Wednesday, 11 May 2016

Australian Federal Election 2016: the pain that awaits under a second Abbott-Turnbull Government


If there is a second term for this Abbott-Turnbull federal government it will be one characterized by high public debt and increased borrowings.

With a taxation revenue stream that has been deliberately limited by a $4 billion dollar giveaway to people whose level of earned income already cushions them from the realities experienced by average and low income households and, a further $48.4 billion hit to the revenue bottom line so that government can cut the company tax rate of an est. 2.121 million businesses - 70 per cent of whom don't paid the full rate anyway.

To keep their ship afloat Turnbull & Co would need to implement all those punitive Abbott-era cuts that were predominately aimed at working class households.

Which means among other things, an extension of the 2013-14 indexation freeze on Medicare rebates paid to specialist doctors, GPs and allied health professionals in an attempt to force them to pass on the shortfall to patients as a co-payment. As well as the introduction on 1 July 2016 of upfront payments for x-ray, imaging and pathology services.

Eligibility for Family Tax Benefits will be tightened and government paid parental leave payment rules will be changed to exclude more mothers.

The regressive Good & Services Tax (GST) has also been broaden so that from 1 July 2016 goods purchased overseas via the Internet will attract this tax.

From September this year anyone 22 years and over applying for Newstart Allowance will receive payment at a lower rate - each fortnightly cash transfer for a single unemployed person (with no children) will be $8.80 less and for unemployed couples (with no children) it will be $15.80 less. 

This means that a single person eligible to receive Newstart who applies in September will only have an est. $259.40 per week on which to live and look for work, while couples will only receive an est. $468.50 each week. With average rents in the Sydney metropolitan area ranging between $500-$530 at the beginning of this year, rental stress is likely to increase in unemployed households.

Liberal and Nationals federal politicians are denying that they are conducting "class warfare" yet large tax cuts are going to the top 25 per cent of income earners and will eventually will be extended to businesses with annual turnovers in the billions of dollars, while the economically and socially vulnerable are told they deserve less.

Indeed spatial demographics demonstrate the Coalition's further widening of social and economic division in this country.

On 6 May 2016 The Age revealed that the biggest proportion of income earners who will benefit fully from these personal income tax cuts are in Prime Minister Turnbull's high socio-economic status electorate of Wentworth, where more than a third will have more in their pockets after tax. With the western Sydney electorate of Fowler having the nation's lowest proportion of taxpayers who qualify for the tax cut. In its suburbs of Liverpool, Cabramatta and Green Valley, just one in 20 earners have a taxable income higher than the new tax threshold.

While The Guardian on 7 May reported that, in the relatively lower socio-economic status regional electorate of Page on the NSW Far North Coast, 94.2% of taxpayers would miss out on that same cut in the tax rate because their taxable income was below $80,000 a year. Similarly, neighbouring Richmond and Cowper electorates would see 92.3% and 94.0% respectively missing out on the tax cut.

A brief look at what to expect..........

Unlegislated measures carried forward in the budget estimates—February 2016 update. Date issued: 3 February 2016. Date revised: 12: 30pm, 10 March 2016


The first Turnbull budget will be propped up by about $13 billion of so-called "zombie measures", which are still on the books from the first and second Abbott budgets but have not yet been passed by the Senate.
A parliamentary budget office count for the coming financial year puts the "ghost" measures at $1.7 billion. The biggest are the $600 million from planned cuts to access to Family Tax Benefits, $258 million from the outlawing of alleged double-dipping of maternity leave schemes, and $139 million from increasing co-payments and changing the safety net for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

2016-17 Budget PapersStatement 6: Debt Statement, Assets and Liabilities, 3 May 2016:

Net debt is expected to be $326.0 billion (18.9 per cent of GDP) in 2016‑17. Net debt is projected to peak at 19.2 per cent of GDP in 2017‑18, before declining over the medium term to a projected 9.1 per cent of GDP ($264 billion) in 2026-27.The end-of-year face value of Commonwealth Government Securities (CGS) on issue subject to the Treasurer's Direction [government borrowing] is expected to be $497 billion in 2016‑17 and is expected to increase to $581 billion in 2019-20. By the end of the medium term (2026‑27) the total face value of CGS on issue is projected to rise to $640 billion.

2016-17 Budget PapersStatement 4: Revenue, 3 May 2016:

The 2016-17 Budget forecasts for tax receipts, excluding new policy, have been revised down since the 2015-16 MYEFO by $4.6 billion in 2016-17 and $13.5 billion over the four years to 2018-19. Excluding GST, tax receipts are forecast to be $4.6 billion lower in 2016-17 and $14.2 billion lower over the four years to 2018-19…..
the forecast for nominal GDP has been revised down by $27.5 billion over the four years to 2018-19….
In 2016-17, tax receipts as a share of GDP are expected to be 22.2 per cent, lower than the 2015-16 MYEFO estimate of 22.5 per cent.

Financial Review, 3 May 2016:

The government will spend almost $4 billion over the next four years to stop 500,000 taxpayers moving into the second-highest tax bracket…..

2016-17 Budget Papers Part 1: Revenue Measures, 3 May 2016:

The GST will be extended to low value goods imported by consumers from 1 July 2017….
The intent of this measure is that low value goods imported by consumers will face the same tax regime as goods that are sourced domestically.
Overseas suppliers that have an Australian turnover of $75,000 or more will be required to register for, collect and remit GST for low value goods supplied to consumers in Australia, using a vendor registration model.

The Guardian, 4 May 2016:

Asked about the plan to increase the threshold at which the 37% tax bracket kicks in from $80,000 to $87,000 – a tax cut of a bit over $300 a year for the top 25% of earners – the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, told ABC radio that even if it was not legislated when he called the federal election at the end of the week it would be implemented "administratively".

On Tuesday the federal government announced it will increase the tobacco excise by 12.5 per cent a year for the next four years.
The plan will cause the price of a packet of 25 cigarettes to rise to about $40, up from $25 today.

ABC News, 5 May 2016:

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has refused to confirm the 10-year cost of the proposal to cut tax for all firms to 25 per cent over a decade.
The Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) has estimated the proposal, which will be phased in over time and benefit small and medium-sized businesses first, will cost $16.5 billion a year in 2026-27. However, during an interview with Sky News, Mr Turnbull would not confirm that figure, despite being asked more than a dozen times for an explanation.

The Australian, 6 May 2016:

Treasury has revealed a hit to revenue of $48.2 billion over 10 years from the Coalition’s plan to cut company taxes….
The government policy starts by cutting the company tax rate to 27.5 per cent to all companies with a turnover of up to $10 million, taking effect from July….
will be extended to bigger companies year by year, followed by several years of cutting the overall rate to 25 per cent for all companies.


Anyone who signs up for welfare from September 20 will get less than those already on it, creating a two-tiered payments system…..
The government is removing an "energy supplement" 
Newstart Allowance payments have steadily decreased in relative terms over the past two decades to less than 40 per cent of the minimum wage……
The cut comes as national youth unemployment is nearly 13 per cent.

Centrelink, 7 May 2016:

Payment rates for Newstart Allowance…..
single, no children $527.60 [per fortnight]
[couple] $952.80 [per fortnight]


[Newstart non-indexed] Rates include Energy Supplement of $8.80 (single, no children), $7.90 (each member of a couple) and $9.50 (single with children or over 60 after 9 months) per fortnight.

ABC News, 14 January 2016:

The typical Sydney unit rent was $500 a week, while a house was $530 in December 2015.

14 May 2013 Suspension of MBS rebate indexation until 1 July 2014 to align indexation with financial year, announced in 2013-2014 Federal Budget.
13 May 2014 Indexation freeze for specialists, allied health professionals, nurse practitioners, midwives and dental surgeons MBS and DVA rebates until 30 June 2016, announced in 2014-2015 budget.
1 July 2015 Rebate indexation freeze commences…..
The Federal Government is reducing its investment in your healthcare by freezing your Medicare rebates. This means your Medicare rebates will remain the same until 1 July 2018, despite the cost of services increasing. The freeze is a co-payment by stealth and the Government has implemented this measure to reduce the amount it spends on all Medicare subsidised services, including general practice services. ….
Practices where a large proportion or all services are bulk billed will be significantly affected. The rebate freeze will have a detrimental impact on the viability of the practice. These practices may need to consider introducing or increasing out-of-pocket expenses to ensure the sustainability of the practice.
Individual GPs employed by a practice may be asked by their practice to pay a larger service fee to cover increasing practice costs.
Patients will experience a reduction in the value of their MBS patient rebate over time. 
The impacts will be magnified for GPs and practices providing patient services in lower socio-economic areas, where a majority of patients are from vulnerable groups (such as pensioners, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and people on very low incomes.). Many people in these areas cannot afford to meet out-of-pocket costs for care.

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

Clarence Valley Council is not above mindless arboreal vandalism


There are so many noxious weed-classified camphor laurel trees dotted over the Clarence Valley floodplain between Grafton and the sea that local government has studiously ignored the problem of their systematic removal for many decades.

Yet for some reason this particular set of councillors are fixated on four 100 year-old camphor laurels that provide the only real green shade for residents and tourists alike in the main street of the small town of Maclean.

The reason why the multitude of camphor trees in paddocks and along waterways are ignored has always been a puzzle, however these councillors see no inconsistency in their apparent indifference to one group of trees and their zealous dislike of another.

The Sydney Morning Herald, 6 May 2016, p. 17:

We, in our small town of Maclean, have been fighting for years to keep the four, century-old, iconic camphor laurels that line our main street, in our only riverside park, and are about to lose the battle. Yes, we know they are "weeds". The council has ignored all pleas, including a petition signed by 1500 people, and are using the weeds argument to implement its plans. If these were the last four in NSW and Queensland, I would, as an environmentalist, fell them myself. But these beautiful, huge, living things are much loved by our community and have been for decades. Maclean's soul is at risk too.

Nicki Holmes
Maclean

Australian Federal Election 2016: slugging the taxpayer for your wine bill


One of the perks of being Prime Minister of Australia is that liquor flows freely courtesy of the taxpayer’s pocket.

Tony Abbott seems to have done himself proud if the redacted wine bills (all 13 pages of them) covering less than two months between February and April 2015 are any indication:

Monday, 9 May 2016

For those who want to know the frontrunners and timetable for this excrutiatingly long federal election campaign



Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has today visited the Governor-General, who agreed to a request for a double dissolution for the House and the whole Senate to be held on on July 2 2016.


The date of 2 July has been adopted to avoid Senate terms being back dated to 2015, and ensures the newly elected government gets close to a full three year term. 

This timing means that a longer than normal campaign will be held. To achieve this, the government has chosen to wait a week after the dissolution before issuing writs, and has allowed an extra week between the close of the electoral rolls and the close of nominations.

The timetable for the election is –

9 May - both houses of parliament dissolved
16 May - election writs issued
23 May - close of electoral rolls
9 June - close of nominations with ballot paper details issued 10 June and early voting should begin 14 June
2 July - polling day
8 August - date set for return of writs

THE NATIONALS SAY THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM ELECTORS


Some weeks ago people in the Northern Rivers – and presumably other parts of the country – received an email from Fiona Nash, the Nationals’ Deputy Leader.  Ms Nash stated that she was committed to giving regional Australians a proper voice at the top table and wanted help in representing us.

She continued with:  “The new Deputy Prime Minister, Barnaby Joyce and I are renewing our commitment to people in small towns, on family farms and small communities. Those on our pristine coast, and deep in the bush. We will fight every day for the hospitals, roads and essential services regional people deserve. Our party, uniquely, has never forgotten who we represent – and who we work for. This is your chance to tell us what YOU think we should be prioritising in 2016.”

The person who told me about the email was rather bemused that she had received such a communication from the Nationals.  However, she decided that, since she had emailed the local federal MP about an issue some time ago, that must have been how her email address was obtained.

A MESSAGE TO FIONA NASH  - SOME VIEWS ON THREE OF THE ISSUES THE NATIONALS SHOULD PRIORITISE

EDUCATION

Gonski should be fully funded until 2020. The Gonski education reforms which provide needs-based funding are about fairness and equal opportunity in education – of vital importance to our national future – particularly a future in which we have been told innovation will be important.

Needs-based resourcing for education is extremely important in rural areas which often suffer from socio-economic disadvantage. 

Before the 2013 election there was a bipartisan commitment to full Gonski  funding – something the Government has since reneged on.  This is one of a number of promises broken by the Coalition following that election.

Some time ago the Prime Minister suggested public schools funding could become the sole responsibility of the states.  This justifiably angered many community members who support public schools and believe they perform a vital role in our society. The Commonwealth must continue to share responsibility for public school funding.

HEALTH

There is considerable room for improvement in dealing with health issues in regional areas.  For example hospitals are often poorly equipped and funded; mental health services are lacking in many areas; and specialist services are minimal except in the larger regional centres.  It is often difficult to attract and keep GPs in rural areas – let alone specialists.

The Medical Research and Rural Health Garvan Report 2015 pointed out that people living in rural and remote areas  make up 30% of the population but do not receive anywhere near 30% of health funding.

A recent article in The Daily Examiner, the Clarence Valley’s daily newspaper, discussed  the major health issues in the Clarence and the fact that local residents are disadvantaged in relation to preventative health care as well as in obtaining medical assistance for health emergencies. (Saturday April 30th)

CLIMATE CHANGE

Climate change is a major and urgent issue which has been woefully neglected by the Coalition Government.  It’s not surprising that the Nationals have been dragging their heels when Deputy Leader Fiona Nash claims the science isn’t settled – and she obviously isn’t the only climate sceptic in the party. 

Despite these views, the Nationals need to realize that an increasing number of Australians – including those in regional areas – are very concerned about climate change and the impact it is already having in Australia and elsewhere.  And that number is going to rise.  There will be an increasing demand from the electorate for effective measures to limit carbon emissions and to transition to renewable energy.  This transition has huge benefits for our economy and for jobs – benefits that the Government is recklessly ignoring.

Just how much do the Nationals know about the potential benefits that renewable energy can bring – and is already bringing – to rural areas?   Are the National aware of moves towards setting up community energy projects?  Are they aware of Enova, the new energy retailer being established in the Northern Rivers?  As well as knowing about these developments, they should be enthusiastically supporting them.  These are examples of important innovations and ones the Government as a whole should be supporting.

SO, FIONA  NASH,  RURAL  PEOPLE DESERVE  ACTION  ON  THESE  MATTERS.  ARE  YOU  AND  YOUR  COLLEAGUES  GOING  TO  FIGHT  FOR  THEM ?

Hildegard
Northern Rivers
6th May 2016

GuestSpeak is a feature of North Coast Voices allowing Northern Rivers residents to make satirical or serious comment on issues that concern them. Posts of 250-300 words or less can be submitted to ncvguestspeak AT gmail.com.au for consideration. Longer posts will be considered on topical subjects.


Australian Federal Election 2016: corporations behaving badly


Since the Turnbull Government announced it was returning some of the Abbott funding cuts to Australia's corporate watchdogs (by way of an increase in an existing levy on banks and other financial institutions) the mainstream media has started to move on from commenting on what appears to be endemic corruption in corporate Australia.

The exception to that observation is The Guardian who reported on The Australia Institute report and also compiled a banking scandal list.


A new report analysing findings from across several corporate regulatory bodies and related agencies finds widespread wrong-doing in the Australian private sector. 
Meanwhile the six major regulatory bodies and other agencies have seen 3,926 staff cut (or 14.9%) between the 2013-14 and 2015-16 budgets – meaning there are less cops on the corporate beat.
The research, commissioned by the ACTU, reviews figures from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Australian Tax Office (ATO), Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).


* The Australian Tax Office (ATO) annual reports were examined to determine the extent of tax evasion and avoidance. Overall the ATO figures and discussion suggest that in the ATO's normal course of business it recovers huge amounts from companies and other businesses that attempt to conceal their liability for taxation. In earlier years the ATO was prosecuting over 500 companies a year and still prosecutes 300 a year, the downward trend possibly reflecting the staffing reductions. It settles with many more and as a result recovers some $3.5 billion in tax from companies attempting to hide their profits. Companies also try to underpay the GST and other indirect taxes as well as PAYG on behalf of their employees; those amounted to $6.3 billion in the latest year for which there is complete data. One of their compliance programs, the taxable payments reporting system' specifically targets building and construction firms and has recovered $2.3 billion for the year 2012-13 alone. Similar successes have been recorded in relation to the other specific target groups such as the international profit shifting program.

* On Tuesday the 5th of April 2016 The Australian Financial Review published nine stories on wrong-doing or alleged wrong-doing on the part of the Australian corporate sector:

1. Banks considering legal action against the board of Arrium (a listed company) for drawing down a loan while simultaneously seeking to negotiate offloading debt at a large discount (page 1 and 11),

2. Panama leaks suggest BHP's many British Virgin Island companies established to create profits appear on the British side of the company (p. 1),

3. WIN alleged Nine Entertainment broke its supply agreement with a streaming service (p. 2),

4. Ken Henry (NAB chair) supported calls for Australian companies to take more responsibility for misdeeds and ASIC wanting to make boards criminally responsible for bad conduct (p. 6),

5. BHP threatening to fire a law firm in Panama for wanting to undertake due diligence on BHP's operations.

6. Queensland Nickel likely to go into liquidation without making provision for workers' entitlements (p. 8),

7. ASIC to 'nail' a second among the big four banks following court proceedings against ANZ (p. 12),

8. Rate rigging probe to investigate other big four banks (p. 15), and

9. CBA facing senate inquiry into charges, inter alia, that it overlooked three whistle-blower claims, ANZ had been examined over links with corruption scandal in Malaysia (p. 15).

A casual check of the front page the previous day suggested this is not unusual, with the lead story of the ATO targeting 800 wealthy individuals using corporations and other structures in tax havens and involving 'suspected money laundering, arms and drug deals, and tax avoidance'. This of course referred to the suspect activities organised by the law firm Mossack Fonseca and largely operating out of Panama.1 Another page one story refers to the takeover of Asciano, which was supposed to involve three independent entities but suggests that common ownership will thwart that independence against the deal negotiated with the ACCC.

*The April 5 articles involved five of the top 10 listed companies in alleged wrong-doing in just one day of news, suggesting such malfeasance is rife among Australia's leading companies. That impression gave rise to this paper which attempts to provide some estimate of the magnitude of the problem. To that end the paper examines various data sources that give a more complete picture of corporate behaviour in Australia. In generating a database of misbehaviour it has to be appreciated that regulators are inclined to settle with corporate wrong-doers. The compliance pyramid used by many regulatory agencies is specifically designed to begin with activates such as education and negotiation and ending with legal proceedings. Usually the number of cases diminishes rapidly as the government agency moves up the compliance pyramid.

In generating a database of misbehaviour it has to be appreciated that regulators are inclined to settle with corporate wrong-doers. The compliance pyramid used by many regulatory agencies is specifically designed to begin with activates such as education and negotiation and ending with legal proceedings. Usually the number of cases diminishes rapidly as the government agency moves up the compliance pyramid.

* The Australia Institute has examined ACCC media releases over the last ten years (from 2006). A total of 92 matters covered by media releases were published relating to ACCC action against companies included in the top 50 listed corporations. On 29 occasions the ACCC took legal action and gained either a ruling in its favour or an out of court settlement. On the other 63 issues, the ACCC did not proceed with litigation, but made administrative proceedings, recommendations or expressed concern.

Of the 92 issues the ACCC took some action on, three companies were involved in 56 of them – the Woolworths, Wesfarmers (parent company of Coles) and telecommunications giant, Telstra.



* ASIC has the power to commence prosecutions, usually through the Director of Public Prosecutions. In the four and a half years to December 2015 it successfully concluded 3,115 cases against corporations. ASIC reports on enforcement activities every six months.19 These include only cases that have been successfully concluded. The areas of enforcement include market misconduct, corporate governance misconduct and financial services misconduct for both large and small businesses. The types of enforcement include criminal and civil proceedings, administrative remedies and enforceable undertakings and negotiated outcomes.

The Guardian, Timeline: banking scandals in Australia since 2009 (in reverse order), 29 April 2016:

Wednesday 6 April 2016
Former ANZ planner jailed for stealing almost $1m  - jailed for more than six years….for stealing almost $1m from an elderly client to feed a gambling debt. ANZ promised to reimburse the victim…..

Tuesday 5 April 2016
Westpac subsidiary paid penalties of $493,000 after breaching consumer protections - Asic found it breached important consumer protection provisions relating to the repossession of motor vehicles, including failing to provide customers with default notices prior to commencing enforcement proceedings to repossess mortgaged vehicles; and failing to provide customers with legally required information setting out their rights within the required time frame after it repossessed mortgaged vehicles.

Tuesday 5 April 2016
Asic sued Westpac over alleged market manipulation in setting bank bill swap rate - Asic started legal proceedings in the federal court in Melbourne against Westpac for unconscionable conduct and market manipulation in relation to Westpac's involvement in setting the bank bill swap reference rate in the period 6 April 2010 and 6 June 2012. It is alleged that Westpac traded in a manner intended to create an artificial price for bank bills on 16 occasions during the period of 6 April 2010 and 6 June 2012….

Monday 4 April 2016
ANZ announces it reported three breaches of dispute resolution requirements - ANZ told a parliamentary inquiry that for 2014-15, it had reported three breaches of the internal dispute resolution requirements under the code of banking practice to the code compliance monitoring committee and six in 2013-14. Two breaches for 2014-15 were self-identified and one was raised with ANZ by the committee.

Wednesday 30 March 2016
ANZ announced it would refund $5m - …..to 25,000 customers after it failed to properly apply some fee reductions and fee waivers for certain customers….

Thursday 17 March 2016
Asic imposed conditions on Macquarie financial services license - Asic imposed additional conditions on Macquarie Bank Limited's Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence for breaches relating to the handling of client money between March 2004 and 2014. The breaches raised issues including failing to deposit monies into a designated client trust account; and making withdrawals that were not permitted from such an account….

Tuesday 15 March2016
ANZ gives $4.5m compensation for breaches - ANZ confirmed engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers in January 2016 to conduct an independent compliance review within its OnePath subsidiaries, following compliance breaches that were proactively reported to Asic from early 2013. Since February 2013, ANZ has compensated about $4.5m to around 1.3 million OnePath customers for breaches including not following up on some unbanked cheques and for superannuation contributions not being allocated to the customer's correct account.

Read the rest of the seven year timeline here.

The Australian, December 2015:

NAB boss Andrew Thorburn earned $5.5 million for his first full year in the banking giant's top job.
Mr Thorburn's remuneration package for the year to September 30 was largely made up of $2.3m in cash and more than $3m in cash and share-based bonuses.
During 2013-14 he earned $2.2m as the head of NAB's Bank of New Zealand subsidiary before taking on NAB's top job on August 1 last year.
His pay packet was dwarfed by his contemporaries at ANZ and the Commonwealth Bank.
ANZ boss Mike Smith received total remuneration worth $10.8m, including a $3.3m cash salary, while Commonwealth Bank chief executive Ian Narev's pay fell to just under $8m.
Gail Kelly collected nearly $12m before she left the chief executive's chair at Westpac in February.


On 4 June 2015 the House of Representatives referred an inquiry into the impairment of customer loans to the committee for inquiry and report by 31 March 2016.
On 4 June 2015 the committee resolved that:
* in conducting the inquiry the committee will not investigate or seek to resolve disputes between customers and banks; and
* where the experiences of customers may inform the committee about the practices of banks, the committee welcomes submissions that explicitly address the terms of reference.
On 22 July 2015 the committee extended the closing date for submissions to 21 August 2015.
On 2 March 2016, the House of Representatives granted the committee an extension of time to report until 20 May 2016.
On 15 April 2016, the inquiry lapsed due to the prorogation of the House of Representatives.
On 19 April 2016, the committee resolved to re-adopt the inquiry using the same terms of reference as the original inquiry referred by the House of Representatives on 4 June 2015 but with a reporting date to be determined by the committee.
This still sitting inquiry has held 8 public hearings to date and received 195 submissions.
Here are excerpts from one submission concerning a home build in a suburb with a median house price of over $1.5 million:
* BankWest insisted that the mortgage was only available to us as a Commercial Loan Facility due to the size of the build. We were told this was appropriate even for a private residence.
 * BankWest was so inefficient with their drawdown to pay the builder and quantity surveying checks, that months of building time were lost. It could take up to 4 weeks to get an approved drawdown. Building stopped during this period......
* At this point no loans were in arrears
* BankWest stopped all contact.
* BankWest increased interest rates to a default 18.5%.....
* ......were offered $11.5m by a third party for the house so long as it was completed.
* BankWest refused the offer.
* BankWest refused to complete the house
* BankWest charges kept accruing.
* BankWest denied all contact with us for nearly 12 months whilst charges kept accruing.
* BankWest appointed receivers.
* Receivers charged huge fees
* BankWest devalued the property extremely low
* .....were denied any right to see valuation.
* ..... were denied any right to see monies being spent.
* .....were denied any right to see any administration costs.
* BankWest then completed the build of the property.as per our request 12 months earlier.
* The completion cost of the build was blown out with huge administration charges and interest.
* BankWest then sold a potential $10m property undervalued with only a 3 week sales campaign.
* Coincidently the only bidder at the auction was a senior executive from NAB whose opening bid was the approximate amount of the mortgage.
* The receiver’s then set a seller opening bid of $7,225,000 and instructed the auctioneer to announce that anyone who paid $1.00 more for this property would purchase the property today.
* BankWest Lawyers were threatening and acted unconscionably. I have to state in my life I have never felt so threatened and shaken by a conversation.
* BankWest demanded we pay an an extra $500K in extra charges.
* At this point I contacted the Banking Ombudsman.
* Within 48 hours of the Ombudsman contacting BankWest they immediately dropped the extra $500,000 of extra charges. Why?
* BankWest demanded that I signed a confidentiality agreement about this process.
* BankWest demanded that I signed an agreement agreeing never to take legal action against them.
* No documents relating to the sale or process were ever provided. [my red bolding]

Sunday, 8 May 2016

Federal Election 2016: Malcolm Bligh Turnbull and housing affordability


On 4 May 2016 this on-air exchange occurred between ABC 774 Radio presenter Jon Faine and Prime Minister Malcolm Bligh Turnbull:

JON FAINE" Yeh but my question was specifically about the intergenerational aspects of it. It’s  [negative gearing] creating conflict with effectively the kids of your and my generation, who can't get into the market and they're saying oh for goodness sake you baby boomers, you just want everything and you're locking us out.”

MALCOLM TURNBULL"Are your kids locked out of the housing market?"

JON FAINE"Yes"

MALCOLM TRUNBULL"Well you should shell out for them, you should support them, a wealthy man like you"

JON FAINE"That's what they say" [laughing]

MALCOLM TURNBULL"Exactly. There you go. See you've got the solution in your own hands”

JON FAINE: “That’s hardly national policy”

MALCOLM TURNBULLYou can provide a bit of inter-generational equity in the Faine family"

There is a reason why Turnbull can be so casually dismissive of concerns about home ownership and housing affordability and, it can be found in his privileged background.


Title records show that Mr Turnbull was a law student at Sydney University when he spent $17,000 on a worker’s semi on Newtown’s Wells Street. At the time he was far from a struggling student kicking around the backstreets of the inner west. He was already a Point Piper resident, with corporate records showing he lived in the Longworth Avenue apartment owned by his late father, hotel broker Bruce Turnbull.
That Newtown investment property was likely Mr Turnbull’s first windfall from the Sydney property market. He sold it in 1981 for $68,000, quadrupling in value over the three years.
The year after his Newtown purchase title records show the Rhodes scholar (or “student” according to the property transfer) bought a terrace on Redfern’s Great
Long before Malcolm Turnbull ascended to the highest political office in the country and took the keys to his official Sydney residence Kirribilli House, he had already amassed a fortune – much of it from Sydney’s property market.
The 29th prime minister has come a long way from his 1978 first-home purchase in Newtown, to his $50 million-plus trophy waterfront home in Point Piper.

Privately educated Malcolm Turnbull was 23 or 24 years old, son of a successful property speculator and a recent university graduate, when he purchased his first property in 1978.

By the end of 1982 this now married practicing lawyer was a member of the Liberal Party, had inherited an est. $2 million in assets, become a grazier and acquired a second investment property – all the while residing in a Point Piper flat owned by his father.

Five years later he was an investment banker at Whitlam Turnbull & Co. Ltd.

By the time he entered parliament as the Member for Wentworth in 2004 he was reputedly worth $133 million.

Turnbull’s fortune continues to grow.

This is a man who has never known Struggle Street.