Google Australia expresses concern in face of Rudd Government intention to censor its search engine

One of the interesting snippets to emerge in discussion of the Rudd Government commissioned report from Enex Test Labs is that the 'live' pilot of the proposed national Internet filtering scheme involved six out of nine of participating Internet Service Providers using filtering software which permanently locks Google's search engine into safe mode and possibly sends URL information back to the U.S. software vendor (this is a company which coincidentally seems to have a board dominated by accountants, financial advisers, venture capitalists and former investment bankers which are just the sort of people that the Global Financial Crisis has taught us to trust).
The software also locks Yahoo! search.

Anyone who has ever researched some of the more obscure historical information available using the World Wide Web will know that this safe mode frequently fails to display innocuous but often useful information and images.

Google's safe mode is of course a personal choice available to every PC user and strict search engine filtering can be locked in with password access.

Google Australia is naturally perturbed by the Rudd Government's drive to impose blanket censorship of the Australian Internet and posted this on its official blog on 16 December 2009.

A sincere thank you to Google's I.Flynn for this effort:

Our views on Mandatory ISP Filtering

At Google we are concerned by the Government's plans to introduce a mandatory filtering regime for Internet Service Providers (ISP) in Australia, the first of its kind amongst western democracies. Our primary concern is that the scope of content to be filtered is too wide.

We have a bias in favour of people's right to free expression. While we recognise that protecting the free exchange of ideas and information cannot be without some limits, we believe that more information generally means more choice, more freedom and ultimately more power for the individual.

Some limits, like child pornography, are obvious. No Australian wants that to be available – and we agree. Google, like many other Internet companies, has a global, all-product ban against child sexual abuse material and we filter out this content from our search results. But moving to a mandatory ISP filtering regime with a scope that goes well beyond such material is heavy handed and can raise genuine questions about restrictions on access to information.

The recent report by Professors Catharine Lumby, Lelia Green, and John Hartley, Untangling The Net: The Scope of Content Caught By Mandatory Internet Filtering, has found that a wide scope of content could be prohibited under the proposed filtering regime. Refused Classification (or RC) is a broad category of content that includes not just child sexual abuse material but also socially and politically controversial material -- for example, educational content on safer drug use -- as well as the grey realms of material instructing in any crime, including politically controversial crimes such as euthanasia. This type of content may be unpleasant and unpalatable but we believe that government should not have the right to block information which can inform debate of controversial issues.

While the discussion on ISP filtering continues, we should all retain focus on making the Internet safer for people of all ages. Our view is that online safety should focus on user education, user empowerment through technology tools (such as SafeSearch Lock), and cooperation between law enforcement and industry partners. The government has committed to important cybersafety education and engagement programs and yesterday announced additional measures that we welcome.

Exposing politically controversial topics for public debate is vital for democracy. Homosexuality was a crime in Australia until 1976 in ACT, NSW in 1984 and 1997 in Tasmania. Political and social norms change over time and benefit from intense public scrutiny and debate. The openness of the Internet makes this all the more possible and should be protected.

The government has requested comments from interested parties on its proposals for filtering and we encourage everyone to make their views known in this important debate.

Posted by Iarla Flynn, Head of Policy, Google Australia

As I write Twitter's #nocleanfeed protest page is running at 35 tweets a minute and The Sydney Morning Herald poll this morning did not favour the Great Firewall of Australia:

You can censor the Internet Mr. Rudd, but you can't interfer with our votes at the next election

First Rudd's Labor team quietly snuck its telecommunications policy onto the Web at almost the last minute before Australia went to the polls in the 2007.
Now as the country gears up for Christmas the Rudd Government releases the much delayed Enex Test Lab Internet Service Provider (ISP) Content Filtering Pilot Report (I see Senator Conroy received it in October) while simultaneously announcing that it intends to introduce mandatory national ISP-level filtering when federal parliament resumes next year.
Well, Mr. Rudd, your government has finally crossed that line in the sand and lost all hope of getting our votes in 2010 or 2011. We'd rather waste our votes on an independent (and exhaust ballot preferences before they reach any of the major parties) than vote for your sorry excuse for a government.
There have been so many betrayals; public health and dental services still abysmal, bad laws stomping on our human rights still on the books, no protection of whales in the Antarctic, p*ss poor environmental record on the land, a pathetic failed attempt at an ETS, no reduction in national greenhouse gas levels (in fact an increase), aboriginal remote community living conditions still disgraceful, gays still unable to legally marry - the list gets longer and longer.
We don't believe Stephen Conroy when he says that the URL blacklist process will be transparent (obviously an oxymoron - a transparent secret list) and we think you all lie when promises are made that only RC classification sites will be blocked in light of the fact that the old ACMA and Classification Board assessment policies will remain and these can even see a school tuckshop banned.
Talk about a poxy policy!

Bill 'n' Ben
Northern Rivers

* Guest Speak is a North Coast Voices segment allowing serious or satirical comment from NSW Northern Rivers residents. Email ncvguestpeak at live dot com dot au to submit comment for consideration.

Dear Kev, Oh how I hate to write.........

A direct tweet sent to Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd last night:

Monsanto under the media spotlight once again

Click on image to enlarge

Monsanto and Co is under the media spotlight once more at US ABC News in a four-page article AP IMPACT: Monsanto Seed Business Role Revealed which looks at how this biotech company is determined to create a global seed monopoly.

Something Australian farmers and consumers should consider carefully, given government's almost uncritical acceptance of gene technology, the very narrow profit margins of many family farms and those comfortable margins jealously defended by the dominant retail grocery companies.

"We now believe that Monsanto has control over as much as 90 percent of (seed genetics). This level of control is almost unbelievable," said Neil Harl, agricultural economist at Iowa State University who has studied the seed industry for decades. "The upshot of that is that it's tightening Monsanto's control, and makes it possible for them to increase their prices long term. And we've seen this happening the last five years, and the end is not in sight."

Monsanto is rather upset about the claims made in this and other similar articles and, as usual, has gone into print itself with a quick muddy of the waters over at its own blog Beyond The Rows.

I'm sure that everyone is relieved to know that, according to its corporate blogger Mica, the biotech giant really doesn't control 90 per cent of seed genetics because; we licensed the technology to hundreds of seed companies, including our major competitors, and no one has offered a better product to these seed companies or to growers.

* This post is part of North Coast Voices' effort to keep Monsanto's blog monitor (affectionately known as Mr. Monsanto) in long-term employment.

NSW Labor Right tries to airbrush Nathan Rees from government history?

First new NSW Premier K-K-Keneally removed her predecessor's tweets from premierofnsw.
Now Labor Right's favourite marionette seems to be removing all his media releases from government websites as well, according to a Crikey rumour this week:
"New Premier Kristina Keneally has decided to wind back one of Nathan Rees' first actions as Premier -- the publication and archiving of all ministerial media releases on the NSW government website. The decision was heralded at the time as a long overdue move towards more open and accountable government in NSW. However, instead of a link to a minister's releases on their contact page, users are now directed to the Premier's releases instead."
Mind you, there are a few traces of Rees left on www.premiers.nsw.gov.au, but these mostly lead to 'HTTP 404 Not Found' notices whenever they are not re-directed to information about very petty Kristina.
Madame, you're visibly tripping over your own ego and pride comes before....et cetera, et cetera.

Specially for those who are good at playing la familia politics but are still profoundly ignorant about what drives NSW voters.

Pic from Google Images

Only in Australia can you trade online in Copenhagen Climate Change Conference Loopholes!

As the developed world walked out of the UN Climate Change Conference (and back in again five hours or so later) over the greenwash proposed by First World heavies and allegations of planned abandonment of the legally binding Kyoto Protocol, things really looked bad all round........
But never fear those super greenhouse gas emitting Aussies are here!

* Only in Australia would humour manifest itself so blackly, with an invitation from the Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM) at the University of New South Wales to trade in Loopholes on The Copenhagen Prediction Market (COPPM) with beaut live graphs of trading market fluctuations available and prizes at the end:
New market on loopholes launched!
Recent heated debate shows that reduction targets can only be truly interpreted if one takes into account the magnitude of loopholes. Therefore, a new market on loopholes is now open for trading.
At the COPPM, you trade on the outcomes of the Copenhagen Climate Conference (Conference of Parties, COP15).

No real money is used in trading. Instead, Participants trade with Experimental dollars (E$). The three participants who accumulate the largest final portfolio values (final value of shares plus experimental dollar holdings) on each question will be awarded a prize. On behalf of the winners, Baker & McKenzie will offset, using Gold Standard Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs), personal emissions equivalent to twelve months, four months and two months for the first, second and third prize respectively. Calculations will be based upon the world annual average per capita emissions. Winners will receive a certificate which states the offset amount (tonnes of CO2e cancelled).

Upon enrolment, you will be given an experimental cash position of E$5000 and 50 "market bundles". You can invest this experimental money in shares which represent the possible outcomes of the Conference. Only the shares that corresponds to the true outcome of the Conference pay out.

* A more sober look at what is happening in Copenhagen can be found at Climate Action Tracker with its detailed information on pledges by individual countries, including Australia's inadequate response:
With only five days to go before a Head of Government Agreement on climate change at Copenhagen, even the best emission reductions proposal are only half way to the limits in 2020 that would keep global average temperature rise below 2°C or 1.5°C as called for by 100 countries. The updated assessment by the "Climate Action Tracker" of the emission commitments and pledges put forward by industrialized and developing countries for the Copenhagen climate negotiations shows that the world is headed for a global warming of 3.5°C by 2100. Carbon dioxide concentrations are projected to be over 650 ppm, with total GHG concentrations close to 800 ppm CO2 equivalent. From these numbers, there is at least a one in four chance of exceeding a warming of 4°C.
This "Climate Action Tracker" is an independent science-based assessment, which tracks the emission commitments and actions of countries. The website provides an up-to-date assessment of individual national pledges to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

Florence Nightingale had feet of clay and nothing much has changed in nursing since then if Calvary Mater is any indictation

By the time I was in my teens it had become apparent that historical figures were not always as presented in popular history tomes considered suitable for high school students.

A case in point is Florence Nightingale, whose admirable drive to establish the nursing profession also hid an individual with almost as many prejudices and erroneous preconceptions as the average person walking the streets of London in Victorian England.

Nothing much has changed over time. The nursing profession is still quick to judge and slow to examine its own assumptions, if hospital patients I have spoken with over the years are to be believed when they complained of the degree of 'labelling' they experienced.

The latest example of this to come to light is this effort by a nurse who should have known better than to mention werewolves at all when being interviewed by The Sydney Morning Herald last Sunday:

There were 91 emergency patients rated as having violent and acute behavioural disturbance at the Calvary Mater Newcastle hospital from August 2008 to July 2009.
Leonie Calver, a clinical research nurse in toxicology, said almost a quarter of the cases (23 per cent) occurred on a night of full moon and this was double the number for other lunar phases.
The patients all had to be sedated and physically restrained to protect themselves and others.
"Some of these patients attacked the staff like animals - biting, spitting and scratching," Ms Calver said.
"One might compare them with the werewolves of the past, who are said to have also appeared during the full moon."
Ms Calver said werewolf mythology included reports of people rubbing "magic ointment" onto their skin or inhaling vapours to induce the shirt-rending transformation from man to beast.
The main ingredients were belladonna and nightshade, she said, both substances that could produce delirium, hallucinations and delusion of bodily metamorphosis.
Ms Calver said it appeared the "modern-day werewolf" preferred alcohol or illicit drugs, as more than 60 per cent of the patients reviewed in the study were under the influence.
"We don't know if its more fun to use drugs and alcohol under a full moon or if their behavioural disturbance is directly influenced by the moon," she said.
"Our findings support the premise that individuals with violent and acute behavioural disturbance are more likely to present to the emergency department during...full moon."

Calvary Mater Hospital should have looked at two things which may have influenced the raw data producing these so-called findings.
One - a full moon means more light in the landscape, which in turn means that vulnerable homeless people have less shadowed urban public space in which to conceal themselves from the predators in our society, so stress levels for some of these marginalised individuals may be higher during this time as a reaction to perceived increased threat levels rather than to a bigger moon in the sky.
Two - full moon during 10 out of the 12 months covered by this particular study fell on or within seven days of at least one type of fortnightly Centrelink payment, which meant that many individuals with long-term substance abuse problems were more likely to have had the cash to purchase alcohol and/or street drugs during a full moon. Those with serious levels of abuse and those self-medicating due to psychiatric disability are also perhaps more likely to turn up at a hospital A&E during the acute intoxication phase.

Not exactly the moon-influenced scenario favoured by the werewolf-loving Catholic hospital in Newcastle, which so foolishly sought a bit of easy publicity for a very limited study which could almost be called bureaucratic time wasting if one was inclined to be unkind.

Less mythology and more empathy required there.

The Big Dry continues and basically we're stuft for another year

Eighty percent of New South Wales is in drought once more as The Big Dry threatens to continue its relentless ten-year roll on into another decade of unreliable rainfall across the state and the rest of Australia.
El Nino predictions mean that water security may get quite desperate, for many on the land and in country towns already under pressure, before May 2010 hopefully brings an easing of this weather pattern.
While the big metropolitian areas across Australia may again have to severely ration water consumption.
Our national food bowl, the Murray-Darling Basin, will fail if this long dry continues.
Here's what NSW looked like at the end of November according to NSW Dept of Primary Industries:



















And here are four Bureau of Meteorology maps to show just how stuft we are as 2009 ends:



Click maps
to enlarge

The Not Evil Just Wrong! team are at it again

The anti-global warming Not Evil Just Wrong team are presently at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen busily trying to live up to their brag You helped us make history! Now help us redefine it!

According to one Standford University view at Fiat Lux:

Professor Stephen Schneider, leader of the Stanford delegation to COP 15 and co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 with the IPCC, was yesterday verbally assaulted by an Irish documentary filmmaker at the UN event in Copenhagen.....
The culprit is one Phelim McAleer, a little-known Irish filmmaker who recently completed "Not Evil, Just Wrong" a feature-length documentary attacking the environmental movement. Judging from the man's tremendously disrespectful behavior, one could easily distinguish that he views environmentalists with disdain, contrary to what his restrained film title might suggest....
With McAleer apparently intent on pursuing his harassment of Schneider, a security guard escorted the irate Irishman away from the professor upon completion of the Q&A.

Alternatively the Not Evil Just Wrong team over at Jennifer Marohasy's blog:
"A Stanford Professor has used United Nation security officers to silence a journalist asking him "inconvenient questions" during a press briefing at the climate change conference in Copenhagen.
"Professor Stephen Schneider's assistant requested armed UN security officers who held film maker Phelim McAleer, ordered him to stop filming and prevented further questioning after the press conference where the Stanford academic was launching a book…

The Huffington Post reported:

Nobel laureate, renowned climate scientist and good friend of former US vice-president Al Gore, Dr. Stephen Schneider, was verbally attacked today during a press conference at the United Nations Climate Talks in Copenhagen.
Dr. Schneider, an outspoken proponent of climate legislation, was announcing his latest book, "Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth's Climate , " when an unidentified man jumped on stage and began to intensely interrogate Schneider. The man became angry after Schneider addressed the leak email controversy from The University of East Anglia's world renowned Climate Research Unit. He repeatedly shouted, "do you approve of deleting data, Dr. Schneider? Do you approve of deleting data?" The man then accused the professor of attempting to censor the press.

As these particular climate change denialists have a recent history of being very loose with the truth, I know who I'm inclined to believe when it comes to what actually happened at this press conference.

Japan's Foreign Minister makes an understatement about an overstatement on whaling

From an interview with The Australian and ABC on 11th December 2009:
"When I met with your Foreign Minister Mr. Smith, I said to him when I described the situation: 'For the Japanese, whaling is equivalent to the Australian beef". I may have overstated, maybe I shouldn't have said that."
Yeah, talking up whaling in that way is definitely an overstatement - whale meat is getting harder to sell to the general public in Japan and beef consumption is on the rise over there with imported beef dominating the market - and "I shouldn't have said that" gets my prize for understatement of the month.

Climate 1 Stop website should settle some of those arguments about climate change impacts

Climate 1 Stop is a new search tool which "provides a single location to access proven climate change tools, resources and information, with a primary focus on adaptation in developing countries.The Climate 1 Stop is a partnership of southern and northern organizations working at all levels, from grass roots to global.
We envision a just and equitable world, where learning and collaboration overcome climate change barriers to development. To that end, we seek to build climate resilience in all sectors. We are open to all and driven by user needs."

The Institute for the Application of Geospatial Technology appears to be acting as webmaster and information co-ordinator for a diverse group of twenty partners which include the United Nations and NASA.

This site is still evolving and it would be nice to see it live up to claims that it is a one-stop shop for climate change information for those vulnerable nations and island groups in the developing world.

Just for the sheer joy of it. Pictures of Antarctica

Emperor Penguins from the UK Telegraph photo gallery:

Extreme diver Norbert Wu's journey into the Antarctic underworld

Coalition super-duper accountant's obsession with China

Nats senator and Coalition front bencher Barnaby Joyce has become a trifle obsessed with the ol' yellow peril it seems.
If you believe this former Queensland accountant from St. George we're all in danger of being seriously in hock to China, which is coincidentally one of our more significant export markets.
Small problem for Joyce though - China doesn't figure as anywhere near our biggest creditor because that honour is reserved for the UK and US.
Hong Kong (which is China's only representative on the creditor list) holds around 3% of Australia's total foreign debt, but Britain holds in the vicinity of 24% and America 22% of the $114 billion or so red ink still on the books racked up by federal or state governments, financial institutions and private companies.
Less than a quarter of Australia's foreign debt is contractually long term if this Australian Parliament Library 2009 research paper has a good handle on the subject.
Barnaby mentions China so often that it's almost a nervous stutter.
Here is an abbreviated list of his comments on China over the last three years from Hansard and the media:

This is money that people want back. Most of them are from overseas. How much more money do you want to owe to these people? The biggest one being the Communist People's Republic of China.
Under this massive new tax of the Australian Labor Party, they will be signing us up to an agreement as a result of which we will be borrowing money from China to pay the interest to China to send back to China to develop China.

The Labor Party cannot tell you exactly how this tax is going to do anything to the temperature of the globe by itself. They aspire to grab America and China.

We have this ridiculous proposition that if we pass this bill we are going to be borrowing money from China to send back to China to help develop China. We will be borrowing money from China and from Saudi Arabia to send to African despots.

We have no money. We are in debt up to our eyeballs. We will be borrowing money from countries such as China to send back to China to help China develop, when we thought they were already doing a pretty good job at it.

So we will be borrowing money from China to pay back to China to develop?

It has stacked us up with debt to the eyeballs so that we could go out on some spending spree and have the stimulus of the nation spread across the carpet on Christmas Day with 'made in China' written on the back.

I have clearly stated that I have no problems dealing with China—I have no problems with the trade to China. I have clearly stated that over and over again.

When this legislation came forward, there was only one other nation on earth that had legislation like this, and that was the communist People's Republic of China, which I thought was peculiar.

In fact, I stated that the stimulus would be spread across the carpet on Christmas Day with 'Made in China' written on the back of it and that it was a complete and utter waste of money. Time has proven us correct.

We will develop a plant in China. We will develop another plant in the United States. But we're not going over there, because those people are half crazy.

Do we implicitly, by association in legislation, say that ovaries are now commercial property disassociated from the person and as property can be extracted from prisoners in China or aborted foetuses in Australia?

The Australian Government would never be allowed to buy a mine in China. So why would we allow the Chinese Government to buy and control a strategic asset in our country? Stop the Rudd Government from selling Australia.

Animalia......(5)

A tail tale of Patsy and the tramp.......

The Daily Examiner, 9 December 2009

Click on image to enlarge

NASA maps global warming 1880 to 2008

NASA has mapped annual changes in global temperature over a 128 year span.
Dark blue indicates areas of greatest cooling and dark red indicates areas of greatest warming.

1881-1885

2003-2007

NASA Goddard Institute of Space Studies animated mapping here and supporting data here.

A Christmas Plea: Have you seen our Sam?

Have you seen Sam?

OUR beagle 'Sam', pictured above, went missing just north of Coffs in the floods at the beginning of November.

He is a little timid, loves to play chasie, loves his food, loves to lie on your bed, loves cuddles and children.

He is tan and white and is five years old. He is microchipped.

He is very much loved and missed. He is our baby - we have no children.

I plead to anyone who has him to please contact us on: 6656 2833.

Thank you so much for your help, I desperately want my little Sam back.

Forever in your debt,

VIVIENNE TREACY-CHANDIER,

Emerald Beach

[Letter to the Editor and photo in The Daily Examiner 10 December 2009]

You know it's December 2009 when......

Clarence Valley thunderstorm on 8 December
from The Daily Examiner 10 December 2009

.......the days are getting too close to 40C for comfort, an acrid smell of bushfire is on the back of each wind, afternoons are regularly troubled by thunderstorms, you start the evening by kicking a large cane toad out of the cat's water bowl in the kitchen and follow that up at 2am in the morning by evicting its mate from the bedroom - then stumbling into the garden at 6am the next day to see how the vegies are surviving you find yourself doing a quick skip to avoid a young brown snake playing summer refugee in the backyard.

I'm almost looking forward to winter next year except heavy rains and flooding bring their own unique problems in the Northern Rivers.

Is this Kristina Keneally for real?

Is this amatuerish Twitter page legitimate or not?
Why is there no link in the first bald tweet announcing the new Keneally Government cabinet?
Who is the "KS" who signed the second tweet?
How on earth did this page acquire 2,757 followers in its first couple of days and only 24 followers since?
And what happened to those two original Keneally tweets which were removed?
Oh, and while I'm at it, if this Twitter account is a government endorsed site for the NSW Premier why were all former Premier Ree's tweets removed? A bent for revisionist history? Spite?

Well when a friend phoned the Premier's minsterial office to check she was assured that Ms. Keneally did have a Twitter account and premierofnsw was probably it, though there was nobody around at that moment who could actually confirm or deny.
Kristina me gurl, you're not off to a good start on the digital communication front.

Walk Against Warming in all Australian capitial cities, Saturday 12 December 2009

Get out your walking shoes, slip, slop, slap & wrap - then march to show that you are concerned about positive outcomes for the planet at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenahgen.

March meeting points on Saturday 12 December 2009:

SYDNEY 1pm, Martin Place

MELBOURNE 12pm, State Library, Swanston St

BRISBANE 10am, King George Square

ADELAIDE 11am, Victoria Square/Tarndanyangga

PERTH 11am, Perth Cultural Centre, Russell Square

HOBART Timbs Track, Upper Florentine, Gordon River

CANBERRA 11.30am, Federation Mall

DARWIN 5pm, Nightcliff Jetty

Can't walk on that day? Sign the petition being sent to Kevin Rudd at Walk Against Warming website.

This is The Greens Senator Christine MiIlne writing from Copenhagen:

I'm writing to you from freezing Copenhagen, where so many world leaders and negotiators are still frozen in the past, working towards a deal that simply won't cut it, according to the latest science.But you can help change that.

This Saturday, let's Walk Against Warming to send a strong message to Kevin Rudd and world leaders in Copenhagen.

Everywhere I go across Copenhagen, there are reminders that the time for real action is now. Artworks, displays and protests all show that the people of the world won't settle for distractions and false solutions.

But inside the conference centre it's a different story.

The thousands of delegates queuing for security, cloak rooms and meals are frozen in negotiations which are deadlocked by the two deal breakers – how much and how fast to cut emissions, and how much rich nations should help finance poor nations to deal with the climate crisis.

There is a palpable tension across the whole city. Everyone here knows that, despite the fine words, the emissions targets and financing figures currently on the table are utterly inadequate.

There is one easy thing you can do to help drag our leaders into the real world.

Join me walking against warming this Saturday.

If millions of people around the world join walks to demand real action, it will send a wake up call to Kevin Rudd and all the other leaders heading to Copenhagen in the next few days.

It will show them that the community is ready to do what it takes and won't be swayed by excuses.

I'll be walking with tens of thousands of others here in Copenhagen, but there is a Walk Against Warming in every Australian capital city and some regional centres.

Click here to find your nearest walk. Let's make it huge!

Yours in hope,

Christine Milne

Clarence Valley Conservation Coalition wants Rudd Government to scrap current CPRS and start over

Click on image to enlarge
The Daily Examiner, 7 December 2009

Copenhagen Climate Change Conference 2009: you've heard the rumours now read leaked Draft Agreement #271109

Hysterical rumour abounds since it was discovered this week that friends and allies amongst the developed nations had put their heads together last September and come up with a wish-list draft of what the COP15 political agreement on climate change should look like.

When one discounts the rumour mill it can clearly be seen that a New World Order is not in the offing and the World Bank is not in charge of the One Ring To Rule Them All.

That the 'big boys' at the United Nations table want to steer outcomes shouldn't come as a shock - it happens at every big UN conference and the smaller countries as a bloc are quite capable of forestalling the more offensive measures proposed as these tensions play out both within the conference and outside for the media's benefit.

Did anyone really expect the biggest emitters, as well as those countries which have historically benefited most from the Industrial Revolution, to not try to pass responsibility onto others while keeping their own national climate change commitments fluid?

Time to remember that this agreement when it comes is not legally binding and, is cynically only for show as business goes on as usual for multinational corporations and global industries.

Here is what the draft actually states about finance:

19. Substantially scaled up financial resources will be needed to address mitigation, adaptation, technology and capacity building. It is essential to strengthen the international financial architecture for assisting the developing countries in dealing with climate change and to improve access to financial support. Resources will derive from multiple sources and flow through multiple bilateral and multilateral channels.

20. The Parties share the view that the strengthened financial architecture should be able to handle gradually scaled up international public support. International public finance support to developing countries [should/shall] reach the order of [X] billion USD in 2020 on the basis of appropriate increases in mitigation and adaptation efforts by developing countries.

21. The Parties confirm climate financing committed under this agreement as new and additional resources that supplement existing international public financial flows otherwise available for developing countries in support of poverty alleviation and the continued progress towards the Millennium Development Goals. In this regard:
- Developed country parties commit to deliver upfront public financing for 2010-201[2] corresponding on average to [10] billion USD annually for early action, capacity building, technology and strengthening adaptation and mitigation readiness in developing countries as set forth in Attachment C;
- From [2013] The Parties commit to regularly review appropriateness of contributions and the circle of contributors against indicators of fairness based on GDP and emissions levels and taking into account the level of development as set forth in Attachment C.

22. Recalling article 4 of the Convention, Parties decide that a Climate Fund be established as an operating entity of the Financial Mechanism of the Convention, which should function under the guidance of and be accountable to the COP as set forth in article 11 of the Convention. The Fund should be operated by a board with balanced representation, which will develop the operational guidelines for the Fund and decide on specific allocation to programmes and projects. The COP will formally elect members of the Fund Board and endorse the operational guidelines and modalities for the Fund. The Fund should complement and maximise global efforts to fight climate change through up-scaled support for climate efforts in the developing countries, including mitigation, adaptation, technology and capacitybuilding. Support from the Fund may be channeled through multilateral institutions or directly to national entities based on agreed criteria. Parties commit to allocate an initial amount of [$x] to the Fund as part of their international public climate support. Medium term funding should be based on a share of no less than [y%] of the overall international public support. Parties decide to operationalise the work of the Fund following the modalities set forth inannex/decision [Y].

23. In the context of the commitment in paragraph [14] Parties commit to global financing contributions from international aviation and international maritime transport generated through instruments developed and implemented by the ICAO and IMO respectively should be channeled through the Climate Fund from [2013], [mainly for adaption purposes], taking into account the principle of common but differentiated responsibility.

24. To enhance transparency and overview The Parties decide to establish an International Climate Financing Board under the UNFCCC to monitor and review international financing for climate action and in this context identify any gaps and imbalances in the international financing for mitigation and adaptation actions that may arise. The Board will consist of [x] representatives from developed countries and [y] representatives from developing countries.
[Z] Representatives from international institutions will participate in the Board as permanent observers. Decision making will be by consensus. [If all efforts to reach a compromise have been exhausted and no agreement has been reached, decisions shall be taken by a two-thirds majority]. The UNFCCC Secretariat will serve as secretariat for the International Climate Financing Board. Parties endorse the further guidelines as set out in attachment D and decision X7/CP.15.

Full text here courtesy of Wikileaks.

In the Liberal Party everything old is new again

It's official. The Liberal Party is jaw droppingly stupid.
Not only has it installed Tony Abbott as its latest leader, he's missed the chance of presenting his shadow ministry as generational change rather than as a return of Howard Government dinosaurs and a reward to his backers in the leadership stoush.
The Opposition is now fronted by politicians who on their former watch allowed the elderly to be neglected and abused, all but dismantled human rights in Australia, institutionalised the 'let's rip off our workers' mentality, dragged the nation into two wars to please George Bush, subverted parliamentary process, turned xenophobia into high art, endorsed racism in welfare delivery, decided that religion rather than science is the better tool for policy decisions and now want another chance to reprise the lot.
To make matters worse Abbott obviously thinks that being The Opposition is nothing but a game.
Some sort of mano a mano contest offering a return to government as first prize and with no consequences for the nation.
Party leadership being no more than a long running series of debating tricks and an orgy of one liners.
At this rate it's not Kevin Rudd or the Labor Party Abbott will give "the fright of its life" - its the Australian electorate which will be quaking in its boots.
I never even remotely thought I would ever feel sorry for Joe Hockey and Julie Bishop but I do - they're going to wish they'd never been elected in the first place by the time Abbott is through making a buffoon of the party.

The information Yahoo! keeps about you

Wikileaks has published the Yahoo! COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT which helpfully assists in identifying what information is available on its users, how to request that data storage on a particular individual be extended and how much it is willing to 'sell' this information for.

Click on image to enlarge

MySpace also has a Law Enforcement Investigators Guide, now available on Wikileaks along with Microsoft's Computer Online Forensics Evidence Extractor.

No one publishes obituaries for junkies

The October 10 - 11 edition of Brisbane's Courier Mail carried an obituary in Kathleen Noonan's "Last Word" column. It appears below:

MOST of us make mistakes and survive. We pick the wrong car to get into, go to the wrong party, kiss the wrong boy or girl, drive when we should have walked, walk when we should have caught a cab, say yes when we should have said no, try things not worth trying, trust someone not worth trusting, wake up in dumb places.

Most of us make mistakes and get away with it. We survive with no awful, lifelong consequences. Not wrapped around a tree at high speed. Not overdosed on the bathroom floor. No fatal outcome.

Robbie Edgar didn't get away with his mistakes. He paid for them. He died recently because of them.

No one publishes obituaries for junkies. That's what his sister Rosey wrote to me. You usually have to be a fine upstanding citizen, sportsman, businessman, dedicated Rotarian or notable academic.

Junkies, really, don't rate. Once we see the word junkie, it sort of makes all the other words in our head disappear. "Junkie" negates everything else. It makes a big, complex, sometimes beautiful, life disappear into one small judgmental word.

"What of someone who did not rise high above his demons, from whom others might feel entitled to withhold their respect? Who will speak to keep his name alive? I will," writes Rosey.

"I will write of Robert Edgar, born 17 May, 1954, to Thomas and Eileen Edgar in Brisbane, precociously interested in the sciences, with a voracious appetite for knowledge and a sharply detailed memory."

He left school early, started an apprenticeship with an optician, but threw that in to come to northern NSW for the Aquarius Festival and the blossoming of the emotional, intellectual and spiritual freedoms promised in the counter-culture.

Robbie embraced transcendental meditation, became vegan, practised yoga, grew organic vegetables, his evenings glowed under kerosene light, he rose early, was fit from long walks, swam with platypus, found glow-worm caves, sought enlightenment.

"He created food gardens at each place: Nimbin, Tuntable Valley and Jiggi," writes Rosey. "He lived by his belief in karma. He did not steal; neither did he drink alcohol nor smoke. He abhorred hard drugs.

"His passions were for food, knowledge meditation and women.

"With the smooth golden skin, a ponytail of long wavy black hair to his waist and a beautiful face, he was a hippie heart-throb."

So what went wrong? One morning Robbie was arrested for possession and supply of drugs – LSD. By his standard, these were not hard drugs. His logic differed from the court's. He was jailed. By the time he was released, he smoked cigarettes, he ate meat and had developed a bad habit that he never came clean of – heroin.

Around this time, he acquired the hepatitis C virus. He continued to live in northern NSW, a junkie. His health suffered from his lifestyle.

But, says Rosey, his humour was resilient and as dry as the dust that swept over Lismore the afternoon of his death. Wicked sarcasm, misquotes, deliberate Spoonerisms: "Time wounds all heals" – were things Rosey loved about her brother. And always pertinent facts, a snippet of history. "Did you know that Pope Leo VIII died of a stroke while committing adultery?" he'd ask.

He made his mark in the community, with well-written and wry articles and letters to various magazines and newspapers.

"He would decimate prejudice with logic and facts," writes Rosey, "and lambast and enlighten with irony and history and humour."

His last article was published posthumously in The Northern Rivers Echo. He wrote, in part: "Greedy people smugglers . . . sneaking unwashed, unwanted aliens with a very different and foreign religion, with superstitious dietary rules and modes of dress . . . incapable of assimilation and as part of a world-wide creed bent on the destruction of our way of life. None but a soft-headed government or left-wing intellectuals would hesitate to intern, in the remotest possible location. Welcoming these illegals and queue-jumpers would open the floodgates to millions of their brethren . . . Ideally, they could all be returned immediately to where they should be waiting, in an orderly manner to be properly and legally processed.

"From a press release from the Swedish Nazi Party, late 1941, in response to the arrival of 90 per cent of Denmark's Jewish population on Sweden's shores, aboard Denmark's fishing fleet.

"Signed Robert Edgar, Lismore."

When Robbie wasn't being Robbie the junkie, he sounds like a bit of a ratbag. Back a couple of years violinist Richard Tognetti, director of the Australian Chamber Orchestra, spoke on ratbags and why we need them in society. "The ratbag is one of the essential bacteria in our culture . . . By breathing in ratbaggery, we become less likely to fall to the illness of moral hypocrisy. Ratbags have no moral agenda; they have a hyperactive bullshit detector; they cannot be entrusted with money, for if they are given money, they will use it on valueless things, such as adventures and storytelling; and the ratbag should confound, astonish, query and disrupt, rather than confirm and soothe."

I think of this reading Rosey's words about her brother. "So much knowledge, such a beautiful, perverse, sharp, contradictory mind. Such a placid nature. He was not demonstrative; he never yelled or lost his temper (except that one time when the Nolan's cow gorged on his vegie patch). His laughter was a chuckle, his rage was a scowl, and his retaliation was a roll of the eyes. And grief did not fall in tears but was breathed as a sigh. Except for that one time, two weeks ago when told that he had terminal liver cancer."

Robbie died on September 22 aged 55. I spoke to Rosey the day after she and her father Tom had seen his body for the last time. Grief threatened to shipwreck her. She spoke of the waste of her whip-smart brother and the care the doctors, nurses and other staff of the Lismore Base Hospital and community nurses who cared for him with non-judgmental respect and loving kindness.

Coming home late the other night, I turn the corner near South Bank and there's a young man near the train station, too drunk or off his tree on something to be a threat. He's thin, that dry, papery Yellow Pages-thin of the addicted. I watch him shuffle off through a dirt-filled empty block, his feet breathing dust in the moonrise.

Many families have a Robbie, someone who makes mistakes and doesn't get away with them.

They don't publish obituaries for junkies. Rosey, you're right. They – we – don't usually see past the word "junkie". It's like the moon blocking out the sun in an eclipse. Everything else they are and they have done in their lives is hidden by the dark side. So let's make the exception. Just because we got away with our mistakes, doesn't make us better than anyone. Because we all make mistakes and we are more than our mistakes.

AND ANOTHER THING

Noonan had this piece in her column the following week:

Last week's obituary for Robbie brought such a strong response from readers, who emailed, wrote and phoned, stopped me in cafes and in the street to say thanks to Rosey and her family for sharing his life. Which makes you think that in this crazy world, there are deep pockets of tolerance and gentleness and open-mindedness. "It made me believe a little more," wrote Ben, who spent a year in jail for something stupid when he was 19 and is now a fine upstanding citizen, putting his kids and two foster kids through uni.

Source: The Courier Mail

The Sydney Morning Herald & The Age refused to print this editorial

The Guardian on 6 December 2009 concerning the 'Fourteen days to seal history's judgment on this generation' world-wide editorial:

Two Australian papers, the Age and the Sydney Morning Herald, pulled out at a late stage after the election of climate change sceptic Tony Abbott as leader of the opposition Liberal party recast the country's debate on green issues.

To rectify in some measure this doubtful call by these newspapers here is an excerpt from that editorial of 7 December 2009:

Today 56 newspapers in 45 countries take the unprecedented step of speaking with one voice through a common editorial. We do so because humanity faces a profound emergency.
Unless we combine to take decisive action, climate change will ravage our planet, and with it our prosperity and security. The dangers have been becoming apparent for a generation. Now the facts have started to speak: 11 of the past 14 years have been the warmest on record, the Arctic ice-cap is melting and last year's inflamed oil and food prices provide a foretaste of future havoc. In scientific journals the question is no longer whether humans are to blame, but how little time we have got left to limit the damage. Yet so far the world's response has been feeble and half-hearted.
Climate change has been caused over centuries, has consequences that will endure for all time and our prospects of taming it will be determined in the next 14 days. We call on the representatives of the 192 countries gathered in Copenhagen not to hesitate, not to fall into dispute, not to blame each other but to seize opportunity from the greatest modern failure of politics. This should not be a fight between the rich world and the poor world, or between east and west. Climate change affects everyone, and must be solved by everyone.
The science is complex but the facts are clear. The world needs to take steps to limit temperature rises to 2C, an aim that will require global emissions to peak and begin falling within the next 5-10 years. A bigger rise of 3-4C — the smallest increase we can prudently expect to follow inaction — would parch continents, turning farmland into desert. Half of all species could become extinct, untold millions of people would be displaced, whole nations drowned by the sea. The controversy over emails by British researchers that suggest they tried to suppress inconvenient data has muddied the waters but failed to dent the mass of evidence on which these predictions are based...........
Overcoming climate change will take a triumph of optimism over pessimism, of vision over short-sightedness, of what Abraham Lincoln called "the better angels of our nature".
It is in that spirit that 56 newspapers from around the world have united behind this editorial. If we, with such different national and political perspectives, can agree on what must be done then surely our leaders can too.
The politicians in Copenhagen have the power to shape history's judgment on this generation: one that saw a challenge and rose to it, or one so stupid that we saw calamity coming but did nothing to avert it. We implore them to make the right choice.

Full text of editorial here.

One of the reasons why the North Coast Area Health Service continues to be given a FAIL

Sometimes it almost beggars belief what the NSW Government, NSW Dept of Health, the North Coast Area Health Service and its CEO Chris Crawford consider priorities in a region where public health services continue to fail to meet community need.

Target budget cuts of $300M, undertake a three-wave reduction of 400 health care positions from directors of nursing right down to ward staff. Even sack a hospital chaplain. Because the Northern Rivers doesn't need medical services - it needs an expensive spin doctor!

This position advertisement is up on the NSW Dept of Health website:

Caring Together Liaison Officer
Name of Facility Lismore Health Campus
Position Number 0433/09
Basis Permanent Full Time
Salary $88,048-$100,375
Closing Date 27 November, 2009
Purpose of Role:
This position reports to the Chief Executive and is responsible for the effective coordination of the implementation of the NSW Health Caring Together, Health Action Plan recommendations incorporating the management of Area-wide media liaison. This will include coordinating media strategies and media responses with NSW Health Communications and the Office of the NSW Health Minister, and the preparation of publications, media releases and editorial contributions, including photographs, and briefings about media issues relating to the activities of NCAHS, in particular, the ongoing implementation of the NSW Health Caring Together Health Action Plan.

The Daily Examiner 4 December 2009

Northern Star 3 December 2009 $100,000 job offer a PR disaster

RED GUMS NEED YOUR URGENT HELP! Email the NSW Premier today

KENEALLY MUST NOT OVERTURN GOOD NATIONAL PARK DECISION

Last week, the NSW Government announced the creation of a magnificent new Red Gum National Park in the Millewa group of forests, and other new reserves along the major rivers in south-western NSW.

This is a magnificent environmental outcome.
It protects globally significant wetlands and threatened species that are facing severe long-term threats to their survival.

However, there is now massive pressure being brought to bear on the new Premier, Kristina Keneally, to reverse the decision. This would be a disaster. It is important that her office is flooded with thousands of emails this week urging her to deliver in full on the decision announced last week.

SEND AN EMAIL TO THE PREMIER NOW!

This is the most important moment in the Red Gum campaign. We urgently need your help to cement this historic reserve outcome. Send an email now to the Premier, by clicking here, and urge her to implement the outcome in full.

Save Red Gum from logging!

National Parks Association of NSW Media Release 7 December 2009
Copyright © 2009 National Parks Association NSW

Premier K-K-Keneally continues to embarrass Kevin and Feral Mal makes life a misery for Abbott's Libs

Click image to enlarge

NSW Labor continues to be an rope stretched out in front of Federal Labor's path to the next election with this from Crikey on 7th December:
"Stunning new details have emerged of the role played ALP heavyweight Joe Tripodi in securing NSW Premier Kristina Keneally's ascension to state parliament, with leaked meeting notes indicating Mr Tripodi told bitter rival Laurie Brereton that anti-branch stacking rules "didn't matter" in relation to Ms Keneally's preselection.......
Labor insiders told Crikey this morning that the process of selecting Ms Keneally was "absolutely bastardised" by the involvement of her husband.
"Ben's always been Joe's man and he's always been completely controlled."

However, the Liberal Party has its troubles too and just as I predicted last Thursday Malcolm Turnbull is continuing to hammer away at the man who took his job, Tony Abbott, and that man's supporters:

Time for some straight talking on climate change

While a shadow minister, Tony Abbott was never afraid of speaking bluntly in a manner that was at odds with Coalition policy.
So as I am a humble backbencher I am sure he won't complain if I tell a few home truths about the farce that the Coalition's policy, or lack of policy, on climate change has descended into.
First, let's get this straight. You cannot cut emissions without a cost. To replace dirty coal fired power stations with cleaner gas fired ones, or renewables like wind let alone nuclear power or even coal fired power with carbon capture and storage is all going to cost money.
To get farmers to change the way they manage their land, or plant trees and vegetation all costs money.
Somebody has to pay.
So any suggestion that you can dramatically cut emissions without any cost is, to use a favourite term of Mr Abbott, "bullshit." Moreover he knows it.
The whole argument for an emissions trading scheme as opposed to cutting emissions via a carbon tax or simply by regulation is that it is cheaper - in other words, electricity prices will rise by less to achieve the same level of emission reductions.
The term you will see used for this is "least cost abatement".
It is not possible to criticise the new Coalition policy on climate change because it does not exist. Mr Abbott apparently knows what he is against, but not what he is for.
Second, as we are being blunt, the fact is that Tony and the people who put him in his job do not want to do anything about climate change. They do not believe in human caused global warming. As Tony observed on one occasion "climate change is crap" or if you consider his mentor, Senator Minchin, the world is not warming, it's cooling and the climate change issue is part of a vast left wing conspiracy to deindustrialise the world.
Now politics is about conviction and a commitment to carry out those convictions. The Liberal Party is currently led by people whose conviction on climate change is that it is "crap" and you don't need to do anything about it. Any policy that is announced will simply be a con, an environmental figleaf to cover a determination to do nothing. After all, as Nick Minchin observed, in his view the majority of the Party Room do not believe in human caused global warming at all. I disagree with that assessment, but many people in the community will be excused for thinking the leadership ballot proved him right.
Remember Nick Minchin's defense of the Howard Government's ETS was that the Government was panicked by the polls and therefore didn't really mean it.
Tony himself has, in just four or five months, publicly advocated the blocking of the ETS, the passing of the ETS, the amending of the ETS and, if the amendments were satisfactory, passing it, and now the blocking of it.
His only redeeming virtue in this remarkable lack of conviction is that every time he announced a new position to me he would preface it with "Mate, mate, I know I am a bit of a weather vane on this, but....."
Third, there is a major issue of integrity at stake here and Liberals should reflect very deeply on it. We have an Opposition whose current leadership dismisses the Howard Government's ETS policy as being just a political ploy. We have an Opposition Leader who has in the space of a few months held every possible position on the issue, each one contradicting the position he expressed earlier. And finally we have an Opposition which negotiated amendments to the Rudd Government's ETS, then reached agreement on those amendments and then, a week later, reneged on the agreement.
Many Liberals are rightly dismayed that on this vital issue of climate change we are not simply without a policy, without any prospect of having a credible policy but we are now open to the charge that we are also without integrity. We have given our opponents the irrefutable, undeniable evidence that we cannot be trusted to keep our word or maintain a consistent position on the issue of climate change.
Not that anyone would doubt it, but I will be voting for the ETS legislation when it returns in February and if my colleagues have any sense they will do so as well. If the legislation is passed, incorporating as it does the amendments Ian MacFarlane negotiated with Penny Wong, then the issue will be settled. It is manifestly in the national interest and in the interest of the Liberal Party that it be so.

Not that the Nats get off lightly - Barnaby 'one shingle missing and another one slipping' Joyce is being tipped to be the Coalition's shadow spokesman on finance!