Showing posts with label disability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability. Show all posts
Monday 3 February 2020
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison & his merry band of cost cutters decided to save $9.2 million a year by cutting off CapTel phones for the profoundly deaf. Luckily this new front in Morrison's ongoing war on the poor & vulnerable was something of a fizzer
"The Commonwealth Government has awarded American company, Concentrix Services a contract to deliver the National Relay Service (NRS). One of the first things Concentrix is contracted to do is to shut down the CapTel handset service on 1 February 2020." [Deaf Forum of Australia, July 2019]
ABC News, 31 January 2020:
Thousands of hearing-impaired Australians could face a return to 1980s technology from today after the Federal Government cancelled a deal to support text-captioning telephones.
Phones with CapTel captioning display words on a large screen in near real time, so deaf and hearing-impaired users can make calls and see the responses.
But in a decision criticised by disability advocates, the phones will not work as of February 1, after the Department of Communications declined to renew the service provider's contract with the National Relay Service (NRS).
A new company won the contract. [Concentrix Services Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of the SYNNEX Corporation]
It will force users to take up alternative options, with many choosing to revert back to what are known as TTY teletypewriter phones — technology first introduced in the 1980s.
For Christine O'Reilly, the CapTel phone changed her life. Ms O'Reilly's hearing has been deteriorating since childhood and now at 62, she is profoundly hearing impaired.
"When I received the CapTel I was so overjoyed I burst into tears," she said.....
Critics say the decision has come down to one thing: money.
The cost of the NRS has blown out in recent years, from $26.3 million in 2015-16, to $31.2 million in 2017-18......
The new NRS contract awarded last June provides for $22 million per year over three years.
Until recently there were more than 3,500 CapTel handsets distributed across Australia. The Department of Communications estimates about 1,000 are still active.
"I certainly acknowledge any transition of this kind is challenging, particularly for older Australians who may not be as familiar with technology,"
Minister for Communications Paul Fletcher said. "We've retained a team of trainers who've been going to meet individually with CapTel users to brief them on their alternatives." .....
It is expected many users will switch to TTY teletypewriter phones, which have a small two-line screen for text above the number pad.
"We're having to go backwards in time, and everyone else can get the latest iPhone," said Dr Alex Harrison, a profoundly deaf veterinarian in Adelaide.
"[I feel] enormously frustrated and discriminated against," he said.
Dr Harrison said the CapTel phone had revolutionised his practice, allowing him to easily make up to 10 calls a day.
Making a call on a TTY phone is much more complicated. "If I want to make a phone call on the TTY, I have to call a 133 number first … and they'll put me through to an operator," he explained.
Once you do that, you may be put on hold or told you are in a queue to make a call.
On January 7, the department acknowledged wait times to get through were unacceptable.
"We understand and acknowledge community disappointment about these issues and can assure you that we are focused on resolving these concerns as a priority," it said.
To address the wait times, the relay service provider Concentrix is currently hiring and training additional staff.
New staff took their first calls just prior to Christmas and more staff will commence during the rest of January.
Other options offered by the Department of Communications are internet-based call captioning and apps designed to work on mobile phones and tablets.
But users said many of the online options were much slower and less user-friendly, requiring them to fill in multiple fields just to initiate a phone call.
"The other options are far too slow. They're primitive," Ms O'Reilly said.
And advocates point out the average age of CapTel phone users is more than 80.
"For an elderly person who's not tech savvy, [these options] can be very intimidating, and often they can't do it. Some of these people are 80 or 90, and they really struggle with that," Dr Harrison said..... [my annotation in red]
"It is indeed a big shock to many Australians, and myself, who rely and need the Captel handset. It seems to me that this section of people with a hearing loss have been sacrificed in a big way so that the TTY can be ‘re-introduced’ and then plunge those who went deaf later in life and whom can speak, right back in the dark ages. It is also a direct insult to the intelligence of the people who worked long and hard to get Captel up and running in Australia. Many of our members have spoken of their dismay and disgust, particularly being isolated and the loss of their independence. In the long run, this move will cost the Australian government much more than it does now." [Deaf Forum of Australia, July 2019]
Thankfully, Captioned Telephone International, the company whose contact the Morrison Government refused to renew and, its president Rob Engelke, have bigger, kinder hearts than either Prime Minister Scott Morrison or Minister for Communications Paul Fletcher, as Mr. Engelke has committed the company to maintaining the CapTel system for those Australians who would otherwise lose their handsets by arranging for the routing of all calls through the company's U.S. captioning centres, while it investigates long-term options based in Australia.
Friday 1 November 2019
A record high of 200,000 Newstart recipients only had a partial capacity to work in December 2018 & by June 2019 the figure was higher still
The Guardian, 24 October 2019:
Official
government statistics have underreported the number of sick and disabled Newstart recipients by as much as 40% or as many as 80,000
people.
Guardian Australia revealed earlier this year that Newstart recipients with
partial capacity to work has reached a record high of 200,000 in December 2018 as
people increasingly languish on the unemployment payment, now for an
average of three years.
But new data for June 2019, released on Wednesday, provided different figures, showing 284,900 on Newstart had “partial capacity to work” in December 2018.
The figure for June increased to 289,489, of a total of 686,000 people on Newstart. It means 42% of recipients now have an illness or disability that prevents them from working full-time. In September 2014, the figure was 25% using the new figures.
Notes provided in the updated quarterly statistics report confirmed the previous data only included people who had been assessed as having a “partial capacity to work” within the past two years. This is also stated in the previous reports.
But
it means sick and disabled people who have been languishing on Newstart for years but had not been reassessed in the past 48 months
were excluded from the statistics.
The
new statistics are significant because welfare groups have long
argued changes to the disability support pension would result in a
large number of people languishing on Newstart because they were too
sick to work.
“It’s
shocking that 40% of people on Newstart have an illness or
disability,” said the Australian Council of Social Service chief
executive Cassandra Goldie.
“No
one can survive on $40 a day and it’s even tougher if you’re sick
or have a disability. It’s heartless and negligent.”……
The
Department of Social Services’ Nathan Williamson rejected that the
previous data contained “errors”, saying the department had found
a “better way, a more fulsome way” to report the statistics.
People
with a partial capacity to work are considered not sick or disabled
enough to be granted the disability pension as a result of the
tightening of disability support pension eligibility. They are
assessed as being able to work more than 15 hours a week but less
than 30 hours a week.
The
Howard government introduced “partial capacity to work” for
people on Newstart in a bid to get more people into work and reduce
spending on the more generous disability support pension.
On Monday, Guardian Australia revealed that people on Newstart
were spending an average of 40% longer on the payment than they were
in 2014.
Friday 19 July 2019
Exodus of senior NDIS officials over the last fifteen months
When
well-paid
senior management
– some
in the top percentile of Australia’s income earners –
begins to abandon ship it’s time to consider if the
Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison
Government
has finally sunk the National
Disability Insurance Scheme.
The
Australian,
5 July 2019:
...The
NDIA has confirmed deputy chief executive Michael Francis has
resigned and will leave in September to take a role “closer to
home”.
A
spokeswoman also confirmed chief risk officer Anthony Vella has
recently departed, along with Antonia Albanese, who was head of
markets, provider and market relations.
Ms
Albanese and Mr Vella both directly reported to the chief executive.
The
Australian has also been told the general manager of critical
services issue response, Stephanie Gunn, has quit.
Mr
Shorten told The Australian Mr Robert was “either oblivious or
delusional” for telling parliament the scheme was being run well.
“It
is alarming that this group of senior executives lack such confidence
in the way the NDIA is being run that they are choosing to leave,”
he said. “This scheme is so important for the vulnerable but is
being chaotically
implemented.
“Yet
the minister in parliament has told the nation it’s all going
swimmingly. He must be either oblivious or delusional.”
The
NDIA spokeswoman said: “The NDIA is grateful to our departing
senior executives, who have made significant contributions to the
NDIS.
“The
NDIA has a strong and experienced leadership team, focused
on continuing to guide the agency to deliver improved outcomes for
NDIS participants. Interim arrangements with - experienced personnel
have been put in place.”
The
confirmation of executive departures came after Mr Shorten tweeted he
was “hearing” that four senior staff resigned
in the past seven days.
Former
chief executive Robert De Luca suddenly
resigned
in May and is yet to be replaced. Former communications head Vicki
Rundle is acting chief executive.
Mr
Robert — a key numbers man for the Prime Minister in last August’s
leadership contest — yesterday used question time to declare the
NDIS was available to “all Australians on the continent”….. [my
yellow highlighting]
Saturday 13 April 2019
What a difference twenty-two months makes to that textbook hypocrite, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison
A little over twenty-two months out from a federal election this was then Australian Treasurer Scott Morrison's voting down the creation of a Royal Commission into the abuse and neglect of people with a disability........
Less than six weeks out from a federal election Morrison will have to fight very hard to win we have tears being shed by the Prime Minister.....
* Snapshots by Highlighter @tvdc99
Labels:
#ScottMorrisonFAIL,
disability,
right wing politics
Friday 1 February 2019
Scott Morrison and his cronies want to buy your vote ahead of the May 2019 Australian federal election
Despite there being a growing urgency to invest in the full range
of climate change mitigation measures, in the face of evidence
that it is going to take billions of dollars to step back from the developing
environmental, social and economic disaster developing in the Murray-Darling
Basin, regardless of constant cost cutting in the welfare
sector leading to a fall in services for older Australians and those
with disabilities, while all the while failing to confront a growing
public debt which now stands at est. 679.5 billion, the Morrison
Lib-Nats Coalition Government intends to try and buy votes ahead of
the May 2019 federal election.
Brisbane
Times, 28
January 2019:
The Morrison government
is now more focused on protecting its electoral chances than the nation's
finances with claims it is going on a pre-poll spending spree based on a
short-term boost in tax collections.
Deloitte Access
Economics said in a quarterly report out on Tuesday that Scott Morrison is
looking to buy back disappointed voters, with the government sitting on $9.2
billion worth of tax cuts and handouts that were included in the December
mid-year budget update but not announced.
Deloitte Access partner
Chris Richardson said the government had promised $16 billion in extra spending
and tax cuts in the past six months, the biggest short-term spend by a
government since Kevin Rudd in 2009 in the depths of the global financial
crisis.
He said with the budget
in a reasonable condition on the back of strong global growth and a surge in
company tax profits, the Morrison government had made a decision to woo back
voters with taxpayers' cash.
"Of late, the
government has been busily taking decisions that add to spending and cut taxes,
thereby worsening the bottom line rather than repairing it," he said.
"After all, they've
got the dollars to do it, they're behind in the polls and the election is just
around the corner.
"That powerful
combination of motive and opportunity means that the government's focus has
shifted to shoring up its electoral standing rather than shoring up the
nation's finances."
News.com.au, 24 January 2019;
Pensioners and some
families could receive one-off cash payments from the Morrison government in a
pre-election sweetener.
Senior advisers are
looking at two one-off payments that could be included in the April 2 budget,
the Australian Financial Review reported on Thursday.
If the government
decides to go ahead with the plan, the payments could be distributed before the
federal election, which is due by mid-May.
The first option is a
one off handout to age pensioners and the second is a cash injection for
families.
It’s believed the single
payments would be aimed at luring those who won’t directly benefit from the
Coalition’s $144 billion personal income tax cuts being phased in over the next
six years.
Tuesday 22 May 2018
AUSTRALIA 2018: Turnbull Government continues to hammer the vulnerable
Remember when reading this that the Turnbull Government is still intending to proceed with its planned further corporate tax cuts reportedly worth an est. $65 billion. Compare this policy with the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funding in Budget 2018-19 which is $43 billion over four years and no dedicated NDIS funding stream established as had been previously promised.
JOINT STATEMENT ON THE
NDIA’S SPECIALIST DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION PROVIDER AND INVESTOR BRIEF
The National Disability
Insurance Agency (NDIA) presented its latest policy position for Specialist
Disability Accommodation (SDA) in a statement to the provider and investor
market on 24 April.
People with disabilities
and developers of innovative housing for people with disabilities are pleased
the NDIA has reiterated the government’s commitment to SDA in its SDA Provider
and Investor Brief. The NDIA has confirmed that the SDA funding model is here
to stay.
However, the NDIA’s SDA
Brief expresses a vision for SDA housing with a clear bias toward shared models
of housing for people with disability, presumably to reduce support costs. This
is unacceptable. You can read our joint statement here (A Rich text format is available here).
The
Australian,
16 May 2018:
The executives of the
flagship National Disability Insurance Scheme, which received guaranteed
funding worth tens of billions of dollars in last week’s budget, have launched
a crackdown on support funding to keep a lid on ballooning costs.
The razor is being taken
to hundreds, possibly thousands, of annual support plans as they come up for
review, demonstrating a new hawkish approach from National Disability
Insurance Agency bosses but resulting in the loss of funding and support for
vulnerable families. In many cases, support packages for families have been cut
by half.
The early years of the
$22 billion program’s rollout saw wild variability in the value and type of
support being granted to participants, forcing executives to come up with a way
to claw back funding that has “an impact on sustainability”. In the process,
people with disabilities and their families have been shocked by sudden
reversals of fortune….
In its quarterly report,
the NDIA noted there was a “mismatch” between reference packages — rough
cookie-cutter guides for how much packages ought to be in normal circumstances
— and the value of annual support packages which affected the financial
sustainability of the scheme.
“The management’s
response to this is to closely ensure that significant variations away from
reference amounts (above and below) are closely monitored and justified,” a
spokesman said.
“Reference packages are
not used as a tool to reduce package amounts to below what is reasonable and
necessary. Individual circumstances are considered in determining budgets,
including goals and aspirations.
“A reference package
does not restrict the amount or range of support provided to a participant, but
acts as a starting point for planners to use for similar cohorts. It provides
amounts that are suitable for a given level of support needs that has been
adjusted for individual circumstances.”
The agency has claimed
the implementation of this process has started to reduce funding blowouts and a
hearing into the scheme by federal parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on the
NDIS last Friday heard startling evidence about how widespread the new approach
is.
Donna Law, whose
21-year-old son has severe disabilities, was told by an NDIS planner: “Donna,
watch out because your son’s next plan is going to be cut by about half.”
Clare Steve had funding
cut in half by the NDIA and wanted to do another review.
“I spoke to multiple
people, because no one would actually give me the paperwork to do the next lot
of reviewing,” Ms Steve told the hearing.
“I was told by multiple
people that it was a mistake: ‘Do not go for another review.
“If you go for another
review, you could get your funding cut again’.”
ABC News, 19 May 2018:
ABC News, 19 May 2018:
Bureaucrats are reportedly working on a strategy to curb costs by tightening up the eligibility requirements after a blowout in the number families seeking NDIS support packages for people with autism.
ABC
News, 19 May
2018:
Last December, Sam's
case was one of about 14,000 sitting in the NDIS's review backlog, according to a damning
ombudsman's report this week. Then, about 140,000 participants were in
the scheme.
The review queue has
since shrunk, but the agency in charge of the world-first scheme — a
Commonwealth department known as the National Disability Insurance Agency
(NDIA) — still receives about 640 review requests each week.
Some of those requests
do not reflect badly on the NDIA. People can request an unscheduled review if
their circumstances change, for example if their condition improves.
But the agency often is
culpable when it comes to another type of review, known as an internal review.
People ask for these when they disagree with the plan and funding package they
are given.
Some reviews come from
people who feel short-changed, given the state government support they
previously received, or because of the high expectations associated with the
scheme.
But the Government is
also to blame. The NDIS's full-scheme launch in mid-2016 was a disaster.
The computer system failed. A backlog of NDIS applications quickly emerged.
Plans were then often
completed over the phone and rushed. Key staff lacked training and experience.
There was little consistency in the decisions being made.
The scheme's IT system
remains hopeless, and elements of its bureaucracy are not much better,
according to the watchdog's report.
The agency accepted all
20 of the ombudsman's recommendations, and Social Services Minister Dan Tehan
said work was underway to bust the backlog "over coming months".
* In February 2018, the
NDIA advised around 8,100 reviews remained in the backlog and the national
backlog team was clearing around 200 reviews each week. The NDIA also advised
it continues to receive around 620 new review requests each week, which are
handled by regional review staff.
* We have received
complaints about the NDIA’s handling of participant-initiated requests for
review. In particular, these complaints concern the NDIA: (1) not acknowledging
requests for review; (2) not responding to enquiries about the status of a
request; or (3) actioning requests for an internal review as requests for a
plan review.
*Participants also
complained they had sought updates on the receipt and/or progress of their
requests by calling the Contact Centre and by telephoning or emailing local
staff. They reported not receiving a response, leaving messages that were not
returned and being told someone would contact them—but no one did.
* In our view, the
absence of clear guidance to staff about the need to acknowledge receipt of
review requests is concerning. Indeed, the large number of complaints to our Office
where complainants are unclear about the status of their review indicates the
lack of a standardised approach to acknowledgements is driving additional,
unnecessary contact with both the NDIA and our Office.
* Our Office monitors
and reports on complaint themes each quarter. Review delays was the top
complaint issue for all four quarters in 2017.
* Some participants have
told us they have been waiting for up to eight or nine months for a decision on
their review request, without any update on its progress or explanation of the
time taken.
In some instances, the
participant’s existing plan has expired before the NDIA has made a decision on
their request for review. As review decisions can only be made prospectively,
it can mean a participant must go through the whole process for the new
(routinely reviewed) plan if they remain unhappy.
Sunday 29 April 2018
Turnbull Government has just placed a multinational corportion with an appalling human rights record at the first contact interface with the National Disability Insurance Scheme
“It has
a history of problems, failures, fatal errors and overcharging” [Senior
Appleby compliance officer quoted in The
Guardian on the subject of Serco, 7 June 2017]
A group implicated in: human rights abuses in prisons and immigration detention centres it has managed; poor to unsafe health service delivery including at Fiona Stanley Hospital in Perth, overcharging for services rendered under government contracts, fraudulent record keeping and manipulating results when there was a failure to reach targets; mishandling of radioactive waste and labour rights abuses.
The
Guardian, 23
Apri 2018:
Disability rights
groups, Labor and the Greens have slammed a decision to hire the multinational
outsourcing giant Serco in a key role administering the national disability
insurance scheme.
The National Disability
Insurance Agency (NDIA) announced
on Friday afternoon that Serco, a company with a chequered corporate
history, would help run its contact centres under a two-year contract.
The decision would put
the company at the frontline of the NDIS, interacting frequently with people
with disability and service providers, many of whom are still grappling with a
vast, complex and sometimes confusing scheme.
“Sourcing our contact centre services
from Serco will
give ongoing flexibility, responsiveness and value for money,” the NDIA said in
a statement.
But the decision has
outraged disability rights campaigners, who say Serco’s poor history abroad and
its lack of experience in disability should have precluded it from any role
delivering the landmark scheme.
People with Disability
Australia co-chief executive, Matthew Bowden, said he was “gravely concerned”
that Serco would, like other third-party providers, fail to uphold the values,
objectives and principles underpinning the NDIS.
“We have no details on
what expertise Serco have in providing communication services for people with
disability, or why the NDIA has decided to outsource such a vital part of its
services,” Bowden said.
“The NDIA needs to hire
more staff and make their communication avenues with people with disability
more transparent. Instead, they are offloading their responsibilities, and
requirements, to deliver services to people with disability.”
Paralympian Kurt
Fearnley was among those expressing concern at the decision, saying Serco would
be “racking their brains on how they can bring lived experience of disabilities
into their workplace”.
“The NDIS will be
worthless if people with disabilities aren’t at its core!” he tweeted.
Labels:
#TurnbullGovernmentFAIL,
disability,
fraud,
health,
human rights,
multinationals,
NDIS,
safety,
Serco
Monday 30 October 2017
Turnbull Government overseeing yet another policy implementation cock up
ABC News, 19 October 2017:
Key Points:
The Productivity Commission is urging state governments to ensure current services are not withdrawn early
The 533-page report says the NDIA sacrificed the quality of NDIS plans while rushing to meet enrolment targets
The report found the disability sector workforce "will not be sufficient" to meet demand
The scheme was meant to be in place by mid-2020 but fell behind schedule soon after its nationwide rollout began in July last year.
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) will be rolled out late, and migrants might be needed to plug workforce gaps, the biggest ever review of the NDIS predicts.
"The reality is that the current timetable for participant intake will not be met," the Productivity Commission report said.
"This delay could be longer if the scheme falls further behind … when the participant intake ramps up in 2017-18."
The commission urged state governments to ensure current services are not withdrawn early.
"Governments and the [agency] need to start planning now for a changed timetable," the report said.
In a 533-page assessment, it condemned the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) for sacrificing the quality of NDIS plans while rushing to meet enrolment targets.
"A key concern that has emerged from our extensive consultations is the speed of participant intake," Commissioner Angela MacRae said.
"This is impacting on planning processes [and] the quality of plans," she said.
The report highlighted the agency's reliance on over-the-phone planning sessions, which hundreds of people have complained about.
Planning meetings dictate how much funding people receive and what services and equipment they can access.
"The Commission heard [on numerous occasions] that participants were called with no forewarning … or were not informed that the call was a planning conversation," the review said.
The NDIA yesterday announced it was phasing out telephone meetings, but did not specify when they would be abolished.
The Federal Government's independent research body estimated 475,000 Australians would be covered by the full scheme.
But it found the disability sector workforce was growing "way too slow" and "will not be sufficient" to meet demand.
The commission said it might not be possible in the short term to train enough allied health professionals, such as speech therapists, and skilled migrants might be needed.
Key Points in the Australian Government Productivity Commission’s 2017 final study report, National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Costs:
* The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a complex and highly valued national reform. If implemented well, it will substantially improve the wellbeing of people with disability and Australians more generally.
* The level of commitment to the success and sustainability of the NDIS is extraordinary. This is important because ‘making it work’ is not only the responsibility of the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), but also that of governments, participants, families and carers, providers, and the community.
* The scale, pace and nature of the changes that the NDIS is driving are unprecedented in Australia. To reach the estimated 475 000 participants in the scheme by 2019 20, the NDIA needs to approve hundreds of plans a day and review hundreds more. The reality is that the current timetable for participant intake will not be met. Governments and the NDIA need to start planning now for a changed timetable, including working through the financial implications.
* Based on trial and transition data, NDIS costs are broadly on track with the NDIA’s long term modelling, but this is in large part because not all committed supports are used. While some cost pressures are emerging (such as higher numbers of children entering the scheme), the NDIA has put in place initiatives to address them. The benefits of the NDIS are also becoming apparent. Early evidence suggests that many (but not all) NDIS participants are receiving more disability supports than previously, and they have more choice and control.
* In the transition phase, the NDIA has focused too much on quantity (meeting participant intake estimates) and not enough on quality (planning processes), supporting infrastructure and market development. For the scheme to achieve its objectives, the NDIA must find a better balance between participant intake, the quality of plans, participant outcomes, and financial sustainability.
#Greater emphasis is needed on pre planning, in depth planning conversations, plan quality reporting, and more specialised training for planners.
*A significant challenge in the transition phase is developing the supply of disability services and growing the disability care workforce. It is estimated that 1 in 5 new jobs over the next few years will need to be in disability care, but workforce growth remains way too slow.
#Emerging shortages should be addressed by independent price monitoring and regulation, more effective coordination among governments to develop markets (including intervening in thin markets), a targeted approach to skilled migration, and equipping participants to exercise choice.
* The interface between the NDIS and other disability and mainstream services is critical for participant outcomes and the financial sustainability of the scheme. Some disability supports are not being provided because of unclear boundaries about the responsibilities of the different levels of government. Governments must set clearer boundaries at the operational level around ‘who supplies what’ to people with disability, and only withdraw services when continuity of service is assured.
* NDIS funding arrangements should better reflect the insurance principles of the scheme. Governments need to allow flexibility around the NDIA’s operational budget and commit to establishing a pool of reserves. [my yellow highlighting]
Labels:
#TurnbullGovernmentFAIL,
disability,
government policy,
NDIS
Wednesday 22 February 2017
What were they thinking?
The Sydney Morning Herald, 15 February 2017:
What were they thinking? On Monday three members of cabinet called a press conference to pressure the Senate to cut the dole. That's right, to cut the dole. At just $13,750 per year plus an $8.80 per fortnight energy allowance, it's already so low the Business Council believes it "presents a barrier to employment and risks entrenching poverty." The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the research arm of the world's richest economies, says Australia's unemployment benefit has reached the point where it may no longer be effective in "enabling someone to look for a suitable job".
Even a Coalition-dominated inquiry found a "compelling case" for boosting it.
But the three ministers wanted to deny the energy supplement to new entrants on the spurious ground that this would merely remove "carbon tax compensation for a carbon tax that no longer exists". It wouldn't. The Newstart cost of living increase was cut 0.7 per cent when the energy supplement came in to avoid double counting. If the energy supplement went but the cut remained, new entrants to Newstart would be worse off than if the whole thing had never happened.
And they wanted to withhold Newstart from newly-unemployed Australians aged 22 to 25, paying them instead the lower $11,375 Youth Allowance. The under 25s would have to wait longer too – five weeks instead of the present one.
Rather than spend time arguing the merits of cutting a benefit already so low it can barely be lived on, Treasurer Scott Morrison, Social Services Minister Christian Porter and Education Minister Simon Birmingham delivered instead what amounted to a threat: if the Senate didn't cut the unemployment benefit, they might not fully fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme.
But not at first. In a burlesque twist, they opened the press conference spruiking the case for an unfunded massive company tax cut.
* Images found at Google Images
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)