Showing posts with label international affairs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label international affairs. Show all posts

Thursday 12 January 2012

Is the Japanese whaling fleet refusing to obey a lawful direction to leave Australian territorial waters?



Since at least 11 January 2012
the Government of Japan-sponsored whaling fleet operating in the Southern Ocean has failed to obey a lawful direction of the Federal Government to quit Australian territorial waters surrounding World Heritage listed Macquarie Island - which also form part of the Australian Whale Sanctuary and the wider International Whaling Commission-endorsed Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.


One has to wonder why the Japanese Government imagines it has a right to ignore Australia's sovereignty in this manner.

Should it continue this intransigence then the Federal Government would be well within its rights to withdraw the credentials of the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Japan, His Excellency Mr Shigekazu Sato.


The Sydney Morning Herald 12 January 2012:

A JAPANESE whaling ship has defied high-level Australian complaints to stay in the waters of World Heritage-listed Macquarie Island.
The harpoon-equipped whale hunter Yushin Maru No.3 was still there late yesterday, hours after the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, said the ship was leaving.
''I'm aware that there has been one vessel which I'm advised has been in Australian territorial waters and I'll advise that it will leave Australian territorial waters,'' Ms Gillard said.
The Australian embassy told the Japanese government on Tuesday that whaling vessels were not welcome in the country's waters, repeating earlier complaints.
But the Japanese ship was photographed yesterday within a few miles of the coast of Macquarie Island, which is part of the state of Tasmania……
ANU professor of international law Don Rothwell said if Yushin Maru No.3 was staying close to Macquarie Island it was violating the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea which would normally allow a ship to proceed though these waters.
''The actions of Yushin Maru No.3 are not consistent with the right of innocent passage,'' Professor Rothwell said.
The Greens leader, Bob Brown, said the ship's presence was illegal and called for a naval vessel to be sent there.

Yushin Maru No.3 stayed just off the coast of Macquarie Island yesterday.
Photo: Carolina A Castro/Sea Shepherd

Monday 12 December 2011

Sometimes the young make my heart sing - Part Five



"Get It Done":
Urging Climate Justice,
Youth Delegate Anjali Appadurai
Mic-Checks UN COP 17 Summit

Durban Climate Change Conference

November/December 2011

The United Nations Climate Change Conference, Durban 2011, brings together representatives of the world's governments, international organizations and civil society. The discussions will seek to advance, in a balanced fashion, the implementation of the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol, as well as the Bali Action Plan, agreed at COP 13 in 2007, and the Cancun Agreements, reached at COP 16 last December.

The Sydney Morning Herald 11 December 2011 - 7:14PM

A United Nations climate conference has reached a hard-fought agreement on a far-reaching program meant to set a new course for the global fight against climate change.
The 194-party conference agreed to start negotiations on a new accord that would ensure that countries will be legally bound to carry out any pledges they make. It would take effect by 2020 at the latest.
The deal doesn't explicitly compel any nation to take on emissions targets, although most emerging economies have volunteered to curb the growth of their emissions.
The proposed Durban Platform offered answers to problems which for years have bedevilled negotiations on global warming.
Controversial issues include sharing the responsibility for controlling carbon emissions and helping the world's poorest and most climate-vulnerable nations cope with changing forces of nature.
The US was a reluctant supporter, concerned about agreeing to join an international climate system that was expected to be opposed in Congress....
Environmentalists criticised the package - as did many developing countries in the debate - for failing to address what they called the most urgent issue, to move faster and deeper in cutting carbon emissions.
"The good news is we avoided a train wreck," said Alden Meyer, recalling predictions a few days ago of a likely failure. "The bad news is that we did very little here to affect the emissions curve."
Scientists say that unless those emissions - chiefly carbon dioxide from power generation and industry - level out and reverse within a few years, the earth will be set on a possibly irreversible path of rising temperatures that lead to ever greater climate catastrophes.
Sunday's breakthrough capped 13 days of hectic negotiations that ran a day and a half over schedule.


Friday 21 October 2011

Shell targets polar bear's home for drilling. We're suing says NRDC




Help us stop
Shell in court!

Polar Bear
Shell is moving full speed ahead with its plan to drill off the coast of the Arctic Refuge, the polar bear’s favorite onshore birthing ground. Help send NRDC to court to stop Shell!
Take action

Important news:

We have filed suit in federal court to stop Shell from drilling off the coast of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge next summer.

We can’t wage and win this courtroom battle without your help.



Please make an online donation right now that can help us stave off Shell’s latest assault on Arctic wildlife.

As you know, the Obama Administration recently gave Shell tentative approval to begin exploratory drilling near the Arctic Refuge, the polar bear’s favorite onshore birthing ground. Shell’s rigs will operate in wildlife-filled waters -- home to vulnerable populations of seals, whales and migratory birds.

An oil spill in this fragile and sensitive ecosystem would be devastating.


Any polar bears swimming in thickly-oiled waters will most certainly die, and an oil spill offshore could blanket the coast of the Arctic Refuge with a layer of thick, toxic oil for generations to come.

Help NRDC fight in court and make sure this tragedy never happens.

Shell’s oil spill response plan reads like a fantasy.


The oil industry still has no proven method for cleaning up spills in ice-filled waters. Yet Shell is claiming that more than 95 percent of spilled oil will be recovered before it hits shore.

Only five percent of the oil unleashed by BP in the Gulf was ever captured.

Thanks to your support, we’ve been fending off Shell’s repeated attempts to drill near the Arctic Refuge since 2008. But with the Obama Administration now paving the way for Shell’s latest plan, we need your help more than ever before.

Shell has vast resources to bring to this fight. We, on the other hand, rely entirely on Members and activists like you to help ensure the survival of America’s polar bears and other Arctic wildlife.


And unlike Shell, we can’t afford to lose even once.

Your tax-deductible donation will allow us to wage and win this courtroom battle against Shell’s scheme and defend our environment in the most effective way possible.

If we’re going to stop Shell before it sinks its first drill bit into Arctic water next summer, we have no time to waste.


Please let me know that I can count on your support today.

Sincerely,
Frances
Frances Beinecke
President
Natural Resources Defense Council

Wednesday 31 August 2011

Australian High Court: Federal Government has "no power" to remove asylum seekers to Malaysia [excerpts & link to full transcript]



On 25 July 2011 the Gillard Government announced an agreement with Malaysia to transfer asylum seekers arriving by boat in Australia waters to Malaysian territory, after the agreement was legally in effect. This decision was challenged by application to the High Court of Australia.

Here are excerpts from Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Plaintiff M106 of 2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 32 (31 August 2011).  
FRENCH CJ, GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJ presiding.

FRENCH CJ.:

Conclusion

68.         The ministerial declaration of 25 July 2011 was affected by jurisdictional error. It was not a declaration authorised by s 198A of the Migration Act. The plaintiffs cannot therefore be taken to Malaysia pursuant to the power conferred by s 198A(1). Nor is it open to any officer of the Commonwealth to remove the plaintiffs to Malaysia pursuant to s 198(2) of the Migration Act without first assessing their claims to be persons to whom Australia owes protection obligations.
69.         In relation to M106, I agree for the reasons explained in the joint judgment[72] that he cannot be removed from Australia without the prior consent in writing of the Minister under the IGOC Act. I agree with the orders proposed in the joint judgment.


GUMMOW, HAYNE, CRENNAN AND BELL JJ.:

Conclusion and orders

148.      For the reasons that have been given, the Minister's declaration that Malaysia is a specified country for the purposes of s 198A of the Act was made without power. There should be a declaration to that effect. The Minister may not lawfully take either plaintiff from Australia to Malaysia and the Minister should be restrained accordingly. In addition, in the case of the second plaintiff, the Minister should be further restrained from taking the second plaintiff from Australia without there being a consent in writing of the Minister given under s 6A(1) of the IGOC Act. The defendants should pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings to date before Hayne J and the Full Court.

KIEFEL J.:

Conclusion and orders

258.      There was no power to make the declaration of 25 July 2011. Because the declaration is invalid, there is no power to remove the plaintiffs to Malaysia. Any attempt to do so would be unlawful. In the case of Plaintiff M106, his removal from Australia to any country is also unlawful absent the consent of the Minister in his capacity as guardian of Plaintiff M106.
259.      I agree with the orders proposed in the joint judgment.


HEYDON J.:

Conclusion

199.       It is not necessary to deal with an alternative argument advanced by the defendants which relied on s 198 of the Act.
200.      Each Amended Application should be dismissed with costs.

Full judgment transcript here.
Judgement summary here.

* This post was emended for name error and dissenting judgment included

Monday 15 August 2011

Put a hand in your pocket for the Horn of Africa



No glib comment is needed as a reminder that famine is always with us somewhere in the world. This time it is the Horn Of Africa and Somalia in particular which is bearing the brunt of widespread drought and crop failure.

So come on Aussies, put a hand in your pocket and send a donation to the Australian fundraising arm of the United Nations Refugee Agency, Australia for UNHCR and the East Africa Emergency Appeal online by credit card or call 1300 440 433 or 1300 361 288 (within Australia) to find out how/where to send cheques or money orders.

“All donations in response to this appeal will go directly towards UNHCR's emergency relief operations in East Africa, providing much-needed essentials like food, clean water, shelter, sanitation, survival kits and emergency feeding and nutrition programs.
90 cents in every dollar donated will go directly to the field to help people in need in East Africa.”
Photographs of famine victims found at Google Images

Tuesday 9 August 2011

What a difference having a genuine national fiscal policy makes


Now before we all give into any international media-inspired hysteria and cry the sky is falling, here is Australia’s sovereign credit rating according to Standard and Poor’s (S&P) as of 5 August 2011:

Commonwealth of Australia
Sovereign local currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)  
AAA/Stable/A-1+
Sovereign foreign currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)
AAA/Stable/A-1+
Transfer and convertibility assessment  
AAA

The Commonwealth of Australia has retained an excellent Triple A credit rating from Standard and Poor's (as well as from Moody’s and Fitch) for the last eight years - for which successive federal governments of different political persuasions can take credit.


In 2011 its public debt as a percentage of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is running in the vicinity of 23 per cent, the current account deficit is around 2.5 per cent of GDP and total combined public, corporate and private individual foreign debt only resulted in a 3.9 per cent net income deficit as a percentage of GDP in the March 2011 Quarter - according to the figures I can find.


Just as importantly, one of the nation's major Asian trading partners China continues to see Australia as "stable" and gives a domestic currency credit rating of AAA and a foreign currency credit rating of AA+ at a time when Dangong Global Credit Rating has downgraded 
America's rating to "negative" and the official Xinhua news agency is stating; China, the largest creditor of the world's sole superpower, has every right now to demand the United States to address its structural debt problems and ensure the safety of China's dollar assets.

Now compare that brief fiscal thumbnail with the recent credit rating history for the USA, courtesy of a Democrat Government incapable of dominating the Congress and a Republican Party which has lost its way.


Standard and Poor’s release on 18 April 2011:

We have affirmed our 'AAA/A-1+' sovereign credit ratings on the United States of America.
The economy of the U.S. is flexible and highly diversified, the country's effective monetary policies have supported output growth while containing inflationary pressures, and a consistent global preference for the U.S. dollar over all other currencies gives the country unique external liquidity.
Because the U.S. has, relative to its 'AAA' peers, what we consider to be very large budget deficits and rising government indebtedness and the path to addressing these is not clear to us, we have revised our outlook on the long-term rating to negative from stable.
We believe there is a material risk that U.S. policymakers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium- and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013; if an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation is not begun by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer 'AAA' sovereigns.

Standard and Poor’s release on 5 August 2011:

We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term rating.
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from CreditWatch negative.
The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics.
More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policy making and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case….


We have taken the ratings off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.....

United States of America
Sovereign local currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)  
AA+/Negative/A-1+
Sovereign foreign currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)
AA+/Negative/A-1+
Transfer and convertibility assessment  
AAA


According to The Australian on 5 August 2011; Australian 3-year government bond prices posted their biggest one-day rise since 1991 as investors rushed en masse to the safety of risk-free assets.
















At 12pm (AEST) 6 August 2011 the Australian dollar was trading at 104.91 US cents....down from $US1.0665 late yesterday and off a 30-year high of $US1.1080 last week.  By 8 August the dollar was at 1.0343 US. 

On 5 August 2011 NASDAQ placed this recently high currency rate into perspective with this statement; the latest ascent comes about three months after the Australian dollar last hit a 30-year high. The initial push higher that started in June of 2010 came as a continuing mining boom and a series of interest rate hikes from Australia's central bank that began in October 2009 lifted the currency more than 30% against the U.S. dollar in a year.

According to the Herald-Sun the Australian stock market fell by 4 per cent on 5 August and at close of business yesterday the ASX All Ords and S&P/ASX200 graphs were not catastophic:



Placing that fall within an historical context is this ASX All Ordinaries (XAO) Index chart 1988 - 2011 graph:


Even the International Monetary Fund doesn't consider the Australian economy an overtly risky proposition. So the next time either the Opposition Shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey, unidentified Liberal/National sources or elements in the Murdoch press  attempt to slyly suggest that Australia's economy is inevitably on the way to the poor house without drastic regime change - yawn loudly and turn aside.

The only thing Australia has to fear at this point in time is the contagion of fear itself and perhaps being overly irritated by the silly political point scoring of conservative politicians and big business lobbyists alike.

Anonymous zaps Syrian Ministry of Defence on 8th August 2011

Sunday 17 July 2011

One Man's Opinion: News Corporation is sorry.....

Advertisement placed in The Guardian newspaper in Britain and other media
during the week ending 16 July 2011
Click to enlarge

Rupert Murdoch and his sons Lachlan and James in happier days

What is the Murdoch family and the News Corporation media conglomerate it dominates sorry for?
Why, for being caught of course.


Who will the family and corporation blame for the unfolding scandal? Inevitably, everyone and anyone other than members of the Murdoch family.

Is this the end of Rupert Murdoch's political influence?
Only if Britain, the United States and Australia all refuse to support the argument that the international media empire he heads is too big to be allowed to fail.


Who or what will be the losers if Murdoch's political balls aren't removed?
Without a doubt, democratic institutions in every county in which News Corp, its subsidiaries and affiliates, operate.

But News Corp isn't behaving badly in Australia is it?
Oh yes it is. In the absence of world war, widespread civil conflict, country-wide famine or desperate national financial crisis driving a need, the Murdoch press has broadly stated an aim of destroying one minor democratic political party and repeatedly calls for an early election (beginning within days of the 2010 ballot results) with the aim of regime change at federal level.
It deliberately misquotes and misrepresents those public figures or scientists who do not support its skewed views.
It is known to have attempted to charge at least one political party for favourable published comment (Page 1 & Page 2) by its journalists during an election campaign and patently wouldn't recognise its own (or indeed any other) Professional Conduct Policy if it fell over a tattered copy on the footpath.

A bit of background courtesy of The Guardian UK and Granny Herald AUS:
Phone hacking: Murdoch goes on defensive over 'total lies' by MPs
Les Hinton sacrificed, but the worst is yet to come for News Corp
Rebekah Brooks's resignation letter
Phone hacking: Met police put pressure on Guardian over coverage
Phone hacking: Murdoch paid US anti-bribery law lobbyists
Rebekah Brooks's belated resignation intensifies spotlight on James Murdoch
News of the World phone hacking - interactive timeline
Murdoch's strange hunt for a handout


Pics found at Google Images

UPDATE:

Staying true to the lack of ethics displayed by its parent company, News Ltd's Herald Sun published this incitement to murder in a comment section, according to @heraldsunreader:

Monday 20 June 2011

Today is UNCR World Refugee Day - time to remember that Refugees R Us

The global theme for UNHCR World Refugee Day in 2011 is “One  refugee without hope is too manyand it’s time to remember that Refugees R Us.
Many of our own forebears came almost penniless to Australia after 1788 because they had been dispossessed in Scotland, were persecuted because of their religion in Ireland, experienced poverty and discrimination across England, endured years of political upheaval and cultural suppression in various European states or were fleeing catastrophic wars and sometimes genocide.

Saturday 11 June 2011

Internet should remain as open as possible - UN expert on freedom of expression


On 3 June 2011 the United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression Frank La Rue warned Friday that fearful Governments are increasingly restricting the flow of information on the Internet due to its potential to mobilize people to challenge the status quo.

Mr. La Rue also called upon Governments to develop a concrete and effective plan of action to make the Internet widely available, accessible and affordable to all segments of the population.

Excerpts from the Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression covering the free flow of information and recommendations are over the page.

Full report at http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/14session/A.HRC.14.23.pdf

UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Media Release 3 June 2011

Wednesday 25 May 2011

Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd to speak at The Red Dove international aid forum in Lismore on Saturday 28 May


Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd to attend aid forum in Lismore

Page MP Janelle Saffin has announced that Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd has accepted her invitation to visit the Page electorate for a forum on overseas aid.

“In this region there are a number of local organisations as well as many dedicated individuals who work to reduce world poverty by their involvement in overseas aid projects.

“I’m delighted to be able to invite them to this forum with the Foreign Minister to hear firsthand about Australia’s international aid program, where the big challenges are, and what is being achieved.

“It is a horrifying statistic that around the world 23,000 children die of preventable starvation or related sickness every day and globally about one billion people are living in extreme poverty.

“More than ten years ago Australia and 188 other countries joined the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and agreed to increase aid with the core focus of reducing world poverty.” Ms Saffin said.

Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd says he looks forward to visiting Lismore and discussing Australia’s aid program.

“Lismore is a great place and Janelle is a great local member. I have visited Lismore many times over the years at Janelle’s invitation and this next visit is long overdue”

“I look forward to discussing with the community the Australian Government’s aid program and our responsibility is to ensure that this program gets real results”

“With one billion people living in abject poverty, we must not forget that we are talking about people who are part of our common humanity, people for whom each day is a struggle to survive.”

“Australians have a great reputation as being givers, and being volunteers and we should be proud that we are responding to the challenge of world poverty by being a real contributor to global development.” Mr Rudd said.

Mr Rudd will speak at an international aid forum The Red Dove in Lismore on Saturday 28 May. Details are available from Janelle Saffin’s office: 66219909.

Janelle Saffin MP, Media Release, 23 May 2011

Monday 2 May 2011

In 2011 Wikileaks remembers the John Winston Howard legacy regarding Fiji


The people of Fiji living under the dictatorship of Frank Bainimarama will be less than impressed with this one paragraph in a 2006 U.S. diplomatic cable - released by Wikileaks on 28th April 2011 - reminding everyone of then Australian Prime Minister John Howard's lack of spine on the morning of the day of that military coup in Fiji:
"¶2. (SBU) Prime Minister Howard told the press December 5 that Fijian Prime Minister Qarase had telephoned him that morning to request Australian military intervention to prevent a coup by Fijian military commander, Commodore Frank Bainimarama. Howard said he had declined the request because it was "not in Australia's national interest" to intervene, adding that he could not countenance Australian and Fijian troops fighting one another on the streets of Suva."
Apparently Howard was willing to charge into other countries when the request came from the U.S. Government, but not when he received an urgent call from a near-neighbour.
Mrs. Bucket will also be unimpressed to see that history is resurfacing from under her constant attempt to turn her hubbie into the greatest thing since sliced bread.

For those who are interested Discombobulated Bubu and Intelligentsiya are still blogging in resistance from Fiji.

Saturday 12 February 2011

Help the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society shut down Icelandic whaling

WDCS Whaling Banner

SHUT DOWN COMMERCIAL WHALING - HELP US KEEP UP THE PRESSURE!

shut it down

Dear Friend

WDCS needs your help to end Icelandic whaling.

WDCS has submitted a legal petition, backed by 19 organisations, calling on the United States government to impose trade sanctions on Iceland for its whaling and trade in whale products.

The good news is that the US, unlike other countries, can do this if it believes Iceland is undermining international conservation agreements. But to justify trade sanctions the government needs to show that it has public support. That’s where you come in. See below for how you can help.

Japanese stockpiles of whale meat are at an all-time high - 6,000 tons - yet the businessman behind fin whale hunting in Iceland still hopes to find buyers in Japan.

We want to put real pressure on Iceland via US trade sanctions.

Please send an email to the US Secrectaries of Commerce and Interior to urge them to take strong action against Iceland.

We have prepared an email for you – it will only take a few seconds of your time. click here to send.

When you've registered your protest, tell your friends. Share the link on Facebook, email your friends, help us spread the word.

Iceland’s whalers will kill more whales if they can get away with it.

We won't let them. Let’s SHUT DOWN commercial whaling.

Sue Fisher Signature

Sue Fisher

WDCS Stop Whaling campaign manager

Follow Us

Join us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Read our Blog from the Front Line

Urge President Obama to impose sanctions

The majestic but endangered fin whale.
Icelandic whalers will kill more if we don't stop them.

© Cherylle Millard-Dawe





SEND AN EMAIL TO THE US GOVERNMENT NOW

We've set it all up for you.

It will take you seconds but could shut down Icelandic whaling!

Click here now.