Wednesday 16 April 2008

An American look at global food shortages. Just how vulnerable are First World countries?

How Far is the US From Food Shortages and Food Riots?
by Monica Davis ( davis4000_2000 [at] yahoo.com )
Saturday Apr 12th, 2008 2:37 PM
 
Even the United States is not immune from the potential for food shortages, food riots and food insecurity. We're just blind to the possibility.
As Americans complain over high gasoline and food prices, many third world countries are experiencing food riots over price and scarcity of food. In some parts of the word rice is so expensive that it is transported in heavily guarded convoys and farmers guard their fields from thieves.---

Experts say the high prices will continue for years, putting billions of people at risk for malnutrition or starvation. World leaders continue to cast fearful eyes at the burgeoning bio-fuels industry, noting that the competition generated by the industrial biofuels industry and food agriculture is pushing up food prices and making it more profitable to grow fuel crops for industrialized countries than it is for big farmers in Third World countries to grow food for their own citizens.---
 
So far, Americans are mostly bystanders in the game, content to grumble at the gas pump and complain in the grocery aisles. As a "First World" nation, the United States so far has not been subject to the food riots, which we have seen in Haiti and other parts of the world. Americans have more per capita income than much of the world; hence the crisis of the Third World, so far, is inconvenience in the "First World" and in developed nations such as the United States.

That said, however, we must understand that this situation is not sustainable. While Americans do have more disposable income than the rest of the word, that income is not unlimited and our food supply is much more vulnerable than we think. When it comes to food security, both in terms of supply and accessibility, this country is much more vulnerable than we think.

As one retired grain salesman noted, most of the nation's grain is moved around the country by just TWO railroads. Little is stored in the event of disaster and the whole system is extremely vulnerable. While we in the United States look at the food riots in other countries with a sense of disbelief, we are not immune. Under the right circumstances, we could be in the same boat. (Ibid)

In order for riots to break out the whole food supply doesn't have to be wiped out. It just has to be threatened sufficiently. When people realize their vulnerability and the fact that there is no short-term solution to a severe enough drought in the Midwest they will have no clue as to what they should do. Other nations can't make up the difference because no other nation has a surplus of grain in good times let alone in times when they are having droughts and floods also. (Robert Felix, "US Food Riots Much Closer than You Think")

Critics say the US is currently too preoccupied with foreign excursions and oil to pay attention to food security, particularly how concentration of suppliers and processors threaten the food chain. The highly concentrated meat processing industry has generated millions of pounds of recalls this year. Outbreaks in e.coli and other food borne pathogens continue to haunt the headlines, as food prices rise around the world.

 
Complete article here.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

What nonsense. Here's how the US could solve any burgeoning grain shortage in a stroke:

"If all the grain currently fed to livestock in the United States were consumed directly by people, the number of people who could be fed would be nearly 800 million," David Pimentel, professor of ecology in Cornell University's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, reported at the July 24-26 [2007] meeting of the Canadian Society of Animal Science in Montreal.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/08/970812003512.htm

The real numbers might have shifted in ten years, but there is no genuine food security problem for the US. McDonalds might go out of business though. Now that indeed might cause a riot.

rotsamuck said...

The problem with most people is they can not envision the possibility of a "First World" nation having food distribution/availability problems, but that is where we are headed--and it is all an artificial construct. The farmers are moving from one crop to another because it is more profitable; supply and demand is increasing corn and wheat prices because of what is being planted and for what markets.

Yes, the nation COULDj solve the grain and corn problem by shifting feed procedures, downsizing mega-meat factories, err, livestock operations, but there hasn't been an incentive to do so.

Meat is a very inefficient way of generating calories for humans--particularly when the food animals are raised under inhumane factory conditions replete with antibiotics, growth hormones and recombinant frankenstein genetic technology. But, the nation's public policy mechanism/government is in hock to mega-corporations which control pharmaceutical-agricultural--chemical behemoths and they manipulate ag policy to their own advantage.
The US as the breadbasket of the world is at the mercy of agro-chemical-pharma combines which manipulate crop chemicals, commodity and meat prices. It is not that the US can not be the bread basket of the world; it is that the agricultural market, vertical markets are so integrated that the industry is now in the position to manipulate supply, price, quanity and availbility across several industries and products. Monica Davis