Monday 15 August 2016
Forget the Olympics for a great winter couch sport.......
There are reportedly at least five unsolicited proposals being developed for presentation to the NSW Dept. of Premier and Cabinet involving the construction of rail corridors, with one apparently involving a Chinese consortium wanting to install an additional freight rail line to Port Kembla.
So it is interesting to watch how they are all competing in the public relations stakes.
When it comes to Australian Infrastructure Developments Pty Ltd.’s proposal for a new inland freight rail corridor to coastal mega port in the Clarence River estuary, it appears that in this competition its proponents have all the grace and expertise of Eddy the Eagle who managed two spectacular last places at the 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics.
It looks as though the company has decided that its officers and shareholders have no fencing or boxing skills but excel at diving in and that's just what they should do in any online comments thread.
This total lack of PR skills means that following the company’s forays onto Facebook has become something of a local couch sport in the Lower Clarence Valley, where the audience happily munches their popcorn, peanuts or chips as they scroll down the latest comments.
This spectacular belly flop in the 10m dive event drew a slow clap in my house:
While this clumsy exit from the pool after the 3m dive was greeted with hilarity:
Sunday 14 August 2016
Once again the NSW Baird Government fails to protect local communities and the public interest
Newcastle Herald Sun, 9 August 2016:
A KOREAN mining company prosecuted for using false photographs to support a Bylong Valley mine application has “got away with lying” after the NSW Government dropped a prosecution under the Mining Act, Greens MP Jeremy Buckingham said.
Mr Buckingham condemned the government for allowing resources giant KEPCO and consultant Worley Parsons to agree to an “enforceable undertaking”, rather than face prosecution and a possible $110,000 fine.
The companies were charged after Bylong man Craig Shaw said photos of his property provided by KEPCO to support drilling sites showed flat paddocks rather than the actual rocky, steep terrain.
“Minister (Anthony) Roberts has essentially let this company get away with a lie and undermined the Mining Act,” Mr Buckingham said.
“This sets a terrible precedent for compliance and enforcement of the Mining Act and has undermined any deterrence effect. The government had already approved this drilling project and it was only diligent landholders who picked up the deception in the application.
“At a time where the Baird government is ramping up penalties against people protesting mining, they are letting mining companies off the hook for outright deception. Minister Roberts needs to explain this double standard.”
Mr Shaw said he was extremely disappointed with the decision that allowed the department to avoid a prosecution. He was also disappointed with how the matter was handled after he raised the complaint, saying he was not formally advised of the decision to accept an enforceable undertaking, despite assisting the department with its investigation.
“These companies have been let off the hook. They have deliberately broken the law, but they will not be punished. KEPCO are free to continue with their plans to turn the spectacular and unique Bylong Valley into a mining complex,” Mr Shaw said.
Lock the Gate Hunter coordinator Steve Phillips said the decision was “a shameful abdication of duty by the NSW Government, but why would KEPCO feel the need to tell the truth when there is no punishment for lying?”
Labels:
mining,
NSW government,
Premier Mike Baird
NOAA/NASA reports leave Australian Communications and Media Authority with egg on its face
This is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies’ Annual Global Analysis for 2014: 2014 was Warmest Year on Record, published January 2015:
Global Highlights
The year 2014 was the warmest year across global land and ocean surfaces since records began in 1880.* The annually-averaged temperature was 0.69°C (1.24°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F), easily breaking the previous records of 2005 and 2010 by 0.04°C (0.07°F). This also marks the 38th consecutive year (since 1977) that the yearly global temperature was above average. Including 2014, 9 of the 10 warmest years in the 135-year period of record have occurred in the 21st century. 1998 currently ranks as the fourth warmest year on record.
The 2014 global average ocean temperature was also record high, at 0.57°C (1.03°F) above the 20th century average of 16.1°C (60.9°F), breaking the previous records of 1998 and 2003 by 0.05°C (0.09°F). Notably, ENSO-neutral conditions were present during all of 2014.
The 2014 global average land surface temperature was 1.00°C (1.80°F) above the 20th century average of 8.5°C (47.3°F), the fourth highest annual value on record….
In January 2016 the following year National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies published Annual Global Analysis for 2015: 2015 was by far the warmest year in the record:
Earth’s 2015 surface temperatures were the warmest since modern record keeping began in 1880, according to independent analyses by NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Globally-averaged temperatures in 2015 shattered the previous mark set in 2014 by 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit (0.13 Celsius).* Only once before, in 1998, has the new record been greater than the old record by this much.
The 2015 temperatures continue a long-term warming trend, according to analyses by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York (GISTEMP). NOAA scientists concur with the finding that 2015 was the warmest year on record based on separate, independent analyses of the data. Because weather station locations and measurements change over time, there is some uncertainty in the individual values in the GISTEMP index. Taking this into account, NASA analysis estimates 2015 was the warmest year with 94 percent certainty…..
While this was the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) ruling in Investigation report no. BI-185 on 8 July 2016:
In April 2016, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) commenced an investigation under section 170 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the BSA) into a segment on The Bolt Report broadcast on Southern Cross Ten by Southern Cross Communications Pty Limited (the licensee) on 8 November 2015.
The ACMA received a complaint alleging that a statement about the interpretation of a graph broadcast during a segment on global warming was inaccurate and misleading.
The ACMA has investigated the licensee’s compliance against clause 4.3.1 of the Commercial Television Industry Code of Practice 2010 (the Code)…..
Despite some contestability about this issue[1], Mr Bolt’s specific comment about there being no real warming of the atmosphere over the last 18 years is consistent with the surface air temperature records for this period referred to in the 2013 IPCC report and by Remote Sensing Systems*…..
Current affairs programs such as The Bolt Report are not precluded from taking a position on any matter and are not required to be balanced or to include all information about a particular issue.
It was clear from the excerpts of the comments of environmentalists, scientists and political leaders in the segment that Mr Bolt’s opinions were contentious and the evidence provided to support his views was selective. However, of itself, the factual material was accurate.*
The ACMA therefore finds that, in the context of the segment in its entirety, Mr Bolt’s statement about there being no real warming of the atmosphere over the last 18 years, and the graph used to support that statement, comply with the code.
Accordingly, the licensee did not breach clause 4.3.1 of the Code.
* My red bolding
Labels:
climate change,
media,
science
Saturday 13 August 2016
Just because it is beautiful......(13)
Gold Eye Lichen
Native to Western Australia
Friday 12 August 2016
WATER WARS: The tired old scheme Griffith City Council wants the NSW Baird Government to consider in 2016
People Power on the Liverpool Plains: Caroona mine to go - will Shenhua Watermark be next?
Congratulations to the people of the Liverpool Plains. You deserve this victory.
ABC News, 11 August 2016:
The NSW Government will buy back BHP's licence for the Caroona coal mine on the Liverpool Plains, ending a decade-long fight by farmers to shut down the project.
inflation, meaning the total price tag is around $220 million.
The exploration licence was issued in 2006 for underground coal mining covering approximately 344 square kilometres in the Liverpool Plains — an area of prime agricultural land.
The State Government said after careful consideration it determined the mine posed too great a risk to the future of the food bowl and its underground water sources.
The Deputy Premier and Nationals leader Troy Grant said the decision was in the best interests of the local community….
Yahoo News, 7 July 2016:
The Mining Gateway Panel has flagged six deficiencies in BHP Billiton's Caroona Coal Mining Project.
NSW Farmers and local landholders have slammed the gateway's lack of authority to shut the project down.
NSW Farmers and local landholders have slammed the gateway's lack of authority to shut the project down.
Hopefully the Baird Government will resist federal government pressure and go on to address the issue of Shenhua Watermark open cut coal mine and associated coal seam gas project.
Labels:
Baird Government,
environment,
mining,
people power,
water wars
Thursday 11 August 2016
Only in the self-indulgent, damn democracy, political climate fostered by the Abbott & Turnbull governments.......
Only in the self-indulgent, damn democracy climate prevailing in the lead-up to the 2016 double dissolution federal election would a registered political party have considered endorsing a candidate with this legal history……
Rod Culleton
Photograph: Channel Nine
The Sydney Morning Herald, 8 August 2016:
In Armidale Local Court on Monday afternoon, Magistrate Michael Holmes granted Culleton's application, and annulled the larceny conviction, which was made when he failed to appear in court in March.
Senator Culleton will fight the larceny charge, after pleading not guilty.
Mr Holmes adjourned the case to September 12 for mention to fix a hearing date.
He told the court if the matter "was short" he could deal with it on that day.
Mr Holmes told Culleton to keep in contact with his solicitor, and dispensed his bail, which was granted by police following his arrest.
Mr Holmes told the court he was happy to deal with the matter, and had read all the files.
He also referenced Senator Culleton's "colourful letter" which was sent to the court.
Fairfax Media understands the letter labelled the Armidale court as a "kangaroo court".
It's now expected Senator Culleton's district court challenge against the conviction, set down for next week in Armidale, will be withdrawn.
The Guardian, 8 August 2016:
New One Nation senator Rodney Culleton is in police custody after turning himself in over an outstanding warrant related to his failure to appear in a NSW court to answer larceny charges.
A NSW Police spokesman confirmed a man was being dealt with by police in Armidale and would be bailed to appear before the local court on Monday afternoon.
The West Australian senator was convicted in his absence earlier this year for stealing a tow truck key from a driver who was trying to repossess one of his company cars in 2014.
He's seeking to have that conviction annulled.
Larceny carries a maximum penalty of five years jail, which could deem him ineligible to be a senator.
The constitution says anyone convicted of crime that has a punishment of at least one year's jail can't be a member of parliament.
Senator Culleton is also awaiting trial in WA later this month - the week before parliament begins - after he was arrested and charged for allegedly stealing a car being used by receivers from RSM Bird Cameron as they began foreclosure proceedings at a friend's farm.
The senator won the 11th spot on the WA ballot.
He is expected to appear before Armidale Local Court again after 1400 (AEST) on Monday.
Financial Review, 7 August 2016:
For someone who apparently prides himself on being a defender of the nation's farmers, new One Nation Senator-Elect Rodney Culleton sure has a strange way of showing it.
ASIC documents show Culleton has appointed an administrator to his company, DEQMO Pty Ltd, which will have the effect of avoiding a wind-up application to be heard in the NSW Supreme Court today (Monday).
The petitioning party is Armidale farmer and mill owner, Jack Vivers, who says he is owed slightly more than $42,500 by Culleton, a former business associate. Money he will have much harder time getting back now that Culleton has put DEQMO into administration.
This is the same Rodney Culleton, it is worth noting, who took part in a 60 Minutes program last year called "Fighting Back" about his battle to retain his WA property and who describes himself on the One Nation website as a defender of Aussie farmers.
And the same Rod Culleton who may not finally be permitted to take his seat in the Senate pending the outcome of a larceny case, in which he is implicated.
Inside Story, 3 August 2016:
In fact, the circumstances of his offence appear to have been relatively trivial: he was said to have stolen the key of a tow truck – a key worth $7.50 – in an effort to prevent the repossession of a vehicle he was leasing. Moreover, he was convicted in his absence because he failed to appear in court, and an appeal is now pending. Yet, at least until his appeal is heard, he is currently “subject to be sentenced” and is therefore “incapable of being chosen.”
It seems to have been assumed that, once it is recognised that Culleton is “incapable of being chosen,” section 15 of the Constitution will come into play. Under that provision, his Senate seat would be declared vacant. This would create a casual vacancy to be filled by the WA parliament, which would be required to nominate someone from the same political party – that is, another One Nation candidate. In the ballot paper on 2 July, the One Nation ticket listed Rodney Culleton first, his friend Peter Georgiou second, and his wife Ioanna Culleton third. So presumably one of these would be chosen.
But this assumption is wrong. As the authoritative explanation in Odgers’Australian Senate Practice makes clear, the mechanism in section 15 comes into play only when a senator who was validly elected “becomes disqualifiedafter the completion of the election process.” What happens when a senator “is found to have been disqualified at the time of election” is different. The election of that senator is totally void; the relevant seat in the Senate remains unfilled and the failure to fill it must be remedied by a recount.
Again, it seems to have been assumed that in this event, once Culleton was eliminated as “incapable of being chosen,” the votes that had been accumulated for him would simply be transferred down the line to the second candidate on the One Nation ticket, and if necessary to the third. But while this might be a realistic assessment of the probable result, it would not be so easy to achieve that result.
The distribution of preferences in Western Australia meant that the ballot papers had to be counted 539 times; and it was only on the 539th count that Culleton achieved his quota. The other two One Nation candidates had already been excluded much earlier – Ioanna Culleton by count 153, and Peter Georgiou by count 157. Thus, in order to ensure that Rodney Culleton’s votes could be transferred further down the ticket, it would be necessary to rework the entire distribution at least from count 153, and the outcome of such a redistribution could no longer be predicted with confidence.
It happens that Culleton is also awaiting trial in Western Australia on a more serious stealing charge (with a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment). If he were able to take his seat, and was later convicted on that charge, then the procedure in section 15 of the Constitution would come into play. But that is irrelevant to the fact that Culleton is now “incapable of being chosen.”
As it stands, the Australian Electoral Commission has declared a candidate to be elected who is in fact “incapable of being chosen.” Strictly speaking, that announcement is unconstitutional. Presumably it might be possible to avoid such an outcome if the AEC had some mechanism for checking, before the distribution of preferences begins, whether all the nominated candidates are “capable of being chosen.” But there seems to be no such mechanism.
Excerpt from Mills Oakley, Granting
yourself a security interest: worthwhile or worthless?, October
2014:
In August 2008 Macquarie
Leasing Pty Ltd (Macquarie) entered into a chattel mortgage agreement with
Elite Grains Pty Ltd (Elite) for the purchase of a Prime Mover (Truck).
In 2012 Elite defaulted
under the agreement, and Macquarie demanded return of the Truck. Elite refused,
so Macquarie commenced and was successful in proceedings against Elite and
Rodney Culleton (Culleton), the sole shareholder and director of Elite.
On 7 August 2014 the
Truck was sold at public auction, and simultaneously DEQMO Pty Ltd (DEQMO), of
whom Culleton was the sole director and shareholder, registered a security
interest in the Truck on the PPSR, with the effect that Macquarie could not
pass clear title to the purchaser.
Macquarie then served an
amendment demand on DEQMO pursuant to the PPSA demanding that DEQMO’s
registration be removed. No response was received. Macquarie then initiated
these proceedings seeking orders that:
DEQMO’s security
interest was void;
DEQMO’s security
interest be removed from the PPSR;
DEQMO be restrained from
re-registering any interest on the PPSR; and
DEQMO and Culleton pay
Macquarie’s costs.
Decision
Rein J granted the
orders sought by Macquarie. The evidence put forward by DEQMO failed to
establish the basis of the security interest, as Culleton was more concerned
with the manner in which the Truck was repossessed and the conduct of its sale.
In light of this
evidence (or lack of), Rein J found a number of reasons why DEQMO’s claimed
interest was invalid. However, the key basis on which Rein J held the security
interest was void was that the claimed interest was one given by DEQMO to
DEQMO, as a person or company cannot give a security interest to itself, as per
section 12 of the PPSA.
Conclusion
This decision highlights
the importance of ensuring that any registration on the PPSR has a proper
foundation to support it. The judgment of Rein J makes it clear that if a
company or person purports to grant a security interest to itself, then such a
registration will be invalid. If the security interest is in fact an ownership
interest, such registrations do not secure “payment or performance of an
obligation” as required by section 12, and can be removed under the
provisions in Part 5.6 of the PPSA.
PERMANENT CUSTODIANS LTD -v- ELITE
GRAINS PTY LTD [2014] WASC 495
In which a
bankrupt Rodney Norman Culleton was involved as second defendant (bankruptcy declared October 2014).
Court transcript here.
Federal
Court of Australia,
Bankruptcy Guide:
What happens if you are
made bankrupt?
If the Judge or
Registrar makes a sequestration order a trustee will be appointed to manage
your financial affairs. Your trustee will notify you of your bankruptcy in writing.
The trustee will explain his or her role and your responsibilities as a
bankrupt. The trustee will also give you a statement of affairs which you must
complete and file with the Official Receiver (AFSA). Your period of bankruptcy
runs for three years from the date you file your statement of affairs with
AFSA.
There are several legal
outcomes of your bankruptcy; for instance:
*You
will be released from responsibility for most of your existing debts. However,
the trustee can sell your assets or property to pay your creditors.
*Any
house or your share of a house that you own may be sold to pay your creditors.
*Any
assets which you acquire while you are bankrupt may be sold by the trustee.
*You
must not obtain credit from another person, or pay for goods or services by
cheque for more than a specified amount without telling the person that you are
bankrupt. The credit limit is updated quarterly, for an up-to-date figure
contact AFSA.
*If
you run a business while you are bankrupt you must keep all proper accounts
showing your business transactions and financial position.
There are other consequences of becoming bankrupt.
Disqualification
Any person who:…….
(iii) is an
undischarged bankrupt or insolvent;……
shall be incapable of
being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
ASIC
Insolvency Notices,
2013:
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
FOR WINDING UP ORDER
Company details
Company:
|
Elite
Grains Pty Ltd
|
ACN:
|
091 599 941
|
An application for the
winding up of Elite Grains Pty Ltd was commenced by the plaintiff Jameson Farm
Pty Ltd and continued by Komatsu Forklift Australia Pty Ltd on 03/05/2013 and
will be heard as set out below.
Labels:
Australian Parliament,
crime,
law,
One Nation,
right wing rat bags,
Senate
Singing the post-Census 2016 blues
One would have to live in a deep sink hole in the middle of Australia not to have heard of the mishandling of the 2016 national census, now not so fondly known as #CensusFail.
First the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) decides to keep census participants' names and addresses (without informed consent) for between four years or until after death– whichever takes its fancy.
It does this so it can match the individual with other records held by government departments to create a super database packed to the brim with sensitive information.
This information goes beyond who you are, where you live and the makeup of your household – it's also how much you earn, how much tax you pay, what illnesses you have been diagnosed with, what prescription drugs you take, how many times you visit the doctor, how many speeding fines you paid, if you have been brought before the court, the sentence you received and, much more.
All this is gathered under a unique Statistical Linkage Key (SLK-581) which follows you forever through census after census after census.
This is what these keys look like:
How do I know that this is what an SLK looks like?
Because an SLK is generated according to a standard formula and the Australian Government not only helpfully lets everyone know what that formula is, it even provides an online open access key generator for our use.
Now one would think that because most people were being manoeuvred into encouraged to fill in the Census form online on 9 August 2016 that the platform ABS was using would be very secure.
However, it turns out that in order to allow people with older versions of Windows on their home computer to access the census form online the ABS decided to have the website support the SHA-1 hashing algorithm long considered to be insecure.
Leaving it vulnerable to man-in-the-middle encryption downgrade attacks which can make it easier to intercept data being sent.
Here is a breakdown of website vulnerabilities from High Tech Bridge,
www.census.abs.gov.au SSL/TLS Security Test on 29 July 2016:
www.census.abs.gov.au SSL/TLS Security Test on 29 July 2016:
The server does not prefer cipher suites providing strong Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS). We advise to configure your server to prefer cipher suites with ECDHE or DHE key exchange.
The HTTP version of the website does not redirect to the HTTPS version. We advise to enable redirection.
The server does not send the HTTP-Strict-Transport-Security. We advise to enable it to enforce the user to browse the website in HTTPS.
The server does not send HTTP-Public-Key-Pinning header. We advise to enable HPKP in order to avoid Man-In-The-Middle attacks.
TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV extension prevents protocol downgrade attacks. We advise to update your TLS engine to support it.
Preferred cipher suite for each protocol supported (except SSLv2). Expected configuration are ciphers allowed by PCI DSS and enabling PFS:
TLSv1.0 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHAMisconfiguration or weakness
TLSv1.1 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHAMisconfiguration or weakness
TLSv1.2 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256Misconfiguration or weakness
Third party content (such as images, JavaScript, or CSS) is loaded from external resources. Despite that for some web applications it can significantly improve loading time, it may also put website visitor's privacy at risk, as information about website visitors become accessible to these third-party content providers. Moreover, a third-party content delivered via HTTP and not HTTPS channel may also expose your privacy.
HTTP methods (or verbs) that are allowed by the server. Some may be dangerous if not handled properly by the application.
Then other security issues raised their heads including the fact that census answers may not always be encrypted for the entire journey from the keyboard to IBM on the SoftLayer cloud.
By then the Australian Bureau of Statistics was on social media telling people they will be fined if they refuse to answer all the questions on the census form.
Doubts also began to pop up as to whether stream10.census.abs.gov.au would be able to handle the millions of people logging in on Census Night.
Predictably it couldn't and suddenly there is multiple choice blame being handed out.
It's all the fault of:
a) evil hackers;
b) malicious furriners mounting denial of service attacks;
c) lazy people not filling out their online forms out days ahead of time; or
d) political plotters wanting to embarrass the Turnbull Government.
Reddit user mykro76 via @Qldaar on 10 August 2016 is probably closer to the mark:
The call is now going out to ditch the 9 August Census and try again at a later date if the government demographers can get their act together.
This is one example:
This is one example:
Wednesday 10 August 2016
Nominations now closed for the 10 September 2016 Clarence Valley local government elections - final candidate list
There are nine elected councillor positions being contested at this Clarence Valley local government election and twenty-one candidates vying for a seat in the council chamber.
This is the list of names which will eventually appear on ballot papers on Saturday, 10 September:
Baker, Andrew – Harwood, land and property developer, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
Bates, Keith – Grafton, self-employed, former journalist & internet marketer
Clancy, Greg - Coutts Crossing, ecologist, small business owner, stood as candidate at 2012 local government elections, now standing as The Greens candidate
De Roos, Joy – Ilarwill, former age care worker, stood as candidate at 2012 local government elections
Ellem, Peter – Wooloweyah, former editor at The Daily Examiner, former Labor candidate at Clarence state by-election receiving 28% of the vote, standing as Independent
Ellem, Trevor – Grafton, former Ulmarra Shire councillor
Hagger, John - Waterview Heights, creator of The Clarence Forum, standing as Independent
Hughes, Sue – Yamba, President Yamba Chamber of Commerce, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
Kingsley, Jason - Great Marlow, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
Lysault, Arthur – Grafton, former general manager Grafton District Services Club, only candidate in 2015 council by-election so elected unopposed without a vote by the electorate, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
McKenna, Margaret - South Grafton, accountant, small business owner, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
Novak, Debrah - Yamba, freelance photograper, community activist, standing as Independent
Riggall, John – Maclean, real estate agent, small business owner, Maclean Chamber of Commerce president, standing as Independent
Rogers, Peta - The Whiteman, standing as Independent
Saunders, Ian – Maclean, former council employee, secretary Greater Maclean Community Action Group, standing as Independent
Simmons, Jim - Maclean, accountant, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
Tibbett, Brett - Lanitza, CEO Grafton Ngerrie Local Aboriginal Land Council, standing as Independent
Toms, Karen – Yamba, small business owner, incumbent councillor, standing as Independent
Tunks, Ursula - South Grafton, former police officer, standing as Independent
Wells, Marty – Grafton, member Clarence Valley Cultural Committee, attempted to crowd source funding election campaign at https://pozible.com/project/marty-wells-for-cvcouncil, standing as Independent
Williamson, Richie - Coutts Crossing, 2GF radio presenter, incumbent councillor and current mayor
UPDATE
Now the ballot draw is over, this is the ballot paper will look on 10 September, according to Marty Wells posting on the Clarence Forum:
Clarence Valley Local Government Elections 2016: Peter Ellem throws his hat in the ring
Peter Ellem posting on The Clarence Forum, 8 August 2016:
OK, the ink had not dried on my nomination for Clarence Valley Council before conservative trolls got to work on another Facebook group. For the political pygmy who couldn't wait to question my ethics, I post my media release:
Peter Ellem, 'fighting for us' in the Clarence Valley
YAMBA resident Peter Ellem, a Walkley Award-winning journalist and former Federal policy adviser, has nominated as an independent candidate for the Clarence Valley Council election on September 10.
Mr Ellem edited The Daily Examiner and Coastal Views newspapers from 2001 to 2007 before becoming the Grafton-based policy/media adviser to the former Federal Member for Page Janelle Saffin from 2007 to 2013.
In November 2011, Mr Ellem gained further political experience by standing as Country Labor's candidate in a by-election for the State seat of Clarence. He is running as an independent candidate for CVC and funding his own campaign.
Mr Ellem said his forebears had helped pioneer the Clarence Valley from the 1860s, and he was motivated by a desire to serve all local communities to make the Valley the best possible place for families and individuals to prosper.
Mr Ellem and his wife Susan have raised three daughters Zoe, Tess and Lily here in the Valley.
“Clarence Valley Council is our largest employer and its staff do a lot of good work in the community, but its long term financial position is unsustainable and should be of concern, particularly to ratepayers, but to all residents,” Ellem said.
“As an editor, I led the popular Not A Drop campaign against moves to dam and divert the mighty Clarence River westward, and campaigned for the Grafton Base Hospital redevelopment, fast tracking of the Pacific Highway upgrade and second Grafton bridge crossing.
“I managed multi-million dollar budgets for a top 100 company, and I would bring the same common sense approach to the real challenges facing the council.
“As a public servant, I liaised with five Northern Rivers councils to successfully lobby for major infrastructure projects and grant programs, and to keep capital works projects on track and to budget.
“CVC needs some new blood – progressive councillors who will try to ensure good governance and greater transparency wherever possible.
“We need to encourage appropriate development under existing planning controls to protect and create local jobs. However, growth should not be at the cost of our wonderful environment or existing industries like tourism, fishing and farming.
“This is why I will fight to stop the proposed mega-port from swamping and destroying the Lower Clarence. I have also consistently opposed coal seam gas exploration and mining in the Valley and the wider region.”
Memo to potential investors in the Yamba Mega Port scheme
Dear Potential Investors,
You may have seen promotional material created by Australian Infrastructure Developments Pty Ltd or Y.P.R. Australia Pty Ltd for the unsolicited proposal often called the Port Yamba Development (Eastgate) or the Yamba Port Rail Project.
The material probably looks rather intriguing to many of you.
However, there are some matters that this promotional material either does not address or merely skates over.
You may have seen promotional material created by Australian Infrastructure Developments Pty Ltd or Y.P.R. Australia Pty Ltd for the unsolicited proposal often called the Port Yamba Development (Eastgate) or the Yamba Port Rail Project.
The material probably looks rather intriguing to many of you.
However, there are some matters that this promotional material either does not address or merely skates over.
Today is Wednesday, 10 August 2016.
This is the Port of Yamba Development project timeline still up on Australian Infrastructure Developments’ official company website:
Even if one allowed for the possibility that the NSW Baird Government is politically suicidal enough to give consent for a mega port in the Clarence River estuary and that the first terminals would not be operational until 31 December 2018, that only leaves Des Euen, Thomas Chiu and Lee Purves a mere 873 days to push this project to Stage 1 bulk terminals completion.
Before any part of the extensive port expansion scheme can be progressed there is the sensitive matter of Dirrangun reef, the breakwater walls and possibly the internal training walls, to be addressed.
Once the potential impact of the removal or significant alteration of breakwater walls sinks in with the communities of Iluka and Yamba I suspect that the friction between community and Yamba Port Rail proponents will increase dramatically.
Once the potential impact of the removal or significant alteration of breakwater walls sinks in with the communities of Iluka and Yamba I suspect that the friction between community and Yamba Port Rail proponents will increase dramatically.
If any activity required to open up the river entrance for those mega ships looks like placing Dirrangun at risk I’m sure that the Yaegl people, who have now spent twenty years fighting to legally protect their river and dream time reef, will not be happy with the port expansion proceeding and they will have a right to be concerned. A right that is now legally recognized as existing since before written history began in Australia.
As neither Des, Thomas or Lee has held a public information night for Lower Clarence communities to date, that particular failure is going to place a drag on the company’s project timetable from the start.
The hypothetical clock is now ticking.
The hypothetical clock is now ticking.
The dredging of an est. 20km of navigation channel inside the river, at the very least is going to require:
*negotiations with NSW government departments/agencies;
* a least two advertised tender invitations if investors are not planning to just throw their money away;
* a least two advertised tender invitations if investors are not planning to just throw their money away;
*sediment sampling at the proposed dredging site and particle size distribution and acid sulphate soils testing to assess sediment properties over the full depth to be dredged;
*assessment of potential impacts on threatened species including wading birds along the est 20 km length of the dredging site;
*assessment of potential noise impacts including what day or night hours of dredging/placement are acceptable;
* the creation of a dredge spoil management plan;and
* the creation of a dredge spoil management plan;and
*consultation with Birrigan Gargle Local Aboriginal Land Council, Yaegl Traditional Owners Corporation as native title trustees, the general public, local residents and commercial operators, commercial and recreational fishermen, waterway users and environmental groups.
Staying with this hypothetical scenario. Once these lengthy negotiations, assessments and consultations are finalised I suspect the actual dredge and spoil disposal would take up to three years to complete. After all this dredge has to remove at least est.13 metres of river bed in every square metre of a continuous 20 km long line an est 60m wide.
Add to this the time needed to purchase privately held regionally important farm land which the company hasn’t even commenced yet – land held by a number of individual owners some of who are adamant they will not sell - and then allow time for the rezoning process which is bound to be resisted by local residents and affected Lower Clarence communities. Now those 873 days are beginning to look very inadequate.
At this moment you may be thinking that if all the individual planning procedures were undertaken at the same time the port expansion might move forward faster. However, any large project is only as fast as its slowest strand of required assessment/modelling/
testing and this particular project is being undertaken by a company which admits it has never handled any sort of development project before.
At this moment you may be thinking that if all the individual planning procedures were undertaken at the same time the port expansion might move forward faster. However, any large project is only as fast as its slowest strand of required assessment/modelling/
testing and this particular project is being undertaken by a company which admits it has never handled any sort of development project before.
By the time one factors in the many studies required to create a viable development application to commence construction of the built environment then 2023 would not be seen as a long enough time frame to finish Stage 1 bulk terminals.
Some of these studies would be obliged to include the sourcing, transport and stabilzation of enough fill to raise 36 sq.km of terminals and berths above projected flood levels and modelling of existing & changed flooding conditions - because all the proposed terminal & berth areas will be submerged in a 1 in 100 flood to est. depths of 0.05 to 2.8m unless the land is raised.
Some of these studies would be obliged to include the sourcing, transport and stabilzation of enough fill to raise 36 sq.km of terminals and berths above projected flood levels and modelling of existing & changed flooding conditions - because all the proposed terminal & berth areas will be submerged in a 1 in 100 flood to est. depths of 0.05 to 2.8m unless the land is raised.
At this point in the development process state and local government may become alarmed at the amount of flood water in even a 1 in 20 year flood that will be displaced by a mega port at the end of this ancient floodplain.
Displaced water (that has likely in some flood events to come at some speed down both the Clarence River and out of the Esk River) which will almost inevitably inundate the proposed remaining undeveloped half of Palmers Island, along with low lying sections of Woombah, Iluka, Yamba and Wooloweyah, as well as exacerbate upriver flooding as far as Maclean. Quite rightly both tiers of government would quail at the thought of this occurring in conjunction with a king tide entering the mouth of the Clarence River and the clock might be permanently stopped on the mega port scheme then and there.
Displaced water (that has likely in some flood events to come at some speed down both the Clarence River and out of the Esk River) which will almost inevitably inundate the proposed remaining undeveloped half of Palmers Island, along with low lying sections of Woombah, Iluka, Yamba and Wooloweyah, as well as exacerbate upriver flooding as far as Maclean. Quite rightly both tiers of government would quail at the thought of this occurring in conjunction with a king tide entering the mouth of the Clarence River and the clock might be permanently stopped on the mega port scheme then and there.
If not and planning madness prevails, the fact that a freight road bridge and new road/s would need to be built so that bulk product can actually reach the bulk terminals - because Stage 1 will not see a completed Pacific West Rail Link stretching from the coast to north-west NSW - and 2023 turns into a rather sad phantasy because the number of planning hoops the company has to jump through just grew in number.
Australian Infrastructure Developments and its shadowy backers would be foolish to believe that Stage 1 would be remotely achievable by 2028.
It is hard to imagine that Australian Infrastructure Developments will ever be able to establish the social contract with the Clarence Valley it needs to proceed, when its grand plan will diminish or destroy so many existing aesthetic, environmental, cultural, social and economic values within the estuary.
It is hard to imagine that Australian Infrastructure Developments will ever be able to establish the social contract with the Clarence Valley it needs to proceed, when its grand plan will diminish or destroy so many existing aesthetic, environmental, cultural, social and economic values within the estuary.
Twelve years is a long time to have investment money tied up in a mega port scheme that in all probability will be successfully scuppered by Northern Rivers people power.
Twelve years in which your company reputations and that of your principal shareholders will be held up for global scrutiny.
Given the power of almost instant communication that the Internet will give to over 50,000 people and the ability of anyone of those with a personal computer to identify and research your company or superannuation fund, are you sure that the hope of future financial returns is worth the public relations risk?
If you think I exaggerate, ask Metgasco Limited what community resistance across the Northern Rivers did to its plans to develop gas fields.
Twelve years in which your company reputations and that of your principal shareholders will be held up for global scrutiny.
Given the power of almost instant communication that the Internet will give to over 50,000 people and the ability of anyone of those with a personal computer to identify and research your company or superannuation fund, are you sure that the hope of future financial returns is worth the public relations risk?
If you think I exaggerate, ask Metgasco Limited what community resistance across the Northern Rivers did to its plans to develop gas fields.
So, potential investors – you might like to consider taking your money and committing it to an infrastructure project in a locality that actually wants what you believe you have to offer.
This is entirely friendly advice, because I like many others would prefer quietly enjoying the Clarence River estuary and the easy, relaxed lifestyle its healthy environment allows me, rather than spending the next twelve years as part of a peaceful but relentlessly effective grassroots protest movement making your corporate lives a misery.
This is entirely friendly advice, because I like many others would prefer quietly enjoying the Clarence River estuary and the easy, relaxed lifestyle its healthy environment allows me, rather than spending the next twelve years as part of a peaceful but relentlessly effective grassroots protest movement making your corporate lives a misery.
Sincerely,
Clarencegirl
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)