Showing posts with label Morrison Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morrison Government. Show all posts

Monday 28 February 2022

ACOSS calls on Morrison Government to act on the 30 recommendations of the Senate Inquiry into Purpose, Intent and Adequacy of the Disability Support Pension

 

An est. 4.4 million Australians have a recognised disability and, included in this number are est. 1.4 million are considered to have a profound disability.

The majority of people with a disability live in private homes. Of these: 1 in 3 people need help with health care;  1 in 4 need help with property maintenance and/or household  chores; and 1 in 2 aged 5 and over have a schooling or employment restriction.

About 340,000 people living with a disability are on an approved plan with the National Disability Insurance Scheme. An est. 53% of people living with a disability are participating in paid employment and 43% rely on a government payments as their sole source of income. Approximately 64% of people with a disability who are not dependents are home owners. [AIHW, "People Living With A Disability 2020"]

Based on the last published Census in 2016, there are est. 19,840 living with a disability and, who require assistance with daily living, residing in the seven local government areas of Northern NSW from the Clarence Valley to Tweed Shire on the NSW-Qld border. That represents 5% of all people in NSW with a disability who require assistance.  

On 13 May 2021, the Senate referred an inquiry into the purpose, intent and adequacy of the Disability Support Pension to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report by 30 November 2021. That date was extended twice and the full report was tabled on 18 February 2022.

The full 145 page report can be found at:

https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportsen/024728/toc_pdf/Purpose,intentandadequacyoftheDisabilitySupportPension.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf


Below is the response to this report by the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS). 


Key disability advocacy groups join with ACOSS to urge the Australian Government to act on the Disability S... by clarencegirl on Scribd

 

Monday 7 February 2022

The centrepiece of the Morrison Government’s “Living with Covid” program is a call centre outsourced to former robo-debt collectors and staffed by workers on casual contracts with no medical experience

 

On January 17, as the nation recorded another 39,000 cases of the disease, with hundreds of thousands of active cases, the first phase of the “transitioning to Living with Covid” plan went live at the national hotline…..Health Minister Greg Hunt first announced what was then an information line for people worried about the novel coronavirus on January 31, 2020. Although hosted by healthdirect – a sort of national cabinet for government health advice across every jurisdiction in Australia – the call centres were set up by Stellar Asia Pacific Pty Ltd, now a wholly owned subsidiary of its former rival Probe Group.” [Journalist & author Rick Morton writing in in The Saturday Paper, 5 February 2022]




The Saturday Paper, 5 February 2022:




The centrepiece of the federal government’s “Living with Covid” program is a call centre outsourced to former robo-debt collectors and staffed by workers on casual contracts with no medical experience.


A cache of documents and testimony obtained by The Saturday Paper reveals the inner workings of the National Coronavirus Helpline, which is being run by private-equity owned Probe Group and its subsidiaries on contracts worth more than $270 million.


This information hotline has now been asked to triage people who have tested positive for Covid-19, or who believe they are infected, as part of the Commonwealth’s pivot to managing the disease in the community.


In practice, it has outsourced a key front-line health service to a small battalion of low-paid, poorly trained workers on insecure contracts. People staffing the hotline do not have medical qualifications. Many were previously unemployed and subject to the welfare system’s “mutual obligations”, which threatens penalties and payment suspensions if they refuse reasonable offers of work.


Training offered to new Probe recruits lasts only two hours.


Accounts obtained by The Saturday Paper show workers have described being placed under extreme stress while managing an overwhelming variety of callers, with limited information or ability to actually help them.


For instance, the coronavirus helpline is listed as the No. 1 point of contact on almost every government department, including Home Affairs and for disability and Aboriginal health services, despite there being no specific resources for team members to even provide advice.


Although scripts for call centre operators advise patients to seek rapid antigen tests if they are available, it is not part of the helpline’s remit to actually provide these tests or information on where they might be obtained.


Helpline workers are also fielding calls from people who are experiencing family violence, poverty or other types of extreme stress and are expected to arrange welfare checks or talk them through complex problems with little support.


Where problems do arise, employees are encouraged to phone their team leaders and not put anything in writing to ensure a “quick response”. Employees have requested access to more resources and training but in some cases have had no response from management or, where concerns have been heard, a two-page “cheat sheet” is provided.


There have been frequent occurrences of callers who have been given incorrect isolation advice from the National Coronavirus Helpline or who have complained about misleading public statements by politicians compared with the advice for different jurisdictions offered by the hotline.


In other cases, callers have been directed to see a doctor but have been sent away from GP clinics and even emergency departments, contrary to the advice offered over the helpline…..


Read the full article here.


Sunday 6 February 2022

Scene: Australian House of Representatives On a Busy Working Day in February 2022. Enter Stage Right: the Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 looking back over its shoulder


On 22 November 2017, then Prime Minister & Liberal MP for Wentworth Malcolm Bligh Turnbull announced a review into religious freedom in Australia.


The review was in response to pushback by religious institutions & conservative persons of faith once it became clear that the nation would be considering separating gender from the definition of legal marriage1 and, the possibility that the Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 would be amended to reflect this.


The Religious Freedom Review was conducted by an Expert Panel, chaired by former Liberal MP for Philip Ruddock, and was comprised of Emeritus Professor Rosalind Croucher AM, Dr Annabelle Bennett AC SC, Father Frank Brennan SJ AO and Professor Nicholas Aroney.


The Report of the Expert Panel was presented to the Prime Minister on 18 May 2018 – five months and nine days after the Marriage Act had indeed been changed to create marriage equality as a fact under law – and it made a total of twenty [20] recommendations.


In the following years there were three publicly released iterations of the proposed draft legislation. These are the versions currently before the Parliament: 

Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 [Provisions]

Religious Discrimination(Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021 [Provisions]; and

Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 [Provisions].


On 2 December 2021, the Senate referred all three bills to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 4 February 2022.


On 4 February 2022, this committee tabled its 164 page Report.


The Report states in part: The religious discrimination bill seeks to implement recommendations 3, 15 and 19 of the Religious Freedom Review, while the human rights legislation bill would implement recommendations 3, 4 and 12.2 It is silent on the remaining fifteen recommendations.


The entire report can be found at:

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Religiousdiscrimination


Starting at Page 95 and ending at Page 150 are the Committee View, Additional comments from Australian Labor Party senators, Dissenting report from the Australian Greens and Additional comments from Senator Andrew Bragg.


What this section of the Report clearly shows is that the only people who come close to being unreservedly happy with the wording and intent of these bills are to be found within the ranks of Scott Morrison’s faction in the Parliamentary Liberal Party. In the wider Parliamentary Liberal Party there is some concern but whether it gets fully realised is another matter.


Further amendments are expected to be put forward, given the very real concerns held by the general public that the rights of LGBTQ+ students, teachers and parents are not protected against discrimination by faith-based educational institutions, as well as other concerns relating to potentially discriminatory impacts of Statement of Belief provisions currently found in the draft Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 and the fact that the successful passage of this bill into law will require as yet unaddressed amendment of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984.


The three bills in question were always going to be used as an improvised explosive device buried deep within the House of Representatives carpeting, all set to explode during the first few weeks of the 2022 parliamentary calendar year in the hope of badly wounding the Labor Party over the course of the federal election campaign


On Thursday 4 February Prime Minister Scott Morrison also clearly stated his intention to legislate amendment of the Sex Discrimination Act before the federal general election. 


Given the limited number of sitting days in February and March in which to amend, it appears that Morrison may be reconciled to not passing  the current version of the Religious Discrimination Bill if the House Of Representatives baulks during the coming weeks. However, it is likely his intention to perform a piece of political theater in which he attempts to bully, intimidate and threaten the parliament in order to be seen as striving to fulfill his longstanding 'religious freedom to discriminate' promises to his conservative Christian base before polling day.


NOTES


1. Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, 2017


2. Recommendations incorporated into the religious discrimination bill and human rights legislation amendments bill:


Recommendation 3

Commonwealth, State and Territory governments should consider the use of objects, purposes or other interpretive clauses in anti-discrimination legislation to reflect the equal status in international law of all human rights, including freedom of religion.


Recommendation 4

The Commonwealth should amend section 11 of the Charities Act 2013 to clarify that advocacy of a ‘traditional’ view of marriage would not, of itself, amount to a ‘disqualifying purpose’.


Recommendation 12

The Commonwealth should progress legislative amendments to make it clear that religious schools are not required to make available their facilities, or to provide goods or services, for any marriage, provided that the refusal:

(a) conforms to the doctrines, tenets or beliefs of the religion of the body, or

(b) is necessary to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of adherents of that religion.


Recommendation 15

The Commonwealth should amend the Racial Discrimination Act 1975, or enact a Religious Discrimination Act, to render it unlawful to discriminate on the basis of a person’s ‘religious belief or activity’, including on the basis that a person does not hold any religious belief. In doing so, consideration should be given to providing for appropriate exceptions and exemptions, including for religious bodies, religious schools and charities.


Recommendation 19

The Australian Human Rights Commission should take a leading role in the protection of freedom of religion, including through enhancing engagement, understanding and dialogue. This should occur within the existing commissioner model and not necessarily through the creation of a new position. 


Saturday 29 January 2022

A picture is worth a thousand words in an election year


Essential Research uses statistical analysis to examine, interpret and report on survey data which is collected via a fortnightly online omnibus active from the Wednesday night of each week and closing on the following Sunday. The target population is all Australian residents aged 18 of age and older. Participants are invited to participate and completed the survey online without an interviewer present and incentives are offered for participation. The response rate varies each week, but usually delivers 1,000+ interviews. Quotas are applied to be representative of the target population by age, gender and location. 


This is one of the graphs contained in the Essential Report published on Tuesday, 25 January 2022 - in response to the survey question asked on 24 January: "Overall, how would you rate the federal government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?" 












The percentage breakdown was 35% of all survey respondents thought the Morrison Government had done "Quite/Very Good" and 38% of all survey respondents thought the Morrison Government has done "Quite/Very Poor".


Broken down by state, the percentage of respondents who answered that question favourably had fallen across all states since 13 December 2021, with the exception of Queensland where the number of survey respondents who thought their state government had done "Quite/Very Good" rose 3 percentage points to 46% on 24 January 2022.











 

Friday 21 January 2022

A brief look at projections and forecasts for six aspects of the Australian economy in 2021-22 & 2022-23

 

With only a seventeen-week window remaining in which Prime Minister Scott Morrison can first present an early Budget 2022-23 to the Australian Parliament, then dissolve said Parliament, before going on to call a federal general election and run a formal election campaign; sometime soon Coalition Government MPs and senators will have to begin addressing economic issues when out and about in their electorates. 


So perhaps it is time to start looking at projections and forecasts for 2022 made by government departments, financial institutions and industry - before local electioneering hype is raised to such a pitch that facts and considered opinion get lost in the political mĂŞlĂ©e. 


Here are six aspects of economic activity which always get a mention in the NSW Northern Rivers region at some time in an election cycle.


CONSUMER CONFIDENCE


ABC News, 18 January 2022:


Consumer confidence slumps


The Omicron COVID-19 variant has hit consumer confidence, according to ANZ and Roy Morgan.


Their measure of consumer confidence fell 7.6 per cent last week to 97.9, the lowest level since October 2020, as Omicron surged across Australia and facilities came under immense strain.


That was lower than during last year's lockdowns when the Delta variant surged.


All the survey's subindices fell including current and future financial conditions.


Nearly one in five respondents expected to be worse off by this time next year.


ANZ head of Australian Economics, David Plank, said the index level of 97.9 was the weakest January result since 1992, when the Australian economy was experiencing rising unemployment.


"The result highlights the concerns about COVID have the potential to significantly impact the economy if they linger," he said.


ANZ said spending had continued to fall because of the spread of Omicron, with a drop of 27 per cent over the first half of January, compared to the first half of December.


Spending was also lower on eating out.


Omicron hit to economy


CBA credit and debit card data indicated that spending has dropped sharply on services over the past few weeks.


Commonwealth Bank economist Gareth Aird said the large number of COVID-19 cases is hurting the employment market, with an estimated 1 million people in isolation, and reduced spending on goods and services.


That means many businesses have been forced to close, or reduce capacity and opening hours.


He has slashed his growth forecast for the first quarter of 2022 from 2.3 per cent to just 1 per cent.


"The next few months are without a shred of doubt going to be difficult and testing for the economy," Mr Aird said.


"Our working assumption is that more policy support will be forthcoming, particularly stimulus that is targeted towards businesses most adversely impacted by the surge in COVID cases and isolation requirements."


Mr Aird said he expected the economy to snap back in the second quarter of 2022.


FINANCE



Australian Government General Government Sector Monthly Financial Statements November 2021, 24 December 2021:



KEY POINTS

  • The Monthly Financial Statements for November 2021 report the budget position against the expected monthly profile for the 2021-22 financial year through to 30 November 2021, based on the 2021-22 Budget estimates published in May 2021.

  • The 2021-22 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) was released on Thursday, 16 December 2021. Commencing with the December 2021 monthly financial statements, which will be released in January 2022, the budget position will be reported against the expected monthly profile based on the updated estimates outlined in the 2021-22 MYEFO.

  • The November 2021 year to date results include the impact of the Australian Government’s response to COVID-19.

  • The underlying cash balance for the 2021-22 financial year to 30 November 2021 was a deficit of $41.8 billion against the Budget profile deficit of $55.9 billion.

  • The fiscal balance for the 2021-22 financial year to 30 November 2021 was a deficit of $36.0 billion against the Budget profile deficit of $55.2 billion.




Monthly results are generally volatile due to timing differences between revenue and receipts, and expenses and payments. Care needs to be taken when comparing monthly or cumulative data across years and to full-year estimates, as revenue and receipts and expenses and payments vary from month to month.


FISCAL OUTCOMES


Underlying Cash Balance

The underlying cash balance for the financial year to 30 November 2021 was a deficit of $41.8 billion, which is $14.1 billion lower than the 2021-22 Budget profile deficit of $55.9 billion.


  • Receipts

Total receipts were $34.3 billion higher than the 2021-22 Budget profile.

  • Payments

Total payments were $20.2 billion higher than the 2021-22 Budget profile.


Net Operating Balance

The net operating balance for the financial year to 30 November 2021 was a deficit of $35.5 billion, which is $17.8 billion lower than the 2021-22 Budget profile deficit of $53.4 billion. The difference results from higher than expected revenue, partially offset by higher than expected expenses.


Fiscal Balance

The fiscal balance for the financial year to 30 November 2021 was a deficit of $36.0 billion, which is $19.3 billion lower than the 2021-22 Budget profile deficit of $55.2 billion. The difference results from higher than expected revenue and lower than expected net capital investment, partially offset by higher expenses.


Assets and Liabilities

As at 30 November 2021:

  • net worth is negative $743.5 billion;

  • net debt is $607.3 billion; and

  • net financial liabilities are $987.2 billion.


MINING SECTOR


Office of the Chief Economist, Resources and Energy Quarterly December 2021, excerpt:

















Australia’s resource and energy exports are estimated to reach a record $379 billion in 2021–22, up from $310 billion in 2020–21. In 2022–23, export earnings are then forecast to decline back to $311 billion, as commodity prices settle lower.


The global recovery remains underway, sustained by the ongoing rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and continued fiscal and monetary support across major economies. However, new outbreaks (and variants) of the pandemic across many regions are inhibiting a full global recovery, as are supply chain blockages — including shortages of semi-conductor chips and of shipping containers in some locations.


China’s power shortages have been a dominant influence on global resource and energy commodity prices in recent months. As a major global metal refiner, the power shortages have seen Chinese (base and ferrous) metal output cut back. China’s property sector has slowed noticeably since our last report, cutting metal usage. However, the Chinese authorities now appear to be taking steps to stabilise the sector.


New policy developments are also impacting the global resources and energy sector. In October, China’s government instructed the nation’s coal miners to lift output and imposed a thermal coal price cap, following critical shortages. In November, the US Congress passed a US$1.2 trillion infrastructure program, which will have a stimulatory effect on economic growth domestically and have flow-on effects offshore.


A stronger outlook for base metals and coal is expected to more than offset the impact on export earnings of the downward adjustment we have made to our iron ore price forecasts. Lithium exports are expected to overtake zinc exports in 2022–23 as car makers race to capture the electric vehicle market.


With energy inventories lower than normal, the severity of the remainder of the Northern Hemisphere winter will have a critical influence on energy markets in the short term. The La Niña weather pattern will likely impact on the demand and supply for coal and other energy products.


The risks to the record export earnings forecast for 2021–22 are skewed to the downside. They include a much faster than expected decline in coal prices. There is also potential for a further rise in global inflation and a risk of higher interest rates in response. New, vaccine-resistant strains of the coronavirus, and the risk of delays in the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines to the world’s population, could also pose significant risks.


AGRICULTURE


Dept. of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Outlook for Crops, excerpt:


Value of crop production to reach record high in 2021–22


The gross value of crop production is forecast to reach a record $43 billion in 2021–22, driven by record winter crop production and high world grain and oilseed prices. Favourable seasonal conditions across all winter cropping regions, particularly in New South Wales and Western Australia (the two biggest winter crop–producing states) are forecast to result in above average to significantly above average yields. A favourable outlook for increased summer crop production is also contributing to the forecast record. The gross value of all major crop commodities is forecast to reach a record level:

  • wheat – $11.5 billion (record high)

  • barley – $3.4 billion (record high)

  • canola – $5.2 billion (record high)

  • cotton – $3.9 billion (record high)

  • horticulture – $12.5 billion (second highest on record)


Heavy November rainfall has caused flooding in northern and central west New South Wales resulting in production losses for some producers. Although this is not expected to significantly affect tonnage produced, it will affect the value because of a downgrade in quality. Continued high rainfall in December will cause further damage and more total crop losses if crops cannot be harvested.


In other areas across the eastern states and South Australia, wet conditions during harvest and reduced soil nutrient levels caused by 2 years of high yields could reduce grain and oilseeds quality compared with recent years. The extent of these impacts would differ from paddock-to-paddock, and downgrades of wheat protein levels or improvements in the oil content of canola crops could affect the prices that growers receive.


Despite concerns about a resurgence in mice numbers, increased baiting on farms during winter and spring has reduced mice populations in affected regions, and there have been no reports of significant damage to date. They still remain a risk for summer crops in parts of southern Queensland and northern New South Wales. Farm profits could be reduced by high baiting and cleaning costs if mouse numbers remain elevated during summer.


Figure 1.1 Gross value of crop production, 1971–72 to 2021–22


f ABARES forecast.

Sources: ABARES; Australian Bureau of Statistics



Dept. of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Economic overview: December quarter 2021, excerpt:


Exchange rate to remain at current levels


In 2021–22, the Australian exchange rate is assumed to average US74 cents – 1 cent lower than the average for 2020–21. Downward pressure on the exchange rate from falling iron ore prices is expected to be balanced by upward pressure from strengthening economic activity and steep increases in coal and natural gas prices.


Overseas interest rates may move higher over 2022, adding to downward pressure on the Australian dollar if current domestic monetary policy settings remain. Stronger than expected inflation overseas could prompt central banks to bring forward planned rate rises. Australian interest rates are not expected to be lifted in 2021–22. The Reserve Bank of Australia has clearly signalled it will not raise rates unless inflation is sustained in the target range (core inflation of 2 to 3%) and wages growth is ‘materially higher’ than it is at present. Wages growth in Australia remains at less than half the average rate recorded between 2000 and 2010, despite relatively low unemployment.


TOURISM


Do not travel to Australia......

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/australia-travel-advisory.html

















https://www.safetravel.govt.nz/australia


Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Commonwealth of Australia, 7 January 2022:


Notice on China-bound foreign passengers' application of health code Jan-07-2022

2022-01-07 16:05

In order to reduce cross-border transmission of Covid-19, especially considering the latest developments of COVID-19 in Australia, the Embassy and Consulate-Generals of China have made major changes on the application procedures. Passengers who travel on and after 17 January, 2022 are kindly required to read and follow instructions below....



Tourism Australia, International Visitor Survey results September 2021:


Key results


Key results for the year ending September 2021 include:

  • international visitor numbers fell by 98.2% to 155,469

  • international visitor spend was down 97.1% to $1.3 billion

  • visitor nights were down 96.2% to 10.4 million.


Australia’s top 5 markets


Australia’s top 5 international visitor markets saw significant losses:

  • Chinese visitor numbers fell 99.7%. This was a loss of 1.3 million visitors. Spend fell 99.4% or $12.2 billion.

  • New Zealand visitor numbers fell 93.0%. This was a loss of 1.2 million visitors. Spend fell 88.6% or $2.3 billion. New Zealand saw the smallest losses of all markets, recording 89,000 visitors. This was more than half (57%) of all visitors to Australia for the year ending September 2021. This was due to a trans-Tasman bubble opening between the 2 countries during the June quarter 2021.

  • United States of America visitor numbers fell 98.9%. This was a loss of 763,000 visitors. Spend fell 96.4% or $3.9 billion.

  • United Kingdom visitor numbers fell 98.9%. This was a loss of 662,000 visitors. Spend fell 96.3% or $3.2 billion.

  • Japanese visitor numbers fell 99.7%. This was a loss of 454,000 visitors. Spend fell 99.3% or $2.1 billion.


Tourism losses due to COVID-19


Total international and domestic tourism losses since the start of the pandemic in March 2020 reached $128.3 billion.


International tourism saw losses of $62.5 billion for March 2020 to September 2021. This was due to international border closures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.


Over the same period, there were further losses of:

  • $49.8 billion from domestic overnight travel

  • $16.0 billion from domestic day travel.


Note: The only federal government tourism recovery scenarios are dated 2020 and can be found at Australian Trade and Investment Commission, Tourism Research Australia, Tourism Recovery Scenarios.


CLIMATE


Australian climate variability & change - Time series graphs

Australian Bureau of Meteorology












Australian climate variability & change - Trend maps

Australian Bureau of Meteorology


Australian Government Dept. of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June 2021, Incorporating emissions from the NEM up to September 2021, excepts:


On a quarterly basis, national emission levels for the June quarter 2021 increased 0.4% or 0.5 Mt CO2-e on the previous quarter in trend terms. The trend result for the June quarter 2021 reflects small increases across all sectors of the inventory with the exception of the electricity sector which was lower by 0.2% on the March quarter 2021….


On an annual basis, the consumption-based inventory increased 0.4% or 1.8 Mt CO2-e to 420.8 Mt CO2-e in the year to June 2021….


National emissions are preliminarily estimated to be 500 Mt CO2-e in the year to September 2021.












Long term sectoral trends


The most important sectoral drivers of Australia’s long-term emissions trend have been:

Electricity – where emissions have fallen by 22.6% since the year to June 2009 as renewables have displaced coal as a fuel source, reversing the long term increases experienced in earlier

years;

Stationary energy (excluding electricity) – which has shown the largest growth of any sector in percentage terms since 1990. Emissions have increased 50.3% or 33.3 Mt CO2-e driven, in particular, by recent growth in the export of LNG;

Transport – where emissions have increased 48.6% or 29.8 Mt CO2-e since 1990, despite recent volatility due to the impacts of the COVID pandemic;

Fugitives – where emissions have increased 21.3% or 8.6 Mt CO2-e since 1990. Emissions were relatively stable until 2012 but have increased strongly as a result of the growth of the LNG industry;

Agriculture – where emissions have declined by 18.5% or 17.0 Mt CO2-e since 1990, in line with declining cattle and sheep populations; and,

Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) – where emissions have decreased by the largest margin of any sector since 1990 (112.6% or 218.1 Mt CO2-e) due to reductions in land clearing and native forest harvesting, increases in plantations and native vegetation, and improvements in soil carbon.