The Australien Government has made an ad about the new media legislation it just passed, and it's surprisingly honest and informative! pic.twitter.com/iD5KRenxGT
— theJuiceMedia (@thejuicemedia) February 25, 2021
Who else needs to see this? pic.twitter.com/Y2B66ZOWaI
— Kailas Wild 🐨 (@kailaswild) March 1, 2021
Office of NSW Labor MP for Lismore Janelle Saffin, media release, 3 March 2021:
Saffin applauds action group for tackling digital divide
A RECENT Parliamentary speech by Lismore MP Janelle Saffin on the digital divide in rural and regional New South Wales has put her in touch with an action group helping isolated communities to access suitable broadband.
During a public interest debate on regional mobile and digital connectivity, Ms Saffin took NSW Deputy Premier John Barilaro to task for only delivering $50 million of $400 million the Nationals promised in February 2019 for faster mobile and internet coverage in regional New South Wales.
Ms Saffin said health was one area where the digital divide can mean life or death, so for that reason we have to ensure good connections.
“How many times can the Deputy Premier announce this? We have heard announcement after announcement, but we want to see runs on the board. We want to see connectivity.
“All members must work together to ensure that the people of rural and regional New South Wales have strong digital connectivity for jobs, business, health and safety.”
Coverage of the debate found its way into the Information Age as an article titled, "Rural MPs lambast Govt. broadband 'BS’”, prompting Jon Gough, of the Wamboin Communications Action Group (WCAG), to contact Ms Saffin.
“WCAG has done a lot of good work over some four years and is now in the process of obtaining suitable broadband for their rural community,” Ms Saffin said.
“Their particular focus has been on the Wamboin, Bywong and Sutton region around the ACT, which had a particular satellite NBN allocated to their area and which the local community stated was not fit for purpose for the residents of the area.
“They
have focused on obtaining a service that could traverse challenging
terrain and how to deliver fibre connectivity to rural areas at a
similar price point to that of city residents.
“Their
website contains information about WCAG that I found very
interesting: https://sites.google.com/site/wamboincommunications/home
“When I spoke with Jon Gough, he asked me if there any communities in our area which would be interested in receiving assistance from them.
“The WCAG secured an Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) grant to help them document what they had done and success with the NSW Government.
“The purpose of this is to help other, similar, rural communities get recognised by both government and non-government organisations to deliver suitable, robust, future-proof digital communications.
“WCAG
were successful in this
endeavour and are now reaching out to find other communities that
need assistance in raising their profile such that they are
recognised as being in need of assistance.”
Ms Saffin
said if there are any groups in the Electorate of Lismore who are
interested and have the capacity to work on such a project, please
contact her on 02 66 213 624 and she shall put them in touch with
WCAG.
The Clarence Valley hasn't had an official "boil water alert" in any of its towns or villages since January through to May 2013.
Although in the chaos of the 2019-20 bushfire season water could not be drawn from a number of local water sources for a while due to ash, debris and fish kills.
However, that doesn't mean there aren't times in uneventful months when the house water coming out of the taps is discoloured, tastes musty or has a slight odour, which has some of us reaching for the emergency stash of bottled water and deciding that doing the laundry is not on the agenda.
Clarence Valley Council is again discussing the dirty water situation and I wince on reading of this discussion - because some of the worst episodes of dirty water tend to occur after a 'fix' has been applied.
The Daily Telegraph, 24 February 2021:
Councillor Karen Toms took the opportunity at last week’s committee meetings to question general manager Ashley Lindsay about proposed plans to help with fixing the issue for residents.
Mr Lindsay explained that items in the upcoming budget would help address the problem, and that a much talked about water filtration system would not be a definitive solution to all the problems.
In response, The Daily Examiner put forward a series of questions to Council, to which manager of water Cycle Greg Mashiah responded.
It was said there were items coming up in the budget to do with fixing the water problem – what specifically will be proposed?
There is a proposal in the draft 2020/2021 operational budget for targeted air scouring of mains in Yamba and Iluka to reduce sediment deposits.
Do you believe there is a water quality issue?
One of the most challenging water quality issues faced by council is a dirty water event which is impossible to predict in duration, frequency and location through the pipeline. During these events, the water quality exceeds the aesthetic criteria of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline and creates numerous problems for the end user. Council’s main goal is to provide drinking water that is in compliance with the Australian Drinking Water Guideline and in line with our adopted standard of service which means the water is less than 5NTU (a measure of turbidity) 95 per cent of the time. In order to address the issue, council undertakes routine and targeted flushing of the mains, selectively draws water from the source with the best quality, monitors chlorine residual to the end of the pipeline and strategically plans water mains to reduce dead ends where possible.
Why is a $40 million filtration system being bandied around in the community as a solution?
Having a water source that is both clean and secure is one of the most important factors contributing to drinking water quality. The majority of Clarence Valley is privileged to have access to the water of the Nymboida River and the storage capacity of Shannon Creek Dam which provides us with valuable water security.
However, our existing treatment methods do not entirely protect us from the potential risk of poor water quality resulting from the impacts of climate change and environmental degradation. For example, council is restricted under its license from taking water from the Nymboida River when the flow is less than 225ML/day, which historically has occurred 5 per cent of the time.
During these periods, Council relies on the Shannon Creek Dam storage as a water source. The Shannon Creek Dam holds plenty of water, however the quality of the water is reliant on many factors including weather (especially rain), environmental contamination, algal growth and bush fires which could make the water unsuitable for use with our existing treatment system.
Our existing methods of treatment have a limited capacity to adjust to raw water changes. The main way Council currently manages its water quality is by “selective extraction”, where water is generally only taken when the turbidity is less than 5NTU. As outlined in Table 11 of the interim Drought Management Plan adopted by Council in October 2020 (page 35 of https://www.clarence.nsw.gov.au/page.asp?f=RES-GKQ-61-55-36), in the period 2013-2020 the Nymboida flow and turbidity was only suitable for extraction (ie flow >225ML/day and turbidity <5NTU) 76.5 per cent of the time, and if the Nymboida volume limit where extraction is permitted is changed to 430ML/day (which is foreshadowed in the Shannon Creek Dam water licence), Council could only have extracted water 44.2 per cent of the time in the last 7 years.
Council is undertaking a “secure yield study” as the first stage of updating its Integrated Water Cycle Management (IWCM) strategy which we believe will demonstrate that an upgraded treatment plant is required to enable extraction of water when turbidity is >5 NTU to ensure the system has sufficient capacity for current and future demands. The state government regulator (DPIE – Water) will require Council to adopt its IWCM strategy to demonstrate there is a requirement for a major treatment upgrade.
The investigation of further treatment (filtration) was also included as a risk management strategy in the new Drinking Water Management System which was adopted by Council in May 2020.
Council has allocated funds in the 2020/2021 budget for scope and design of Rushforth Road 32ML replacement reservoir, and the scoping study includes concept design of a possible future treatment upgrade including filtration to ensure future treatment is feasible with the replacement reservoir.
Will it fix the problem, or is there another underlying matter?
There are many contributing factors associated with dirty water events in the pipeline including but not limited to historical accumulation of sediment in the pipeline, a vast distribution system which challenges chlorine residuals in areas, changes in flow rates during peak periods of usage, seasonal fluctuations in water temperature, natural biofilms forming in the pipeline and natural and added minerals in the water. A filtration plant will improve water quality by reducing the turbidity of the treated water, improve our capacity to remove potential pathogens in the raw water, improve water colour and organics, improve taste and odour associated with algae and our protection against potential algal toxins.
While a filtration plant will improve water quality as a whole, Council cannot guarantee that it will completely eliminate all dirty water events due to the additional contributing factors, but there should be a significant improvement. Even if a filtration plant is constructed, because the natural water supply is very soft Council will need to continue to add lime to the water to increase its hardness. Council has added lime to its water supply since 2008 because the soft water means that over time the water dissolves metals such as iron, zinc and copper that make up water pipelines and fittings.
Even with the added lime, our water is still classified as “soft”. Properties which have water sitting in their household pipelines may still have these metals dissolved out due to the soft water. Customers may see the lime as a brown scale in their kettles or, if they have a water filter installed, the filter generally removes the lime which is why water filters clog up so quickly in the Clarence. Even if a filtration plant was constructed, because we will continue to add lime customers will still find they have a brown scale in their kettles and their filters will still clog up quickly. The best way to remove the iron scale from kettles is to boil vinegar in the kettle……..
Stirring words in that quote at the top of this post, however the reality was somewhat different for two regional communities on the NSW North Coast - Clarence Valley and Lismore City.
Lismore Airport services a city and population on the banks of the Wilsons River and is a gateway for both business travel and holidaymakers.
While Grafton Airport in the Clarence Valley is predominately used by state authorities and local government.
Having received financial assistance from Clarence Valley Council as well as nearly $24 million from the federal government’s $198 million Regional Airline Network Support Program (RANS), $53.9 million from the $100 million COVID-19 Regional Airlines Funding Assistance Program (RAFA), Jobkeeper workforce wage subsidies, and unspecified funding through Australian Airline Financial Relief Package (AAFRP), Regional Express Airlines (REX) suddenly decided to cease flights into Grafton Airport on 3 July 2020.
Apparently it had decided it wished to expand its presence on other routes where it could compete with a pandemic-weakened Qantas Airlines.
It reversed its decision to abandon Grafton Airport in August 2020 – promising to operate return services three days a week, on Monday, Wednesday and Friday on a Sydney-Grafton Lismore route commencing 17 August 2020.
Coincidentally REX's re-entry followed on the heels of negative publicity and media reports that Clarence Valley Council had begun looking for another airline to take its place.
Now seven months after its return, the predominately foreign-owned REX is withdrawing from its Sydney-Grafton-Lismore route as of 23 March 2021.
This time all but admitting that having milked the federal government for as much funding as it could, it was again abandoning both Grafton and Lismore just days ahead of the cessation of the emergency regional airline funding streams it had previously accessed.
In a media release dated 22 February 2021 REX stated:
Rex will, from April, commence new services to ports where Virgin Australia has retreated, leaving Qantas as the sole or dominant operator. The new services are from Sydney to:
Coffs Harbour (330,000 passengers pre-COVID)
Port Macquarie (190,000 passengers pre-COVID)
and will be available for sale from tomorrow.”
“Other routes under active consideration where Qantas is the sole or dominant carrier include:
Sydney - Tamworth (175,000 passengers pre-COVID),
Perth - Geraldton (110,000 passengers pre-COVID),
Melbourne - Devonport (146,000 passengers pre-COVID), and
Sydney - Canberra (930,000 passengers pre-COVID).”
“We will be launching services to these cities once a partnership agreement is concluded with the local councils or airport owners.”
“Our plans to commence domestic jet services on the Sydney-Melbourne route on 1 March are still firm barring further border closures.”
In another media release dated 1 March 2021 REX stated:
Adelaide and the Gold Coast as they have been chosen by Rex to receive domestic jet services just in time for the Easter rush.
Rex today announces that it will commence new services between Melbourne and Adelaide from 31 March, whilst the Gold Coast will receive services from Melbourne commencing 29 March and from Sydney commencing 1 April 2021…..
“I wish to thank both Adelaide Airport and the Gold Coast Airport who have worked tirelessly with us to make this happen in such a short time frame.”
One has to wonder how long the honeymoon will last for Coffs Harbour, Port Macquarie and Gold Coast airports and, whether airport managements realise just how many times REX will seek financial concessions from local government to keep flying these routes.
In the Clarence Valley the honeymoon is long over and personally I'm hoping we have finally seen the last of REX.
BACKGROUND
According to Regional Express Airline’s 2019-20 Annual Report its largest shareholders are:
MR KIM HAI LIM with18,998,346 fully paid ordinary shares – 17.25% of total shares issued
BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD with 16,234,094 fully paid ordinary shares – 14.74% of total shares issued
THIAN SOO LEE with 7,722,181 fully paid ordinary shares – 7.01% of total shares issued
JOO CHYE CHUA with 7,454,362 fully paid ordinary shares – 6.77% of total shares issued
MING YEW SEE TOH & HUI ING TJOA with 7,454,362 fully paid ordinary shares – 6.77% of total shares issued
MS HUI LING TJOA with 5,755,513 fully paid ordinary shares – 5.22% of total shares issues.
In February 2021 the alleged 2019 sexual assault of a female ministerial staffer at Parliament House in Canberra became public knowledge. Within less than two weeks the public also became aware of the alleged 1988 sexual assault of a 16 year-old girl in Sydney by a man who is now a cabinet minister in the Morrison Coalition Government.
The first allegation can be investigated by police and if charges are laid it can be tested at law, the second allegation cannot be investigated or tested at law because the alleged victim died in 2020 and therefore NSW Police cannot lawfully investigate the claims made before her death.
Essential Research conducted an online survey of 1,074 respondents from 24 February to 1 March 2021.
According to The Guardian on 2 March 2021, about 65% of those surveyed agreed with the statement: “The government has been more interested in protecting itself than the interests of those who have been assaulted.”
A gender breakdown showed that level was 68% among women and 62% of men.
Based on federal voting intentions, the statement was backed by 76% of Labor supporters, 51% of Coalition supporters and 88% of Greens supporters.
Again according to The Guardian; nearly seven in 10 respondents agreed with the statement that “it’s wrong that the Liberal party did not notify the police to launch a criminal inquiry immediately after the allegations were made” – a view that was backed by about six in 10 Coalition supporters.
“We consider that the extent of substandard care in Australia’s aged care system is deeply concerning and unacceptable by any measure. We also consider that it is very difficult to measure precisely the extent of substandard care, and that this must change. Australians have a right to know how their aged care system is performing; their government has a responsibility to design and operate a system that tells them; and aged care providers have a responsibility to monitor, improve and be transparent about the care they provide. The extent of substandard care in Australia’s aged care system reflects both poor quality on the part of some aged care providers and fundamental systemic flaws with the way the Australian aged care system is designed and governed. People receiving aged care deserve better. The Australian community is entitled to expect better.” [Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, A Summary of the Final Report, p.73]
Given the three volume interim report of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety was titled “Neglect”, the publication of the Final Report was not going to contain good news concerning the piecemeal approach taken by the federal government to what is now a predominately privatised health care sector.
Privatisation of the aged care sector has literally made millionaires of many founders and directors of residential aged care businesses.
According to a May 2019 Tax Justice Network – Australia and
Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability & Research (CICTAR) reportTax Justice Network – Australia and Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability & Research (CICTAR) report, Australia’s six largest family-owned aged care companies make a up a significant and growing portion of the aged care sector and they received over $711 million in annual federal funding to operate 130 facilities, with almost 12,000 beds. This was in addition to fees received from residents. While several of the largest family-owned aged care companies, owned by some of Australia’s richest families, have complex corporate structures, intertwined with trusts, that appear specifically designed to avoid tax.
The aged care system offers care under three main types of government subsidized service: Commonwealth Home Support Programme, Home Care Packages, permanent residential care and short-term respite care.
None of these service types have met the goals assigned to them under government policy and, the distressing examples of abuse and neglect which led to the creation of this Royal Commission have not disappeared as media reports during 2020 revealed [source source source source].
Regardless of whether a residential aged care business was privately-owned, corporate-owned or a not-for profit belonging to a religious institution, too many times in 2020 their individual residential aged care facilities were cited for a failure in one of all 8 of the Aged Care Quality Standards including those of concerning “consumer dignity and choice” and “personal care and clinical care”.
The Royal Commission’s Final Report Executive Summary tells us that:
The Aged Care Financing Authority reported that in 2018–19, there were over 3000 providers of aged care services. This included 873 residential aged care providers, 928 home care providers (as at 30 June 2019) and 1458 Commonwealth Home Support Programme providers.
However, a worryingly small percentage of the workforce employed by these 3,000 aged care services hold suitable qualifications. Out of the est. 366,000 paid workers only est. 15% had nursing qualifications or were accredited enrolled nurses in 2016.
The Final Report Executive Summary also tells us that:
In 2019–20, the Australian Government’s expenditure on aged care programs administered by the Department of Health was $21.2 billion. Older people are required to contribute to the costs of their care and accommodation if they can afford to do so through co-payments and means tested fees. People receiving aged care services contributed $5.6 billion to the cost of their aged care in 2018–19.
The Parliamentary Budget Office has projected that, over the next decade, Australian Government spending on aged care will increase by 4.0% a year, after correcting for inflation. This increase will mean that aged care spending will be growing significantly faster than the rate of all Australian Government spending (2.7%). By 2030–31, aged care will account for 5.0% of all Australian Government expenditure compared to 4.2% in 2018–19.
With the current Morrison Government having displayed a penchant for whittling down funding and services for the poor and vulnerable in our society, one would be foolish to suppose that Prime Minister & Liberal MP for Cook Scott Morrison would do no more than throw a financial sop at deficiencies in the aged care system.
On the heels of the Final Report, Morrison immediately committed to spend a paltry$452m on the sector and announced a further $189.9m in “temporary financial support” without a requirement that residential aged care providers spend it on increasing staff numbers and/or providing more qualified staff – needs identifed within a number of the 148 recommendations in the Final Report.
The full final report of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety is at https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/final-report
The Final Report Executive Summary opens at https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/final-report-executive-summary
The preceding Interim Report is found at
https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/interim-report
ABC News, 1 March 2021:
After years of supporting others to find secure accommodation, Cherie Bromley never imagined she would find herself on the receiving end of the housing crisis on the far north coast of New South Wales.
Key points:
Valuable members of regional communities are being forced out of the area due to a shortage of affordable rental properties
A woman who applied for rental properties says she was told the successful applicants offered to pay $100 more than the advertised price
The head of a homeless support group says many of her own staff are struggling to find accommodation for themselves
"I didn't even approach the real estates because I just knew there was nothing out there," she said.
For the past decade, Ms Bromley has been working for the Byron Community Centre, which provides a number of services, including support for the town's homeless population.
The Byron Bay resident of 29 years said she began the search for a home when the lease on her share house ended late last year, thrusting her into a rental market with a vacancy rate close to zero.
"This is the worst it's ever been," she said.
"There is no housing stock that is affordable."
Ms Bromley said she was extremely fortunate to have a good network of friends who were able to find her and her 14-year-old daughter temporary accommodation.
"I'm sleeping in the kitchen area [and] I gave my daughter the bedroom, but I have to pass through her bedroom to go to the bathroom," she said.
"It's not sustainable long-term."
 |
| Cherie Bromley is sharing a one-bedroom unit with her teenage daughter. (ABC North Coast: Leah White) |
'Catastrophic
proportions'
The term "traumatic experience" is not one Ballina solicitor Sadie Hunt thought she would ever use to describe trying to secure a rental property in regional NSW.
After all, she works in conveyancing, has a regular and respectable income, and has contacts in the local real estate industry — how hard could it be?
"I thought I had a pretty good chance of getting a rental property, but I was rejected from all the properties I applied for," Ms Hunt said.
"I was basically told that if you weren't a DINK (double income, no kids) … you just had zero chance of getting a rental property."
Ms Hunt said she sold her Lennox Head property in November 2020 and gave herself a five-week settlement period to find a new place.
But she said even the first hurdle into the rental market — property viewings — proved challenging.
"You get sent an email and if you don't respond to that email within two minutes those little 4-minute appointment slots are all filled," Ms Hunt said.
"You turn up and there's 30 to 50 people there … that you're essentially competing with to get a home for you and your family to live in."
Ms Hunt said she was able to find a private rental at the eleventh hour but was knocked back for the three rentals she applied for through real estate agents.
She said that the real estate agents later informed her that, in at least two of the homes she missed out on, other prospective tenants had offered higher rental payments to secure the properties…...
Right now a three bedroom house rental in Yamba is likely to cost between 35% and 50% of the 2020-21 middle tier median annual income of $67,000 in regional New South Wales. In Ballina a three bedroom rental is likely to take between 35% to 61% out of that same income if suitable housing stock is available. While renting a three bedroom home in Tweed Heads would reduce that median annual income by between 43% to 56% and, in Lismore such a rental would likely subtract between 34% to 43% from that $67,000 if there was suitable housing stock available.
A single parent raising a child on an annual Centrelink payment of $21,920 from March 2021 who is attempting to secure private rental of even a one-bedroom unit between Clarence Valley and the NSW-Qld border faces a daunting task.
