Showing posts with label access & equity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label access & equity. Show all posts
Tuesday 1 October 2019
Indue Cashless Debit Card: shame, Prime Minister Scott Morrison, shame on you!
"I woke up this morning and went to pay my rent - only to have it fail to transfer....The Cashless Debit Card is NOT WORKING."
https://youtu.be/AqopUAyf9Ww
Tuesday 13 August 2019
An as yet unconfirmed rumour about the Indue Cashless Welfare Card
Indue Limited (ABN 97 087 822 464) is a bank and Authorised Deposit-Taking Institution (“ADI”) that is regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Indue is owned by financial institutions, each of which is also an ADI. Indue provides transaction processing and settlement services to credit unions, building societies, church funds, mortgage originators, commercial clients and the Australian government.
via @CartwheelPrint |
Facebook, The Say NO Seven, 9 August 2019:
🐦⚠⚠⚠⚠⚠ #LNP_CASHLESS_CARD_AGENDA
Whistle blower testimony sent to the SNS has confirmed the LNP agenda for Indue Cards.
As long time members are aware, the SNS operates an encrypted mail service and drop box specifically for those people within the system to speak out in relative safety.
A rarely used resource, this week and we assume as a direct result of the the muzzling of certain sectors, we have received information from two independent sources attached to the department and public service that corroborate our concerns.
The LNP Agenda is clear. They are "confidant" that regardless of whether ALP support/do not support further expansions, that with Cross Bench support, they will reach this target prior to the next Federal election.
We do not send this notice to generate groundless fear. We send it to inform you and to inform those within our government who feel themselves above the law and the will of the people, that we *will* and will continue to resist.
We have deliberated deeply about presenting this information, which should come as no real surprise to those are literate in card matters and current political machinations.
We concluded it was necessary to post, despite being unable to provide documentation to you at this time, as has been our standard thus far and will continue to be. The risks are simply too great to not speak out now, while we still can, and are as great as the risks whistle blowers face if we provide any further detail.
We can confirm the sources are credible, reliable, are informed, and have been vetted.
⚠ We must reiterate that AT THIS TIME there are NO Bills before parliament that would permit ANY further roll out in ANY location nor are there any current Bills before parliament to expand payment captures to include aged pension aka under the Act as Mature Aged Payment.
We must continue to remain steadfast and take one step at a time, and take each presentation to parliament as it comes.
Information sharing over several weeks along with these new posts has confirmed that four Bills concerning or including cashless cards are in progress and that these Bills may arrive as a single Omnibus Bill. We are informed that the writing of these Bills has been outsourced to partisan legal interests.
Even so, as we said, we must remain steadfast and take each presentation to parliament as it comes and not allow fear to dictate or determine *our* outcomes decisions or directions.
We send this to you for 'the grace of time' - for your emotional and mental preparation and for wider general awareness of what we are likely to be facing over the next three years.
We will post over the next week on just what this agenda, if successful, could mean for Australians and our nation and economy; on the utilization and role of religious groups as relates to LNP's social welfare policy as a whole; and we will also speak on issues of effective resistance.
Now we know. Time to wake the masses.
Heads up..eyes open..no fear. ✊
- SNS🌿
Monday 3 June 2019
Clarence Valley Council to do away with dedicated council meeting chamber in Maclean?
OPTION 3, ground floor:
Green: civic hall; blue: library; purple: front/desk lobby; orange: CVC
administration (10 staff, 30 on new level); white: innovation hub; grey: core
(lifts and shared amenities). Image: CVC from Clarence Valley Independent, 10 April 2019
|
Clarence Valley Council, media release, 28 May 2019:
Your
views sought on Maclean community hub
LOWER
Clarence residents are being offered the opportunity to shape what the future
of community facilities in Maclean might look like.
Currently
facilities like the library, council offices, the civic hall and community
services are spread across the town, but the Clarence Valley Council is now
investigating bringing those together while making improvements to the civic
hall.
Mayor,
Jim Simmons, said the whole of the Lower Clarence was growing and community
infrastructure needed to grow to keep pace with it.
“Maclean
is the geographical centre of the Lower Clarence, so it makes sense to have a
central hub for many community assets,” he said.
“At
the moment we are just investigating, but we would like the community to be
involved and to give us their input.
“Council
staff has put together a web page (https://www.clarenceconversations.com.au/maclean-community-precinct)
where
people can have a look at a range of concept plans and offer their views.
“The
more people who put their thinking caps on and offer suggestions the more
likely we are to come up with something fantastic.”
Cr
Simmons said once a final concept was decided, council would seek funding to
take the project to the next step.
Consultation
is open until June 30.
Release ends
Clarence
Valley Independent, 10 April 2019:
The consultant has
estimated costs for each of the three options, any of which, when adopted, will
result in the hub being contained within the boundaries of the current CVC
chambers and the civic hall.
Councillors were advised
that the plan “addresses the current and future usage of council buildings” and
that the completed concept would “function as a community hub, where people
gather for a range of community activities, programs, services and events”.
OPTION 1: cost
$12,963,000 or $4,883 per m2; Modification to the existing civic hall;
Demolition of existing offices on site; and, Refurbishment of existing CVC
administration building with a library, reducing the size of administration to
leave enough space for 40 CVC staff.
OPTION 2: cost $15,945,000
or $4,053 per m2; Modification to the existing civic hall; Demolition of
existing offices on site; Refurbishment of existing CVC administration
building; and, New build library with car parking under.
OPTION 3: cost
$23,739,000 or $5,162 per m2; Modification to the existing civic hall;
Demolition of existing offices on site; and, Refurbishment of existing
administration building, including a new level and roof, with a library and
event spaces – this option the concept plan states, will provide an “expanded
innovation hub, compared to other options”.
Options 1 and 3 include
“new green space for public events, with buildings activating off the new
area”; and, “accessibility upgrades to improve the new library fit-out, [which]
will also add accessibility to the administration area”.
The report to council
stated: “The Concepts presented are for the purpose of seeking grant funding.
“Prior to any works
taking place, further community engagement and situational review (facility
usage, sustainability, community need, etc.) would be required to inform final
design decisions.
“…The current asset
management requires the upkeep of 3 properties and 4 facilities.
“The finalised proposal
would reduce this to 2 properties and 2 facilities.”
Wednesday 29 August 2018
“Shit Life Syndrome” is sending Britons and Americans to an early grave…..
With Scott Morrison as the new prime minister, the Abbott-Turnbull era persistent attacks on the social fabric of the nation are bound to continue. Thus ensuring that Australians follow down the same path as Britain and America?
The
Guardian, 18
August 2018:
Britain
and America are in the midst of a barely reported public health crisis. They
are experiencing not merely a slowdown
in life expectancy, which in many other rich countries is continuing
to lengthen, but the start of an alarming increase in death rates across
all our populations, men and women alike. We are needlessly allowing our people
to die early.
In
Britain, life expectancy, which increased steadily for a century, slowed
dramatically between 2010 and 2016. The rate of increase dropped by 90% for
women and 76% for men, to 82.8 years and 79.1 years respectively. Now, death
rates among older people have so much increased over the last two years – with
expectations that this will continue – that two major insurance companies,
Aviva and Legal
and General, are releasing hundreds of millions of pounds they had been
holding as reserves to pay annuities to pay to shareholders instead. Society,
once again, affecting the citadels of high finance.
Trends
in the US are more serious and foretell what is likely to happen in Britain
without an urgent change in course. Death rates of people in
midlife (between 25 and 64) are increasing across the racial and ethnic
divide. It has long been known that the mortality rates of midlife American
black and Hispanic people have been worse than the non-Hispanic white
population, but last week the British Medical Journal
published an important study re-examining
the trends for all racial groups between 1999 and 2016.
The
malaises that have plagued the black population are extending to the
non-Hispanic, midlife white population. As the report states: “All cause
mortality increased… among non-Hispanic whites.” Why? “Drug overdoses were the
leading cause of increased mortality in midlife, but mortality also increased
for alcohol-related conditions, suicides and organ diseases involving multiple
body systems” (notably liver, heart diseases and cancers).
US
doctors coined a phrase for this condition: “shit-life syndrome”. Poor
working-age Americans of all races are locked in a cycle of poverty and
neglect, amid wider affluence. They are ill educated and ill trained. The jobs
available are drudge work paying the minimum wage, with minimal or no job
security. They are trapped in poor neighbourhoods where the prospect of owning
a home is a distant dream. There is little social housing, scant income support
and contingent access to healthcare.
Finding meaning in life is close to
impossible; the struggle to survive commands all intellectual and emotional
resources. Yet turn on the TV or visit a middle-class shopping mall and a very
different and unattainable world presents itself. Knowing that you are
valueless, you resort to drugs, antidepressants and booze. You eat junk food
and watch your ill-treated body balloon. It is not just poverty, but growing
relative poverty in an era of rising inequality, with all its psychological
side-effects,
that is the killer.
Shit-life
syndrome captures the truth that the bald medical statistics have economic and
social roots. Patients so depressed they are prescribed or seek opioids – or
resort to alcohol – are suffering not so much from their demons but from the
circumstances of their lives. They have a lot to be depressed about. They, and
tens of millions like them teetering on the edge of the same condition,
constitute Donald Trump’s electoral base, easily tempted by rhetoric that pins
the blame on dark foreigners, while castigating countries such as Finland or
Denmark, where the trends are so much better, as communist. In Britain, they
were heavily represented among the swing voters who delivered Brexit.
Read the full
article here.
NOTE: The last time the United States saw a prolonged life expectancy decrease due to natural causes was during the Spanish Influenza pandemic of 1917-1919 when life expectancy fell by twelve years.
Labels:
access & equity,
economics,
health,
inequality,
life expectancy,
society
Sunday 5 August 2018
An ethics question for corporations large and small
Labels:
access & equity,
greed,
society,
Wealth
Tuesday 22 May 2018
AUSTRALIA 2018: Turnbull Government continues to hammer the vulnerable
Remember when reading this that the Turnbull Government is still intending to proceed with its planned further corporate tax cuts reportedly worth an est. $65 billion. Compare this policy with the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funding in Budget 2018-19 which is $43 billion over four years and no dedicated NDIS funding stream established as had been previously promised.
JOINT STATEMENT ON THE
NDIA’S SPECIALIST DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION PROVIDER AND INVESTOR BRIEF
The National Disability
Insurance Agency (NDIA) presented its latest policy position for Specialist
Disability Accommodation (SDA) in a statement to the provider and investor
market on 24 April.
People with disabilities
and developers of innovative housing for people with disabilities are pleased
the NDIA has reiterated the government’s commitment to SDA in its SDA Provider
and Investor Brief. The NDIA has confirmed that the SDA funding model is here
to stay.
However, the NDIA’s SDA
Brief expresses a vision for SDA housing with a clear bias toward shared models
of housing for people with disability, presumably to reduce support costs. This
is unacceptable. You can read our joint statement here (A Rich text format is available here).
The
Australian,
16 May 2018:
The executives of the
flagship National Disability Insurance Scheme, which received guaranteed
funding worth tens of billions of dollars in last week’s budget, have launched
a crackdown on support funding to keep a lid on ballooning costs.
The razor is being taken
to hundreds, possibly thousands, of annual support plans as they come up for
review, demonstrating a new hawkish approach from National Disability
Insurance Agency bosses but resulting in the loss of funding and support for
vulnerable families. In many cases, support packages for families have been cut
by half.
The early years of the
$22 billion program’s rollout saw wild variability in the value and type of
support being granted to participants, forcing executives to come up with a way
to claw back funding that has “an impact on sustainability”. In the process,
people with disabilities and their families have been shocked by sudden
reversals of fortune….
In its quarterly report,
the NDIA noted there was a “mismatch” between reference packages — rough
cookie-cutter guides for how much packages ought to be in normal circumstances
— and the value of annual support packages which affected the financial
sustainability of the scheme.
“The management’s
response to this is to closely ensure that significant variations away from
reference amounts (above and below) are closely monitored and justified,” a
spokesman said.
“Reference packages are
not used as a tool to reduce package amounts to below what is reasonable and
necessary. Individual circumstances are considered in determining budgets,
including goals and aspirations.
“A reference package
does not restrict the amount or range of support provided to a participant, but
acts as a starting point for planners to use for similar cohorts. It provides
amounts that are suitable for a given level of support needs that has been
adjusted for individual circumstances.”
The agency has claimed
the implementation of this process has started to reduce funding blowouts and a
hearing into the scheme by federal parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on the
NDIS last Friday heard startling evidence about how widespread the new approach
is.
Donna Law, whose
21-year-old son has severe disabilities, was told by an NDIS planner: “Donna,
watch out because your son’s next plan is going to be cut by about half.”
Clare Steve had funding
cut in half by the NDIA and wanted to do another review.
“I spoke to multiple
people, because no one would actually give me the paperwork to do the next lot
of reviewing,” Ms Steve told the hearing.
“I was told by multiple
people that it was a mistake: ‘Do not go for another review.
“If you go for another
review, you could get your funding cut again’.”
ABC News, 19 May 2018:
ABC News, 19 May 2018:
Bureaucrats are reportedly working on a strategy to curb costs by tightening up the eligibility requirements after a blowout in the number families seeking NDIS support packages for people with autism.
ABC
News, 19 May
2018:
Last December, Sam's
case was one of about 14,000 sitting in the NDIS's review backlog, according to a damning
ombudsman's report this week. Then, about 140,000 participants were in
the scheme.
The review queue has
since shrunk, but the agency in charge of the world-first scheme — a
Commonwealth department known as the National Disability Insurance Agency
(NDIA) — still receives about 640 review requests each week.
Some of those requests
do not reflect badly on the NDIA. People can request an unscheduled review if
their circumstances change, for example if their condition improves.
But the agency often is
culpable when it comes to another type of review, known as an internal review.
People ask for these when they disagree with the plan and funding package they
are given.
Some reviews come from
people who feel short-changed, given the state government support they
previously received, or because of the high expectations associated with the
scheme.
But the Government is
also to blame. The NDIS's full-scheme launch in mid-2016 was a disaster.
The computer system failed. A backlog of NDIS applications quickly emerged.
Plans were then often
completed over the phone and rushed. Key staff lacked training and experience.
There was little consistency in the decisions being made.
The scheme's IT system
remains hopeless, and elements of its bureaucracy are not much better,
according to the watchdog's report.
The agency accepted all
20 of the ombudsman's recommendations, and Social Services Minister Dan Tehan
said work was underway to bust the backlog "over coming months".
* In February 2018, the
NDIA advised around 8,100 reviews remained in the backlog and the national
backlog team was clearing around 200 reviews each week. The NDIA also advised
it continues to receive around 620 new review requests each week, which are
handled by regional review staff.
* We have received
complaints about the NDIA’s handling of participant-initiated requests for
review. In particular, these complaints concern the NDIA: (1) not acknowledging
requests for review; (2) not responding to enquiries about the status of a
request; or (3) actioning requests for an internal review as requests for a
plan review.
*Participants also
complained they had sought updates on the receipt and/or progress of their
requests by calling the Contact Centre and by telephoning or emailing local
staff. They reported not receiving a response, leaving messages that were not
returned and being told someone would contact them—but no one did.
* In our view, the
absence of clear guidance to staff about the need to acknowledge receipt of
review requests is concerning. Indeed, the large number of complaints to our Office
where complainants are unclear about the status of their review indicates the
lack of a standardised approach to acknowledgements is driving additional,
unnecessary contact with both the NDIA and our Office.
* Our Office monitors
and reports on complaint themes each quarter. Review delays was the top
complaint issue for all four quarters in 2017.
* Some participants have
told us they have been waiting for up to eight or nine months for a decision on
their review request, without any update on its progress or explanation of the
time taken.
In some instances, the
participant’s existing plan has expired before the NDIA has made a decision on
their request for review. As review decisions can only be made prospectively,
it can mean a participant must go through the whole process for the new
(routinely reviewed) plan if they remain unhappy.
Wednesday 18 April 2018
Australian Minister for Communications and longstanding member of the far-right pressure group the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) is up in arms because Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman tells some home truths
On Tuesday 17 April the Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman (TIO) sent out the media
release in this post.
That same day the Australian Minister for
Communications and longstanding member of the far-right pressure group the Institute
of Public Affairs (IPA), Liberal Senator
for Victoria Mitch Fifield, came out fighting after the TIO report showed: complaints
about services delivered over the NBN surged by 204% in the second half of
2017, compared with the same period a year earlier…. Fifield said the way the
information regarding the 22,827 complaints about services delivered over the
NBN was presented in the TIO report, released Tuesday, “could give the
impression that responsibility for this figure rests with NBN Co”.
It looks suspiciously like the Minister is now approaching a scheduled review of telecommunications consumer protections and the complaints process with a view to quash an inconvenient truth – that transfers to the version of the National
Broadband Network (NBN) cobbled together by Tony Abbott and MalcolmTurnbull are a dismal failure for far too many Australian businesses and households.
Telecommunication
Industry Ombudsman (TIO), media
release, 17 April 2018:
Report highlights
increase in complaints about landline, mobile and internet services
Australian residential
consumers and small businesses made 84,914 complaints to the Telecommunications
Industry Ombudsman in the last six months of 2017 (1 July 2017 to 31 December
2017). In this period, complaints about landline, mobile and internet services,
increased by 28.7 per cent compared to the same six month period in 2016.
Publishing the
Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman’s Six Monthly Update today (Tuesday 17
April, 2018), Ombudsman Judi Jones said “The telecommunications industry in
Australia continues to experience significant change. An increasing range of
products and services are being offered to consumers, expectations for the
quality of phone and internet services are high, and the rollout of the
National Broadband Network is changing the way we use telecommunications
services.
“However, consumers
still seem to be facing the same problems, particularly with their bills and
the customer service they receive. Confidence in services being updated or
transferred reliably, faulty equipment, and poor service quality were also
recorded as key issues. Additionally, the wider issues relating to phone or
internet problems such as debt management are concerning.”
Jones added, “Complaints
about services delivered over the National Broadband Network continued to
increase compared to the same six month period in 2016. This indicates the
consumer experience is still not meeting expectations for all. Recent changes
to regulation and an increase in our powers to resolve complaints are positive
steps that will help improve the consumer experience.”
Highlights for the
period 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2017 include:
* 84,914 total
complaints were received
* 74,729 complaints (88
per cent) were from residential consumers
* 9,947 complaints (11.7
per cent) were from small businesses
Landline, mobile,
internet, multiple services and property
Complaints for the
period increased 28.7 per cent compared to the same six month period in 2016.
* 9,447 complaints (11.1
per cent) were recorded about landline phone services
* 24,923 complaints
(29.4 per cent) were recorded about mobile phone services
* 23,785 complaints (28
per cent) were recorded about internet services
* 26,112 complaints
(30.8 per cent) were recorded about multiple services*
* 647 complaints (0.8
per cent) were recorded about property*
* Charges and fees,
unsatisfactory response from the provider (provider response), and poor service
quality were the most common issues.
Small Businesses
Between 1 July and 31
December 2017 complaints from small businesses increased 15.6 per cent to 9,947
compared to the same period in 2016.
* Complaints from Small
Businesses accounted for 11.7 per cent of total complaints for the period
* 2,178 complaints (21.9
per cent) were recorded about landline phone services
* 2,074 complaints (20.9
per cent) were recorded about mobile phone services
* 1,716 complaints (17.3
per cent) were recorded about internet services
* 3,937 complaints (39.6
per cent) were recorded about multiple services*
* 42 complaints (0.4 per
cent) were recorded about property
* The
main issues affecting small businesses were charges and fees, unsatisfactory
response from the provider (provider response), and no service.
Complaints by State
All states and territories
in Australia saw a growth in complaints in the last six months of 2017 compared
to the same period in 2016.
Queensland recorded the
highest growth in complaints, an increase of 39.3 per cent, followed by Western
Australia with 36.5 per cent.
Complaints by state (in
alphabetical order) are as follows:
* Australian Capital
Territory made 1,184 complaints, an increase of 11 per cent
* New South Wales made
26,914 complaints, an increase of 27.9 per cent
* Northern Territory
made 504 complaints, an increase of 20 per cent
* Queensland made 16,418
complaints, an increase of 39.3 per cent
* South Australia made
6,552 complaints, an increase of 22.7 per cent
* Tasmania made 1,614
complaints, an increase of 33.1 per cent
* Victoria made 23,954
complaints, an increase of 30.5 per cent
* Western Australia made
7,381 complaints, an increase of 36.5 per cent
* The main issues
affecting Australian states and territories were charges and fees,
unsatisfactory response from the provider (provider response), and poor service
quality
Services delivered over
the National Broadband Network
Complaints about
services delivered over the National Broadband Network increased 203.9 per cent
to 22,827 on the same period in 2016.
* 14,055 complaints were
recorded about service quality
* 8,757 complaints were
recorded about delays in establishing a connection
* The
main issues affecting residential consumers and small businesses were
unsatisfactory response from the provider (provider response), poor service
quality, and connecting a service (connection/changing provider)
NOTES TO EDITORS
*From 1 July 2017, the
Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman changed the recording of complaints.
There are now five complaint service categories: landline phone services,
mobile phone services, internet services, multiple services (where the consumer
is complaining about more than one phone or internet issue), or a complaint
about damage or access to property. The changes mean data will more accurately
reflect the description of complaints given by residential consumers and small
businesses. The changes also make it easier to see the issues facing
the telecommunication industry, helping providers improve the delivery of phone
and internet services. Trend analysis will build over time from the start of
this reporting period.
Tuesday 17 April 2018
More reports showing that 'trickle up' economics is at work in Australia
Here is just a little of what Liberal & National party members - and their governments - refuse to understand as they support a far-right economic platform which is built on a reduction in corporate tax rates, high business profits and large management salaries in conjunction with employee wage supression, erosion of workers' rights, an increase in employment insecurity based on casual, part-time and/or employees as sham contractors and, further restrictions on eligibility for a number of basic welfare payments.
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
10 April 2018:
Last year, as the
government prepared another round of welfare crackdowns, Minister Michaelia
Cash said she expects “that those who can work should work and our welfare
system should be there as a genuine safety net, not as something that people
can choose to fund their lifestyle.”
The subtext was clear –
those who need help are a drain on the rest of us.
This rhetoric is
familiar, but it is wrong. It is the wealthiest Australians who enjoy the most
support.
Research commissioned by
Anglicare Australia shows that each year, a staggering $68 billion is spent
keeping the wealthiest households wealthy. That is greater than the cost of
Newstart, disability support, the age pension, or any other single welfare group.
The Cost of Privilege
report, prepared by Per Capita, models four household types to show how these
concessions and tax breaks work. One of the couples we modelled, Tim and
Michelle, own their own home. They have two children in private schools, top
health insurance, and two investment properties. Michelle doesn’t work, and Tim
runs a small business. Each year, Tim and Michelle get $99,708 in concessions
from the taxpayer, or $1917 per week. That is well over twice as much as a
couple with two children on Newstart, and nearly three times as much as a
family with one parent on the Disability Support Pension. Tim and Michelle do
this by getting concessions on their superannuation, negatively gearing their
investment properties to minimise their taxable income, and getting tax breaks
for private schools and private health insurance. They also get generous
Capital Gains Tax exemptions.
Each year, thousands of
Australia's wealthiest households profit from these loopholes and subsidies.
Our report finds that tax exemptions on private healthcare and education for
the wealthiest 20 per cent cost more than $3 billion a year.
Superannuation
concessions to them cost over $20 billion a year, and their Capital Gains Tax
exemptions cost an astonishing $40 billion a year. Compare that to the annual
cost of Newstart, which comes in at just under $11 billion a year.
Importantly, nothing
that Tim and Michelle are doing is wrong or illegal. This is not a broken
system. It is a system working exactly the way it was designed to work,
supporting the wealthiest at the expense of the rest of us.
These numbers tell us
that something has gone badly wrong. The eighties were the decade of
trickle-down economics, where taxes were cut for the richest with the promise
that everyone else would soon feel the benefits. But now it’s worse – we’re in
an era of trickle-up economics where subsidies, tax breaks and concessions for
the richest are paid for by everyone else.....
Anglicare Australia, 26 March 2018:
Cost of Privilege Report (.pdf)
Cost of Privilege - overview (.pdf)
Cost of Privilege - households (.pdf)
ABC
News, 15
April 2018:
One in every five
Australian children has gone hungry in the past 12 months according to a new
report, with some even resorting to chewing paper to try to feel full.
The survey of 1,000
parents commissioned by Foodbank shows 22 per cent of Australian children under
the age of 15 live in a household that has ran out of food at some stage over
the past year.
One in five kids
affected go to school without eating breakfast at least once a week, while one
in 10 go a whole day at least once a week without eating anything at all.
"I think that's a
very sad indictment on us as a society," said Foodbank Victoria chief
executive Dave McNamara…..
"Some kids were eating paper. Their parents had told them
'There's not enough food, if you get hungry you'll need to chew paper.'"
"This isn't made
up. This is a story we heard setting up one of our school breakfast programs
down in Lakes Entrance, which is a beautiful part of the country."
"No-one's spared.
It's not people on the street; it's people in your street. It's in every
community across Australia."
Foodbank Victoria graphic below based on its Rumbling Tummies Report, April 2018:
Thursday 8 March 2018
International Women's Day, 8 March 2018
A voice I am listening to on International Women's Day 2018.....
IndigenousX, 7 March 2018:
“Racism is one that all women in the women’s movement
must start to come to terms with. There is no doubt in my mind that racism is
expressed by women in the movement. Its roots are many and they go deep.”
– Pat O’Shane
Those words were written
by former magistrate, First Nations woman Pat O’Shane more than two decades ago
and yet still represent an uncomfortable truth for mainstream feminism. Similar
criticisms have also been made by First Nations women like Jackie Huggins, Judy
Atkinson and Aileen Morton-Robinson and are revived and re-spoken by younger
feminists like Larissa Behrendt, Celeste Liddle, Nayuka Gorrie and many more
who continue the fight to hold mainstream feminism to account.
The roots of racism
within mainstream feminism are still there, under the soil. But that’s not to
say there haven’t been changes in the mainstream feminist movement. Rather than
outright denial on racism and how race impacts gender, an even more damaging
phenomenon has taken hold: co-option.
Intersectionality,
grounded in critical race theory, is now used by many white feminists but has
been watered down to a buzzword: a superficial display of “inclusiveness”
whereby it is used to deflect rather than interrogate the way race impacts the
lived experience of gender, class, gender identity, sexual orientation and
disability. An example of this, is the way Aboriginal women are consigned
to a footnote with no context in articles about domestic violence, aligning the
staggering statistics with the continuing colonial portrayal of the Aboriginal
‘other’ as inherently violent.
Much like International
Women’s Day, which has become a day for corporates and fancy breakfasts that
few women outside of the upper and middle classes can attend – the term has
been re-purposed to fit into a limited type of white feminist thought.
Over the years, I’ve
spent a lot of time being angry at the failings of white liberal feminism,
largely because it is the type of feminism that finds the loudest voice in
mainstream media. Because it has this voice it has become synonymous with
‘feminism’, despite the movement itself being a broad church. I even questioned
whether to continue calling myself a feminist.
I have realised that as
an Aboriginal feminist, I don’t have to continue reacting to these failures.
There is already a foundation built by brilliant black women which allows us to
continue developing an Aboriginal feminism. And the reason this is so important
is because the unique experiences of Aboriginal people, the way racism impacts
our lived experiences as women, brotherboys, sistergirls and non-binary
peoples, is a matter of life and death.
While the national
conversation around domestic violence and sexual assault is undoubtedly
important, often Aboriginal voices are bypassed altogether. An example of this
was the recent Our Watch media awards, where a white male journalist was given
an accolade for reporting on “the violence no one talks about”. Aboriginal
women have been talking about violence for decades – the ‘silence’ is not the
issue. It is that no one listens unless it is spoken in a way that bypasses the
role of white Australia, and places blame right back onto Aboriginal people
themselves.
That is why arguments
about Aboriginal culture being inherently violent are so appealing. There may
have been instances of violence in pre-colonial Aboriginal society –
but from my perspective, if Aboriginal people were participating in
the level of violence we see now in many communities, we would not have
survived for tens of thousands of years, and we would not have developed a
sophisticated system of land management, astronomy and science that intertwined
with our spirituality.
But the cultural
arguments around Aboriginal violence find an audience in a white Australia that
denies its continuing role in the current circumstances affecting our people.
And white feminists can often be complicit in the perpetuation of the myth,
particularly when it comes to ‘saving black women and children’ from the hands
of Aboriginal men. The fact is, Aboriginal communities are not inhuman – we
care deeply about violence and the impact on our people, particularly our
children. But the conversation has become dangerous due to the centring of
white outrage and the appetite for black pathology which borders on
pornographic.
Meanwhile, Aboriginal
women are painted as depraved for this perceived silence. Like the colonial
images that rendered Aboriginal women as uncaring ‘infanticidal cannibals’ who
did not love their children, we are again caricatured as powerless and
unconcerned about our children. This is the real silence: the silencing of the
strong Aboriginal women all across the country who have worked day in and day
out on this problem in the face of continual slander. …..
Full article can be read here.
Labels:
access & equity,
feminism,
Indigenous Australia,
inequality,
IWD,
racism,
women
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)