Sunday, 7 March 2010
Lack of public facilities such as transport in rural and regional Oz
Last year the local community of ***** (name removed) buried young ****** (name removed).
***** hanged himself out of despair. Centrelink hounded him.
In order to pacify Centrelink ***** drove everywhere to find work, often in an unregistered vehicle as he had not the means to pay for registration.
Individuals like ***** end up driving, often without a licence, and more often in unregistered vehicles. The seeds of criminality begin this way, from despair.
Truth is, this is not an isolated incident.
Over to you Mr Rudd et al.
Source: Read this
And these are the people Rudd & Co intend to trust with access to a national database containing all your sensitive personal information?
It wasn't all that many years ago that a series of royal commissions and investigations revealed that Australian police officers were not above inappropriately accessing information about ordinary citizens and that in New South Wales a corrupt trade in personal information had occurred.
If you have ever lived in rural and regional Australia you will be aware that doctors gossip about their patients, and not just amongst themselves.
That even now public hospital computer access is not always secure.
Anyone who has read national newspapers over the last decade would be aware that at least 465 Centrelink employees were found to have accessed personal information about people on pensions and other welfare benefits, sometimes in exchange for money.
Now we are told that; More than 1,000 Medicare employees have been investigated for spying on customers' personal information over the past three years and at least 150 of those investigated were found to be plain spying on other people.
These health professionals and public servants are the very people Kevin Rudd and his Health Minister Nicola Roxon are going to entrust with our very personal health information (cross matched by name, address, date of birth, gender etc.) when they introduce the Medicare smart card/e-card and national health information database.
According to The Australian this week:
Last week, the Healthcare Identifiers Bill was referred to the Senate Community Affairs committee for an inquiry and report on "the significant changes" proposed by Ms Roxon by March 15.
Under the planned regime, Medicare will issue every Australian with a unique, 16-digit identity number, while more than 600,000 healthcare providers -- including pharmacists, psychologists and podiatrists -- will be given similarly unique identifiers to access patient numbers.
While the Medicare-operated service will not store clinical information along with the patient's number, name, address and date of birth, the HI number will be used to populate records held by a range of care providers, so that eventually all related files can be brought together at the point of care. But the unexpected news of snooping by Medicare staff has set off alarm bells.
That the Rudd Government's so-called reform of health information is suspect is nothing new, indeed public figures are to be given the opportunity to have their personal information hidden behind a false name because privacy risk is admitted.
In fact North Coast Voices has posted on problems with the Rudd-Roxon grand database plan before this.
It doesn't matter how many times the Prime Minister goes in front of the camera and tells the Australian electorate that he means well and can do better - this national health information database is one of his worst ideas after mandatory internet censorship and leaving those draconian sedition laws in place.
Saturday, 6 March 2010
Footprints for Peace: women's walk for peace events on the NSW North Coast 20 March to 15 April 2010
The Women's Walk for Peace follows a route from Brisbane in Queensland to Sydney in New South Wales. The walk will be held from February to May 2010.
Stages of this walk pass through all major NSW North Coast towns and villages between 20 March to 15 April 2010.
If you wish to join a stage in your area go to Footprints for Peace Australia for details.
EDO Free Seminar on Tweed Draft Local Environmental Plan, 23 March 2010 Murwillumbah
FREE Seminar: Tweed Draft LEP
The draft Tweed Local Environmental Plan is on public exhibition until Wednesday 31 March. In response to requests from the local community, the EDO Northern Rivers office is holding a public seminar to discuss how well the draft Plan protects the area's unique biodiversity and how the community can make effective submissions.
Where : CWA Hall, 20 Queen St MURWILLUMBAH
When : 5.45 for 6 pm sharp to 8 pm, Tuesday 23 March
Light refreshments provided. No booking necessary. Presented by the EDO NSW Northern Rivers office
For more information please call Mark Byrne on 6621 1113 or email
Friday, 5 March 2010
SES Yamba rules, O.K.
I sincerely appreciate their efforts to keep me dry under a compromised roof.
JM
Yamba
* GuestSpeak is a feature of North Coast Voices allowing Northern Rivers residents to make satirical or serious comment on issues that concern them. Posts of 250-300 words or less can be submitted to ncvguestspeak at live dot com dot au for consideration.
Rudd thinks censoring MPs access to Internet 'sensible'?
Rudd described some opposition to the government's Internet filtering schemes as "stupid debate" about "extreme civil libertarianism" that claims filtering "means the imposition of Soviet Communism a la 1980". He said most people "are sensible folk" who "know where the balance lies", according to Computer World on 1 March 2010.
Is that why the Australian Senate runs a web filter on all the internet connections it assigns and censored those of senators so that they were unable to read a reputable gay online newspaper - because it was "sensible" to reduce parliamentarian's access to information about a significant voter demographic?
Thursday, 4 March 2010
Obama appointment of Medina as U.S. representative on International Whaling Commission indicates developing pro-Japan stance?
President Obama's appointment this month of former Pew Institute director of whale conservation to the post of U.S. commissioner for the International Whaling Commission does nothing to bolster support for Australia's determinedly anti-whaling position.
In fact Monica Medina's views at the end of the day would seem to run parallel with the current Japanese push for limited commercial whaling in the Antarctic.
Limiting Japan's Whale Hunting
01/10/2008 - The Japanese whaling fleet set off recently amid much fanfare and celebration from its home port of Shimonoseki. Children waved flags covered with cartoon whales, politicians made speeches, and a band played "Popeye the Sailor Man." Officials told the assembled crowd that Japan must preserve its "whale-eating culture."
While it's true that Japanese communities have been whaling in their coastal waters for hundreds of years, in fact no nation, including Japan, is legally permitted to conduct a hunt like this one — where almost 1,000 whales may be killed — for the purpose of preserving its whaling tradition.
And in reality, today's high-tech whaling in no way resembles traditional Japanese coastal whaling. Japanese whalers use boats the size of battleships and employ high-powered automatic harpoon guns to kill whales. They process the whale meat at sea so that it can be sold once they return home.
Meanwhile, back home in Japan, demand for whale meat continues to decline — more than 4,200 tons remains stockpiled in freezers, according to a recent government report. It is hard to understand why the Japanese government is trying so hard to preserve its whale-eating tradition. But at least the world is beginning to understand their real motives.
In the past, Japan had been more guarded about describing these motives. For more than 20 years, international law has prohibited commercial hunting because whales had been hunted to the brink of extinction. The law, however, contains a large loophole. As long as the Japanese maintain that whale hunting is conducted for the purpose of scientific research, they can kill any species of whale, even endangered whales, and can do so anywhere in international waters, even in a whale sanctuary.
So whereas they may call it research, the Japanese officials' send-off remarks only confirm what many have suspected all along — the whaling expedition is not primarily about science......
But Japan is still actively expanding its "scientific research program." It still plans to kill hundreds more whales than it killed last year, including highly endangered fin whales. Since the prohibition on all commercial whaling was enacted, the Japanese alone have killed more than 15,000 whales under the guise of science.
Moreover, Japan is planning to build a new, state-of-the-art commercial-sized whaling vessel that would operate for many years to come. Scientists across the globe have condemned Japan's "scientific" whaling program.......
It is time for the Japanese government to face the reality of its fading whaling industry. Rather than killing whales in the name of science, exploiting a loophole in the international commercial whaling moratorium, it should attempt to determine whether some elements of the long whaling tradition could be retained without causing lasting harm to whale populations and the international rule of law.
And rather than increase the size and scale of its falsely labeled scientific research, in the face of shrinking demand for whale meat at home and a chorus of rebuke abroad, Japan should completely abandon its ambitions to kill humpbacks and other endangered whales.
For its part, the U.S. government must push for real reform of the international laws and institutions established to protect whales. And it should employ all available diplomatic channels to obtain binding assurances that the Japanese will not hunt endangered whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. It is time to bring whale conservation into the 21st century.
Monica Medina is director of whale conservation at the Pew Charitable Trusts Environment Group.