Thursday, 16 May 2019
At least 13 local government authorities around Australia have formally recognised a climate emergency
Clarence Valley Council,
media release, 8 May 2019:
Mayor: Jim Simmons LOCKED BAG 23 GRAFTON NSW 2460
General Manager: Ashley Lindsay Telephone: (02) 6643 0200
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Council recognises a climate emergency
ADDRESSING
climate change has become a core issue in the Clarence Valley following a
council decision to recognise there is a climate emergency that requires urgent
actions by all levels of government and the community.
Council
has joined a number of local councils that have recognised the urgency needed
to implement actions to mitigate and adapt to projected climate change impacts.
Australia’s
climate has warmed by 1°C since 1910 and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) September 2018 report on global warming highlights the serious
risks of not containing global warming to 1.5°C or below. Current projections
are tracking for more than 3°C of global warming by 2100.
To
stay below 1.5°C the IPCC concludes the world must embark on a World War II
level of effort to transition away from fossil fuels and start removing carbon
dioxide from the atmosphere at large scale.
Council
has previously decided to fast track a strategy of cutting Council emissions by
40% and increase the use of renewables to 50% before 2030.
At
its last meeting, council adopted a five-point resolution aimed at addressing
climate change urgently, including making “climate change” a sub heading in all
council reports and continuing to carry out actions in an earlier “100%
Renewables” strategy.
Waste
and sustainability coordinator, Ken Wilson, said there were cost savings for
council from its energy efficiency gains and onsite solar, with an average
payback period of 6.5 years.
He
said council’s recognition of a climate emergency provided an opportunity to
lobby other levels of government on the urgency of cutting emissions.
“Council’s
work to date and the ambitious strategy for increasing renewable energy and
reducing emissions is doing well, however the community Climate Change Advisory
Committee considers council should engage our local community and other levels
of government to communicate there is a climate emergency and we all need to do
more,” he said.
At
least another 12 local government authorities around Australia have formally
recognised a climate emergency, including Upper Hunter Shire Council, Blue
Mountains, Hawkesbury and Bellingen councils in NSW. The British parliament has
also just resolved to declare a national climate emergency.
*
NSW Government projections about the impact of climate change on the North
Coast are available here
Release ends.
Wednesday, 15 May 2019
Australia cannot afford a third term Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison Government
The continuous prevarication and callous disregard for any policy which might provide a sustainable future for our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren makes the Liberal and National political parties a danger to us all.........
The
Guardian, 9
May 2019:
Scott Morrison’s office
has declined to say what legislation he was referring to when he said he had
“been taking action” on a
landmark UN report about the extinction of a million different species.
On Monday, the UN
released a comprehensive, multi-year report that revealed human
society was under threat from the unprecedented extinction of the
Earth’s animals and plants. The agriculture minister, David Littleproud, said
the report “scared him”, during a debate on Wednesday.
On Tuesday, Morrison
responded to the report saying: “We already introduced and passed legislation
through the Senate actually dealing with that very issue in the last week of
the parliament. We’ve been taking action on that.”
However, no legislation
regarding animal conservation or the environment passed in the last week of
parliament.
When asked what the
legislation was, the prime minister’s office did not reply. The office of the
environment minister, Melissa Price, also did not respond when asked what
legislation Morrison was referring to.
The only legislation
regarding animals that passed within the last few months is the
Industrial Chemicals Bill 2017, which set new regulations on testing
cosmetics on animals.
However, it was passed
by both houses on 18 February – not in the last week of parliament, which was
in April.
Neither the prime
minister nor the environment minister responded to clarify if this was the bill
Morrison was referring to, or whether he made an error.
Tim Beshara, the federal
policy director of the Wilderness Society, said Morrison appeared to have
“alluded to a bill that doesn’t exist”.
“The last bill to pass the Senate from the
environment portfolio was about changing the board structure of the Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority in 2018,” he said.
“It looks like the prime
minister of Australia is so desperate to move the debate off the environment as
an issue that he has alluded to a bill that doesn’t exist so that journalists
would stop asking questions about it.”…..
On Wednesday, Morrison
also railed against the expansion of environmental regulations, calling them
“green tape”.
He told the Sydney
Morning Herald the
expansion of “green tape” – like native vegetation laws – was delaying projects
like mining and “costs jobs”.
“[Labor] want to
hypercharge an environment protection authority which will basically interfere
and seek to slow down and prevent projects all around the country,” he said.
Beshara said the timing
of this with the mass extinction report showed “excellent comedic timing”.
“What he is calling
‘green tape’, most Australians would call basic environmental protections,” he
said. “I don’t expect the prime minister to know their numbats from their
bandicoots, but I do expect them to know what bills their government has
passed, and to respond to a globally significant UN report like this with the
seriousness it deserves.”
The
Guardian, 9
May 2019:
Most clearing of
Australian habitat relied on by threatened species is concentrated in just 12
federal electorates, nine of which are held by the Coalition, an
analysis has found.
University of Queensland
scientists found more than 90% of the threatened species habitat lost since the
turn of the century has been in six electorates in Queensland, two each in NSW
and Western Australia and one in Tasmania and the Northern Territory. Most of
the land-clearing in Queensland has been to create
pasture.
The study, commissioned
by the Australian Conservation Foundation, was released following a United
Nations global assessment that found biodiversity is being lost at an
unprecedented rate, with one million species at risk of extinction. The report
warns the decline in native life could have implications for human populations
across the globe.
Threatened species
habitat loss, by federal electorates
Showing the percentage
of habitat loss used by threatened species
| Source: ACF |
The research found the
greatest loss of threatened species habitat had been in the agriculture
minister David Littleproud’s electorate of Maranoa, in southern Queensland.
Nearly two million hectares, or 43%, has been cleared since 2000, when the
federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
was introduced. Among the 85 threatened species affected are the koala, the
greater bilby, the black-throated finch and the long-nosed potoroo.
Maranoa is followed on
the list by Kennedy, home to the maverick independent Bob Katter, the Liberal
Rick Wilson’s Western Australian seat of O’Connor and Capricornia, a marginal
electorate held by the LNP’s Michelle Landry.
The environment minister
Melissa Price’s vast electorate of Durack, which covers nearly two-thirds of
Western Australia, is seventh, with more than 300,000 hectares lost.
Other seats on the list
are Flynn, Parkes, Leichhardt, Lingiari, Farrer, Dawson and Lyons.
James Watson, the
director of the university’s centre for biodiversity and conservation science,
said Australia was sleep-walking through a worsening extinction crisis.
“These results show the
laws we have to protect our wonderful natural heritage are not working and that
is a significant failure of government,” he said.
The Australian
Conservation Foundation’s nature policy analyst, James Trezise, said the next
Australian government must invest in the recovery of threatened species and
introduce strong environment laws overseen by an independent national regulator
if it was serious about reversing the decline in native wildlife…..
Australia has the highest
rate of mammal extinction in the world over the past 200 years. It
is considered
one of 17 “megadiverse” countries, which share just 10% of global land but
70% of biological diversity. A green group study found funding to the national
environment budget has been reduced
by a third since the Coalition was elected.
Habitat loss on the NSW North Coast
Richmond electorate held by Labor MP Justine Elliot - 710 ha loss
Page electorate held by Nats MP Kevin Hogan - 16,725 ha loss
Cowper electorate held by Nats MP Luke Hartsuyker until April 2019 - 5,159 ha loss
Lyne electorate held by Nats MP David Gillespie - 6,181 ha loss
Palmer loses bid in Australian High Court to stifle election coverage on 18 May 2019
![]() |
| Clive Palmer before he resigned from parliament ahead of the 2016 federal election Image: Huffington Post |
Mining billionaire Clive Palmer may be back onto the Forbes Australian Rich List and currently attempting to 'buy' his way into the Senate on 18 May 2019, but the High Court of Australia is unimpressed by his latest legal foray.
The Court unanimously dismissed Clive Palmer's application with reasons to be given at a later date.
The Court unanimously dismissed Clive Palmer's application with reasons to be given at a later date.
SBS
News, 7 May2019:
Clive Palmer's attempt to delay the publication of early results on federal
election night has been shot down by the High Court.
Mr Palmer wanted the
detailed data kept quiet until all polling booths had closed, lest last-minute
crowds in far-flung locations be swayed by the results.
He was concerned West
Australian voters who left their run until the last two hours could be
influenced by early figures from the eastern states.
But the full bench of
the High Court ruled the Australian Electoral Commission does not need to wait
for stragglers in WA before broadcasting indications in east coast seats.
"The court is
unanimous in its view that the application should be dismissed," Chief
Justice Susan Kiefel said on Tuesday…..
Mr Palmer's case takes
aim at the AEC's two-candidate preferred counting practice.
This is used on election
night to give an early indication of results.
But the two candidates
listed are almost always from Labor and the coalition, rather than the minor
parties or independents. But the two candidates listed are almost always from
Labor and the coalition, rather than the minor parties or independents…….
Solicitor-General
Stephen Donaghue downplayed the potential "bandwagon" effect.
Mr Donaghue said
last-minute voters in WA voters could be influenced by many other factors,
including basic voting figures and exit polls.
He also argued the
federal election was not a presidential race, with people in WA voting for
different local candidates than those on the east coast.
Palmer's United Australia Party is said to be standing candidates in every federal electorate and for Senate positions in every state.
Palmer's United Australia Party is said to be standing candidates in every federal electorate and for Senate positions in every state.
The
Guardian
reported on 1 May 2019 that almost 40% of all United Australia party candidates
do not live in the electorates they are standing for and, the party has
recruited senior executives from Clive Palmer’s mining interests to fill its
ranks.
Tuesday, 14 May 2019
Quality of Australian television & radio will take a dive under a re-elected Morrison Government
The Sydney Morning Herald, 6 May 2019:
The ABC is facing
"inevitable" job cuts and programming disruption if the Morrison government
is returned to power, the national broadcaster's new managing director has
warned.
In his first interview
in the new job, David Anderson told Radio National's Patricia Karvelas that
planning for two possible budget scenarios was at the top of his to-do list,
after establishing a new leadership team.
One of those options is
a budget in which the ABC's indexation funding is frozen for the next three
years.
"If the Coalition
is returned, then we have an $84 million budget reduction over the next three
years," Mr Anderson said.
"Having been
through a number of budget reductions to this point, I don’t see how we can
avoid staff cuts and, I think, disruption to our content. I think it’s
inevitable."
None of the options
available for finding $84 million in savings were great, he said.
Labels:
ABC radio,
ABC television,
entertainment,
funding,
government policy
UN-UNESCO Global Assessment Report: "The loss of species, ecosystems and genetic diversity is already a global and generational threat to human well-being."
Smithsonian.com, 6 May 2019:
Our world is losing
biodiversity, and fast. According to a report released today by the United
Nations, up to one million species could face extinction in the near future due
to human influence on the natural world. Such a collapse in biodiversity would
wreak havoc on the interconnected ecosystems of the planet, putting human
communities at risk by compromising food sources, fouling clean water and air,
and eroding natural defenses against extreme weather such as hurricanes and
floods.
In the sweeping
UN-backed report, hundreds of scientists found that biodiversity loss poses a
global threat on par with climate change. A 40-page “Summary for Policy Makers”
was released in advance of the full report, which is expected to be published
later this year and span nearly 2,000 pages. The document calls the rate of
change in nature “unprecedented” and projects that species extinctions will
become increasingly common in the coming decades, driven by factors such as
land development, deforestation and overfishing.
“The basic message is
the same as what the scientific community has been saying for more than 30
years: Biodiversity is important in its own right. Biodiversity is important
for human wellbeing, and we humans are destroying it,” Robert Watson, the
former chair of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity
and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) that produced the report, said during a press
conference on Monday.
To produce the report,
145 biodiversity experts plus hundreds of other contributors compiled
information over three years from 15,000 sources. For years, scientists have
been sounding the alarm about biodiversity’s dramatic decline in what some have
dubbed the world’s sixth
mass extinction event. This die-off, however, differs from the other five
in its central cause: humans.
As the global assessment
confirms, human activity is a major driver of biodiversity decline among
the millions of species on Earth. The report ranks some of the
top causes of species loss as changes in land and sea use, direct exploitation
of organisms (like hunting or fishing), climate change, pollution and invasive
alien species (often introduced by human travel across ecosystems).
The current global rate of species extinction is already “at least tens to
hundreds of times higher than it has averaged over the past 10 million years,”
and it’s expected to keep accelerating.
All in all, human action
has “significantly altered” about 75 percent of the world’s land environment
and 66 percent of its marine environment, according to the report. Insect
populations have plummeted in tropical forests, grasslands
are increasingly drying out into deserts, and pollution along with ocean
acidification is driving
many coral reef ecosystems to the brink.
The destruction of
biodiversity at all levels, from genes to ecosystems, could pose
significant threats to humankind, the report says. In addition to affecting
human access to food resources, clean water and breathable air, a loss of
species on a global scale could also clear a path for diseases and parasites to
spread more quickly, says Emmett Duffy, a biodiversity expert with the
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center who contributed to the report.
“Historically, a lot of
us have thought about conservation and extinction in terms of charismatic
animals like pandas and whales,” Duffy says. “But there’s a very strong utilitarian
reason for saving species, because people depend on them. There’s an
environmental justice aspect.”
The effects of
biodiversity loss won’t be distributed equally, either, the researchers found.
The most devastating impacts would disproportionately affect some of the
world’s poorest communities, and the report concludes that the decline in
biodiversity undermines global progress toward the Sustainable
Development Goals, milestones set by the U.N. General Assembly in 2015 to
reduce global inequality…..
IPBES Global
Assessment Preview,
excerpt:
Important
aspects of the Global Assessment
Building upon earlier IPBES assessment
reports, especially the recently-released Land Degradation and Restoration
Assessment and the Regional Assessment Reports for Africa, the Americas,
Asia-Pacific and Europe and Central Asia (March, 2018), the Global Assessment:
• Covers all land-based ecosystems
(except Antarctica), inland water and the open oceans
• Evaluates changes over the past 50 years — and implications for our economies, livelihoods, food security and quality of life
• Explores impacts of trade and other global processes on biodiversity and ecosystem services
• Ranks the relative impacts of climate change, invasive species, pollution, sea and land use change and a range of other challenges to nature
• Identifies priority gaps in our available knowledge that will need to be filled
• Projects what biodiversity could look like in decades ahead under six future scenarios: Economic Optimism; Regional Competition; Global Sustainability; Business as Usual; Regional Sustainability and Reformed Markets
• Assesses policy, technology, governance, behaviour changes, options and pathways to reach global goals by looking at synergies and trade-offs between food production, water security, energy and infrastructure expansion, climate change mitigation, nature conservation and economic development
• Evaluates changes over the past 50 years — and implications for our economies, livelihoods, food security and quality of life
• Explores impacts of trade and other global processes on biodiversity and ecosystem services
• Ranks the relative impacts of climate change, invasive species, pollution, sea and land use change and a range of other challenges to nature
• Identifies priority gaps in our available knowledge that will need to be filled
• Projects what biodiversity could look like in decades ahead under six future scenarios: Economic Optimism; Regional Competition; Global Sustainability; Business as Usual; Regional Sustainability and Reformed Markets
• Assesses policy, technology, governance, behaviour changes, options and pathways to reach global goals by looking at synergies and trade-offs between food production, water security, energy and infrastructure expansion, climate change mitigation, nature conservation and economic development
What the CSIRO
and climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au
state about coastal New South Wales:
KEY MESSAGES
·
Average
temperatures will continue to increase in all seasons (very high confidence).
·
More
hot days and warm spells are projected with very high confidence. Fewer
frosts are projected with high confidence.
·
Decreases
in winter rainfall are projected with medium confidence. Other changes are
possible but unclear.
·
Increased
intensity of extreme rainfall events is projected, with high confidence.
·
Mean
sea level will continue to rise and height of extreme sea-level events will
also increase (very high confidence).
·
A
harsher fire-weather climate in the future (high confidence).
·
On
annual and decadal basis, natural variability in the climate system can act to
either mask or enhance any long-term human induced trend, particularly in the
next 20 years and for rainfall.
At its ordinary monthy meeting of 23 April 2019 Clarence Valley Council passed the following resolution:
Monday, 13 May 2019
Only 5 more sleeps until federal polling day across Australia & Newspoll still predicts that the Morrison Coalition will lose government
This is the 54th consecutive Newspoll in which Labor leads on a Two Party Preferred (TPP) basis.
The last time the Coalition scored a higher TPP than Labor was on election day in 2016.
Primary Vote - Coalition 39 (up 1 point) Labor 37 (up 1 point)
Two Party Preferred (TPP) Vote - Coalition 49 (unchanged) Labor 51(unchanged)
Voter Net
Satisfaction with Leaders - Scott Morrison 0 (up 1 point) Bill Shorten -10 (up 8 points)
| Newspoll results 11-12 May 2019, published 13 May 2019 |
If an election was held today then Labor would form government with 77 House of Representatives seats to the Coalition's 68 seats.
Both Pauline Hanson's One Nation and Clive Palmer's United Australia Party would have 0 seats in the Lower House.
Based on preference flows at the June 2016 federal election Antony Green predicts that Labor will gain the electorates of Robertson (NSW), Gilmore (NSW), Flynn (Qld), Ford (Qld) and Capricornia (Qld).
All five of these electorates were held by either the Liberal Party or Liberal-National Party at the 2016 election.
Previous Newspolls
Previous Newspolls
Labels:
elections 2019,
poll,
statistics
This move by Murdoch’s News Corp has Scott Morrison’s political paw prints all over it
Standing in
the shadows pulling the strings of those willing to make spurious or defamatory
claims about a political opponent worked so well for the interim Prime Minister
and Liberal MP for Cook Scott Morrison
in the past that he appears to be doing it again.
Last time the
efforts of his political puppets cost News
Corp tens of thousands of dollars in legal costs and like last time The Daily Telegraph is the
Liberals vehicle of choice.
The smear campaign
revealed……..
The
Saturday Paper,
11 May 2019, excerpt:
Midweek, Murdoch’s
Sydney tabloid The Daily Telegraph went for broke. On page one, it
ran a story under the headline “Mother of invention”, and set out to destroy
what it said was hailed as Shorten’s “election-winning moment”. It accused him
of omitting the fact his mother went on to enjoy an illustrious career as a
barrister. The paper said he had failed to disclose that his mother graduated
law later in life “and [practised] at the bar for six years”. It said the Labor
chief had only told half the family story. If that were the case, however, he
left out the half that gives even more potency to his mother’s legacy.
One senior Liberal wondered who was the genius on their
side who thought it a good idea to prompt the Telegraph’s ill-considered
and cockamamie attack. Gallery journalists confirm the “Libs were shopping the
story around on Tuesday”.
Melbourne’s Herald Sun, unlike its Brisbane
stablemate, The Courier-Mail, refused to take it. Scott Morrison played
the innocent bystander.
He told reporters it was a “very upsetting story” and he can understand that
Shorten would have been “very hurt by it”. That was an understatement. The
opposition leader was furious.
For 10 minutes during a
half-hour press conference on Wednesday, Shorten spoke of his mother’s
achievements. Fighting back tears, he told of a woman in her 50s with grey
hair, who, even though she topped her law school, could not get a law firm to
take her on for articles. When she eventually got to the bar, she struggled for
briefs – “she got about nine briefs in her time”. Far from fulfilling her
dream, as the Murdoch hatchet job claimed, she went back to education. The
partisan attack on the Labor leader opened the way for him to hit back at one
of the Liberals’ biggest vulnerabilities: their failure to promote more women
through their parliamentary ranks. Their most high-profile and credible woman,
Julie Bishop, has quit. She won’t be at the party’s Mother’s Day launch on
Sunday to support Morrison, the man who blocked her run for the leadership.
Shorten says the experience of his mother – “the smartest woman I’ve ever
known” – is why he believes in the equal treatment of women.
News Corp sources say the Tele has another
story on their news file to throw at Shorten. It is highly defamatory and
legally dubious.
The desperation that led to the attack on Shorten and his mother’s memory may
give them pause to think about running it. As one Labor campaign worker says,
“It’s difficult to know where the government ends and News Corp begins.” [my
yellow highlighting]
Phase Two of the smear campaign.......
A scurrilous, below-the-radar whispering campaign has broken through onto social media.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
