Clarence Valley Council itself admits that the entire estuary is already under stress in its Report Card 2013:
Showing posts with label Clarence River. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clarence River. Show all posts
Friday 15 February 2019
Clarence Valley 2019: keeping the Clarence River Estuary healthy for future generations
“like other heavy
fabricating sectors shipbuilding involves the use of materials and
manufacturing practices that can impact on the environment, can contribute to
climate change”
[OECD Council Working Party on Shipbuilding
(WP6), November 2010]
“Shipyards are
dangerous construction zones with many worker hazards. Shipbuilding, repair,
cleaning, and coating use toxic chemicals and hazardous or flammable materials.
These activities also can pollute water directly or through runoff. Repairs may
require emptying dirty water from a ship’s ballast and bilge tanks into the
surrounding waters….. Shipbuilding and ship repair use toxic chemicals that
include chromium,
copper, lead,
and nickel. Ship cleaning activities use chemicals that include copper,
hazardous or flammable materials, heavy metals, and solvents.
They release lead, particulate
matter, volatile
organic compounds, zinc, and other air
pollutants.” [NIH U.S. National Library
of Medicine, Boats & Ships, retrieved 18 February 2019]
If it wasn’t
bad enough that barely two years ago Lower
Clarence communities still had a flimflam man and then a set of dodgy
companies (mentioned in a NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption investigation
in 2018) trying to push for large scale industrialisation of Clarence River
estuary – now Clarence Valley Council apparently attracted by the lure of vacant crown land up for grabs appears to be joining the push to industrialise-and-be-damned if these little
gems in its “Clarence Valley Regional Economic Development Strategy 2018 -2022”
are any indication.
These are excerpts from that document:
Clarence Valley’s key
endowments lie in its coastal, riverine and hinterland amenity; arable soils
and favourable climate; access to Sydney and Brisbane via the Pacific Highway;
and the ability to bring new industrial land to market cost effectively…..
Industrial Land -The
Clarence Valley has seven industrial estates open for business and far more
potential development sites compared with neighbouring councils…..
Sustaining a ready
supply of zoned and serviced industrial land is a strategic priority for
supporting growth in these specialisations, with marine precinct proposals……
•Meet emerging
industrial land use opportunities in a timely way •Develop a marine precinct
proposal •Develop a project portfolio of enabling infrastructure for industrial
sites, including the marine precinct proposal…..•Develop a Port of Yamba Strategy…….
Develop a marine
precinct proposal
•Develop a project
portfolio of enabling infrastructure for industrial sites, including the marine
precinct proposal
•Build on the Transport
Precinct Feasibility Final Report to develop road investment priorities
•Review and complete
land use planning through collaboration with neighbouring councils
•Partner with local
industries and training providers to align training courses to industry’s needs
•Advocate for a marine
manufacturing SkillsPoint
•Identify and cost
options for better Pacific Highway connections
•Advocate for progress
on strategic priorities for the Port of Yamba and Summerland Way
•Develop a Port of Yamba
Strategy
•Develop Yamba Road
& Harwood Road business cases…..
The Clarence
River estuary covers an 800 sq. kilometres floodplain and key environmental
indicators for this estuary’s health include water quality, riverbank vegetation, the
number and distribution of fish species, as well as the presence of macroinvertebrates
and plankton.
The estuary is already beginning to struggle under the weight of human
activity, including marine activity. A fact it would seem that Clarence Valley
Council ignores in its development strategy.
It is a fact
that estuary communities cannot afford to ignore if they wish to preserve the
aesthetic, cultural, social and environmental amenity which supports both
community life and the local economy.
In 2016-2017 a
study of six NSW ports was undertaken and published in PLoS One and online in
December 2017 as “Water
quality assessment of Australian ports using water quality evaluation indices”.
With regard
to the Port of Yamba in the lower Clarence
estuary the study recommended regular monitoring and management of port
activities accounting for both biological and chemical toxicological profiles
of the discharging activities.
It did so for
the following reasons:
* The Port of
Yamba has standard levels of Dissolved Oxygen according to ANZECC guidelines. However. the amount of
fecal coliforms was significantly higher in the water of the port area than the
corresponding background samples, which clearly indicates the impact of the fishing
fleet and recreational boating on the port environment.
* Very high concentrations of iron were found in the port
water, the maximum concentration of lead in the water exceeded the ANZECC (0.0022)
guidelines with all the background samples had much lower concentration
of lead compared to the port area and, the maximum concentration of
copper in the water was much higher than ANZECC guidelines and exceeded other
international guidelines at (0.04 mg/l) in Port of Yamba.
* The mean concentration of copper also exceeded the ANZECC
guidelines. When it came to zinc levels were low except in the port area which contained
very high concentrations of zinc, which exceeded the guidelines. Concentration
of cadmium and cobalt were within the ANZECC guidelines.
* Overall the Port of Yamba portrayed high contamination for all
standard guidelines when it came to water quality – the port area has water
quality of medium contamination and one site has high contamination.
Clarence Valley Council itself admits that the entire estuary is already under stress in its Report Card 2013:
Clarence Valley Council itself admits that the entire estuary is already under stress in its Report Card 2013:
“Water quality was poor
in the estuary throughout the study, with the region around the tidal limit with
consistently the worst water quality of the Clarence River
reflecting the
freshwater and tidal inputs at these sites. Estuary tributaries, particularly
Swan and Sportsmans Creeks and the Coldstream River were in very
poor overall condition
receiving a grade of F. These systems had consistently poor water quality that
contributed nutrient rich, low oxygen and acid water
to the Clarence River
following flooding.
Concentrations of
nitrogen and phosphorus consistently exceeded the guideline values throughout
the study at all sites. Very high nitrogen concentrations were
recorded in estuarine
reaches following flooding. There were no algal blooms recorded during the
study. However, algal concentrations were consistently
above the guideline
value in estuarine reaches.
The Broadwater and
Wooloweyah coastal lagoons both had very poor water quality, with high algal
and nutrient concentrations and turbidity, and low dissolved oxygen values
consistently exceeding a number of water quality guidelines. The Broadwater had
better riparian condition relative to Wooloweyah that improved its
overall grade.
Riparian condition was
generally low from a poor diversity of native vegetation, reduced vegetation
structure and small isolated pockets that were poorly connected to other native
vegetation. Reaches showed evidence of eroding river banks and sediment
deposited in the channel. Estuarine reaches were often dominated by riverbanks with
little or no vegetation present, leading to very poor condition grades.”
The tidal water exchange will not protect the lower estuary from a spreading loss of water quality and increased levels of pollution once industry begins to expand along its foreshores and clusters of marine businesses such as shipbuilding and repair are further developed.
There will be a tipping point that once reached will be hard, perhaps even impossible, to reverse.
This is something that Lower Clarence communities need to consider before council goes too far down this path which leads away from a healthy estuary for future generations.
Thursday 22 November 2018
Update on attempt by water raiders from the Murray-Darling Basin to get NSW Government agreement to dam and divert water from the Clarence River system
The NSW Legislative Council Industry and Transport Committee Inquiry report would not go so far as to recommend damming and diverting water from the Clarence River catchment and, the Berejiklian Government would only go as far as "noting' the fallback position held by the water raiders from the Murray-Darling Basin.
NSW LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, Portfolio
Committee No. 5 – Industry and Transport Augmentation of water supply for rural
and regional New South Wales,
14 May 2018:
Recommendation 40
That the NSW Government
consider establishing a stormwater and/or flood harvesting pilot program for
flood mitigation in the Northern Rivers.
6.89 The committee heard
evidence from some inquiry participants that there may be potential benefits of
diverting the Clarence River to the west. These inquiry participants were of
the view that there is merit to any strategy that seeks to mitigate floods and
flood damage in the Clarence Valley and provide additional water for
agriculture in the Barwon region. The committee acknowledges that stakeholders
were divided on the issue of water diversion. However, some inquiry
participants held strong views against diverting waters from the Clarence River
to the west.
6.90 We also acknowledge the work of local
councils in undertaking repair work for public assets and infrastructure and
the strain that such labour has on council resources, finances and staff. The
committee acknowledges that stakeholders called for the National Disaster
Relief and Recovery Arrangements to undergo a review in order to compensate for
council resources and staff, the committee supports this idea and recommends
the NSW Government pursue this through the Council of Australian Governments.
Government Response - Water Augmentation, 14 November 2018:
Monday 24 September 2018
When it comes to protecting Clarence Valley water resources "Castillo's credibility is wearing very thin indeed"
This is a basic map clearly showing a historic cluster of small abandoned mine sites in the vicinity of the Mann River, one of the principal tributaries of the Clarence River which is the largest coastal river in New South Wales.
The old Cangai Mine site is now part of a Castillo Copper Limited exploration lease and its proximity to the Mann River is apparent.
As the crow flies the distance between this site and the Mann River is estimated to be less than 4 kms and Cangi Mine is also bounded on three sides by three creeks which feed into the Mann.
Following North Coast Voices posting Castillo Copper Limited's Jackadgery Project: has spinning the truth already begun? on 17 September 2018 one Clarence Valley resident sent me an email which pointed out a curious ommission in Castillo Copper Limited exploration licence application this mining company:
"However, under Section 19.4
beneath the heading: “Surface water
sources”, is the following requirement:
“Provide details of the
existing surface water sources in the area that are likely to be affected by
the activity. Provide details of the nearest watercourse/s and the distance
between the proposed disturbance area/s and the nearest watercourse/s”.
Castillo's Response
“The proposed activity area bounded by Bobward creek from the west and
Smelter creek from the east. The distance from disturbance area to Bobward
creek is 550 – 620m; the distance to Smelter creek is about 500m. The water for
drilling if required will most likely will be taken from Bobward creek.
Permission has been sought and granted by the landowner”.
No mention of the Mann or Clarence in
the entire document.
Talk about "dodgy". Castillo's
credibility is wearing very thin indeed,"
BACKGROUND
North Coast Voices, 17 September 2018, Castillo Copper Limited's Jackadgery Project: has spinning the truth already begun?
BACKGROUND
North Coast Voices, 17 September 2018, Castillo Copper Limited's Jackadgery Project: has spinning the truth already begun?
Sunday 23 September 2018
Yamba, the jewel in the crown of Clarence Valley tourism
The Daily Examiner, 18 September 2018, p.1:
The Clarence Valley is
out-performing the whole state in tourism growth, according to Clarence Valley
Council, with Yamba the jewel in the crown.
Director environment,
planning and community Des Schroder said the Clarence Valley had recorded a
12.2 per cent growth, while NSW had only notched up a 5.7 per cent growth.
Tourism has become one
of the Valley’s biggest employers with 6.8 per cent of people employed in the
Valley working in tourism and hospitality according to Mr Schroder.
Council statistics
show Yamba has become the fourth most visited town in the North Coast
behind Byron Bay, Port Macquarie and Coffs Harbour, with more tourists than
Ballina, Tweed Heads and Old Bar, Taree.
Mr Schroder said
according to NSW tourism research Yamba statistics are merely 30 per
cent of Byron Bay’s tourism numbers at the moment, but it might not be that way
for long.
“Yamba is growing
but it’s not Byron Bay yet from a tourism point of view, but it’s getting up
there,” he said.
Mr Schroder added the
population of Yamba is fairly stable, but still growing.
He said the influx of
people visiting Yamba around Christmas is starting to become a
constant stream of tourists all year round.
“The impact of the
highway will make a big difference,” Mr Schroder said. “The highway will
improve access for people coming to Yamba from the north and south.”
With 30 per cent of
tourists visiting Yamba hailing from South-East Queensland he said
the council is conscious the tourism in Yamba will continue to grow.
“All council can do is
put the framework in place,” Mr Schroder said.
“We need to manage
lifestyle for the locals while allowing for tourism growth which balances jobs.
You need tourism to create jobs but you don’t want to be over run by tourists.”…….
Monday 17 September 2018
Castillo Copper Limited's Jackadgery Project: has spinning the truth already begun?
On 15 September 2018 The Daily Examiner reported that:
Concerns about the health of the Mann and Clarence
rivers have been raised by community members following explorations by Castillo Copper at
Cangai, near the historic copper mine….
It’s the high grade of
the finding that has some community members concerned, with the prospect of a
mine opening in the area becoming more likely.
At a meeting attended by
about 20 people, NSW Parliament Greens candidate for the Clarence Greg Clancy
and John Edwards from the Clarence Valley Environment Centre explained their
concerns with mining so close to the river.
After having trouble
getting in contact with Castillo through its website, Mr Edwards took
his inquiries about the exploration to the mining regulator.
“I got an email from
their managing director … and he said they were just out there doing some
investigation and it wasn’t very much to worry about,” he said.
But this has not eased
his concerns about the future of the Clarence Valley’s rivers.
“It would be good to get
out there and see what they are actually doing,” he said.
“They’ve been talking up
their exploration finds to date … maybe that is to just get investors’ money,
but it’s certainly in a bad position where the river is and where all this
siltation and run-off and toxic crap that runs off when they mine copper,
silver...
“It’s not going to be
easy for them when they are at the top of a hill overlooking a river.”
Mr Clancy said the group
would need to get more information so they could understand exactly how the ore
would be mined.
“There is loss of
vegetation and threatened species on the hill. This is going to be an open cut
mine … and the water table may not be up there, but once they’ve got an open
cut mine it will gather water and they have to use water in the process to get
the minerals out.
“They will be creating
their own artificial ponds and we would have to explore this further, but I
know with (extracting) gold they use arsenic.
“There are a whole range
of chemicals they could be using. Whatever projections they are supposed to
use, they often don’t work.”
The group is planning to
do more research and attempt to make contact with the company before they hold
another meeting in one month’s time at the Grafton library.
[my yellow bolding]
Castillo Copper Limited (ASX:CCZ) is a West Australian base metal explorer listed on the stock exchange which has four subsidiaries:
Castillo Copper Chile Spa, Total Minerals Pty Ltd, Queensland Commodities Pty Ltd and Total Iron Pty Ltd.
Castillo Copper Limited holds three mining exploration leases as part of its Jackadgery Project:
Castillo Copper Chile Spa, Total Minerals Pty Ltd, Queensland Commodities Pty Ltd and Total Iron Pty Ltd.
Castillo Copper Limited holds three mining exploration leases as part of its Jackadgery Project:
EL 8625 (1992) 17-Jul-2017 17-Jul-2020 35
UNITS About 43 km WNW of GRAFTON TOTAL
MINERALS PTY LTD est. at 155 km2
EL 8635 (1992) 21-Aug-2017 21-Aug-2020 52
UNITS About 41 km WNW of GRAFTON TOTAL
IRON PTY LTD
EL 8601 (1992) 21-Jun-2017 21-Jun 2020 51
UNITS About 38 km SE of DRAKE QUEENSLAND COMMODITIES PTY LTD.
Castillo Copper is not characterising its activities on these leases as "just doing some investigation".
In fact it is indicating to its shareholders and the stock exchange that the company has clear intentions to mine at the old Cangai Mine site before the end of the exploration on these leases:
* “Road to fast-track
production taking shape”
* “Preliminary
metallurgical test-work on samples from the two McDonough’s stockpiles, along
the line of lode, has demonstrated the ore can be beneficiated materially….. Discussions
continue with prospective off-take partners interested in processing ore as
relevant information comes to hand …. Meanwhile, the geology team have
approached the regulator for guidance on the optimal way forward to remove the
stockpiles from site and capture the economic benefits”
* “…they are an asset and
could potentially generate early cashflow”
* “The clear options are
third party processing locally or a direct shipping ore product once regulatory
clearance is secured”.
Castillo Copper Limited images
Well, the board is composed of:
Peter Francis Meagher, company director since 2 February 2018, from East Freemantle, West Australia - position Chairman;
Peter Smith, on the board as but not officially listed as a director of Castillo Copper Limited - position Non-Executive Director; and
Alan David Stephen Armstrong, company director since 1 August 2017, from Canning Vale West Australia - position Executive Director.
Listed company director who is not included at https://www.castillocopper.com/board/ is:
Neil Armstrong Hutchinson. company director since 1 August 2017, from Double View, Western Australia - position previously reported to be Technical Executive Director at Castillo Copper Limited since August 1, 2017. by Bloomberg.
NOTE; All three listed company directors appear to be shareholders in this miming company.
Castillo Copper Limited's Top 20 shareholders as of 20 September 2017 were:
Castillo Copper Limited Annual Report 2016-17 |
Labels:
Clarence River,
Clarence Valley,
environmental vandalism,
mining,
water
Monday 20 August 2018
Clarence River Estuary communities need to remain both alert and alarmed as NSW Berejiklian Government seeks to expand exposure to international cruise ship industry
In July 2018
the NSW Berejiklian Coalition Government released the document “NSW
Cruise Development Plan” to the delight
of the international cruise ship industry.
This plan confirms that Berejiklian ministry - sitting in offices over 670kms south of the small towns of Yamba and Iluka on the
banks of the Clarence River estuary - is still pursuing the idea that the Port of Yamba is a potential official cruise
ship destination.
The state
government also obviously expects that Clarence Valley local government will both accommodate the needs of the plan and contribute to
the cost of meeting this aim if it is progressed.
To further
the Berejiklian Government’s aim to make as many small ports or undeveloped harbours/inlets
capable of use by cruise ships the NSW Cruise Development Plan states that:
A regulatory framework
that fosters the competitiveness of ports, encourages the expansion of the
tourism sector, minimises environmental impacts, protects the community, and
supports jobs growth is required for the NSW cruise industry.
National regulatory
barriers currently inhibit the cruise industry, including the small expedition
and luxury cruise market’s, access to NSW coastal ports.
Differences in
regulatory requirements between states also restricts the freedom of cruise
liners to set national itineraries that take advantage of regional ports.
The NSW Government will
continue to lead discussions with the other States, Territories and the
Commonwealth on removing regulatory barriers that limit cruise ship growth
potential.
Action: The NSW Government will investigate opportunities
to remove regulatory barriers to entry for emerging cruise markets, including
the expedition cruise market, and will seek an inter-jurisdictional policy
position with other governments. [my yellow highlighting]
What the
Liberal-Nationals government in faraway Sydney considers as “regulatory barriers”
may not be what the people of the Lower Clarence River consider as impediments
which should be removed.
These
regulations cover all aspects of port
safety, marine pilotage and marine pollution as well as port
boundaries, riverbed disturbance, moorings, traffic control, service charges,
licencing and penalties for breaching regulations.
They are in place for good reason and any weakening of these regulations has the potential to affect the environmental sustainability of an ancient, healthy and highly productive estuary system which is the largest in south-east Australia and, whose waters are covered by Yaegl Native Title.
Facts estuary communities may need to continually press upon a state government wrapped up as it is in a cosy relationship with the international cruise ship industry.
Friday 6 July 2018
A CERTAIN RMS ASPHALT BATCHING PLANT: Open Letter to NSW Premier & Liberal MP for Willoughby, Gladys Berejiklian, as well as Minister for Roads Maritime and Freight & Nationals MP for Oxley, Melinda Pavey
Dear Premier Berejiklian and Minister Pavey,
Communities in the Clarence River estuary are concerned about an aspect of the NSW Government's current Pacific Highway construction planning.
Below are some of those concerns expressed to local newspaper The Daily Examiner with regard to a Roads and Maritime Services
(RMS) plan
to install a temporary asphalt batching plant at Woombah on the Clarence River
flood plain.
The build is
scheduled to start this month and the plant will operate for the next two and a
half years.
Please note
the attitude – local residents are not amused at the high-handed way in which
the NSW Government and RMS went about a cursory declaration of intent.
“What they’re not happy
about is an asphalt batching plant being built right near their houses, using
their only connecting road to the villages”
“We want the highway,
and we want the asphalt plant to be somewhere, but we want it to be away from
our communities where it won’t impact on our health and safety”
“The plant will add a
reported 500 truck moments and 100 car movements per day at peak, or one every
minute, and residents are concerned the additional traffic will create safety
problems, and a bottleneck at their intersection, which they already describe
as “tight” after it was temporarily re-routed. They also cite concerns over
possible health affects the dust may cause for nearby residents.”
We have a resident as
close as 450 metres from the plant who is suffering from lung cancer….Although
Pacific Complete have been made aware of this, since they were first told they
have failed to take action to acknowledge her.”
“We live within one
kilometre of the plant and we found out two weeks ago by letterbox drop”
“We found out last Wednesday
they didn’t tell anyone else. We’ve been around to other residents who are just
outside the area and they had no idea the plant was coming at all.”
I also draw your attention to the content of emails coming out of Iluka:
“Woombah
is surrounded by World Heritage National Park. Within the waterways affected by
run off from the proposed asphalt plant is the organic Solum Farm. Woombah
Coffee will also be affected. Not to mention the multiple organic gardners who sell
at the Yamba Markets and those who grow their own food.
The small community of
Woombah and its neighbour Iluka are places that welcome tourists for the
natural and clean beauty of the environment. An asphalt plant WILL threaten
that.
In addition, the Esk
River at Woombah is fed by many of the creeks and waterways in the bushland
where the asphalt plant is proposed. They will be adversely affected, which
will flow into the Esk which will flow into the Clarence which will affect the
fishing, oyster and prawn industries, on which many make their living. Not to
mention the tourist industry that survives because our area offers a clean
environment with unpolluted air and water.
This proposal is an
outrage. Teven said NO. Woombah says NO as well.”
“What about our kids on
school buses with no seatbelts and the increase in traffic particularly trucks”
“Iluka Naturally, turn
off at the asphalt plant, how ironic.”
For my own part I would add to these expressions of concern the fact that the 80ha, NPWS-managed Mororo Creek Nature Reserve is only est. 98 metres from the western end of the southern boundary of the proposed asphalt batching site.
This protected land parcel is one of the reserves which form part of a forested corridor linking Bundjalung National Park to the east and the protected areas of the Richmond Range to the west. It lies within the boundaries of the Yaegl Local Aboriginal Land Council area, the Clarence Valley Local Government Area and the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority.
The Mororo Creek Reserve conserves areas of endangered swamp sclerophyll forest, coastal saltmarsh, subtropical coastal floodplain forest and swamp oak floodplain forest.
For my own part I would add to these expressions of concern the fact that the 80ha, NPWS-managed Mororo Creek Nature Reserve is only est. 98 metres from the western end of the southern boundary of the proposed asphalt batching site.
This protected land parcel is one of the reserves which form part of a forested corridor linking Bundjalung National Park to the east and the protected areas of the Richmond Range to the west. It lies within the boundaries of the Yaegl Local Aboriginal Land Council area, the Clarence Valley Local Government Area and the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority.
The Mororo Creek Reserve conserves areas of endangered swamp sclerophyll forest, coastal saltmarsh, subtropical coastal floodplain forest and swamp oak floodplain forest.
Most importantly, Mororo Creek and several of its tributaries which run through this reserve empty into the Clarence River Estuary less than est. 2km from the proposed asphalt batching site.
Now I have no
idea why the NSW Government decided that a brief three-page information sheet
and invitation to comment published online at http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/documents/projects/northern-nsw/woolgoolga-to-ballina/w2b-woombah-batch-plant-notification-2018-06.pdf
was to be the limit
of its community consultation effort or why a similar document was sent at
short notice to such a small number of Woombah residents.
I don’t
pretend to understand why the information sheet contained just one small image
of a section of a Pillar Valley temporary asphalt batching plant with no description
of typical batching plant infrastructure and no Woombah site layout plan at
all, much less one to scale.
There was not
a hint in the information sheet of the range of known issues which can arise during site
construction, plant operation and site rehabilitation.
Those
residents who were originally invited to comment were supplied with less than
rudimentary information on which to assess the desirability of a batching plant
on the designated site.
Given that
the proposed Woombah asphalt batching plant site is est. 2 to 2.5kms as the crow
flies from Clarence River estuary waters
which:
(1) are
covered by Yaegl Native Title;
(2) at certain points are covered by international treaties, including JAMBA, CAMBA,
ROKAMBA;
(3) contain
the second largest area of seagrass (83 ha), the largest area of mangroves (765
ha) and the third largest area of saltmarsh (290ha) in the northern rivers
region [Williams et al 2006 in Northern Rivers
Regional Biodiversity Management Plan 2010];
(4) are part
of the largest combined river-ocean fishery in NSW containing high fisheries value
marine species; and
(5) are a
vital component of regional tourism,
perhaps Premier
Berejiklian and Minister Pavey can answer two vital questions.
1. Is the Woombah asphalt batching plant
site above the 100 year flood level for the lower Clarence Valley flood plain?
Because if it
is not, then the NSW Government’s cavalier attitude to flood risk management
would potentially see toxic waste from asphalt batching flow into the Clarence
River estuary during a flood event – including solid waste and any organic
solvents/hydrocarbons captured in holding ponds for the life of the plant –
along with any nearby excavated plant/road construction materials. After all, extreme flood event
height predictions for that general area are 3.5 to 4.5 mAHD.
2. Why on earth was a decision made to
site the asphalt batching plant and access road at a point along the Pacific
Highway where it would cause the maximum damage to Iluka’s clean, green destination
image and vital tourism trade?
When the NSW Government
first mooted the Pacific Highway upgrade on the North Coast one of the
advantages it canvassed was an increase in tourism numbers due to better road
conditions.
In the 2015-16
financial year annual visitor
numbers to the Clarence Valley were approximately 986,000 persons and their
estimated spending was in the vicinity of $383.3 million. By
the end of the 2016 calendar year the tourism
visitor count for that year had reached over 1 million.
Most of these
visitors holidayed along the Clarence Coast and Iluka is a strong component of that
coastal tourism.
If the NSW Government seriously believes that leaving Woombah-Iluka with only one safe, unimpeded access point
for day, weekend and long-stay visitors, the Yamba to Iluka foot passenger
only ferry, will
not significantly affect tourism numbers over the course of two and a half
years, one has to wonder if it bothered to investigate the issue at all before signing off on the proposed plant site.
The effect of
siting the asphalt batching plant and access road on the designated site will
in all likelihood have the effect of diminishing not growing tourism traffic to
Iluka for a period beyond the years it actually takes to complete the Maclean
to Devil’s Pulpit section of the highway upgrade, as visitor perception of a holiday area can change when industrial level activity becomes visually prominent.
When it comes to commitment to the community consultation process, the NSW Government obviously hasn’t insisted that Roads and Maritime Services live up to its undertaking to engage
with communities to understand their needs and consider these when making
decisions.
In fact,
looking at satellite images of the site one cannot escape the suspicion that pre-construction
ground preparation had already commenced before any information was sent out to
selected Woombah residents.
Since news of the asphalt batching plan site reached the Lower Clarence and residents began to approach their local state member, there appears to have been a promise made to hold a "drop-in information session" at an unspecified date.
Having experienced NSW departmental drop-in information sessions, I am well aware that they are of limited value as purveyors of anything other that the meagre degree of information found in the aforementioned three page RMS document and, ineffectual as vehicles for genuine community consultation.
The people of Woombah and Iluka deserve better. They deserve a formal information night which canvasses all the issues, with representatives from RMS and the Pacific Highway project team prepared to address concerns and answer questions, as well as representatives of both the Premier and Minister for Roads, Maritime and Freight in attendance as observers.
Since news of the asphalt batching plan site reached the Lower Clarence and residents began to approach their local state member, there appears to have been a promise made to hold a "drop-in information session" at an unspecified date.
Having experienced NSW departmental drop-in information sessions, I am well aware that they are of limited value as purveyors of anything other that the meagre degree of information found in the aforementioned three page RMS document and, ineffectual as vehicles for genuine community consultation.
The people of Woombah and Iluka deserve better. They deserve a formal information night which canvasses all the issues, with representatives from RMS and the Pacific Highway project team prepared to address concerns and answer questions, as well as representatives of both the Premier and Minister for Roads, Maritime and Freight in attendance as observers.
I’m sure that
all residents and business owners in both Woombah and Iluka would appreciate
both Premier and Minster taking the time to consider these questions and ensure government genuinely consults with both village communities before considering proceeding with any Roads and Maritime Servces site proposal.
Sincerely,
Clarence Girl
Monday 2 July 2018
Yet another 'temporary' asphalt batching plant rears its ugly head - this time at Woombah in the Clarence Valley
It would appear that the Berejiklian Government is about to wish a temporary asphalt batching plant on the Lower Clarence River flood plain.
Running for two and a half years day and night.
Two years of bitumen odour from the holding tanks, lime dust from the silo, diesel fumes from the generator, sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides releasing during production - all wafting on the breeze - along with the never ending rumble of dusty heavy trucks belching exhaust fumes.
Then a cleanup of the toxic waste left behind.
With not even the courtesy of a genuine community consultation.
Australian and NSW
Government-RMS,
June 2018:
The Australian and NSW
governments are jointly funding the Woolgoolga to Ballina Pacific Highway
upgrade. Roads and Maritime Services’ Pacific Highway Project Office, Pacific
Complete and its contractor partners are working together to deliver the
upgrade.
To build the upgrade,
the project team will be establishing batch plants along the 155 kilometre
route. These sites will have different functions and will support the building
of the new road.
The project team is
proposing to build a temporary asphalt batch plant at Woombah. The batch plant
would be located on the eastern side of the existing highway about 700 metres
north of the old Iluka Road turnoff. A map has been provided to show the
proposed location of the temporary asphalt batch plant.
This facility would make
asphalt for the upgrade between Maclean and Devils Pulpit. Batch plants are
facilities where raw materials are brought in, mixed together and then loaded
into trucks and transported to site for use.
If approved, we would
start building this site in July, with the batch plant operational by
mid-August 2018. This site is proposed to be operational for about two and a
half years with the land to be rehabilitated after completion in line with the
project’s conditions of approval…..
There would be up to 500
heavy vehicle movements and 100 light vehicle movements per day at peak…..
Typically work would be
carried out during the project’s approved construction hours which are:
9am
- 6pm Monday – Friday
8am
– 5pm Saturday
In areas where residents
live more than 200 metres from the work area, extended work hours are allowed
between 6am and 7am and 6pm and 7pm from Monday to Friday. Additionally, work
outside or normal construction hours is also allowed where the impact to
residents is predicted to be low, including no greater increase in noise levels
than 5 decibels above the existing background noise level.
The batch plant
would need to be operational whenever asphalting work is required on the road.
To minimise the impact on the Pacific Highway and ensure the work sites are
safe, some of this work would be carried out at night. The temporary batch
plant would need to operate at night to support these activities. Residents would
be notified in advance of this taking place.
We are seeking your
feedback on the proposed building and operation of the temporary asphalt batch
plant at Woombah. To have your say, please fill out the attached feedback form
by Wednesday 4 July 2018.
You can return it by:
Email: W2B@pacificcomplete.com.au
Alternatively, you can
provide your feedback over the phone by calling 1800 778 900 (toll free).
Google Earth snapshot of Woombah site and surrounding land, an est. 2.5kms
as the crow flies from the Clarence River estuary and est. 1km from residential dwellings.
Woombah batching site boundaries.
Iluka Road problems
THE safety of Iluka road users is being put at risk
by increasing truck movements to an additional 500 truck and trailers as well
as 100 cars per day. That’s an additional truck or car travelling on Iluka road
at a rate of one every 50 seconds! A situation that will continue for two and a
half years.
The NSW Government has put out a letter seeking
feedback on a proposed asphalt batch
plant at Woombah for the Pacific Highway Upgrade from Mororo to Devils Pulpit.
However speaking with other locals in the Woombah
area I found out quickly that very few residents of Woombah, let alone IIluka
have received this letter. It is something that will affect all the 2500
residents of Iluka/Woombah area, as well as tourists and service vehicles. The
letter has only just been sent out, but the site is already being prepared.
Another case of community consultation and feedback after the fact, and the
decision has been made!
The new temporary turn off from Iluka Rd onto the
highway is already a difficult and dangerous turn-off because of the short
turning lanes, additional turns and give way signs. Along with increased truck
movements and road blockages associated with the construction of the Iluka road
overpass, the dangers associated with navigating this entrance and exit to
Iluka Road has increased.
Now all the traffic for an asphalt batching plant is to also travel on Garretts
Lane, coming from the Old Pacific Highway and crossing Iluka Rd onto this new
temporary turn-off.
This will cause traffic congestion problems for all
Iluka Rd users. It will create further problems entering and exiting the
highway. It will increase that danger of motor vehicle collisions and possible
injury. We must stand up for the safety of our loved ones, our children, and
for the many families who holiday here.
Locating the batching plant where it has its own
dedicated access road to the highway, one which could adequately accommodate
this large number of truck movements is the only sufficient solution. They
should not be placed on busy local roads.
There are several areas, including Mororo Rd, which
have already been blocked to public access, which could easily be fitted out
for this purpose without endangering people.
Also with the plant being on the Western side of
the Pacific Highway, these fully loaded trucks that are all going north will
not have to cross the busy Pacific Highway but instead only need to merge with
traffic. This would also solve the problem
Davild Wilson, Iluka
Labels:
Berejiklian Government,
Clarence River,
environment,
Iluka,
pollution,
roads,
Woombah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)