Tuesday, 23 July 2019
Australia attempts to "erase the science" on climate change at UN talks in Bonn?
BBC
News,
27 June 2019:
Oil
producing countries are trying to "erase the science" on
keeping the world's temperatures below 1.5C, say some delegates at UN
talks in Bonn.
The
chair of the Alliance of Small Island States said Saudi Arabia and
others were trying to pretend a key scientific report didn't exist.
Small
island states believe keeping temperatures below 1.5C this century is
critical to their survival.
A
key report in October said this was possible.
But
huge emissions cuts would be needed in the short term.
The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report on 1.5C was
commissioned by the UN back in 2015.
But
when it was presented to climate negotiators in December in Poland,
four countries including the US, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait
refused to "welcome" it.
The
simmering battle over the report has re-emerged here at this meeting
in Bonn.
There
has been a serious battle over a text that would include reference to
the scientists' conclusion that carbon emissions would have to be
reduced by 45% by 2030.
Saudi
Arabia has been at the fore in wanting to include text that
underlined the uncertainties in the report.
For
the group of around 40 small island states, this has proved
inflammatory.
"The
report came out in in October of 2018 and now we see this move at the
negotiations to try and have it almost erased from existence, which
is impossible to do," Lois Young, the ambassador from Belize,
who is chairing the group, told the BBC.
"There's
this move to pretend as though it's not there, to not to refer to it
in documents. And it's been ongoing since we got here."
The
Saudis have gained some support in their arguments from an unlikely
alliance of countries, including the US, Australia and Iran.
"The
countries that are trying to downplay the importance of the document,
erase it from the records, not all of them are showing their faces,"
said Ambassador Young.
"It's
unreal, it's as though they're resigning our Aosis states to
collateral damage, I mean, it's like we have no importance doesn't
matter." [my
yellow highlighting]
Read
the full article here.
Police accused of running "a new regime of secrecy"?
From the July 2019 issue of the Australian Newspaper History Group Newsletter:
The Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants' progress report, which was tabled by the Victorian Government today, is now available along with the Commission’s first tranche of public submissions here.
Labels:
police,
royal commission,
Victoria
Monday, 22 July 2019
Great Barrier Reef Marine Authority makes its position clear to Australian governments
SBS News, 20 July 2019:
The agency that manages the Great Barrier Reef broke ranks with the Federal Government to call for the "strongest and fastest possible action" against climate change to save the world heritage marine wonder.
The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, a government body, said in a study released this week that an urgent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, both nationally and globally, was needed to protect the future of the reef.
Rising sea temperatures linked to climate change have killed off large areas of coral in the 2,300km reef, a UN-listed World Heritage site, that suffered back-to-back coral bleaching in 2016 and 2017.
Australia's emissions of greenhouse gases have risen for the past four years under the recently re-elected government of Prime Minister Scott Morrison, which backs the country's huge coal industry.
Australia's emissions of greenhouse gases have risen for the past four years under the recently re-elected government of Prime Minister Scott Morrison, which backs the country's huge coal industry.
It has refused to enshrine emission reduction targets agreed to under the Paris climate accords in its formal energy policy and experts question whether it can meet its commitment to cut greenhouse gas output by at least 26 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030.
Great Barrrier Reef Marine Authority (GBRMA):
Climate change is the greatest threat to the Great Barrier Reef. Only the strongest and fastest possible actions to decrease global greenhouse gas emissions will reduce the risks and limit the impacts of climate change on the Reef. Further impacts can be minimised by limiting global temperature increase to the maximum extent possible and fast-tracking actions to build Reef resilience.
The position statement explains what is causing the climate to change, why it’s the greatest threat to the Reef, and that caring for the Reef requires actions at all levels.
Caring for the Reef is a shared responsibility. We recognise the critical importance of strong and effective implementation of all government programs, policies and tools supporting action on climate change. We encourage others to take action to reduce the risks and limit the impacts of climate change on the Reef and coral reefs globally. Actions everyone can take can be found on our website and the Department of the Environment and Energy’s website.
Building the resilience of the Reef is central to ensuring it can withstand threats. Our approach to managing the Marine Park is adaptive and future-focused and we are committed to strengthening partnerships to build the capacity of Marine Park managers, industries and communities to adapt their activities to a changing climate....
What many frail aged Australians can expect if they enter a nursing home - maggots, rotten food and a starvation diet
ABC
News,
16 July 2019:
PHOTO:
Pictures supplied to ABC investigations as part of a crowdsourcing
project on food in aged care. (Supplied)
…..Cutting corners
Earlier,
a roundtable of three chefs with almost 100 years of experience in a
range of aged care services and kitchens between them suggested an
answer to why food standards were so poor.
The
commission heard the quality of aged care menus — described by one
panellist as "the one thing [residents] get to look forward to"
— came down to what the facility paid per resident.
For
$16 a day, the residents of the unnamed facility Lindy Twyford
manages were served salt-and-pepper squid, fillet mignon, and
occasional portions of frozen but high-quality produce.
At
the other end of the spectrum, a home spending $7 would rely on
secondary cuts of meat and mass-ordered vegetables, some of which
would be thrown out at the expense of serving sizes.
"You're having to cut corners, you're having to use frozen foods, you're having to use processed foods just to feed residents," chef Nicholas Hall said.
Mr
Hall said food costs at some facilities he formerly worked at were
inflated by an ordering system beyond supermarket prices, in one
instance by as much as 100 per cent.
Chef
Timothy Deverell raised concerns about the lack of training to create
texture-modified foods, menus that had no input from residents until
they complained, and food served on open-air trolleys that was often
cold by the time it reached some residents.
Some
homes would place food orders using a "restrictive" system
in which a drop-down box offered just a handful of options, Mr Hall
said.
Facilities
would opt for finger food platters because they were "low-risk",
cheap, and didn't require a chef.
Some
meals would be repeated up to three or four times a week as providers
made a bid to reduce costs.
"They're racing to the bottom to see who can feed for the lowest amount of cost," Mr Hall said
Maggots, rotten food
The
commission was also told of one "upmarket residential aged care
facility" which had a maggot-infested rubbish store between
service trolleys and a nearby fridge containing enough rotten food to
fill a trailer.
"[I've
seen] reusing food that's already been out, served to residents and
come back to the kitchen," Mr Deverell said.
"They
use that for texture-modified diets."
Mr
Hall said food safety audits were too infrequent and services were
given advance notice, meaning extra cleaners could be hired to bring
facilities up to scratch.
He
said nutritionists failed to properly engage with residents and their
needs…..
Labels:
aged care,
elder abuse,
food,
human rights,
royal commission
Sunday, 21 July 2019
Coraki still without a local doctor
According to Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016 Census data Coraki and neighbouring Woodburn have a combined population of over 2,000 residents and 499 families.
Half of those residents living in Coraki are over 45 years of age and half of those living in Woodburn are over 42 years of age. While children make up almost 19 per cent of the population of both villages.
Yet the Northern NSW Local Health District cannot even supply a sessional doctor for the health centre at Coraki.
The Northern Star, 20 July 2019, p.7:
Ray Hunt is more frustrated than most about living in a town where the hospital has no doctor.
“If you cut your toe, you can’t go there,” Mr Hunt said.
His late wife Anne used to be the “boss” of the original Coraki Campbell Hospital, before it was closed.
The two-year-old, $4 million Coraki Campbell HealthOne facility looks modern and slick and offers dentistry and dietary appointments but services are limited without a doctor.
Down the road on Thursday, about 10 people gathered to voice their frustration about no sign of a doctor for Coraki.
Eighty-five-year-old Tubby Daley was there. He was born in Coraki. He doesn’t drive so when he needs to see the doctor he has to use limited public transport to get to Casino or Lismore.
Peggy Gooley takes her sick husband regularly to Casino and District Memorial Hospital.
Mrs Gooley failed to understand why they couldn’t have a doctor on rotation, even if the doctor was only in Coraki for two days a week.
A list of 241 names of residents who would use a GP shows the solid customer base in Coraki.
Jennifer Sherwin wore a grim reaper outfit to emphasise how Coraki residents felt about the absence of a doctor.
Ms Sherwin believes the contracts the Northern NSW Local Health District is offering are too restrictive.
Northern NSW Local Health District chief executive Wayne Jones said efforts had been made to recruit a GP for Coraki Campbell HealthOne, however there had been no successful applicants....
Labels:
Coraki,
Health Services,
Northern Rivers
Once more the Adani Group demonstrates that it acts in bad faith and cannot be trusted
ABC
News,
16 July 2019:
The
Queensland Government is prosecuting mining giant Adani for allegedly
providing false and misleading information to the Environment
Department over land clearing at the site of its proposed Carmichael
mine.
The
ABC understands the charge under the Environmental Protection Act
carries a fine that runs into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
"The
prosecution relates to information contained in Adani's 2017/2018
annual return for its Carmichael mine," the department said in a
statement to the ABC.
"The annual return requires information about planned and actual disturbance of land at the mine.
"The
department alleges that Adani's annual return contained false and
misleading information about the disturbance already undertaken at
the mine during the annual return period."
Last
September, Adani notified the Department of "an administrative
paperwork error" in its annual return for the Carmichael mine.
The
company admitted that areas "that were disturbed during the
final three-and-a-half weeks of the annual return period should have
been included".
The
prosecution against Adani is listed for mention at the Brisbane
Magistrates Court on August 16......
Labels:
coal,
environmental vandalism,
foreign investment,
mining
Guess who Clarrie spotted in Yamba?
Paparazzi, eat your hearts out!
Clarrie spotted this bloke, in company, having lunch at a cafe in Yamba on Friday.
Credit for image: abc.net.au
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)