Monday, 7 March 2022

The flooding has not yet stopped in NSW but one of Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison's 'captain's picks' is publicly badmouthing flood victims

 

“You’ve got people who want to live among the gum trees – what do you think is going to happen? Their house falls in the river and they say it’s the government’s fault”. [Shane L. Stone, Coordinator General, National Resilience and Recovery Agency, quoted at news.com.au 4 March 2022]



Geoscience Australia (GA) was created in 2001 when the Australian Surveying and Land Information Group (AUSLIG) merged with the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO).


It has gravitas.


So when it informs the general public that Australia is the lowest continent in the world with an average elevation of only 330 metres, I believe what this organisation is saying.


It points out that (excluding islands) 8,500 sq km of Australia is below sea level and another 2,909,500 sq km is within 0-199 metres of sea level – bringing the total low lying land to 38.9% of mainland Australia’s total land mass.


Additionally, another 3,728,700 sq km or 48.68% of mainland Australia is only between 200-499 metres above the current sea level.


Australia has over 330,000 sq km of coastal zone with an elevation of <30m above sea level. Major Cities only cover around 7,000km² (2%); Inner Regional areas cover about 25,000km²; Outer Regional areas cover around 44,000km² and Remote or Very Remote areas make up about 80 percent of the remaining low lying coastal regions.


To get some idea of the extent of land Australia has that could be considered vulnerable in regions where rivers run, just look at the pink on this map and, then look where coastal cities have been established since 1788.


Geoscience Australia, Elevations, retrieved 5 March 2022



Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Topographic Drainage Divisions and River Regions Map, retrieved 5 March 2022. Click to expand














By 2011 Geoscience Australia’s national topographical mapping had identified approximately 15,000 sq km of New South Wales as being low coastal areas <30m elevation above sea level.


Its mapping had also identified 10,000 sq km of flood-prone inland locations across the state. 


While the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment has identified 37 major rivers in the state - 19 coastal and 18 inland. Along with somewhere in the vicinity of 1,899 tributaries to these major rivers.


Geoscience Australia noted in 2011 that the then New South Wales Land & Property Management Authority (LPMA): recognises that it does not currently have sufficient resources to complete level 3 classification for all data captured, and has an estimated backlog of 9,000 sq km (2,250 tiles) requiring classification in the North Coast regions of Kempsey, Bellingen, Richmond Valley, Lismore, Ballina and Byron Bay. Additional funding is required to out-source this work and LPMA is seeking additional resources over the life of the current program to keep pace with capture, processing and classification tasks. [my yellow highlighting]


One has to wonder - were all 7 local governments in Northern NSW (Northern Rivers region) supplied with a complete topographical and bathymetric assessment of the land within their borders when they came to put their own floodplain management plans/strategies in place by 2014?


So the next time a public service czar wants to have a go at communities experiencing flooding by name calling, blaming entire populations for planning decisions often made a century ago and telling us we should live elsewhere – perhaps he could identify on a detailed map exactly which land across Australia won’t be further impacted by climate change-induced; flood events, land slips, erosion, permanent water level change or become so arid & hot as to become life threatening. Then advise governments of what land being free of such impediments could therefore be considered suitable to build new towns and required infrastructure far away from the 100km wide coastal zone.


Given the water course distribution in NSW, federal and state ministers along with public servants might like to consider which rivers are actually good water sources for large populations relocated from the coastal zone and at the same time guaranteed by science to be moderate to major flood free? A task of epic proportions and one I suspect none would consider undertaking.


Science has been telling us for decades that  Australia is on the frontline of climate change and only a fool would argue that federal and state governments as well as the general population did not have to consider how best to adapt to extreme weather events. Australian society is clearly running out of time in which to organise mass population movements in response to what is likely to be millennia-long changes to seasons of the years and precipitation.


However, before rushing to judgement on ordinary people it would be wise for self-important individuals to first reflect on how long colonial, dominion and then federation authorities have been aware of the effect adverse weather has had on built environments and, why this has never been adequately addressed when planning for residential and commercial buildings as well as town/city infrastructure anytime in the last 234 years.


Just a few of the historic floods which might have given former President of the Liberal Party of Australia 1999-2005 Commander The Honourable Shane L Stone AC PGDK QC RAN (Rtd)  pause for thought but obviously didn't......


"A flood in New South Wales" 1870

Maitland Flood 1893

Lismore Flood undated

Georges River Flood 1956
on Liverpool, Fairfield and Canterbury-Bankstown floodplain 

Nepean River Flood 1961

Picton Flood 2016

Parramatta River Flood 2020

NOTE: All photographs were found on Google Images.

Sunday, 6 March 2022

In 2020, for a brief moment in the long life of the federal Liberal-Nationals Coalition it decided to halve poverty in Australia and reduce income inequality. Then the Coalition remembered its real purpose was to keep 18th Century notions of class structure alive & well in Australia and promptly tore that 'brief moment' to shreds


ACOSS & UNSW,  Covid, inequality and poverty in 2020 & 2021: How poverty and inequality were reduced in the COVID recession and increased during the recovery


Medianet Release


02 Mar 2022 12:01 AM AEST - New ACOSS and UNSW Sydney Report shows how poverty and inequality were dramatically reduced in 2020, but have increased ever since


A new report from the ACOSS/UNSW Sydney Poverty and Inequality Partnership shows that during the first ‘Alpha’ wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Australia halved poverty and significantly reduced income inequality, thanks to a raft of Commonwealth Government crisis support payments introduced to help people survive the first lockdown.


It also highlights that over the course of 2021, and throughout the spread of the ‘Delta’ variant, the Federal Government rapidly reversed this extraordinary progress by cutting financial aid and denying it to most people on the lowest incomes.


The latest report from ACOSS and UNSW, Covid, inequality and poverty in 2020 & 2021: How poverty and inequality were reduced in the COVID recession and increased during the recovery examines how people at different income levels fared during those two phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic.


During the first ‘Alpha’ wave of the pandemic, the Coronavirus Supplement and JobKeeper support payments played a crucial role in reducing both income inequality and poverty during the deepest recession in 90 years. Despite an effective unemployment rate of 17% at the time, many people on the lowest incomes could afford to pay their rent and household bills and feed themselves properly for the first time in years. 


When lockdowns eased in late 2020, the Government was quick to wind back financial supports. By April 2021 both the Coronavirus Supplement and JobKeeper payments were gone, leaving a yawning gap in pandemic income supports for about a million people still unemployed, when Delta struck later that year.


80% of people on the lowest income support payment were excluded from the COVID Disaster Payment, introduced in September 2021. Subsequently the number of people in poverty rose by around 20% and a bias in jobs growth towards high paid jobs and a rapid rise in investment incomes lifted income inequality.


A few weeks after lockdowns ended, those still out of paid work lost their COVID Disaster Payment and joined the l.7 million people already struggling to get by on the $45 a day unemployment Jobseeker payment. Financial stress came roaring back as did increased reliance on emergency relief.


ACOSS CEO Dr. Cassandra Goldie said: 


The COVID-19 pandemic has taught us that poverty and inequality are not an inevitable state of being. They grow because government policies allow them to, and in many cases, directly increase them. 


‘’The income supports introduced during the first COVID wave reduced poverty by half and greatly reduced inequality of incomes. We also showed that good social policy, tackling poverty, is good economics. By targeting income support to those with the least, the vital help was rapidly spent on essentials, helping to keep others in jobs.


We now know what governments are capable of when they set their minds to it. Instead of taking the opportunity to end poverty in Australia and build our resilience to cope with future crises, the Government reversed the gains made during the first year of the pandemic and failed to adequately plan to mitigate the ongoing health risks. 


Australia’s income support system should sustain people in tough times and help them find suitable employment. At just $45 a day, the unemployment JobSeeker Payment is not up to the task and the Government acknowledged this by almost doubling it. People out of paid work, or without the paid working hours they need, should not have to spend every waking moment worrying about how they will feed themselves and pay the rent.


Whoever wins the next election will know exactly what levers they need to pull if they wish to end Australian poverty and support jobs. But will they?


Our response to COVID-19 showed we can end poverty. And when we do, it’s good for all of us. We need candidates, in the lead up to this federal election, to commit to lifting the rate of Jobseeker to at least $69 a day, so that people have the confidence of knowing that they can cover the basics while they are retraining and looking for paid work. Together with investing in social housing, these are the two big levers that could change the face of Australia for good and for the good of us all.


Scientia Professor Carla Treloar, Director of the Social Policy Research (SPRC) and the Centre for Social Research in Health (CSRH) at UNSW, said:


This research shows that the COVID support payments changed lives. The Government’s decision to take away the Coronavirus supplement and JobKeeper without an adequate substitute, and later on to exclude people on the lowest income-support payments from the COVID disaster payment and prematurely end that payment, locked more people into poverty.


‘’Despite remarkable early progress in reducing poverty and income inequality during the COVID recession, they are both likely to be higher now than before the pandemic. That’s the legacy of the policy response to the COVID pandemic.”



Key Findings


2020: Alpha wave of COVID and recession:

  • Between March and December 2020, the average incomes of the lowest 20% income group rose by 8% ($56pw). Those in the next 20% saw their incomes rise by 11% ($144pw). In contrast the average incomes of the highest 20% fell by 4% ($230pw).

  • Between 2019 and the middle of 2020, the percentage of people in poverty fell from 11.8% to 9.9% despite the recession. It would have been twice as high (22.7%) without the COVID income supports. 

  • Among people in households on the JobSeeker Payment, poverty fell by four-fifths, from 76% in 2019 to 15% in June 2020. Among sole parent families (both adults and children) poverty was reduced by almost half, from 34% to 19%. 

  • The income support safety net for those on the lowest incomes was buoyed by the $275pw Coronavirus Supplement, 70% of which went to the lowest 40% households by income.

  • The JobKeeper wage subsidy of up to $750pw helped sustain the incomes of middle income-earners at risk of losing wages during lockdowns, as 70% of those payments went to the middle 60% of households by income.


2021: Economic recovery and Delta wave of COVID

  • In January 2021 the Coronavirus Supplement was cut to $75pw in January 2021, poverty rose to 14%, well above pre-recession levels. The income of a single adult on JobSeeker Payment fell to approximately 15% below the poverty line. 

  • By April 2021 when the supplement was removed completely, and despite an ongoing increase of $25pw to the lowest income support payments, the new rate of JobSeeker payment fell to approximately 30% below the poverty line and a third of recipients reported increasing difficulty trying to make ends meet.

  • By September 2021, COVID-19 Disaster Payments were introduced in response to lockdowns during the Delta wave of the pandemic. This was only paid to people who directly lost paid working hours in a lockdown, and was quickly withdrawn when a lockdown ended.

  • Over 80% of people on the lowest income support payments were denied the COVID Disaster Payment, despite the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their employment prospects. 

  • The Jobseeker Payment was just $391pw and Youth Allowance was just $331pw, well below the poverty line at that time. Around 1.7 million people (around 25% more than before the pandemic in September 2019) relied on these and other income supports set well below poverty levels.

  • At the same time, many people on high incomes saw their incomes surge. From August 2020 to August 2021 the number of high-paying jobs rose 251,000 compared to growth in low-paid jobs of 76,000. Investment incomes surged through 2020-21, comprising one quarter of all household income growth in that year. Around two thirds of investment income goes to the highest 20% of households by income.


Read the full report at: https://bit.ly/3LWJtJn


Find out more about the poverty and inequality partnership at http://povertyandinequality.acoss.org.au


Friday, 4 March 2022

How to look for a missing friend or relative during the February-March 2022 NSW floods


NSW Police, News, 1 March 2022:


Police are encouraging people within the impacted flood areas to register their movements using the Australian Red Cross ‘Register, Find, Reunite’, as emergency services continue to respond to several calls for assistance. 


 A significant rain event has impacted several communities in Northern NSW since late last week, with towns such as Lismore isolated due to flood waters.


Evacuation Orders issued by the NSW State Emergency Service (SES) remain in place for several northeast NSW communities, including Lismore, Ballina, South Ballina, Casino, Woodburn, Coraki, Murwillumbah and Mullumbimby. 


 A full list of current evacuation orders and warnings can be found on the NSW SES website: https://www.ses.nsw.gov.au/


Yesterday (Monday 28 February 2022), police from multiple units including Police Rescue and general duties, SES volunteers, NSW Surf Life Saving, NSW Rural Fire Service, Fire and Rescue NSW and more than 200 members of the community assisted in rescuing more than 3000 people from homes within the Lismore area. 


The Australian Defence Force has also deployed to the region, with aircraft assisting with rescue efforts and around 200 officers supporting on the ground. It is estimated multiple people remain isolated in their homes across the Northern Rivers today (Tuesday 1 March 2022), with emergency services recommencing rescue operations to locate and assist them. 


As the rescue operation continues, State Emergency Operations Controller, Deputy Commissioner Mal Lanyon, is urging all those who have been rescued to register their movements using the Register, Find, Reunite website – https://www.redcross.org.au/emergencies/about-register-find-reunite/ – which is a National system managed and operated by Australian Red Cross. 


“Whilst emergency services and members of the community rescued more than 3000 people yesterday, only around 1000 of those have let authorities know they are okay,” Deputy Commissioner Lanyon said “The system of reporting a flood rescue can come from multiple avenues – either through the NSW SES on 132 500 or through Triple Zero (000). 


“As we continue our efforts to rescue as many people as we can from homes in the Northern Rivers, NSW Police also need to account for the whereabouts of a number of people who were rescued yesterday. 


“We understand communications in the region have been significantly impacted by this weather event, and this can add to the stress of not being able to get in contact with family and friends. 


“If you or any family members reside within the impacted area, the Register, Find, Reunite service is a helpful tool to let people know you are safe, and to allow Police, with consent, to share details of family and friends with each other,” Deputy Commissioner Lanyon said. 


The Register, Find, Reunite website – https://www.redcross.org.au/emergencies/about-register-find-reunite/ – is a National system managed and operated by Australian Red Cross. 


It is a service which registers, finds and reunites family, friends and loved ones after an Emergency. 


It allows people to: 

  • Register to let people know they are safe 
  • Find people who may be affected by an Emergency and know they are safe 
  • Reunite through a matching process which enables Police, with consent, to share details of family and friends with each other. 


The Public Information and Inquiry Centre (PIIC), has also been activated to support the severe weather operation. 


The principle function of the PIIC is to not only provide accurate, up-to-date general information to the public, but to also answer their inquiries regarding the flood event which has impacted on the community. 


The Public Information and Inquiry Centre can be contacted by calling 1800 227 228. 


Members of the public in flood affected areas should continue to listen to local radio stations, or check the websites listed below. 


It should be noted this inquiry hotline does not replace the State Emergency Service emergency hotline. 


Members of the public seeking emergency assistance during a flood or storm should call the NSW State Emergency Service on 132 500, or visit their website www.ses.nsw.gov.au


The State Emergency Operations Centre at Homebush has also been stood up and will provide real-time assistance and intelligence to emergency services in the affected communities. 


For the latest weather warnings, please visit the Bureau of Meteorology website: http://www.bom.gov.au/. In life-threatening situations and emergencies, the public are advised to contact Triple Zero (000)


The death toll is beginning to mount in the Northern NSW floods of February-March 2022. 


A 54 year old identified man from Matcham on the Central Coast found in creek after his vehicle was swept off a causeway by flood waters. (24-25 February 2022)


An identified woman believed to be in her 80s found in a flooded home in Ewing St, Lismore. (1 March 2022) 


An identified woman believed to be in her 80s found inside a flooded home in Casino St, South Lismore. (1 March 2022)


An as yet unidentified man believed to be in his 70s found in a flooded unit in Cromer St, Lismore. (2 March 2022)


An identified man in his 50s found floating in flood waters at the corner of Uralba and Dawson Streets, Lismore. (2 March 2022) 


By 3 March the national death toll from the February-March 2022 floods stood at 14 people.


Thursday, 3 March 2022

Many people are living through the NSW floods, many more are seeing the disaster on their TV screens - it's very clear they know the cause


Major flooding also causes fires
Lismore Feburary-March 2022

Image: The Australian



A 93 year old woman recued at Lismore....



The Sydney Morning Herald, 3 March 2022:


Our state is experiencing unprecedented floods ("Specialist rescue teams sent to Lismore", March 2). It went through catastrophic bushfires in 2019-2020. Rain bombs and firestorms. The effect of these catastrophes on the mental and physical health of communities and the economy is devastating.


What more do climate change deniers and those responsible for enabling change need to accept the truth? Yes, change will be expensive. It is false economy to do the bare minimum. A federal election is looming. It's time for action. Inaction and complacency will be at our peril.


Jane O'Donnell, Turramurra


The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report introduces new words - "cascading" and "compounding" to describe successive catastrophic climate events of droughts, bushfires, sea-level rise and now the "unprecedented" floods that are upending lives in communities across Queensland and NSW ("Australia's climate change to cost 'hundreds of billions", March 2). As your correspondents have noted, MPs frequently say "now is not the right time to talk about climate change", but this is exactly the time for everyone who is not directly involved in the clean-up to consider our climate crisis. The reality is our federal parties' performance on climate and energy has been appalling as they remain addicted to the money and influence of the fossil fuel industries.


Rob Firth, Cremorne Point


The current flooding is a one in a 1000-year event, according to the NSW Premier ("Sydney braces for expected savage storm cell," March 2). What if it is a one in 10-year event as a result of climate change? Politicians often reach for statistical salvation.


Ian Clague, Bellbowrie (Qld)


Where did the Premier pull the "one in 1000-year" event from to describe the floods? Extreme weather events are the new normal, Premier. Are you and your government ready?


Kate Lumley, Hurlstone Park


In 1968, the Club of Rome was formed to study issues such as overpopulation and climate change. Their reports were quite alarming. We are now experiencing these weather events forecast all those years ago. The warnings were ignored and climate scientists have been ridiculed by ignorant politicians across the world. In Australia, funds to CSIRO were cut. No doubt politicians will have their theories about these extreme events and will carry on as before. New houses will be built in the areas that have been flooded and it will happen all over again. Will we ever learn?


Gill Graham, Bowral


Perhaps now the eye-watering and ongoing billions of dollars in damage will finally get the people in charge to quit the fossil fuel industry. They must surely see no amount of exported coal and gas can possibly justify the tragedies taking place due to climate change.


Kris Mckeon, Cowra


Given the number of "unprecedented" events in the past decade, we either have an unprecedented number of politicians unable to plan for the future or an unprecedented number of politicians rushing to excuse their inaction to deal with said "unprecedented" events.


Brian Everingham, Engadine

 

Wednesday, 2 March 2022

Australian Society 2022: Are Australia's frail aged ever going to receive the care, dignity and respect that is their right?


A dinner of chicken nuggets and chips at an aged care home
IMAGE: The Age, 1 March 2022]
 


The federal government does not know how much of almost half-a-billion dollars it paid aged care providers to improve nutrition was spent on meals, as families report residents are still being served “disgusting” food. The $10 basic daily supplement was a key part of the government’s response to the Aged Care Royal Commission final report a year ago. It has so far handed over more than $460 million to about 2700 homes, without an effective system to ensure it is spent on food....The royal commission heard evidence that two-thirds of aged care residents were malnourished and recommended funding earmarked for food be lifted by $10 a day for each resident. [The Age, 1 March 2022]


Even though residential aged care has been increasing privatised for the last twenty-five years - until commercial delivery of residential aged care dominates what is now an industry - the Australian Government remains the primary funder and regulator of the aged care system. Thus it has many avenues to influence the quality of aged care.


The aged care sector has a troubled history and many older people fear being admitted to nursing homes once they become frail or chronically ill. There have been 18 inquiries and reviews of aged care in Australia since 1997.


The most recent investigation, the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety was established on 8 October 2018 and The Honourable Tony Pagone QC and Ms Lynelle Briggs AO were appointed Royal Commissioners.


The Commissioners' eight volume Final Report titled “Care, Dignity and Respect” was handed down on 26 February 2021 and made 148 detailed recommendations.


In May 2021 the Morrison Government on paper accepted roughly half the recommendations and, rejected outright or offered up a workaround of the other half.


Thus far it appears that only 16 aspects of those 148 Royal Commission recommendations have been acted upon by federal government and, at least one in a way which might not have been expected by the Commissioners.


One of the recommendations which was not readily agreed to and is yet to be acted on is:

Recommendation 87: Employment status and related labour standards as enforceable standards.

1. By 1 January 2022, the Australian Government should require as an ongoing condition of holding an approval to provide aged care services that

a. approved providers: have policies and procedures that preference the direct employment of workers engaged to provide personal care and nursing services on their behalf

b. where personal care or nursing work is contracted to another entity, that entity has policies and procedures that preference direct employment of workers for work performed under that contract.

2. From 1 January 2022, quality reviews conducted by the Quality Regulator must include assessing compliance with those policies and procedures and record the extent of use of independent contractors.


Almost two months past the Royal Commission deadline to demonstrate an increase in direct employment of those providing personal care and nursing care to aged care facility residents, the Australian Treasurer & Liberal MP for Kooyong Josh Frydenberg announces that Productivity Commission would undertake a study of employment models in aged care, and the effects that policies and procedures to preference the direct employment of aged care workers would have on the sector.


Thus kicking ensuring provision of adequate personal and nursing care for aged care residents, further down the road and past the May 2022 federal general election.


One might suspect from the wording of the directive to the Productivity Commission, that Mr. Frydenberg is less concerned about how nursing home staff are employed and more concerned that corporate owners of nursing homes retain their ability to pay low wages to much of their workforce.


Australian Productivity Commission, retrieved 1 March 2022:


Aged Care Employment


Terms of reference


I, the Hon Josh Frydenberg MP, Treasurer, pursuant to Parts 2 and 4 of the Productivity Commission Act 1998, hereby request that the Productivity Commission (the Commission) undertake a Study to examine:


  • employment models in aged care, and the effects that policies and procedures to preference the direct employment of aged care workers would have on the sector.


Background


The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (the Royal Commission) was established on 8 October 2018 and the Final Report: Care, Dignity and Respect was released on 1 March 2021.


The Australian aged care system provides subsidised care and support to older people. It is a large and complex system that includes a range of programs and policies. In response to the Royal Commission there will be significant reform to the aged care system. These reforms will be underpinned by a new Aged Care Act, which is intended to commence from 1 July 2023, subject to parliamentary processes.


The Royal Commission noted a trend in recent years has been the increased use of ‘independent contractors’ in aged care.


The Royal Commission’s Final Report noted numerous submissions over the course of the Royal Commission inquiry had made the claim that quality care was more likely to be delivered by direct employees than by contractors. However, some stakeholders consider these subcontracting models deliver better consumer choice and flexibility, which is also desired by the sector.


Scope of the study


The Commission will undertake a study to examine employment models in aged care, and the effects that policies and procedures to preference the direct employment of aged care workers would have on the sector.


When examining these issues, the Commission should also consider recommendation 87, as well as submissions and evidence provided to, the Royal Commission.


In undertaking this Study, the Commission should:


  • examine the extent of the aged care personal care and nursing workforce who are not directly employed by aged care providers

  • taking into account the wide scope of duties within the aged care sector, ranging from low level care such as grocery shopping and gardening through to high level personal and medical care, examine how different employment arrangements might impact on:

  • quality of care
  • consumer choice
  • job creation and availability of workforce
  • employment conditions for the workforce
  • worker preferences
  • flexible and innovative models of care
  • accountability of aged care providers for care delivered on their behalf
  • costs of providing care
  • viability of aged care providers
  • explore any preconditions in personal care and nursing workforce supply that would be required prior to any potential policies and procedures to preference direct employment

  • consider whether new policies and procedures would impact other care sectors, such as disability and childcare.

The Commission should support analysis with modelling using quantitative and qualitative data.


Process


The Commission should undertake broad consultation with consumers, the aged care workforce, unions and aged care providers.


The Commission could release a draft report in June 2022, and provide a final report to the Australian Government in September 2022.


The Hon Josh Frydenberg MP

Treasurer


[Received 23 February 2022]


Independent political comment is not pulling its punches in Australia 2022 *WARNING: Coarse Language*