Proof that a business model of election campaigning has come off the pages of a Hollywood screenplay and out onto the streets of everyday Australia (video at 5:54).
Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts
Wednesday 21 March 2018
The 'new' business model in politics
"It's
no good fighting
an election campaign on the
facts because actually it's all about
emotion."
Proof that a business model of election campaigning has come off the pages of a Hollywood screenplay and out onto the streets of everyday Australia (video at 5:54).
Labels:
data mining,
elections,
privacy,
safety,
transparency
Wednesday 7 March 2018
When it comes to human rights and civil liberties is it ever safe to trust the junkyard dog or its political masters?
On 18 July 2017, Prime
Minister Malcolm Bligh Turnbull announced the establishment of a Home Affairs
portfolio that would comprise immigration, border protection, domestic security
and law enforcement agencies, as well as reforms to the Attorney-General’s
oversight of Australia’s intelligence community and agencies in the Home
Affairs portfolio.
On 7 December 2017, the Prime Minister
introduced the Home Affairs and Integrity Agencies Legislation Amendment Bill2017 into the House of Representatives.
This bill amends the Anti-Money
Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, the Independent
National Security Legislation Monitor Act 2010, the Inspector-General
of Intelligence and Security Act 1986 and the Intelligence Services Act 2001.
The bill was referred to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security which tabled its report and recommendations on 26 February 2018.
This new government department on steroids will be headed by millionaire former Queensland Police detective and far-right Liberal MP for Dickson, Peter Craig Dutton.
His 'front man' selling this change is Abbott protégé, former Secretary
of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection and current Secretary of the new Department of Home Affairs, Michael Pezzullo.
The question every Australian needs to ask themselves is, can this current federal government, the ministers responsible for and department heads managing this extremely powerful department, be trusted not to dismantle a raft of human and civil rights during the full departmental implementation.
It looks suspiciously as though former Australian attorney-general George Brandis does not think so - he is said to fear political overreach.
The
Saturday Paper,
3-9 March 2018:
On
Friday last week, former attorney-general George Brandis went to see Michael
Pezzullo, the secretary of the new Department of Home Affairs.
The
meeting was a scheduled consultation ahead of Brandis’s departure for London to
take up his post as Australia’s new high commissioner. It was cordial, even
friendly. But what the soon-to-be diplomat Brandis did not tell Pezzullo during
the pre-posting briefing was that he had singled him out in a private farewell
speech he had given to the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation on the
eve of his retirement from parliament two weeks earlier.
As
revealed in The Saturday Paper last week, the then senator Brandis
used the ASIO speech to raise concerns about the power and scope of the new
department and the ambitions of its secretary. Brandis effectively endorsed the
private concerns of some within ASIO that the new security structure could
expose the domestic spy agency to ministerial or bureaucratic pressure.
In
a regular Senate estimates committee hearing this week, Pezzullo described his
meeting with Brandis – on the day before The Saturday Paper article
appeared – as Opposition senators asked him for assurances that ASIO would
retain its statutory independence once it moves from the attorney-general’s
portfolio to become part of Home Affairs.
“I
had a very good discussion on Friday,” Pezzullo told the committee, of his
meeting with Brandis.
“He’s
seeking instructions and guidance on performing the role of high commissioner.
None of those issues came up, so I find that of interest. If he has concerns,
I’m sure that he would himself raise those publicly.”
Labor
senator Murray Watt pressed: “So he raised them with ASIO but not with you?”
“I
don’t know what he raised with ASIO,” Pezzullo responded. “… You should ask the
former attorney-general if he’s willing to state any of those concerns … He’s a
high commissioner now, so he may not choose to edify your question with a
response, but that’s a matter for him. As I said, he didn’t raise any of those
concerns with me when we met on Friday.”
The
Saturday Paper contacted George Brandis but he had no comment.
“ANY
SUGGESTION THAT WE IN THE PORTFOLIO ARE SOMEHOW EMBARKED ON THE SECRET
DECONSTRUCTION OF THE SUPERVISORY CONTROLS WHICH ENVELOP AND CHECK EXECUTIVE
POWER ARE NOTHING MORE THAN FLIGHTS OF CONSPIRATORIAL FANCY…”
Watt
asked Pezzullo for assurance there would be no change to the longstanding
provisions in the ASIO Act that kept the agency under its director-general’s
control and not subject to instruction from the departmental secretary. The
minister representing Home Affairs in the Senate, Communications Minister Mitch
Fifield, said: “It is not proposed that there be a change to that effect.”
The
new Department of Home Affairs takes in Immigration and Border Protection, the
Australian Federal Police, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, the
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, known as AUSTRAC, and ASIO.
ASIO
does not move until legislation is passed to authorise the shift, and will
retain its status as a statutory agency.
Pezzullo
addressed the fears of those questioning his department’s reach. He said some
commentary mischaracterised the arrangements as “being either a layer of overly
bureaucratic oversight of otherwise well-functioning operational arrangements
or, worse, a sinister concentration of executive power that will not be able to
be supervised and checked”.
“Both
of these criticisms are completely wrong,” he said.
Pezzullo
had already described his plans, both to the committee and in a speech he made
in October last year, in which he spoke of exploiting the in-built capabilities
in digital technology to expand Australia’s capacity to detect criminal and
terrorist activity in daily life online and on the so-called “dark web”.
But
the language he used, referring to embedding “the state” invisibly in global
networks “increasingly at super scale and at very high volumes”, left his
audiences uncertain about exactly what he meant.
Watt
asked if there would be increased surveillance of the Australian people. “Any
surveillance of citizens is always strictly done in accordance with the laws
passed by this parliament,” Pezzullo replied.
In
his February 7 speech to ASIO, George Brandis described Pezzullo’s October
remarks as an “urtext”, or blueprint, for a manifesto that would rewrite how
Australia’s security apparatus operates.
Pezzullo
hit back on Monday. “Any suggestion that we in the portfolio are somehow
embarked on the secret deconstruction of the supervisory controls which envelop
and check executive power are nothing more than flights of conspiratorial fancy
that read into all relevant utterances the master blueprint of a new ideology
of undemocratic surveillance and social control,” Pezzullo said.
As for day to day human resources, financial management and transparent accountable governance, media reports are not inspiring confidence in Messrs. Turnbull, Dutton and Pezzullo.
The Canberra Times, 2 March 2018:
The Canberra Times, 2 March 2018:
Home Affairs head Mike
Pezzullo was one of the first to front Senate estimates on Monday.
It's been up and running
for only weeks, but his new department is part of one of the largest government
portfolios.
Having brought
several security agencies into its fold, and if legislation passes letting ASIO
join, the Home Affairs portfolio will be home to 23,000 public
servants.
Mr Pezzullo was also
quizzed on the investigation into Roman Quaedvlieg, the head of
the Australian Border Force who has been on leave since May last year,
following claims he helped his girlfriend - an ABF staff member - get a
job at Sydney Airport.
It was revealed the Prime Minister's department has had a corruption watchdog's
report into abuse of power allegations for at least five months
while Mr Quaedvlieg has been on full pay earning hundreds of thousands of
dollars.
Friday 2 March 2018
Family, Domestic & Sexual Violence in Australia: "On average, 1 woman a week and 1 man a month is killed by a current or former partner"
“Family violence refers to violence between family
members, typically where the perpetrator exercises power and control over
another person. The most common and pervasive instances occur in intimate
(current or former) partner relationships and are usually referred to as
domestic violence. Sexual violence refers to behaviours of a sexual nature carried
out against a person’s will. It can be perpetrated by a current or former
partner, other people known to the victim, or strangers.” [Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; Family,domestic and sexual violence in Australia, 2018]
Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare, media
release, 28 February 2018:
New
national statistical report sheds light on family violence
The
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) has released its first
comprehensive report on family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia.
The
report brings together, for the first time, information from more than 20
different major data sources to build a picture of what is known about family,
domestic and sexual violence in Australia. It also highlights data gaps and
offers suggestions to help fill these gaps.
The
report, Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia, 2018,
covers family violence (physical violence, sexual violence and emotional abuse
between family members, as well as current or former partners), domestic
violence (a subcategory of family violence, involving current or former
partners), and sexual violence (a range of nonconsensual sexual behaviours,
perpetrated by partners, former partners, acquaintances or strangers).
‘Women
are more likely to experience violence from a known person and in their home,
while men are more likely to experience violence from strangers and in a public
place,’ said AIHW spokesperson Louise York.
1 in 6
women (aged 15 or above) —equating to 1.6 million women—have experienced
physical or sexual violence by a current or former partner, while for men it is
1 in 16—or half a million men. Three in 4 (75%) victims of domestic violence
reported the perpetrator as male, while 1 in 4 (25%) reported the perpetrator
as female.
Overall,
1 in 5 women (1.7 million) and 1 in 20 men (428,800) have experienced sexual
violence. Most (96%) female victims of sexual violence reported the perpetrator
as male, while male victims reported a more even spilt (49% female and 44% male
perpetrators).
On
average, 1 woman a week and 1 man a month is killed by a current or former
partner.
While
overall the data show that women are at greater risk, certain groups are
particularly vulnerable, such as Indigenous women, young women and pregnant
women.
Children
who are exposed to violence experience long-lasting effects
‘Children
can be victims of or witnesses to family violence—and this early exposure can
heighten their chances of experiencing further violence later in life,’ Ms York
said.
Children
who were physically or sexually abused before they were 15 were around 3 times
as likely to experience domestic violence after the age of 15 as those children
who had not experienced or witnessed violence earlier in life.
Women
who, as children, witnessed domestic violence towards either their mother or
father were more than twice as likely to be the victim of domestic violence
themselves, compared with women who had not witnessed this violence.
Men who
witnessed violence towards their mother by a partner were almost 3 times as
likely to be the victim of domestic violence compared with men who had not,
while men who witnessed violence towards their father were almost 4 times as
likely to experience domestic violence compared with those who had not.
Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander people experience higher rates of family violence
The
report shows that Indigenous women were 32 times and Indigenous men were 23
times as likely to be hospitalised due to family violence as non-Indigenous
women and men respectively, while Indigenous children were around 7 times as
likely as non-Indigenous children to be the victims of substantiated cases of child
abuse or neglect.
Two in 5
Indigenous homicide victims (41%) were killed by a current or former partner,
compared with 1 in 5 non-Indigenous homicide victims (22%).
A
significant toll on victims and society
The
report also shows that family, domestic and sexual violence can have a profound
effect on people’s ability to work, health and financial situation.
‘People
who experience domestic violence are likely to need time off work as a result,
and women affected by domestic violence experience significantly poorer health
and mental health than other women,’ Ms York said.
For women
aged 25–44, domestic violence causes more illness, disability and deaths than
any other risk factor, such as smoking, alcohol use, being overweight, or being
physically inactive.
Domestic
violence is a leading cause of hospitalised assault, particularly among women.
In 2014–15, 2,800 women and 560 men were hospitalised after being assaulted by
a spouse or partner.
‘Family
and domestic violence is also a leading cause of homelessness. In 2016–17,
72,000 women, 34,000 children and 9,000 men sought homelessness services due to
family and domestic violence,’ Ms York said.
The
financial impacts are also substantial, with violence against women and their
children estimated to cost at least $22 billion in direct (healthcare,
counselling, child and welfare support) and indirect (lost wages, productivity
and potential earnings) costs in 2015–16.
The
importance of evidence, data gaps and looking forward
AIHW CEO
Barry Sandison said the report was a significant piece of work for the AIHW—and
one with a real human impact. But there’s more to be done.
‘We know
that family, domestic and sexual violence is a major problem in Australia, but
without a comprehensive source of evidence and analysis, tackling such a
complex issue will continue to be difficult,’ he said.
He noted
that while the report was certainly a step in the right direction, its
development had highlighted several areas where future work is needed. For
example, inconsistent definitions of violence in data collections pose a
challenge, as does the limited information available on specific at-risk groups
(such as people with disability), childhood experiences, the characteristics of
perpetrators and the service responses for both victims and perpetrators.
‘It’s
important to note that while looking only at the numbers can at times appear to
depersonalise the pain and suffering that sits behind the statistics, the
seriousness of these issues cannot be overstated,’ Mr Sandison said.
‘This
work is an excellent example of organisations working together to build the
evidence on an important issue. It was achieved through financial support and
collaboration from several Australian Government and state government
departments.’
If the
information presented raises any issues for you, these services can help:
1800RESPECT (1800
737 732, www.1800respect.org.au)
Lifeline (13
11 14, www.lifeline.org.au)
Kids
Helpline (1800 551 800, www.kidshelpline.com.au)
Men's
Referral Service (1300 766 491, www.ntv.org.au)
Further information:
Elizabeth Ingram, AIHW: Tel. 02 6249 5048, mob. 0431 871 337
Elise Guy, AIHW: Tel. 02 6244 1156, mob. 0468 525 418
Elise Guy, AIHW: Tel. 02 6244 1156, mob. 0468 525 418
Report
Monday 12 February 2018
AUSTRALIA CARD MARK II: no national digital ID number will mean no access to any Australian federal government services
“When signing
up to the platform for the first time, users will be asked to provide their
name, email address, and phone number, and verify their details via email or
SMS. They will then be asked to provide information from three identity
documents, which goes through the exchange to the identity provider for verification.
The exchange receives encrypted details back which it passes on to the
government service the user wants to reach, which then grants the user access.” [IT News, 20 March 2015]
IT
News, 8
February 2018:
The Department of Human
Services looks set to become the federal government's exclusive manager of
digital identities after being selected to build the identity provider solution
that will be used for the Govpass platform.
The Govpass framework is
a decentralised identity model that allows individuals
to choose their identity provider - an organisation that issues identity
documents, like Australia Post or the ATO - and access a range of public and
private sector services through a single digital identity credential.
There is no limit on the
number of identity providers outside of the Commonwealth that can be accredited
for Govpass; Australia Post has already indicated it will seek to become
the first non-government identity provider, using its Digital iD platform.
Several state and
territory government agencies and private sector entities are also expected to
become identity providers over time.
However, the federal
government last year made the decision that only one
identity provider would operate for the entire Commonwealth.
The Digital
Transformation Agency revealed the decision following meetings with existing
Commonwealth identity service providers, DHS and the ATO. Its rationale for the
move was to focus security efforts in one place and avoid complex
administrative structures.
iTnews revealed in
October that the DTA was yet to make up its mind up on which of the two
agencies would serve as the federal government’s sole identity provider for
GovPass, even as testing
of the new platform was taking place with the ATO’s new online tax
file number application service.
Instead the DTA said it
was working closely with the ATO and DHS on the “next steps” for the platform.
But in response to
questions on notice from recent estimates hearings, DHS revealed it had been
instructed to develop the federal government’s single identity provider
platform, to be known as myGov IdP.
“The department was
commissioned by the DTA to build the identity provider (IdP) for the
whole-of-government,” it said.
“The myGov IdP will
enable citizens to verify their identity online and use it to apply for
government services.”
iTnews has made
several attempts to clarify the statements with the DTA and DHS, but
both refused to comment on the build and DHS’ apparent position as the
single government identity provider.
The ATO similarly
redirected questions about its involvement with Govpass, including whether it
had also been asked by the DTA to build an identity provider solution, to the
DTA.
Selecting DHS as the
sole government identity provider would be an obvious choice for the DTA -
the agency is the government’s current defacto whole-of-gov identity provider
through the myGov digital services platform.
A private beta release
of myGov IdP is currently planned for later this month.
Identity providers on
Govpass will use the DTA-built identity exchange – and in turn the document
verification service (DVS) and facial verification service (FVS) – to verify an
individual’s credentials without revealing their identity to service providers.
[my yellow bolding]Note: The Face Identification Service (FIS) is a one-to-many, image-based identification service that can match a photo of an unknown person against multiple government records to help establish their identity. FIS is also available to police, security services, Dept. of Immigration and Dept. of Foreign Affairs. [Australian Attorney-General's Department, October 2017]
Wednesday 24 January 2018
Is the Turnbull Government spending veterans mental health funding wisely?
On the Line Limited state that it is a professional social health business that provides counselling support, anywhere and anytime, primarily via telephone, web chat and online support through the rather bluntly named MensLine Australia, Suicide Call Back Service, SuicideLine Victoria, a Department of Defence All Hours Support Line After Hours Service and other geographically specific services.
On the Line Limited also provides tailored counselling services for corporate, member and community organisations.
According to its 2016-17 Annual Report On the Line Limited is doing very nicely thank you, with an income of over $11.3 million and $6.2m in new tenders, grants, and business opportunities.
However, it appears that this company may be falling down on the job……
The New Daily, 9 January 2018:
The government is refusing to reveal how often vulnerable veterans are unable to reach its crisis helpline for ex-service members in order to protect the bottom line of a private contractor, The New Daily can exclusively reveal.
The refusal comes as veterans’ advocates warn of a suicide epidemic among ex-service members, with support group Warrior’s Return estimating at least 84 veterans took their own lives in 2017.
The Department of Veterans Affairs claims that disclosing the call abandonment rates and wait times for the Veterans and Veterans Families Counselling Service would adversely impact the company that manages the service outside of normal business hours.
In response to a freedom of information request by The New Daily, the DVA said the disclosure would give the contractor’s business rivals information that could be used to out-compete the company.
The New Daily has appealed the decision on public interest grounds.
The DVA has awarded Melbourne-based company On the Line contracts worth at least $2 million to operate the after-hours counselling service since 2010, according to government procurement website AusTender.
The department also revealed to The New Daily that it does not collect data on the call abandonment rates and wait times for its regular hours service, which is managed in-house.
Doug Steley, an ex-service member who works with a number of veterans’ advocacy groups, said the department’s attitude was “totally unacceptable” and typical of its lack of transparency.
“Their service should be so excellent that they should be willing to boast about how good it is, and they should have absolutely no fear that a private contractor would be able to match the service to those who served Australia,” he said.
“There is no transparency in this department,” he added. “It operates on secrecy and hiding everything from the public.”
The DVA has faced repeated controversy over its treatment of veterans, with an official inquiry last year ruling it had failed to provide adequate support to 32-year-old Afghan war veteran Jesse Bird before he took his own life last June. In August, more than 100 people protested outside DVA headquarters in Melbourne to call for the establishment of a royal commission into the department’s failure to halt suicides among ex-service members.
Opposition spokeswoman for veterans’ affairs Amanda Rishworth accused the department of putting the welfare of a private firm above that of veterans.
“We expect DVA to act in the best interest of veterans – and not in the best interest of a private contractor,” Ms Rishworth told The New Daily.
“Labor thinks it is unacceptable that DVA is withholding any information that will provide greater transparency on services which directly affect those veterans and family members. It is also deeply concerning that DVA is not even collecting data on how the VVCS is performing during business hours.”
Labels:
government policy,
health,
safety,
Turnbull Government
Wednesday 17 January 2018
Things you should know if you are logging on to a website using your Facebook account
The Daily Telegraph, 5 January 2018:
Ian Cox of Supremo.tv said: “If you’ve ever pressed ‘Login with Facebook’ on a website, you’re giving Facebook permission to share sensitive data with the site you are visiting.
“This includes, for example, your personal email address, where you live, where you work, details about your relationship, places you have recently been and who you’re friends with.
“In today’s digital age, people are sharing just about everything on social media sites like Facebook. But most are unaware of just how much can be seen by brands, businesses and, in some cases, criminals.
“The best way to stay protected online is to only share what you would be happy with the whole world seeing.
“As tempting as it may be to rejoice about the fact that the whole family is going on a weekend away, keep in mind that you may be inadvertently letting criminals know that your house is empty during this time.”
WHAT INFORMATION CAN FACEBOOK SHARE ABOUT YOU?
* Your public profile (name, age, gender, location, profile picture, timezone)
* All your likes
* Your friends
* Where you are now
* Your email address
* Your photos
* Your “about me” section
* All your posts
* Your birthday
* Your relationship details
* Your education history
* Your religion/politics
* Events you’ve been to
* Your work history
* Where you are from
* Your phone number
Tuesday 16 January 2018
Forecasting a dangerous present and devastating future for Australia
“Background warming associated with anthropogenic climate change has seen Australian annual mean temperature increase by approximately 1.1 °C since 1910. Most of this warming has occurred since 1950.” [Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Annual Climate Statement 2017]
Bloomberg, 10 January 2018:
The road-melting heatwave that made Sydney the hottest place on Earth at the weekend may just be a taste of things to come.
Temperatures in Australia are set to rise until around 2050 due to greenhouse gas emissions already in the atmosphere, according to the country’s weather bureau.
“Australia is one country where you really can see the signal of global warming,” Karl Braganza, the Bureau of Meteorology’s head of climate monitoring, told reporters on a call. “We’ve locked the degree of warming in until mid-century and that means it’s likely that one of the next strong El Nino events in the coming decade or two will set a new record.”
Western Sydney touched 47.3 degrees Celsius (117 degrees Fahrenheit) on Sunday and 2017 was Australia’s third-hottest year on record. Heat and drought risk devastating crops in Australia, the world’s third-largest exporter of cotton where farm production is forecast to be worth A$59 billion ($46 billion) this financial year.
The Heat is On
Australia has had just one cooler-than-average year since 2005
Since 2005, Australia has notched up seven of its 10 warmest years, the weather bureau said in its annual climate statement.
More heatwaves could stress a power grid that’s struggled to cope with demand as people crank up air-conditioning during the scorching summer months.
Australian Bureau of Meteorology Annual Climate Statement 2017, issued January 2018.
Visible impacts in 2018.................
The Guardian, 9 January 2018:
More than 400 animals have died in one colony alone as temperatures soar above 47C, causing exhaustion and dehydration
Visible impacts in 2018.................
The Guardian, 9 January 2018:
More than 400 animals have died in one colony alone as temperatures soar above 47C, causing exhaustion and dehydration
Mounds of dead flying foxes in Campbelltown suburb of Sydney, Australia. Photograph: Facebook/Help Save the Wildlife and Bushlands in Campbelltown
Labels:
climate change,
drought,
electricity,
extinction,
flora and fauna,
health,
safety,
sustainable food,
water,
weather
Thursday 11 January 2018
NSW Auditor-General not impressed by government agencies cyber security risk management
“Specific financial reporting, controls and service delivery comments are included in the individual 2017 cluster financial audit reports tabled in Parliament from October to December 2017.” [NSW Auditor-General, Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2017, December 2017]
On 20 December 2017 the NSW Auditor-General released the Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2017.
Two-thirds of NSW government agencies are failing to properly safeguard their data, increasing the risk of improper access to confidential information about members of the public and identity fraud by cyber criminals.
The finding has emerged from an audit of dozens of government agencies, including those holding highly sensitive personal information collected from millions of citizens, such as NSW Health, the department of education, NSW Police Force, Roads and Maritime Services and the justice department.
While the report by auditor-general Margaret Crawford does not name the agencies failing to properly manage privileged access to their systems, it highlights the potential consequences.
"Personal information collected by public sector agencies about members of the public is of high value to cyber criminals, as it can be used to create false identities to commit other crimes," she says in the report.
"Despite these risks, we found that one agency had 37 privileged user accounts, including 33 that were dormant. The agency had no formal process to create, modify or deactivate privileged users."
Overall, Ms Crawford's report found 68 per cent of NSW government agencies "do not adequately manage privileged access to their systems".
In addition, she said, the audit determined that 61 per cent of agencies "do not regularly monitor the account activity of privileged users".
"This places those agencies at greater risk of not detecting compromised systems, data breaches and misuse," the report said.
The audit found 31 per cent of agencies "do not limit or restrict privileged access to appropriate personnel". Of those, just one-third monitor the account activity of privileged users.
It found that almost one-third of agencies breach their own security policies on user access.
The report warns that if agencies fail to implement proper controls "they may also breach NSW laws and policies and the international standards that they reference".
Read the full article here.
List of NSW Government Agencies Examined by NSW Auditor-General
Education
|
Department of Education
|
Family and Community Services
|
Department of Family and Community Services
|
New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation
|
Finance, Services and Innovation
|
Department of Finance, Services and Innovation * Specifically identified in report
|
Place Management NSW
|
Property NSW
|
Service NSW
|
Health
|
NSW Health
|
Industry
|
Department of Industry
|
Destination NSW
|
Forestry Corporation of New South Wales
|
Office of Sport
|
TAFE Commission
|
Water NSW
|
Justice
|
Department of Justice
|
Fire and Rescue NSW
|
Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales
|
NSW Police Force
|
Office of the NSW Rural Fire Service
|
Planning and Environment
|
Department of Planning and Environment
|
Essential Energy
|
Hunter Water Corporation
|
Landcom
|
Office of Environment and Heritage
|
Office of Local Government
|
Sydney Water Corporation
|
Premier and Cabinet
|
Department of Premier and Cabinet
|
Transport
|
NSW Trains
|
Rail Corporation New South Wales
|
Roads and Maritime Services
|
Sydney Trains
|
Transport for NSW
|
WCX M4 PTY Limited
|
WCX M5 PTY Limited
|
Treasury
|
Crown Finance Entity
|
Insurance and Care NSW
|
Lifetime Care and Support Authority
|
NSW Treasury Corporation
|
NSW Self Insurance Corporation
|
Excerpt from Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2017:
Some deficiencies were common across agencies
The most common internal control deficiencies were poor or absent IT controls related to:
user access management
password management
privileged access management
user acceptance testing.
The most common governance deficiencies related to:
management of cyber security risks
capital project governance
management of shared service arrangements
conflicts-of-interest management
gifts-and-benefits management
risk management maturity
ethical behaviour policies and statements.
Labels:
big data,
data retention,
information technology,
Internet,
NSW government,
privacy,
risk,
safety
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)