issue for many. Their responses to The Daily Examiner Q&A were too little and too late for any effective dissemination. None of these candidates door knocked in my street or mailed out literature which reached my letterbox. Therefore (with Walker being the exception because he was already known with regard to one local issue) they remain virtual ballot paper ghosts to date.

Assessment:

1. Chris Gulaptis – despite the contentious televised campaign ads this lacklustre campaign sees him losing scorecard ground since last week.

2. Peter Ellem – proved that a strong candidate can make an incumbent state government react, thus improving the funding bottom line for the Clarence electorate. His score improves considerably.

3. Janet Cavanaugh – punched above her weight throughout and treated the electorate with the respect it deserves. Her score increases.

4. Wade Walker – probably needs to work out a realistic election campaign strategy if he intends to stand for office again. Although his past online presence will always be there to haunt him. His score remains static.

5. Bethany Camac – perhaps it’s time her party rethought who might represent it at future elections. No movement in her score.

6. Clinton Mead – despite a late Facebook page creation and a bizarre Q&A response he remained Clinton Who? until the end. No score change.

7. David Robinson – another whose party needs to rethink its pre-selection process. No score change.

8. Stewart Scott-Irving – one of the disadvantages of the democratic process it that it throws up serial candidates who turn almost non-existent campaigning into an art form. No score change.

Rolling Scorecard*

Gulaptis -4

Ellem 5

Cavanaugh 5
Wade Walker 0.5
Bethany Camac -3

Clinton Mead -2

David Robinson -0.5

Stewart Scott-Irving -0.5

* This scorecard is predicated on a -5 to 5 range of possible scores

Gulaptis on the campaign trail - but wait, there's more!

The Nationals candidate in the Clarence by-election, Chris Gulaptis, has escaped the reservation again with a message that The Cops are Coming and they will be on the beat by the end of the year.

Now the entire Clarence Valley is aware that ten more police are on their way there and Casino is hoping for three additional probationary constables, but Gulaptis is promising more, more, more!

Do we want 20, 30, 35+ extra officers? Just name the figure and Chris is apparently privately promising to deliver these coppers to our door.

It is almost certain that NSW Premier O’Farrell, Deputy Premier Stoner and Police Minister Gallacher are blissfully unaware of the actual size of the blue army they are expected to march north by Christmas.

A walk down memory lane as the Clarence electorate prepares to vote on 19 November 2011

ABC Unleashed in 2007:

For instance, Chris Gulaptis, the candidate for their only marginal seat, Page, stated in public and on the record that people living in the northern rivers region should just put up with lower wages because of the scenery - and how about the serenity? I don't know, I just don't think this is the canniest vote-winning tactic in one of the poorest areas in Australia.

Leavening the blog loaf

Because it gets so serious around here during North Coast elections, I thought I might post this………………

Alright, Fine, I’ll Add a Disclaimer to My Emails.

By James Sinclair

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: This email does not create an attorney-client relationship. Probably. If it does, it will have said it does. Although it could have created an attorney-client relationship without explicitly saying so, because the law is tricky like that, and the authoritative statements in this disclaimer are not as authoritative as they look. Suffice it to say, if you aren’t absolutely certain about whether or not an attorney-client relationship exists between yourself and the sender of this email, you should probably hit “reply” and ask for some clarity.
This email may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If it does, and you are not the intended recipient, then the sender hereby requests that you notify him of his mistake and destroy all copies in your possession. The sender also concedes that he is very, very stupid, and obviously should not be operating an electronic-mail machine without supervision.
The purpose of this disclaimer, in theory, is to protect the sender from whatever liability may result from the sender’s own failure to communicate clearly or properly send an email, even though the sender, having obtained a formal legal education, is well aware that a generic email disclaimer, even one written with that ominous language of which lawyers are so fond, is unlikely to be enforced against a party lacking a sophisticated understanding of the legal principles surrounding said disclaimer, and that in the case of a party who does understand the legal principles surrounding said disclaimer, the disclaimer merely restates what said party already knows. This disclaimer is a catch-22.
This disclaimer is not unlike the ceaseless blaring of a distant car alarm—a once-sincere warning that has evolved into an unpleasant nuisance, rendered meaningless by its own ubiquity. This disclaimer exists in a country where the demand for legal services is substantial enough to provide gainful employment for more than one million lawyers, virtually all of whom make liberal use of disclaimers purporting to protect themselves from the very litigiousness that pays their bills. You do the math.
This disclaimer is not especially concerned with intelligibility. Unlike the sender of this email, this disclaimer has no qualms about indulging in the more obnoxious trademarks of legalese, including but not limited to (i) the phrase “including but not limited to”, (ii) the use of “said” as an adjective, (iii) re-naming conventions that have little to no basis in vernacular English and, regardless, never actually recur (hereinafter referred to as “the 1980 Atlanta Falcons”), (iv) redundant, tedious, and superfluous repetition of synonymous terms, (v) ENTIRE SECTIONS OF FULLY-CAPITALIZED TEXT, PRESUMABLY INTENDED TO SAY TO THE READER, “HEY! THIS IS IMPORTANT! YOU SHOULD READ THIS PART! AND REMEMBER IT!”, AS IF NO ONE HAS EVER NOTICED THAT PHYSICALLY ENLARGING TEXT WITHOUT INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF SPACE AVAILABLE FOR SAID TEXT TO OCCUPY CREATES THE VISUAL EFFECT OF A SOLID RECTANGULAR BLOCK OF LETTERS, ROUGHLY AS CAPABLE OF IMPARTING A COHERENT THOUGHT AS A TIGHTLY-PACKED SCRABBLE® BOARD, and (vi) lowercase Roman numerals.
This disclaimer exists for precisely one reason—to make this email appear more professional. This disclaimer shall not be construed as a guarantee of actual professionalism on the part of the sender. Any actual professionalism contained herein is purely coincidental and is in no way attributable to the presence of this disclaimer. While the sender of this email likes to think the professionalism with which he approaches his work speaks for itself, this disclaimer constitutes (i) begrudging acquiescence to the industry standard, or at least a superficial imitation thereof, and (ii) begrudging acceptance of the paradoxical reality that people who exchange emails with lawyers both expect to see, and pay no attention to, legal disclaimers. If you aren’t reading this, then this disclaimer has done its job. Its sad, pointless job. THIS DISCLAIMER IS NOT INTENDED TO BE IRONIC.

Gulaptis tells political pork pies - again!

Nats candidate in the Clarence byelection, Chris duh, don’t know Gulaptis, escaped his minders again and opened his mouth without finding out the facts. He capped this off with another untruth. What survey was that again, Chris?

The Daily Examiner on 17^th November 2011:

“SIX years after the Iluka Rd speed limit between Woombah and Iluka was dropped from 100km/h to 80km/h, Nationals candidate for the Clarence by-election Chris Gulaptis wants the O'Farrell government to reverse the change.

In 2005, the then roads minister Eric Roozendahl signed off on the speed limit reduction which was partly imposed to reduce road kill of the endangered coastal emu population that live in nearby Bundjalung National Park.

Now, Mr Gulaptis said he has a 1500 signature petition signed by locals, calling for the speed limit to be raised to 100km/h.

He said the push to reinstate the 100 km/h speed limit was instigated by former member for Clarence, Steve Cansdell.

"When it happened it was a unilateral decision by the minister without any community consultation," he said.

He understood the speed limit was under review by the minister for roads.

"The road will handle the speed, there is no reason for the road not to be 100km/h."

Mr Gulaptis could not answer whether the petition was a recent one, or one launched six years ago in opposition to the speed limit reduction, as he said he hadn't seen it, despite claiming on radio yesterday that he had it. “

Pollie in a glass house lashes out

It's becoming clear that Peter Ellem will say anything to get a vote." cried a shrill Chris Gulaptis today.

A little cat let this out of the bag...

The Brushgrove community has long favoured building a small "low level" flood levee to protect their homes and hopefully avoid the need for emergency evacuation. 
Apparently every voter's friend Chris Gulaptis has been telling residents there that a levee in their area is not on any important To Do list - saying that a former Maclean Shire councillor (not of the Nationals persuasion) agrees with him.
I'm hearing that this former councillor and longtime Brushgrove resident is irate that Gulaptis is telling so blatant an untruth.
In fact the former Maclean Shire Floodplain Management Study and Plan refers to a flood levee at Brushgrove as a feasible floodplain management option for the village and that same former councillor is still raising the need for a levee with Clarence Valley Council's Floodplain Risk Management Advisory Committee. He made his latest plea for a levee in August 2011 when he told Clarence Valley Council that the Brushgrove community would help build the levee if it got approval.

Howzat!

Chris Gulaptis caught out again in another whopper by Peter Ellem's bowling this evening:
"But Mr Ellem called on Mr Gulaptis to provide the Budget details to back up his claim.
Is this $3.7 million part of the $11.73 million the former Labor Government delivered for Casino Public School?" Mr Ellem asked.
Labor had already provided $11.73 million over two and a half years for new buildings and a refurbishment, with the work to be completed by 2012
Interestingly, the 2011/12 Budget papers from the O'Farrell-Stoner Government claim the $3.7 million funding is for 'continued major building projects at Casino Public School'.
If it is indeed the same funding, Mr Gulaptis should apologise for misleading the people of the Clarence yet again over incorrect funding claims.
Casino Public School parents, teachers and students would have been forgiven for thinking their school had received a new $3.7 million grant given Mr Gulaptis' campaign material.
This appears to be the third time Chris Gulaptis has wrongly claimed credit for millions of dollars in funding the National Party did not deliver to the Clarence," Mr Ellem said.
If Mr Gulaptis is going to keep wrongly claiming credit for funding the O'Farrell-Stoner Government has nothing to do with, how will he fight for new funding and resources for our community?
Mr Gulaptis' first campaign move was to incorrectly claimed the Nationals delivered $9 million for Grafton Base Hospital when it was actually from the Commonwealth and former Labor Government."

And another lie bites the dust

The ever inventive Chris Gulaptis told the Clarence electorate tonight; "There is not, nor has there ever been such a scheme" to build a coal seam gas mine in our area.
Studiously ignoring the enormous Metgasco elephant at Casino (with the Liberal Party's Richard Shields as its external relations manager and Nationals Stuart George as its land administration officer) which falls within the Clarence electorate and the Casino to Ipswich coal seam gas pipeline the O'Farrell Government will be pushing to completion because the "NSW government has not announced any change of policy related to coal seam gas licences,..The legal rights of any exploration holders across NSW remain unchanged."

Update:

Another deliberate misstatement rears its head

"Country Labor candidate Peter Ellem said yesterday the funding was actually provided by the former Labor Government. This may have been a Labor promise, Mr Gulaptis said, but the Coalition Government delivered it."
So tired of all this fudging and fibbing that I'll just link to a North Coast Voices post which shows the money was actually to be paid out under a contract between the former NSW Labor Government and the builder doing major capital works at Casino Public School as I write.