The nature of both types of representative remain somewhat of a mystery, although a few of their falls from grace do eventually become public knowledge over time.
However.............
It would be hard not to know a whole lot about those local government councillors who've supposedly collectively acted on my behalf since I first saw the light of day.
With some shining exceptions, they would have to be the most one-eyed, short-sighted, venial and often downright corrupt mob that ever graced government.
And the council management structure which develops under them would be just as bad on average.
So I almost fell off my perch laughing when ABC News Radio announced that:
But Lake Macquarie Deputy Mayor Barry Johnston says a two-tier system of government makes more sense.
"It costs the Australian people over $2 billion per year to have the three levels of government, and there is a lot of duplication between State and Federal Government," he said."
I'm sorry Barry, old china, it was hard not to guffaw at this. Given the opportunity, councils would waste more than $2 billion annually in duplication with one hand tied behind the back and then waste some more in parochial fighting over the central pot.
I would happily support Australia-wide local government directly receiving a fixed percentage of the GST or other taxes, but heaven forfend that any NSW North Coast council is my only bulwark against the centralised power of Canberra.
1 comment:
Of course 2 tiers of govt. is the best way to go. Whether the reps. we have are worthy or not there is no denying the fact that duplication within and across government is a waste of the taxpayer dollar. Getting rid of State govt. would also decentralise the dollars that city centric, corporate-whoring pollies waste on city centric, corporate pleasing policies.
Post a Comment