This was Teh Bolta on the 23rd July 2011 before the first of many judicious post updates:“Once the identity of the attackers becomes known, the consequences for Norway’s immigration policies could be profound:
A BOMBING and a separate shooting in Oslo, which appear to have targeted Norway’s prime minister and have left at least 11 people dead, are believed to be linked, police say.
Police say seven people have been confirmed dead following a bomb blast outside prime minister Jens Stoltenberg’s office in Oslo. Acting Police Chief Sveinung Sponheim told broadcaster NRK that investigators suspect today’s bombing was linked to a shooting spree that killed four people at the Labor Party’s youth camp later in the day by a gunman in a police uniform.
The bomb left seven people dead and another 15 injured, two seriously, police said.
Already the unconfirmed reports suggest our immediate suspicions are correct, although the shooter’s appearance tells us to still be cautious about our conclusions:
Abu Suleiman al-Nasser, an Islamist with links to Al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremist groups, has claimed responsibility for today’s bomb in Oslo…”
The fourth update by Bolta to the original post:
“He claims to be a Christian.”
And this was the same eejit Murdoch journalist four days later:
“HEAR that gloating sound, among the sobs for the 76 people murdered last week by Anders Behring Breivik?
Hear that cackling among the moans?
It’s Leftist polemicists, gleeful that the Norwegian murderer was a “far-Right Christian”.
How often you’ve been reminded.
One ABC news story filed on Sunday mentioned three times that Breivik was a “Christian”…”
So it’s alright for Bolta to quickly publish his erroneous suspicion that the acts of terrorism in Norway were the work of Islamic extremists, then to later mention the declared religious allegiance of the actual perpetrator – but it’s hands off the news story completely if you're not prepared to bash Teh Big Bad Left along with with him?
Andy has more hide than Jessie the Elephant!
