Tuesday, 9 September 2025

NSW Minns Labor Government announced the creation of the Great Koala National Park on Monday 7 September 2025. However, it may be too soon to broach the champagne as there are a number of conditions & caveats of concern & a timeline which may not see this park legally established before the 2027 NSW State Election


The Minns Labor Government came to power on 23 March 2023 for an initial four year term.


It was elected by the people of New South Wales on an election platform that included the creation of the Great Koala National Park. Indeed this was the third time Labor had taken the Great Koala National Park proposal to an election.


However, despite a recognised koala extinction crisis being underway, no sooner was the Minns state ministry sworn in than this assurance was put on the back burner.


State-owned Forestry NSW was allowed to continue at an increased pace to log native forests within the proposed boundaries of the Great Koala National Park to the detriment of biodiversity and endangered, vulnerable & protected native wildlife.


Now having passed the halfway point of its four year-term in government and facing another election in March 2027, the Minns Government appears to have suddenly realised that it would be politically unwise not to formally announce that at an unspecified date in the future it will legislate the creation of the Great Koala National Park - with qualifications and caveats attached to this announcement set out below in its media release.


MINNS SHARPE MORIARTY SAFFIN - MEDIA RELEASE - THE GREAT KOALA NATIONAL PARK - SUNDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER 2025

7 September 2025 at 07:04


OFFICIAL


Chris Minns Premier of New South Wales

Penny Sharpe Minister for Climate Change

Minister for Energy

Minister for the Environment

Minister for Heritage

Tara Moriarty Minister for Agriculture

Minister for Regional NSW

Minister for Western NSW

Janelle Saffin Minister for Small Business

Minister for Recovery

Minister for the North Coast


MEDIA RELEASE


The Great Koala National Park

Sunday, 7 September 2025



MAP: NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service
Click on image to enlarge


The Minns Labor Government has today confirmed the next major step delivering on an election commitment to protect koalas in the wild, announcing the proposed boundary for the Great Koala National Park, alongside a comprehensive plan to support workers, industry and local communities.


On National Threatened Species Day, the NSW Government is announcing:


  • The proposed boundary for the Great Koala National Park

  • An immediate temporary moratorium on timber harvesting within this proposed boundary

  • A comprehensive worker and industry support package

  • $6m in community and small business supports for the mid-north coast region

  • An additional $60 million to establish the park.


Without action, koalas are on track to be extinct in the wild in NSW by 2050. At the last election, we promised to take action to establish the Great Koala National Park — and today we are delivering on that commitment.


The park will reserve 176,000 hectares of state forest and connect with existing national parks to create a 476,000-hectare reserve – one of the largest in NSW.


This park will protect more than 12,000 koalas, 36,000 Greater Gliders and habitat for over 100 other threatened species.


The Government has imposed a temporary moratorium effective Monday 8 September 2025 on timber harvesting within the proposed park boundary.


The NSW Government has planned carefully and will stand with affected workers, businesses and communities every step of the way.


It’s why today we are announcing comprehensive assistance for impacted business and workers.


The immediate temporary moratorium will have an impact on 6 out of more than 25 timber mills in the region and approximately 300 jobs.


Assistance includes JobKeeper-style payments to support workers by covering salaries, and also financial assistance towards business operating costs.


As well as financial payments to cover salaries, workers and their families will have immediate free access to mental health, financial and legal counselling services and training support.


The Government has contacted every impacted mill and will now commence discussions with them about their long-term options and ensure appropriate support for workers.


The Government recognises there will be challenges as the transition begins and is committed to working with local communities every step of the way.


The NSW Government has also committed $6 million to support new opportunities for tourism and small businesses on the Mid North Coast, with the package to be developed in consultation with local communities to grow jobs and investment as the Great Koala National Park is established.


An additional $60 million in funding is being announced for the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service to support the establishment of the park. This is in addition to the $80 million announced in 2023.


The final creation of the park is dependent on the successful registration of a carbon project under the Improved Native Forest Management Method, which is currently moving through the Federal Government assessment processes.


Today's announcement follows extensive consultation with industry and community stakeholders and a comprehensive expert assessment process.


The Government thanks everyone involved for their input and patience during this process.


The Great Koala National Park will not end forestry on the North Coast. The Independent Forestry Panel is continuing to provide advice to the Government to inform the Forestry Industry Action Plan.


Information is available online, via www.nsw.gov.au/greatkoalanationalpark.


Quote attributable to Premier of NSW, Chris Minns:


Koalas are at risk of extinction in the wild in NSW – that’s unthinkable. The Great Koala National Park is about turning that around.


We’ve listened carefully and we’re making sure workers, businesses and communities are supported every step of the way.”


Quote attributable to Minister for the Environment, Penny Sharpe:


The Great Koala National Park has been a dream for more than a decade. It will ensure koalas survive into the future so our grandchildren will still be able to see them in the wild.


These amazing old-growth forests are among the world’s top biodiversity hotspots – home to more than 100 threatened species including greater gliders, the powerful owl and yellow-bellied gliders.”


Quote attributable to Minister for Agriculture, Tara Moriarty:


Our government’s priority is to fully support impacted workers with payments and services during this major change.


That is why we will provide financial assistance to businesses we know will be impacted, so they can continue to pay their staff’s salaries and cover costs.


We are committed to a sustainable forestry industry in NSW.”


Quote attributable to Minister for the North Coast and Small Business, Janelle Saffin:


We are delivering on our election promise to deliver the Great Koala National Park for the North Coast.


This will deliver the protection of our most precious and loved species, our koalas, that everyone in NSW wants to see protected; and the Greater Koala National Park will also provide an economic boon for locals and businesses alike.


It is important to work together to ensure no one is left behind. We will be supporting impacted workers, businesses, communities and industry to maximise opportunities as we deliver the Great Koala National Park.


I am committed to ensure that our forest workers and small business forest operators are supported economically and emotionally through this change.”


ENDS


BACKGROUND


Nature Conservation Council of NSW


New data reveals land clearing rates in NSW jump 40% across the state

MEDIA RELEASE

28th July 2025


The Nature Conservation Council of NSW, the state’s leading environmental advocacy organisation, is calling for urgent protection of rural bushland after Government data released today shows a dramatic jump in land clearing rates.


New South Wales’ latest land clearing data shows we are wiping out over 66,000 hectares of the Australian bush each year – that's equivalent to bull-dozing Sydney’s Royal National Park four times over.


The jump in land clearing across NSW by 40% during Labor’s first year of governing is a major red flag. The Government needs to get moving on its election commitment to 'end runaway land clearing’,” Nature Conservation Council NSW CEO Jacqui Mumford said.


Just last month the state’s foremost scientific scorecard – the State of the Environment Report – signalled that nature was getting worse across the board, with vegetation clearing a major driver of biodiversity decline.


Destroying native bushland directly kills and displaces native animals, opens land up to erosion and weed invasion and decreases the health of the landscape.


If we continue on the current trajectory, scientists predict NSW will lose nearly 500 wildlife species to extinction within the next century.


The data released today is yet more evidence that NSW’s environmental laws are too weak.


We’re calling on Premier Chris Minns to do as promised and strengthen habitat clearing laws urgently.”


Some of the highest land clearing rates are occurring in the western part of the state, which is home to the last populations of endangered malleefowl and critically endangered red-tailed black-cockatoos in NSW.


Today’s findings are not surprising. When the previous government scrapped the Native Vegetation Act in 2016 we saw land clearing rates triple, and since then it’s remained out of control,” Ms Mumford said.


The data released today confirmed agriculture as the biggest driver of land clearing in NSW. In 2023, 77% of all clearing was due to agriculture – or 51,201 hectares.


It also showed that woodland and forest clearing on private land climbed particularly sharply.


Tens of thousands of hectares of private land covered with habitat, that could have supported koalas and other species, were cleared in just 12 months, and the creatures that call those trees home are paying the price,” Ms Mumford said.


Currently, agricultural businesses can bulldoze bushland, including koala habitat, without any independent assessment, due to regulation changes by the previous Liberal National Coalition Government. That needs to end.


The Labor Government promised to rein in land clearing before the last election, but it's still a free-for-all.”


Background:


· The latest data produced by the NSW Government as part of its annual Statewide Land and Tree Study (SLATS) survey shows that 66,498 hectares of NSW bush was destroyed across the state in 2023 through agriculture, native forestry and development. This is a 47% increase from 45,252 hectares cleared in 2022.


· Based on average yearly land clearing rates, since coming to Government in March 2023 around 192,525 hectares of native vegetation may have been cleared by private landowners.


· At the 2023 state election the Labor Government made commitments to: ‘stop excess land clearing, strengthen environmental protections and reform the biodiversity offset scheme’. These commitments are also articulated in their Planfor Nature.


· In 2023 77% of all vegetation cleared was on agricultural lands, 15% due to private native forestry and 8% attributed to infrastructure development.


· Clearing native vegetation directly kills and displaces native animals. Over time, the effects of habitat fragmentation and disturbance can lead to invasion by weeds and further deteriorate the condition and habitat values of the remnant vegetation.


· According to the latest NSW State of the Environment Report report cards, of the 1000 plant and animal species listed as threatened in NSW only 50% are predicted to be living within 100 years time (i.e. 500 species will be extinct in 100 years).


ENDS

 

Sunday, 7 September 2025

Now Spring has arrived and Summer months are not that far away perhaps it's time to reconsider how to reduce the risk of an encounter with a shark

 

Great White Shark
IMAGE: Australian Geographic

Human and shark interactions are not uncommon in New South Wales, Australia.


Most interactions are benign and have passed without remark over the last 237 years, though records of interactions do go back for the last 234 years. [SEE: Australian Shark-Incident Database Public Version.xlsx]


Of those incidents which have been recorded occurring in open ocean, coastal waters, ocean & surf beaches, rivers, estuaries and harbours, an est.107 resulted in no injury to the surfer, swimmer or diver.


However, an est. 47 human-shark interactions have resulted in injury to the person, with another 78 resulting in death.


Sadly, the last death in New South Wales occurred on Saturday, 6 September 2025.


This is the seventh recorded human-shark interaction in the state in 2025 to date and the first death this year.


As three of these seven incidents occurred in north-east NSW waters, perhaps now is the time for those of us living in the region to reassess our personal and family adherence to water safety rules.


Be SharkSmart is a good place to start to refresh an understanding of current safety advice. It can be found at https://www.sharksmart.nsw.gov.au/staying-safe.


How to reduce the risk of an encounter with a shark


Swim between the red and yellow flags

One of the simplest safety routines to follow is to only swim at patrolled beaches and to stay between the flags. This is the safest place to swim because lifesavers and lifeguards are there to monitor beach and water conditions and maximise the safety of all beach goers. Pay attention to the advice of the lifesavers and safety signs. Patrolled beaches may also sound shark alarms. You should leave the water as soon as an alarm is sounded or a shark is spotted.


SharkSmart swimmers and surfers

  • Tell an on-duty lifesaver or lifeguard if you see a shark.

  • Stay close to shore when swimming.

  • Stay out of the water with bleeding cuts or wounds.

  • It's best to swim, dive or surf with other people.

  • Avoid swimming and surfing at dawn, dusk and night – sharks can see you but you can’t see them. [Bull and Tiger sharks are more active at Dawn and Dusk]

  • Keep away from murky, dirty water, and waters with known effluents or sewage.

  • Avoid areas used by recreational or commercial fishers.

  • Avoid areas with signs of bait fish or fish feeding activity; diving seabirds are a good indicator of fish activity.

  • Dolphins do not indicate the absence of sharks; both often feed together on the same food, and sharks are known to eat dolphins.

  • Be aware that sharks may be present between sandbars or near steep drop offs.

  • Steer clear of swimming in canals and swimming or surfing in river/harbour mouths.

  • Avoid having pets in the water with you.

  • Keep away from shark nets and other shark mitigation measures.

  • Consider using a personal deterrent.

  • There are several commercially available shark deterrent products but the NSW Government recommends investing in a device that has been independently tested and verified. 


SharkSmart divers, snorkellers and spearfishers

  • Understand and respect the environment. Find out which species of shark you are most likely to encounter and what behaviour to expect from them.

  • Realise that diver safety becomes increasingly difficult with decreasing visibility, such as at night or in turbid water and with increasing depth and current.

  • Discuss dive logistics and contingency plans such as hand signals, entry and exit considerations and separation procedures with your dive partner before you enter the water.

  • Be aware that using bait to lure fish may attract sharks.

  • Don't chase, grab, corner, spear or touch a shark.

  • Don't use bait or otherwise attempt to feed a shark while underwater. Feeding may radically change the shark's behaviour and may lure other sharks.

  • Observe and respond to a shark's behaviour. If it appears excited or agitated, exhibiting quick, jerky movements or other erratic behaviour, leave the water as quickly and calmly as possible. Try to minimise splashing and noise.

  • Be aware of the behaviour of fish. If they suddenly dive for cover or appear agitated, leave the water as quickly and calmly as possible. A shark may be nearby.

  • Do not attach speared fish to your body or keep them near you; use a float and line to keep your catch well away.


Stay SharkSmart with our app

Check the latest sightings and tagged shark detections before you hit the water in NSW.

Download the SharkSmart app today

For iOS visit the iTunes store, or for Android visit Google Play.

@NSWSharkSmart on Twitter/X


Thursday, 4 September 2025

MARCH FOR AUSTRALIA 31 August 2025: when people believe what neo-Nazis & white supremacists loudly chant and fail to fact check before they join a march


"On 18 August, 2GB radio host Ben Fordham said that 1,544 migrants, or the equivalent of five fully-loaded Boeing 787 Dreamliners, were arriving in Australia "day after day, week after week".

Fordham went on to suggest this figure is why the 'March for Australia' protests were organised....

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) said these figures are not an accurate reflection of actual migration figures." [SBS News FactCheckers, 1 Sept 2025]

 


Because the barely concealed 'othering' of large parts of the Australian population should never be tolerated and because the combination of ignorance, racism and hate-filled violence which also occurred during the March for Australia event was a disgrace, here is a brief outline of Australia's genuine migration statistics.

 

Note: click on tables & graphs to enlarge for easier reading

 

Australian Bureau of Statistics, National, state and territory population, as of December 2024:


Estimated Resident Population (ERP).

  • Australia’s population was 27,400,013 people at 31 December 2024.

  • The quarterly growth was 91,133 people (0.3%).

  • The annual growth was 445,900 people (1.7%).

  • Annual natural increase was 105,200 and net overseas migration was 340,800.



Components of annual population change(a) Dec 04 to Dec 24



Components of annual population change by states and territories in 2024


AIFS, Births in Australia, December 2024:


The total fertility rate for Australia in 2023 was 1.50, which is the lowest ever recorded. The previous lowest rate was 1.59 recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020....

Since 1976, the total national fertility rate has been below the replacement level, which is about 2.1 births per woman....

Replacement level is the level at which a population is replaced from one generation to the next without immigration....

Over the last decade it [the fertility rate] has been below replacement level for all states and territories.

[SEE: https://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/births-australia-2024]


These figures indicate that Australia is no longer able to sustain a stable population demographic based on live births alone. The beginning of the marked fall in population replacement levels can be pinpointed to 1961 with the introduction of the contraceptive pill.


Total fertility rate in Australia, 1921-2023

[SEE: https://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/births-australia-2024]


The figures and graphs also tell us that permanent migration from overseas into the Commonwealth of Australia and its territories has not increased dramatically.


In the year ending 31 December 2024, net overseas migration:

  • was 340,800 people

  • decreased by 189,900 (35.8%) people since the previous year.

[SEE:

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release


Basically that is a rough average of est. 934 individuals per day arriving in Australia as permanent residents in 2024. Given Australia loses roughly est. 510 individuals per day due to death, then permanent migration figures are hardly the avalanche pushing Australia's population to the unsustainable level that neo-Nazis, white supremacists, far-right lobby groups and the Murdoch media say is occurring in this country. [SEE: https://www.actuaries.asn.au/research-analysis/mortality-in-first-eight-months-of-2024-2-higher-than-predicted]


Looking at state and territory population change below for the year 2024—which is comprised of natural increase, net overseas migration (overseas arrivals minus overseas departures), and net interstate migration (interstate arrivals minus interstate departures) - it clearly shows that population change is not evenly distributed between the states and territories. That metropolitan areas in some states, as well as having markedly mobile resident populations may also have higher levels of both post WWII and post-pandemic migrants.


Net overseas migration by state and territory—annual




Natural increase by state and territory – annual




Perhaps uneven population distribution is one factor which appears to make a sub-section of Australian society more susceptible to the influence of those bad actors on the political stage who are erroneously insisting that out-of-control "mass migration" is "overwhelming the country". The susceptible may come to falsely believe that all migrant numbers are exactly replicated in every corner of Australia.


Saturday, 30 August 2025

Confused about Australia's response to US President Trump's latest move creating international trade chaos - this time with low cost mailed goods? Unfortunately, it is up to the Trump Administration to sort out implementation of this policy & supply a coherent explanation to the international community, so Australia is probably in for weeks or even months of frustrating uncertainty .


On Friday 29 August 2025 US President Donald Trump's tariffs & fees applying to de minimis (low cost) goods valued up to US $800 entering American territory by way of a postal service came into effect. From that day all goods entering the country by mail became subject to a charge reflecting the July-August 2025 US trade tariffs imposed on the specific country of origin/sale of these low cost goods.


Before 29 August no tariff applied to low cost goods under an international de minimis rule within trade agreements between countries. The cut-off amount for tariff exemption varies between trade agreements.


Between 1 October 2024 and 30 June 2025 a total of 945.3 million such mailed items from all points of the globe arrived in the U.S. having been mailed by small businesses advertising directly on the Internet or operating on platforms such as Etsy or eBay, as well as sent as gifts mailed by individuals living abroad to friends or family living in America.


During those nine months the de minimis value of such goods was calculated to total US $49.8 billion, which roughly averages out at an estimated value of US$52.68 per padded envelope/package.


Like most changes to international trade with the U.S. it came via a presidential order containing more rhetorical flourish than established fact or hard detail. This one titled "SUSPENDING DUTY-FREE DE MINIMIS TREATMENT FOR ALL COUNTRIES" dated 30 June 2025.


Given President Trump appears to believe that these new charges/fees on low cost goods imported by mail into America should be borne by the seller not the importer and because of the uncertainty concerning the point along international mail routes at which new charges/fees become payable and by whom, Australia along with at least 32 other countries has suspended all package mail into the U.S.with Australia only continuing the delivery of letters, documents and gifts worth less than $150.


BACKGROUND


CNBC, 28 August 2025, excerpts:


The de minimis exemption lets U.S. consumers import $800 worth of goods free of tariffs, duties and fees. The rule makes it cheaper for consumers who buy products directly from international sellers.


The volume of these low-value shipments has swelled amid the rise of e-commerce, experts said.


In 2024, the U.S. received about 1.4 billion de minimis shipments, more than double the 637 million in 2020, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.


The average de minimis shipment was about $48 in 2024, according to CBP data....


All shipments — including beauty products from Korea, leather shoes from Italy, kitchen knives from Japan — will be subject to additional fees and taxes, such as tariffs that the Trump administration has levied on most U.S. trading partners....


For the consumer, it can be quite a big price increase,” said Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, whose research specializes in trade with China and global supply chains.


The actual price increase for consumers will depend on many factors such as country-specific tariff rates, duties the U.S. places on goods and manufacturing materials, and how businesses adjust pricing, economists said.


Here’s how the end of de minimis would impact some specific consumer goods, according to a FlavorCloudanalysis:


  • $30 slippers (lightweight, premium cotton) from China would cost about $45, a 51% increase;

  • $37 nutritional supplements (plant-based, performance-formulated) from Canada would cost about $60, up 60%;

  • A $240 chef’s knife (with wooden handle and white steel) from Japan would cost about $298, up 24%.


Pablo Fajgelbaum, an economics professor at University of California, Los Angeles, and Amit Khandelwal, an economics professor at Yale University, write that de minimis is a “pro-poor trade policy.”...



ABCNews, 29 August 2025, excerpt:



Why Australia Post halted most US shipping


Australia Post's suspension of most shipments to the US follows the Trump administration axing the "deminimis" exemption.


Until now, parcels of goods worth less than $US800 ($1,230) were not taxed when they arrived in the US — an exemption relied upon by many Australian retailers to send items to the US duty-free.


This exemption was axed for China already in 2025, throwing retailers including Shein and Temu off guard.


Australia Post is taking the extraordinary step of immediately suspending many forms of shipping to the United States.


Originally, this exemption was not supposed to end for the rest of the world until 2027. Yet last month, the deadline was brought forward to August 29, 2025.


"Until such time as the actual decision was going to be enforced, we ran the risk of actually going early and then the US government changing its mind again, which it has done before," Mr Graham told ABC News.


"We couldn't give [our customers] concrete advice."

"It's been very difficult for our team members, but most importantly, difficult for our customers.


"Because there has been a degree of uncertainty around the whole tariff landscape for the US Is it on? Is it not on?


"Originally, we were told that the de minimis would not be removed until 2027 and then the system was brought rapidly forward, but we have to deal with that.


"We have to roll with those punches."




TheWashington Post, 23 August 2025, excepts:



Postal operators in several countries have announced they will suspend certain deliveries to the United States, ahead of an end to a long-standing tariff exemption for packages worth $800 or less.


President Donald Trump has framed the decision as part of a fight against illegal drugs. But mail companies abroad are halting some of their services to the U.S., saying that many aspects of the new rules remain unclear.


Here's what to know.


The facts

Previously, most imported goods with a value of $800 or less were exempt from tariffs. That rule, known as the de minimis exemption, is set to end on Friday — though letters or personal gifts worth less than $100 won't be affected, postal operators said.


A number of national mail companies from countries such as France, Germany, the U.K and India have responded by temporarily suspending some mail services to the U.S.


For consumers, this could mean delays in receiving packages — which may now also incur tariffs of $80 or more.....


What will it mean for consumers?

The extra charges on a package will depend on the methodology used to calculate it, according to the executive order. The duty rate will either match the level of tariff the U.S. has imposed on the country of origin, or a specific duty based on the following:


For countries with a tariff rate of 15 percent or less, such as Britain, each package will incur an additional charge of $80.


Parcels originating from countries with U.S. tariffs of between 16 and 25 percent will incur an additional $160.


Countries with a tariff rate of more than 25 percent will face an extra $200.


Letters, documents and gifts under $100 are exempt — though DHL said in a statement that any parcel declared as a gift "will be subject to even stricter controls than before to prevent the misuse of private gift shipments for sending commercial goods."


UPDATE


See: V.O.S. Selections Inc et al v Donald J Trump et al 


1. https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/25-1812.OPINION.8-29-2025_2566151.pdf and

2. https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/25-1812.ORDER.8-29-2025_2566157.pdf



 

Tuesday, 19 August 2025

The cost of climate change resulting in bushfires, destructive storms, floods, coastal erosion & inundation is becoming self evident, but where is government consideration of what that really means to regions like the Northern Rivers in NE NSW?


Echo, editorial, 15 August 2025:


The cost of climate change


Over the weekend we saw the cancellation of the Byron Writers Festival owing to another significant rain event on the NSW east coast.


Wildfires are burning again in Greece as temperatures ramp up across Europe, California has seen evacuations as fires burn again, and it wasn’t that long ago that our news feeds were filled with the Texas flash flood that washed children and adults away.


According to The Guardian, some parts of NSW have seen more than ‘their average monthly rainfall dramatically exceeded in the first eight days of August’.


It was predicted that climate change in the Northern Rivers of NSW would see an increase in rainfall, and that it would also see an increase in rain bursts, which is when a large amount of rain falls in a short time, which can lead to flash flooding.


A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture, and more energy to fuel storms,’ explained the Climate Council in their 2025 report At Our Front Door: Escalating Climate Risks For Aussie Homes.


We are experiencing more of our rain in the form of short, intense downpours leading to a greater risk of floods.’


Since the 2022 floods we have heard how communities need to be ‘resilient’ in the face of climate change. However, it is not just the soft skills of resilience we need, but hard investments from government to create more resilient infrastructure along with action on climate-change reduction targets.


We are still looking at roads and infrastructure yet to be repaired since the 2022 floods. When grants finally do become available, they are more likely to be ‘like for like’ rather than the government-touted ‘build back better’.


Action is needed from all levels of government to meet the needs of their communities locally, nationally, and globally. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has pointed out the obvious economic pain: ‘Climate change has caused over $3.6 trillion in damage since 2000.’


In addition the Australian Investor Group on climate change (https://igcc.org.au) stated that, ‘New economic modelling shows climate damage will deliver a 14 per cent annual hit to Australia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) if current global climate policies continue, wiping out $6.8 trillion from our economy between now and 2050 and cutting thousands of dollars a year out of the pockets of Australians.’


While the cost of action may seem high the cost of inaction is extreme. The Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) estimates that climate finance needed to ensure global temperatures do not rise above 1.5°C could increase up to USD 12.2 trillion per year between now and 2050.


When you consider the future cost of inaction, governments should be clearly spelling out the how, the why, and the value of taking action on climate change right now.


Aslan Shand, editor


For those living along the edge of the coastal fringe of New South Wales climate change impacts are very real and, many coastal local governments are no longer in denial of the potential scope of the change facing their communities - even if current available coastal inundation projections may be overly optimistic when it comes to timeframes.


These are the nearest pressure points to where I live - and coastal inundation projections from 2025 to 2090 are not measured in kilometres but in metres from my home in Yamba at the mouth of the Clarence River and estuary.

 

PRESSURE POINT A





PRESSURE POINT B




Note: Shades of rusty red/pink denote areas of coastal inundation. Clarence Valley Council interactive mapping tool can be found at: